Descending perineum syndrome: are abdominal hysterectomy and bowel habits linked?

Faecal incontinence in adults

Faecal incontinence, which is defined by the unintentional loss of solid or liquid stool, has a worldwide prevalence of ≤7% in community-dwelling adults and can markedly impair quality of life. Nonetheless, many patients might not volunteer the symptom owing to embarrassment. Bowel disturbances, particularly diarrhoea, anal sphincter trauma (obstetrical injury or previous surgery), rectal urgency and burden of chronic illness are the main risk factors for faecal incontinence; others include neurological disorders, inflammatory bowel disease and pelvic floor anatomical disturbances. Faecal incontinence is classified by its type (urge, passive or combined), aetiology (anorectal disturbance, bowel symptoms or both) and severity, which is derived from the frequency, volume, consistency and nature (urge or passive) of stool leakage. Guided by the clinical features, diagnostic tests and therapies are implemented stepwise. When simple measures (for example, bowel modifiers such as fibre supplements, laxatives and anti-diarrhoeal agents) fail, anorectal manometry and other tests (endoanal imaging, defecography, rectal compliance and sensation, and anal neurophysiological tests) are performed as necessary. Non-surgical options (diet and lifestyle modification, behavioural measures, including biofeedback therapy, pharmacotherapy for constipation or diarrhoea, and anal or vaginal barrier devices) are often effective, especially in patients with mild faecal incontinence. Thereafter, perianal bulking agents, sacral neuromodulation and other surgeries may be considered when necessary.

Imaging and clinical assessment of functional defecatory disorders with emphasis on defecography

Functional defecation disorders (FDD) encompass causes of constipation associated with anorectal dysfunction, which include dyssynergia or inadequate defecatory propulsion. FDD are frequently encountered in clinical practice and may affect up to 33-50% of patients with chronic constipation. The etiology of FDD is unclear, however, it has been defined as an acquired, but subliminal behavioral disorder. Pathophysiologic mechanisms may include discoordination of rectoanal muscles, paradoxical contraction or insufficient relaxation of puborectalis and/or anal sphincter during defecation, and sluggish colonic transit. A combination of comprehensive clinical assessment, digital rectal examination and a battery of physiologic tests are needed to make an accurate diagnosis of FDD. Defecography may play a crucial role in the evaluation of FDD, especially when a balloon expulsion test (BET) and/or anorectal manometry (ARM) are equivocal or demonstrate contradictory results. In this review, we provide a thorough overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, clinical and imaging evaluation, and treatment options for FDD, with an emphasis on available diagnostic imaging tools such as defecography and conventional fluoroscopic methods.

Sampling reflex: pathogenic role in functional defecation disorder

BACKGROUND

The sampling reflex is necessary to begin defecation or flatulence. It consists of a simultaneous rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) mediated by relaxation of the internal anal sphincter and rectoanal excitatory reflex (RAER) mediated by contraction of the external anal sphincter. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sampling reflex in patients with functional defecation disorder (FDD).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on 58 obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) patients with FDD. All 58 patients and 20 controls were evaluated with anorectal manometry to study the sampling reflex. Quantitative RAIR (total duration of reflex; maximal amplitude of relaxation; residual pressure at the lowest point of the RAIR) and RAER data (maximal amplitude of contraction; duration) were obtained. The straining test on manometry was considered positive for FDD if there was a muscle contraction/lack of relaxation or an insufficient pressure gradient for the passage of feces. Defecography was performed on all the patients with assessment of the anorectal angle and persistence or increase of puborectalis indentation.

RESULTS

Fifty (86.2%) FDD patients had an altered sampling reflex, showing incomplete/short duration of RAIR and excessive contraction/duration of RAER. More specifically, there was a correlation between a positive straining test and a short total duration of RAIR (ρ 0.92) as well as with excessive duration of RAER (ρ 0.89). There was also a correlation between lack of muscle relaxation on defecography and short total duration of RAIR ((ρ 0.79) and between lack of muscle relaxation on defecography and excessive duration of RAER (ρ 0.83). Altered maximal amplitude relaxation had the highest sensitivity in detecting impairment of RAIR (87.9) while maximal amplitude contraction had the highest sensitivity in detecting impairment of RAER (89.6). High residual pressure at the lowest point of RAIR had the highest specificity in detecting impairment of RAIR (80.0) while RAER duration had the highest specificity in detecting impairment of RAER (77.7).

CONCLUSION

The sampling reflex is impaired in patients with FDD. This finding provides an important insight into the pathogenesis of obstructed functional defecation.

