Inflammatory polyps: a cause of late bleeding in stapled hemorrhoidectomy

The Complications of Hemorrhoidectomy From Patients' Perspective: A Qualitative Study

Background

Hemorrhoidectomy is a common general surgical procedure with numerous and intensive complications.

Objective

This study sought to investigate the complications of hemorrhoidectomy from the patients' perspective.

Methods

This qualitative study employed a phenomenological approach to explore the experiences of 27 patients with a history of hemorrhoidectomy. Convenience sampling was utilized initially, but purposive sampling was used as the investigation continued. All participants' statements were documented after obtaining informed consent and permission to record their experiences. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved. The interview data was analyzed using content analysis, which involved the systematic extraction, interpretation, and reporting of the concepts and themes in the data.

Results

The study identified three main categories of complications: physical, psychological, and social. Additionally, 26 themes and 56 sub-themes were identified and defined under the main categories. Physical complications (PhCs) included nutritional problems, pain, sleep disturbances, physical weakness, bleeding, fecal incontinence, excretion problems, infection, fissures, anal prolapse, urinary retention, and disease recurrence. Psychological complications (PsCs) included fear, aversion, denial, isolation, depression, boredom, embarrassment, feeling defective, and dependency; Social complications (SCs) included secrecy, irritability, social withdrawal, and inability to perform social roles.

Conclusions

In addition to common PhCs such as pain and bleeding, patients with a history of hemorrhoidectomy face numerous PsCs and SCs that need to be communicated to the patient before deciding on this surgery. Furthermore, doctors should also consider special measures to manage these complications properly.

Retained or expelled staples after transanal stapled surgery: this is the problem!

Study objective The aim is to assess the presence and persistence of the agraphes at the level of staple line after transanal stapled surgery.

Methods From April to December 2016 one-hundred-thirteen patients with variable follow-up (6 months–10 years) were randomly selected among all the patients undergone transanal stapled surgery for haemorrhoidal disease or functional disorders such as obstructed defecation syndrome. Only 87 patients agreed to participate this study. All the patients underwent digital exploration, anoscopy and 360° tridimensional transanal ultrasound.

Main results Different types of stapled transanal surgical procedures were performed: 48 transanal rectal resection with high volume device, 24 stapled haemorrhoidopexy, 8 Double Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy, 7 Transtarr. In 41.4% the staple line was not identified with digital examination or anoscopy and 17.2% of patients have some staples partially expelled inside the lumen. 360° tridimensional transanal ultrasound showed a complete staple line at the ano-rectal junction which appears as an interrupted hyperechoic circular layer.

Conclusion The staples after stapled transanal surgery remain at the level of the staple line independently from the device used by the surgeon leading to the necessity of a shared and adequate language, in fact the shed staples need to be considered as expelled instead of retained.

Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review

A systematic review addressing reported complications of stapled hemorrhoidopexy was conducted. Articles were identified via searching OVID and MEDLINE between July 2011 and October 2013. Limitations were placed on the search criteria with articles published from 1998 to 2013 being included in this review. No language restrictions were placed on the search, however foreign language articles were not translated. Two reviewers independently screened the abstracts for relevance and their suitability for inclusion. Data extraction was conducted by both reviewers and entered and analyzed in Microsoft Excel. The search identified 784 articles and 78 of these were suitable for inclusion in the review. A total of 14,232 patients underwent a stapled hemorrhoidopexy in this review. Overall complication rates of stapled hemorrhoidopexy ranged from 3.3%-81% with 5 mortalities documented. Early and late complications were defined individually with overall data suggesting that early complications ranged from 2.3%-58.9% and late complications ranged from 2.5%-80%. Complications unique to the procedure were identified and rates recorded. Both early and late complications unique to stapled hemorrhoidopexy were identified and assessed.

Persistent Bleeding Following a Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy

A stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) is widely used for treatment of patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids. The SH is easy to perform, is associated with less pain and allows early return to normal activities. However, complications, whether severe or not, have been reported. Here, we present the case of a female patient with persistent bleeding after a SH. The bleeding was caused by the formation of granulation tissue at the stapler line, diagnosed with sigmoidoscopy, and successfully treated via transanal excision (TAE) under spinal anesthesia. The biopsy showed inflammatory granulation tissue. After the TAE, her symptom was completely gone.

Does the removal of retained staples really improve postoperative chronic sequelae after transanal stapled operations?

BACKGROUND

Transanal stapled procedures are increasingly being used. Several postoperative complications can be referred to their application, including those related to the presence of retained staples at the level of the staple line.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to assess whether the removal of the retained staples is a useful approach to improve some of the most common postoperative complications of these surgical techniques.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at the One-Day Surgery Unit of St. Andrea Hospital.

PATIENTS

All of the patients who underwent a stapled transanal procedure from January 2003 to December 2011 were included in the study. Patients included in the study were followed postoperatively for 1 year after surgery to identify the presence of retained staples.

