FDG PET and FDG PET/CT in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Current treatment strategies and future perspectives for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors that originate from the gastrointestinal tract, mostly from the stomach. GISTs are derived from the myenteric interstitial cells of Cajal and are caused by several mutations in the c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor genes. Clinically, GISTs are detected by endoscopic and imaging findings and are diagnosed by immunostaining. Surgery is the first line of treatment, and if the tumor is relatively small, minimally invasive surgery such as laparoscopy is performed. In recent years, neoadjuvant therapy has been administered to patients with GISTs that are suspected of having a large size or infiltration to other organs. Postoperative adjuvant imatinib is the standard therapy for high-risk GISTs. It is important to assess the risk of recurrence after GIST resection. However, the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use will vary by the mutation of c-kit genes and the site of mutation. Furthermore, information regarding gene mutation is indispensable when considering the treatment policy for recurrent GISTs. This article reviews the clinicopathological characteristics of GISTs along with the minimally invasive and multidisciplinary treatment options available for these tumors. The future perspectives for diagnostic and treatment approaches for these tumors have also been discussed.

Early response evaluation using 18F-FDG-PET/CT does not influence management of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with palliative intent

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT on treatment decision making in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients.

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT scans to monitor response of metastatic GIST patients treated with palliative intent. Data from the Dutch GIST Registry was used. Early scans (<10 weeks after start of treatment) and late scans (>10 weeks after start of treatment) were scored on the impact in change of treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-one PET/CT scans were performed for treatment evaluation in 39 patients with metastatic GIST of which 36 were early scans and 25 were late scans. Early PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 5.6% of patients and late PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 56% of patients. Change in management was more often seen after scans with lack of metabolic response (48% vs. 11% in scans with metabolic response, p=0.002). Neither metabolic response nor change in treatment were more often seen in patients with KIT mutations compared to patients with non-KIT mutations (metabolic response 65% KIT vs. 46% non-KIT, p=0.33, and change in management 28% KIT vs. 21% non-KIT, p=0.74).

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT is not recommended for early response evaluation in an unselected patient population with metastatic GIST, since it does not influence treatment decisions. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, however, can be useful for late response assessment, especially in case of indeterminate CT results.

FDG PET Hybrid Imaging

Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) using tumour-seeking radiopharmaceuticals has gained wide acceptance in oncology with many clinical applications. The hybrid imaging modality PET/CT (computed tomography) allows assessing molecular as well as morphologic information at the same time. Therefore, PET/CT represents an efficient tool for whole-body staging and re-staging within one imaging modality. In oncology, the glucose analogue 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is the most widely used PET/CT radiopharmaceutical in clinical routine. FDG PET and FDG PET/CT have been used for staging and re-staging of tumour patients in numerous studies. This chapter will discuss the use and the main indications of FDG PET/CT in oncology with special emphasis on lung cancer, lymphoma, head and neck cancer, melanoma and breast cancer (among other tumour entities). A review of the current literature is given with respect to primary diagnosis, staging and diagnosis of recurrent disease. Besides its integral role in diagnosis, staging and re-staging of disease in oncology, there is increasing evidence that FDG PET/CT can be used for therapy response assessment (possibly influencing therapeutic management and treatment planning) by evaluating tumour control, which will also be discussed in this chapter.

F-18 FDG PET, CT, and MRI for detecting the malignant potential in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare cancer in gastrointestinal carcinomas and has been widely known as a curable disease among all the digestive tumors. However, early detection of malignant potential in patients with GIST has still been a huge challenge all around the world. CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET are all considered as good tests for diagnosing malignant GIST efficiently, but no recommended suggestions presents which test among the 3 is the prior one in detecting the malignant potential of GIST. We perform this study to assess the accuracy between CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET through network meta-analysis method, and to rank these tests.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PubMed, EMBASE.com, CNKI, and CBM databases will be searched without search date and language restrictions. We will include diagnostic tests which assessed the accuracy of CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET in detecting the malignant potential of GIST. The risk of bias in each study will be independently assessed as low, moderate, or high using criteria adapted from Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). Meta-analysis will be performed using STATA 12.0 and R 3.4.1 software. The competing diagnostic tests will be ranked by a superiority index.