Japanese Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence Part 2-Examination and Conservative Treatment for Fecal Incontinence- English Version

Examination for fecal incontinence is performed in order to evaluate the condition of each patient. As there is no single method that perfectly assesses this condition, there are several tests that need to be conducted. These are as follows: anal manometry, recto anal sensitivity test, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, electromyogram, anal endosonography, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and defecography. In addition, the mental and physical stress most patients experience during all these examinations needs to be taken into consideration. Although some of these examinations mostly apply for patients with constipation, we hereby describe these tests as tools for the assessment of fecal incontinence. Conservative therapies for fecal incontinence include diet, lifestyle, and bowel habit modification, pharmacotherapy, pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback therapy, anal insert device, trans anal irrigation, and so on. These interventions have been identified to improve the symptoms of fecal incontinence by determining the mechanisms resulting in firmer stool consistency; strengthening the pelvic floor muscles, including the external anal sphincter; normalizing the rectal sensation; or periodic emptying of the colon and rectum. Among these interventions, diet, lifestyle, and bowel habit modifications and pharmacotherapy can be performed with some degree of knowledge and experience. These two therapies, therefore, can be conducted by all physicians, including general practitioners and other physicians not specializing in fecal incontinence. However, patients with fecal incontinence who did not improve following these initial therapies should be referred to specialized institutions. Contrary to the initial therapies, specialized therapies, including pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback therapy, anal insert device, and trans anal irrigation, should be conducted in specialized institutions as these require patient education and instructions based on expert knowledge and experience. In general, conservative therapies should be performed for fecal incontinence before surgery because its pathophysiologies are mostly attributed to benign conditions. All Japanese healthcare professionals who take care of patients with fecal incontinence are expected to understand the characteristics of each conservative therapy, so that appropriate therapies will be selected and performed. Therefore, in this chapter, the characteristics of each conservative therapy for fecal incontinence are described.

Clinical Features and Associations of Descending Perineum Syndrome in 300 Adults with Constipation in Gastroenterology Referral Practice

BACKGROUND

Outlet obstruction constipation accounts for about 30% of chronic constipation (CC) cases in a referral practice.

AIMS

To assess the proportion of patients with CC diagnosed with descending perineum syndrome (DPS) by a single gastroenterologist and to compare clinical, radiological, and associated features in DPS compared to patients with constipation.

METHODS

We conducted a review of records of 300 consecutive patients evaluated for constipation by a single gastroenterologist from 2007 to 2019, including medical, surgical, and obstetrics history, digital rectal examination, anorectal manometry, defecation proctography (available in 15/23 with DPS), treatment, and follow-up. DPS was defined as > 3 cm descent of anorectal junction on imaging or estimated perineal descent on rectal examination. Logistic regression with univariate and multivariate analysis compared factors associated with DPS to non-DPS patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-three out of 300 (7.7%, all female) patients had DPS; these patients were older, had more births [including more vaginal deliveries (84.2% vs. 31.2% in non-DPS, p < 0.001)], more instrumental or traumatic vaginal deliveries, more hysterectomies, more rectoceles on proctography (86.7% vs. 28.6% non-DPS, p = 0.014), lower squeeze anal sphincter pressures (p < 0.001), and lower rectal sensation (p = 0.075) than non-DPS. On univariate logistic regression, history of vaginal delivery, hysterectomy, and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome increased the odds of developing DPS. Vaginal delivery was confirmed as a risk factor on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

DPS accounts for almost 10% of tertiary referral patients presenting with constipation. DPS is associated with age, female gender, and number of vaginal (especially traumatic) deliveries.

Defecography: An Overview of Technique, Interpretation, and Impact on Patient Care

Pelvic floor and defecatory dysfunction are common in the female patient population. When combined with physical examination, barium defecography allows for accurate and expanded assessment of the underlying pathology and helps to guide future intervention. Understanding the imaging findings of barium defecography in the spectrum of pathology of the anorectum and pelvic floor allows one to appropriately triage and treat patients presenting with defecatory dysfunction.

