An overview of the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of keloids

Can Electrical Stimulation Prevent Recurrence of Keloid Scars? A Scoping Review

Objective: Keloids represent a symptomatic, aberrant healing process that is difficult to treat with high recurrence rates spanning from 55% to 100% if treated via excision without adjuvant therapy. Electrical stimulation (ES) has demonstrated findings that suggest it could reduce the recurrence rate of keloids after resection. Therefore, the aim of this study is to conduct a scoping review to investigate ES as an adjuvant therapy for decreasing keloid recurrence after excision. Approach: A scoping review was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases. The search strategy encompassed terms linking keloids and various aspects of electrical stimulation. Results: Our search yielded 2,229 articles, of which 115 articles were analyzed as full text and 1 article met inclusion criteria. Despite this, ES has demonstrated other evidence that suggests its utility. ES has been shown to counter keloidic features by reducing mast cell counts, shifting wound composition from M2 to M1 macrophages, promoting angiogenesis, and controlling fibroblast orientation and location. An alternating current will orient fibroblasts perpendicular to the current without unintended migration. Innovation: Our study indicates that, based on a compilation of clinical and preclinical in vitro data, the optimal scenario for ES in the role of keloid treatment is after excision with a biphasic pulsed application and square waveform. Conclusions: ES could serve as a multifaceted, adjuvant treatment after keloid excision, steering the healing process away from keloid-associated characteristics. Its cost-effectiveness means it could be adopted globally, providing a strategy to mitigate the burden of keloids irrespective of other available treatments or economic conditions.