RESULTS

This study is ongoing, and will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

CONCLUSION

This study will provide a comprehensive evidence summary of CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET in detecting the malignant potential of GIST.

Personalized Clinical Decision Making in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: The Role of PET

Gastrointestinal malignancies comprise a heterogeneous group of diseases that include both common and rare diseases with very different presentations and prognoses. The mainstay of treatment is surgery in combination with preoperative and adjuvant chemotherapy depending on clinical presentation and initial stages. This article outlines the potential use of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT in clinical decision making with special regard to preoperative evaluation and response assessment in gastric cancer (including the gastroesophageal junction), pancreatic cancer (excluding neuroendocrine tumors), colorectal cancer, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings of gastric lymphoma: Comparisons with gastric cancer

The role of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in numerous malignant tumors, including gastric lymphoma, is well-established. However, there have been few studies with regard to the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT features of gastric lymphoma. The aim of the present study was to characterize the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT features of gastric lymphoma, which were compared with those of gastric cancer. Prior to treatment, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was performed on 24 patients with gastric lymphoma and 43 patients with gastric cancer. The ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT pattern of gastric wall lesions was classified as one of three types: Type I, diffuse thickening of the gastric wall with increased FDG uptake infiltrating more than one-third of the total stomach; type II, segmental thickening of the gastric wall with elevated FDG uptake involving less than one-third of the total stomach; and type III, local thickening of the gastric wall with focal FDG uptake. The incidence of the involvement of more than one region of the stomach was higher in the patients with gastric lymphoma than in those with gastric cancer. Gastric FDG uptake was demonstrated in 23 of the 24 patients (95.8%) with gastric lymphoma and in 40 of the 43 patients (93.0%) with gastric cancer. Gastric lymphoma predominantly presented with type I and II lesions, whereas gastric cancer mainly presented with type II and III lesions. The maximal thickness was larger and the maximal standard uptake value (SUV_max) was higher in the patients with gastric lymphoma compared with those with gastric cancer. A positive correlation between the maximal thickness and SUV_max was confirmed for the gastric cancer lesions, but not for the gastric lymphoma lesions. There was no difference in the maximal thickness and SUV_max of the gastric wall lesions between the patients without and with extragastric involvement, for gastric lymphoma and gastric cancer. Overall, certain differences exist in the findings between gastric lymphoma and gastric cancer patients on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images, which may contribute to the identification of gastric lymphoma.

The role of molecular imaging in modern drug development

Drug development represents a highly complex, inefficient and costly process. Over the past decade, the widespread use of nuclear imaging, owing to its functional and molecular nature, has proven to be a determinant in improving the efficiency in selecting the candidate drugs that should either be abandoned or moved forward into clinical trials. This helps not only with the development of safer and effective drugs but also with the shortening of time-to-market. The modern concept and future trends concerning molecular imaging will assumedly be hybrid or multimodality imaging, including combinations between high sensitivity and functional (molecular) modalities with high spatial resolution and morphological techniques.

Real time dynamic imaging and current targeted therapies in the war on cancer: a new paradigm

In biology, as every science student is made to learn, ontology recapitulates phylogeny. In medicine, however, oncology recapitulates polemology, the science of warfare: The medical establishment is transitioning from highly toxic poisons that kill rapidly dividing normal and malignant cells with little specificity to tailored therapies that target the tumors with the lethality of the therapeutic warhead. From the advent of the information age with the incorporation of high-tech intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance has resulted in "data fusion" where a wide range of information collected in near real-time can be used to redesign most of the treatment strategies currently used in the clinic. The medical community has begun to transition from the 'black box' of tumor therapy based solely on the clinical response to the 'glass box' of dynamic imaging designed to bring transparency to the clinical battlefield during treatment, thereby informing the therapeutic decision to 'retreat or repeat'. The tumor microenvironment is dynamic, constantly changing in response to therapeutic intervention, and therefore the therapeutic assessment must map to this variable and ever-changing landscape with dynamic and non-static imaging capabilities. The path to personalized medicine will require incorporation and integration of dynamic imaging at the bedside into clinical practice for real-time, interactive assessment of response to targeted therapies. The application of advanced real time imaging techniques along with current molecularly targeted anticancer therapies which alter cellular homeostasis and microenvironment can enhance therapeutic interventions in cancer patients and further improve the current status in clinical management of patients with advanced cancers.