Post-surgical fecal incontinence

The primary endpoint of this work was to understand the pathophysiology of fecal incontinence manifested after rectal and anal surgery. A retrospective cohort study with negative colonoscopy patients was created and 169 postoperative incontinent patients were analyzed (114 women and 55 men: mean age 58.9 ± 6.3): clinical evaluation, endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry reports were scanned. The duration of incontinence was very long, with a mean of 21.7 months. The mean number of bowel movements/week was 18.2 ± 7.2. Urge incontinence was present in 82.2% of patients, mixed with passive incontinence in 44 patients. Patients' Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score was 27.0 ± 6.6. Operated patients had significantly lower anal resting pressure (P < 0.01) than controls while patients with colo-anal anastomosis and those who underwent Delorme operation had lowest values (P < 0.01). Maximal tolerated volume and rectal compliance were significantly impaired in operated patients with rectum involvement (colo-anal anastomosis, Delorme, restorative procto-colectomy and STARR). External anal sphincter (EAS) defects were present in 33.1% of all patients and internal anal sphincter (IAS) was damaged in 44.3%: a combined lesion of anal sphincters was detected in 39 patients (23.0%). A positive correlation was found between patients' FISI score and thickness of both sphincters (EAS: ρ_{s =} 73; IAS: ρ_s = 81). Malfunctioning continence factors may induce fecal incontinence involving each time, in a different way, the volumetric capacity and/or the motility of the rectum, the perception of the fecal bolus and anal sphincter contraction.

Descending perineum syndrome: a review of the presentation, diagnosis, and management

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Defecatory dysfunction is a relatively common and challenging problem among women and one that practicing pelvic reconstructive surgeons and gynecologists deal with frequently. A subset of defecatory dysfunction includes obstructed defecation, which can have multiple causes, one of which is descending perineum syndrome (DPS).

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of DPS.

RESULTS

Although DPS has been described in the literature for many decades, it is still uncommonly diagnosed and difficult to manage. A high index of suspicion combined with physical examination consistent with excess perineal descent, patient symptom assessment, and imaging in the form of defecography are required for the diagnosis to be accurately made. Primary management options of DPS include conservative measures consisting of bowel regimens and biofeedback. Although various surgical approaches have been described in limited case series, no compelling evidence can be demonstrated at this point to support surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of DPS is essential for the practicing pelvic reconstructive surgeon to make a timely diagnosis, avoid harmful treatments, and initiate therapy early on.

Defecating Disorders: A Common Cause of Constipation in Women

Defecating disorders are a common and complex problem. There are a range of anatomical and functional bowel abnormalities that can lead to this condition. Treatment is difficult and needs a multidisciplinary approach. First line treatment for defecating disorders is conservative. For those that fail conservative treatment, some may respond to surgical therapy but with variable results. The aim of this review is to offer an overview of defecating disorders as well as provide an algorithm on how to diagnose and treat them with the help of a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach.

Perineal descent does not imply a more severe clinical disorder

AIM

There is poor consensus in the literature about measuring perineal descent. We aimed to assess symptoms and quality of life in constipated patients with abnormal perineal descent.

METHOD

Constipated patients were categorized into those with obstructed defaecation, colonic inertia, mixed disorders and irritable bowel syndrome constipation types. Anal physiology was performed. KESS score, Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life and SF-12 questionnaires were completed. The position of the perineum was measured by defaecography. Patients were divided into two groups according to the position of the perineal descent at rest: group 1 (normal < 3.5 cm) and group 2 (abnormal > 3.5 cm).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were identified, 23 (40%) in group 1 and 35 (60%) in group 2. Patients in group 2 were older (P = 0.007), had a higher body mass index (BMI; P = 0.003), a higher rate of hysterectomy (P = 0.04) and more vaginal deliveries (P = 0.001). Obstructed defaecation was the predominant subtype of constipation. Group 1 had more difficulty in initiating defaecation and group 2 presented more cases with intussusception and enterocele (P = 0.03 for both). Group 2 had a lesser degree of perineal descent between rest and straining. Rectal compliance was greater in group 2 (P = 0.03). Symptoms and quality of life scores were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Radiologically determined excessive perineal descent is not indicative of worse symptoms or quality of life. This radiological finding does not warrant further investigation.

Medical and surgical management of pelvic floor disorders affecting defecation

Pelvic floor disorders that affect stool evacuation include structural (for example, rectocele) and functional disorders (for example, dyssynergic defecation (DD)). Meticulous history, digital rectal examination (DRE), and physiological tests such as anorectal manometry, colonic transit study, balloon expulsion, and imaging studies such as anal ultrasound, defecography, and static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can facilitate an objective diagnosis and optimal treatment. Management consists of education and counseling regarding bowel function, diet, laxatives, most importantly behavioral and biofeedback therapies, and finally surgery. Randomized clinical trials have established that biofeedback therapy is effective in treating DD. Because DD may coexist with conditions such as solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) and rectocele, before considering surgery, biofeedback therapy should be tried and an accurate assessment of the entire pelvis and its function should be performed. Several surgical approaches have been advocated for the treatment of pelvic floor disorders including open, laparoscopic, and transabdominal approach, stapled transanal rectal resection, and robotic colon and rectal resections. However, there is lack of well-controlled randomized studies and the efficacy of these surgical procedures remains to be established.