INTERVENTIONS

If identified, the retained staples were removed endoscopically or transanally.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

After the staple removal, patients were followed with biweekly office visit for 2 months to evaluate the progression of symptoms.

RESULTS

From the 566 patients included in the study, 165 experienced postoperative complications, and in 66 of these cases, retained staples were found and removed. With the removal of retained staples, symptoms were almost all resolved or improved. In only 1 case did the retained staples removal not modify the symptoms.

LIMITATIONS

The study design may have introduced potential selection bias. In addition, the study was limited by the lack of a specific questionnaire for the evaluation of symptoms improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The removal of the retained staples is an efficacious and safe procedure to solve or improve postoperative complications and should be always considered.

Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele

BACKGROUND

Various sequelae which might lead to reintervention have been described after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids. One potential treatment modality for persistent complaints after stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SHP) or stapling for rectocele is the so-called agraffectomy (removal of the retained staples). This treatment option means a further procedure that can range from removal of the staples through the anoscope to removal of the entire staple line with the associated scar tissue.

METHODS

In order to review the published literature, we conducted a search on Medline, Pubmed, and Embase using different terms for "agraffectomy."

RESULTS

Overall, fourteen reports were found, dealing with agraffectomy for various conditions after low rectal stapling for hemorrhoids or rectocele. Agraffectomy is a rarely mentioned treatment option for conditions after SHP. In rectal stenosis with complete occlusion of the rectal lumen, the removal of the stenotic anastomosis and remaining staples seems to be reasonable. The same can be said of the removal of retained staples for rectal bleeding or in order to avoid penile injuries in anal intercourse. In contrast, the collected published reports on agraffectomy in this review only provide low-level evidence that this procedure provides relief for other problems such as incontinence or chronic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear evidence that agraffectomy is indicated if not in case of rectal stenosis and hemorrhage caused by the staples.

The fate and significance of retained staples after stapled haemorrhoidopexy

AIM

We studied the fate of staples after stapled haemorrhoidectomy (SH) and reviewed the complications they may cause.

METHOD

A survey was carried among 16 surgeons experienced at performing SH to assess their knowledge regarding retained staples. In addition, plain pelvic radiology was used to visualize residual staples at different time intervals after SH in 45 patients.

RESULTS

Ten (63%) surgeons informed their patients that the staples would be shed within 3 months of SH. Regardless of the timing of surgery, part of the staple line was radiologically visible in all patients, and in 19 patients (45%) the staple line was completely visible.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the common belief, the majority of staples are retained after SH.

Staple Line Polyposis and Cytomegalovirus Infection after Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy

Early bleeding after stapled haemorrhoidectomy (SH) is not uncommon. Late and persistent bleeding occurring weeks or months after SH, however, is rare; it has only been described in more than 10% of cases. It is attributed to the development of inflammatory polyps at the staple line. Occurrence of rectal bleeding in the presence of palpable polypoid lesions at the stapled anastomotic line can cause diagnostic confusions, and it is not uncommon that such lesions are initially confused with rectal carcinoma. We report a case of a 38-year-old male who presented with persistent rectal bleeding some 6 months after SH performed in another hospital. Rectal and colonoscopic examinations revealed polypoid lesions at the anastomotic line. The biopsy failed to confirm malignancy, but identified cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. The development of multiple inflammatory polypoid lesions in conjunction with CMV infection at the stapled anastomotic line has caused a diagnostic confusion, but - after exclusion of cancer - this complication was efficiently treated by CMV infection eradication combined with surgical excision of the remaining polyps due to persistence of bleeding. This case is reported to highlight late bleeding due to inflammatory polyps after SH and to increase the awareness of surgeons and gastroenterologists of this benign but somewhat common complication.

Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to analyse the outcomes of all patients requiring a reoperation after an initial circular stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) for prolapsing haemorrhoids.

METHODS

Data of all patients undergoing a circular SH from 1998 thru 2007 available in a prospectively collected database were reviewed, and all patients who had reoperations were studied.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,233 patients (551 females, median age 52 years) underwent a circular SH. Complete follow-up was available in all patients (median follow-up 7 months, range 0.5-100); 127 patients (10.3%) required one or more reoperations. Early reoperations (<30 days) were necessary in 47 patients (3.8%), and 45 (3.6%) were stapler-related complications. Late reoperations (>30 days) were performed in 84 patients (6.8%) and 57 (4.6%) were stapler-related. A learning curve was observed with significant reduction of early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) reoperation rate with time.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperations after SH are necessary in about 10% of the patients. The majority of the reoperations are due to either complications arising from circular SH, recurrent/persistent haemorrhoidal symptoms or other anorectal issues not addressed by the circular SH procedure (3.8% early; 6.8% late). Circular SH appears to be an effective procedure for symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease; however, training and learning curve issues should be addressed to minimise treatment failures.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.