Atypical fibroxanthoma-a diagnosis of exclusion!

Atypical Fibroxanthoma Demonstrating HMB45+ Staining

ABSTRACT

Immunohistochemistry is useful and often necessary for the diagnosis of many histopathological entities, including atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX), which is typically considered a diagnosis of exclusion after ruling out spindle cell melanoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, and other spindle cell tumors. AFX is a superficial fibrohistiocytic tumor previously believed to be related to pleomorphic sarcoma (formerly known as malignant fibrous histiocytoma), but is now considered a distinct clinicopathological entity. AFXs commonly express CD68, smooth muscle actin, and lysozyme and are usually negative for melanocytic markers such as HMB45 and S100. However, immunohistochemistry can sometimes be misleading, especially when used without other relevant markers in making a histopathologic diagnosis. HMB45 is a glycoprotein marker of premelanosomes and is often helpful in identifying melanoma because it stains melanosomes in the epidermis, dermis, and nevi glycocomplexes. We report a case of AFX which was strongly positive for HMB45, but negative for all other melanocytic markers. This case emphasizes the potential pitfall of relying on a single immunohistochemical marker to make the diagnosis, especially of melanoma, and also is one of the only rare reported cases of AFXs which are HMB45+.

Surgical excision margins for fibrohistiocytic tumors, including atypical fibroxanthoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: A probability model based on a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Mohs micrographic surgery or wide local excision is the treatment of choice for fibrohistiocytic tumors with metastatic potential, including atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and cutaneous undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (cUPS). Since margin clearance is the strongest predictor of clinical recurrence, improved recommendations for appropriate surgical margins help delineate uniform excision margins when intraoperative margin assessment is not available.

OBJECTIVE

To determine appropriate surgical wide local excision margins for AFX and cUPS.

METHODS

Literature search (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2020) to detect case-level data. Estimation of margins required using a mathematical model based on extracted cases without recurrences.

RESULTS

Probabilistic modeling based on 100 cases extracted from 37 studies showed peripheral clearance margin (ie, wide local excision margin) calculated to clear 95% of all tumors was 2 cm for AFX and 3 cm for cUPS. AFX tumors 1 cm or less required a margin of 1 cm.

LIMITATIONS

Data were extracted from published cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical fibroxanthoma removed with at least a 2-cm peripheral excision margin is less likely to recur. Smaller tumors 1 cm or less can be treated with a more conservative margin. Margin-control surgical techniques are recommended to ensure complete removal while minimizing surgical morbidity.

Expression of 3q oncogene SEC62 in atypical fibroxanthoma-immunohistochemical analysis of 41 cases and correlation with clinical, viral and histopathologic features

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a rare mesenchymal tumor with predominance in older male patients located mainly in chronically UV-exposed skin. Differentiation from clinically more aggressive pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) is still under debate and immunohistochemical markers are not available yet. An immunohistochemical study, including 41 cases of AFX was conducted to investigate the expression of 3q encoded oncogene SEC62 in AFX and determine the associations with histomorphologic, clinical and viral parameters. Our cohort displayed a mean of 79.9 years at the onset of the disease. In total, 90.2% (37/41) AFXs were located in the head and neck area, whereas, four were located at the extremities (9.7%). Tumor diameter ranged between 0.06 and 40 cm² with a mean of 5.7 cm². SEC62 expression was markedly increased in lesional tissue compared with the adjacent healthy squamous epithelium. We found significantly higher expression of SEC62 in cases of AFX with tumor necrosis. Tendency of higher Sec62-IRS-scores were found for tumors with higher Clark levels and a tumor size >5 cm². Sec62 is involved in endoplasmic reticulum stress tolerance and cell migration, and has been identified as a novel prognostic marker for non-small cell lung cancer as well as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. For the first time, to the best of our knowledge, we suggest a role of 3q oncogene SEC62 in AFX and discuss a potential prognostic relevance in cases of disputable AFX with unfavorable histomorphologic features and may initiate a discussion on Sec62 serving as discriminating marker between AFX and PDS.

A bone fide atypical fibroxanthoma of penis

Malignant mesenchymal tumors of the penis are very rare and they have vascular origin. We present a case of a 71-year-old man with a painless nodule of 2.0 cm in diameter located in the penile foreskin. There was no history of urinary or sexually transmitted disease. An excisional biopsy revealed a markedly pleomorphic sarcoma resembling atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) associated with a squamous cell carcinoma in situ. The patient refused a wide re-excision and was free of disease after 36 months. Because the different therapeutic management and prognosis, differential diagnosis should be made with sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma: A diagnosis of AFX or malignant fibrous histiocytoma may be considered only after the complete exclusion of these two entities.

Atypical fibroxanthoma: new insights

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is an ultraviolet radiation-associated dermal neoplasm. To address the clinicopathologic and molecular features of this particular neoplasm. The author conducted a literature review using PubMed searching for articles relating to AFX. AFX usually appears as a rapidly growing nodular or nodulo-ulcerative lesion. It occurs on sun-exposed skin of elderly peoples. AFX may be composed predominantly of pleomorphic, spindle, epithelioid cells, or admixture of these cells. The differential diagnosis of AFX includes pleomorphic dermal sarcoma, squamous cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma and leiomyosarcoma. Several observations favor a mesenchymal origin for AFX. These reviews address the clinicopathologic features, molecular pathology, prognosis and treatment of this neoplasm.