Diagnostic value of pelvic floor ultrasound in constipation due to female pelvic floor dysfunction

Constipation caused by female pelvic floor dysfunction (FPFD) is closely related to pathological changes in the front, middle and back basins. Constipation caused by pathological changes in the back basin manifests itself as rectocele, internal rectal intussusception, enterocele, descending perineum, and pelvic floor dyssynergia. Constipation due to the pathological changes in the front and middle basins not only manifests the above symptoms but also exhibits the symptoms of uterine and bladder prolapse. Pelvic floor ultrasound allows observing pathological changes in the front, middle and back basins in patients with constipation caused by FPFD, analyzing the changes in structure and function of static and dynamic pelvic floors, and making a more systematic assessment of female pelvic floor lesions, which is conducive to guiding constipation treatment. Therefore, pelvic floor ultrasound has great value in constipation caused by FPFD. In this paper, we review the diagnostic value of pelvic floor ultrasound in constipation due to female pelvic floor dysfunction.

An analysis of factors associated with increased perineal descent in women

Purpose

Treatment of descending perineal syndrome is focused on personal etiology and on improving symptoms. However, the etiology of increased perineal descent (PD) is unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate factors associated with increased resting and dynamic PD in women.

Methods

From January 2004 to August 2010, defecographic findings in 201 female patients were reviewed retrospectively. Patient's age, surgical history, manometric results and defecographic findings were compared with resting and dynamic PD.

Results

Age (P < 0.01), number of vaginal deliveries (P < 0.01) and resting anorectal angle (P < 0.01) were correlated with increased resting PD. Also, findings of rectoceles (P < 0.05) and intussusceptions (P < 0.05) were significantly correlated with increased resting PD. On the other hand, increased dynamic PD was correlated with age (P < 0.05), resting anal pressure (P < 0.01) and sigmoidoceles (P < 0.05). No significant correlation existed between non-relaxing puborectalis, history of pelvic surgery and increased PD. Also, no significant differences in PD according to the symptoms were observed.

Conclusion

Increased number of vaginal deliveries and increased resting rectoanal angle are associated with increased resting PD whereas increased resting anal pressure is correlated with increased dynamic PD. Older age correlates with both resting and dynamic PD. Defecographic findings, such as rectoceles and intussusceptions, are associated with resting PD, and sigmoidoceles correlated with dynamic PD. These results can serve as foundational research for understanding the pathophysiology and causes of increasing PD in women better and for finding a fundamental method of treatment.

Effects of vaginal hysterectomy on anorectal sensorimotor functions--a prospective study

BACKGROUND

While bowel and bladder dysfunction are recognized consequences of a radical hysterectomy, the effects of a simple hysterectomy on anorectal sensorimotor functions, particularly rectal sensation, vary among studies and the effects on rectal compliance remain unknown. Our aims were to prospectively evaluate anorectal sensorimotor functions before and after a hysterectomy.

METHODS

Anal pressures, rectal compliance, capacity, sensation, and bowel symptoms were assessed before, at 2 months, and at 1 year after a simple vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications in 19 patients. Rectal staircase (0-44 mmHg, 4-mmHg steps), ramp (0-200 mL at 50, 200 and 600 mL min(-1)) and phasic distentions (8, 16, and 24 mmHg above operating pressure) were performed.

KEY RESULTS

Anal resting (63 ± 4 before, 56 ± 4 mmHg after) and squeeze pressures (124 ± 12 before, 124 ± 12 mmHg after), rectal compliance and capacity (285 ± 12 before, 290 ± 11 mL 1 year after), and perception of phasic distentions were not different before vs after a hysterectomy. Sensory thresholds for first sensation and the desire to defecate were also not different, but pressure and volume thresholds for urgency were somewhat greater (Hazard ratio = 0.7, 95% CI [0.5, 1.0]) 1 year after (vs before) a hysterectomy. Rectal pressures were higher (P < 0.0001) during fast compared with slow ramp distention; this rate effect was greater at 1 year after a hysterectomy, particularly at 100 mL (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

A simple vaginal hysterectomy has relatively modest effects (i.e., somewhat reduced rectal urgency and increased stiffness during rapid distention) on rectal sensorimotor functions.

Treating pelvic floor disorders of defecation: management or cure?

