Local anesthesia of upper anal canal for multiple rubber band ligation: description of technique and preliminary results

Pudendal nerve block (PNB): a safe, simple and effective approach in surgical proctological patients

BACKGROUND

Pudendal nerve block (PNB) is commonly used in pudendal neuralgia (PN) and as an anaesthesiological technique in obstetrical and urological procedures. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy of PNB with other anaesthesiolocal techniques in proctological surgery.

METHODS

A total of 362 patients were seen from a 22 months time interval. Surgical indication was placed after a conservative therapy. 78 patients underwent surgery: 42 with spinal anaesthesia with PNB and 36 with PNB alone according to their anatomical characteristics. All the patients underwent PNB in lithotomy position and with a perirectal approach. The success rate of PNB was evaluated in post operative pain control with the VAS score, after the first and the second evacuation. The follow up also included a third check on the seventh day after surgery.

RESULTS

In post operative period, the mean VAS score found after the first evacuation in patients undergoing PNB was 2.66, after the second evacuation was 1.55, while the VAS score on the seventh day was 0.38. The mean VAS score in the group who underwent spinal anaesthesia and PNB were respectively 3.71 and 1.80 after the first and second evacuation. The VAS score calculated on the seventh day was 0.50. There were no statistically significant differences in the VAS score between the 2 groups (P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PNB may be a valid alternative to spinal anaesthesia in proctological patients. PNB has proven to be both safe and effective technique.

Local anaesthesia for haemorrhoidal rubber band ligation reduces immediate post-operative recovery time and use of opioid analgesia

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoidal rubber band ligation (RBL) is a well-established, safe and cost-effective treatment for bleeding haemorrhoids. It is generally well tolerated; however, some patients may require narcotic analgesia or even admission to hospital for pain management. This comparative cohort study reports on the difference in peri-procedural analgesia administration and post-operative recovery time between patients who received local anaesthetic (LA) infiltration in addition to RBL, compared with patients treated only with RBL.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with haemorrhoids treated over a 3-month period with LA infiltration in addition to RBL were compared to a consecutive control group who received RBL alone in the preceding 3 months. Clinical data were collected prospectively for LA group and retrospectively for the control group. Data collected included analgesia administered during the procedure and in recovery, as well as the mean time to discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients treated with LA infiltration following RBL for haemorrhoids were compared with 22 patients who were treated with RBL alone. There was a reduction in the administration of intra-procedural parecoxib in the LA group (P < 0.001). Following the procedure, there was a reduction in the administration of both oral and intravenous opioid analgesia (P = 0.009) and reduced mean time to discharge in the LA group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Infiltration of LA proximal to the band following RBL for haemorrhoids reduced the administration of analgesia both during the procedure and in recovery, as well as mean time to discharge following the procedure.

Haemorrhoid energy therapy versus rubber band ligation for the management of grade I and II haemorrhoids: a randomized trial

BACKGROUNDS

Grade I and II haemorrhoids are commonly managed in colorectal practice. Management often involves rubber band ligation. The haemorrhoid energy therapy (HET) device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has been developed as an alternative to rubber band ligation (RBL). This study is the first to prospectively evaluate the device versus RBL in the management of grade I and II haemorrhoids.

METHODS

A single blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in the colorectal outpatient department. Patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids suitable for banding were prospectively recruited and randomized. Primary outcome was post procedural pain at 1 h as recorded on a 10-point Likert scale. Secondary outcomes were efficacy in reduction of haemorrhoidal symptom score at 12 weeks, daily average and maximum pain scores for 14 days and complications arising from the intervention.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were randomized (14 HET, 16 RBL). There was no significant difference between the two group's pre-intervention symptom score and haemorrhoidal grade. The mean pain scores at 1 h in the HET group were 1.5 ± 068 (95% confidence interval), and in the RBL group 4.64 ± 1.74 (95% confidence interval) (P < 0.05). Average (0.7 versus 2.95, P < 0.05) and maximum (1.25 versus 4.4, P < 0.05) pain were lower in the HET group on day one post procedure. At 12 weeks there was no significant difference in the reduction of haemorrhoid symptom scores between the groups (HET 2.27, RBL 1.5 (P > 0.2)).

CONCLUSION

HET causes less pain then RBL, and is at least as effective in treating the symptoms associated with grade I and II haemorrhoids in the outpatient setting.

Randomized clinical study on the analgesic effect of local infiltration versus spinal block for hemorrhoidectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

Postoperative analgesia and early recovery are important for hospital discharge. The primary objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effectiveness of perianal infiltration and subarachnoid anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy. The secondary objective was to compare time to discharge, adverse effects and complications.

DESIGN AND SETTING:

Randomized, prospective and comparative study at Dr. Mário Gatti Hospital.

METHODS:

Forty patients aged 18-60, in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status category 1 or 2, were included. The local group (LG) received local infiltration (0.75% ropivacaine) under general anesthesia; the spinal group (SG) received subarachnoid block (2 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine). Analgesic supplementation consisted of fentanyl for LG and lidocaine for SG. Postoperative pain intensity, sphincter relaxation, lower-limb strength, time to discharge, analgesic dose over one week and adverse effects were assessed.

RESULTS:

Eleven LG patients (52.4%) required supplementation, but no SG patients. Pain intensity was higher for LG up to 120 min, but there were no differences at 150 or 180 min. There were no differences in the need for paracetamol or tramadol. Times to first analgesic supplementation and hospital discharge were longer for SG. The adverse effects were nausea, dizziness and urinary retention.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pain intensity was higher in LG than in SG over the first 2 h, but without differences after 150 and 180 min. Time to first supplementation was shorter in LG. There were no differences in doses of paracetamol and tramadol, or in adverse effects.

REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02839538.

The non-surgical management for hemorrhoidal disease. A systematic review

The non-surgical treatments for hemorrhoids are cost and time-saving techniques usually performed in patients suffering early hemorrhoidal disease. The most used are rubber band ligation (RBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS), and infrared coagulation (IRC). We performed a systematic review in order to evaluate: do these procedures really help to avoid further more aggressive treatments? What are the common harms? What are the rare harms? How many recurrences there are? A total of 21 RCTs were included in this review: 12 on RBL, 4 on IRC and 5 on IS. In RBL bleeding stops in up to 90% and III degree hemorrhoids improves in 78%-83.8%. IV degree prolapse should have a more invasive treatment. The commonest complications are bleeding and pain (8-80%). IRC related improvement is 78%, 51% and 22% for I, II and III degree. Post-operative pain occurs in 15-100% and post-operative bleeding ranges from 15% to 44%. Recurrence rate is 13% at a three months follow-up. IS brings to the resolution of prolapse in 90%-100% of II degree and allows good results for III degree even if reported only by case series. The post-procedural pain is 36%-49%. Bleeding is a very rare harm. Even if not definitive, these treatments could be an alternative for mild symptomatic patients after a clear explanation of recurrence rates and possible complications.