Pelvic floor disorders that affect defecation consist of structural disorders (eg, rectocele) and functional disorders (eg, dyssynergic defecation). Evaluation includes a thorough history and physical examination, a careful digital rectal examination, and physiologic tests such as anorectal manometry, colonic transit study, and balloon expulsion test. Defecography and dynamic MRI may facilitate detection of structural defects. Management consists of education and counseling regarding bowel function, diet, laxatives, and behavioral therapies. Recently, several randomized, clinical trials have shown that biofeedback therapy is effective in dyssynergic defecation. Dyssynergia may also coexist in structural disorders such as solitary rectal ulcer syndrome or rectocele. Hence, before proceeding with surgery, neuromuscular training or biofeedback should be considered. Several surgical approaches, including stapled transanal rectal resection, have been advocated, but well-controlled randomized studies are lacking and their efficacy is unproven.

Retrograde colonic irrigation for faecal incontinence after low anterior resection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic effect of retrograde colonic irrigation in patients with faecal incontinence after a low anterior resection for a rectal carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with a previous low anterior resection, who were selected for treatment with retrograde colonic irrigation for faecal incontinence between 2005 and 2008, were included in the study. The data from the patients were gathered by chart research and an interview by phone.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included in the study. Three patients died and one patient was not able to answer questions due to a cognitive disorder. The data of the remaining 26 patients were analysed. Five patients had already stopped with the retrograde colonic irrigation treatment due to side effects. Twelve of the 21 patients (57.46%) who still performed RCI became completely (pseudo)continent, three patients (14.2%) were incontinent for flatus and six patients (29.4%) were still incontinent for liquid stool. Five patients stopped with the retrograde colonic irrigation treatment due to side-effects.

CONCLUSION

Retrograde colonic irrigation is an effective method to treat patients with faecal incontinence after a low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Retrograde colonic irrigation is not invasive and has only mild side effects.

Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: encouraging results

PURPOSE

Some patients, having undergone sphincter-saving operations for rectal cancer, may suffer from fecal incontinence. This study was designed to evaluate the results of rehabilitative treatment in patients with fecal incontinence after sphincter-saving operations and to identify the negative factors that influence therapeutic success.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and June 2007, 88 incontinent patients (54 women; age range, 47-73 years; 69 had received a low anterior rectal resection; 19 a straight coloanal anastomosis) were included in the study. After a preliminary clinical evaluation, including the Wexner Incontinence Scale score, anorectal manometry was performed. All 88 patients underwent rehabilitative treatment according to the "multimodal rehabilitative program" for fecal incontinence. At the end of program, all 88 patients were reassessed by means of a clinical evaluation and anorectal manometry; their results were compared with the clinical and manometric data from ten healthy control subjects. Postrehabilitative Wexner Incontinence Scale scores were used for an arbitrary schedule of patients divided into three classes: Class I, good (score </=3); Class II, fair (score >3 to </=6); Class III, poor (score >6).

RESULTS

After rehabilitation, there was a significant improvement in the overall mean Wexner Incontinence Scale score (P < 0.03) for both surgical operation types (low anterior rectal resection: P < 0.05; coloanal anastomosis: P < 0.02). Only 21 patients (23.8 percent) were symptom-free, and 37 (42 percent) were considered Class III. A significant postrehabilitative direct correlation was found between: 1) Wexner Incontinence Scale score and degree of genital relaxation (rrho (s) 0.78; P < 0.001); 2) Wexner Incontinence Scale score and irradiation (rrho (s) 0.72; P < 0.01); and 3) Wexner Incontinence Scale score and pelvic (rrho (s) 0.65; P < 0.01) or anal surgery (rrho (s) 0.68; P < 0.01). No significant differences were found between prerehabilitative and postrehabilitative anal pressures in low anterior rectal resection and coloanal anastomosis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

After rehabilitation, some patients become symptom-free, many patients show an improvement in the Wexner Incontinence Scale score, and others exhibit the highest grades of fecal incontinence. Genital relaxation, radiotherapy, and previous pelvic, and/or anal surgery are impeding factors to rehabilitative success.

Fecal Incontinence: a woman's view

Fecal incontinence (FI) has a prevalence of 2-7% in the general community and increases substantially in hospitalized patients and nursing home residents. Incontinent patients often isolate themselves from society for fear of having an incontinent episode in public. Few of these patients ever discuss this ailment with their doctor, despite a significant increase in depression and anxiety. Women have gender-specific medical and surgical conditions that predispose them to FI such as pregnancy, scleroderma, MS, IBS, childbirth, and pelvic surgeries. This article will address multiple facets of FI, but will focus specifically on issues related to women.