Glaucoma diagnostic performance of humphrey matrix and standard automated perimetry

Diagnostic Accuracy of Frequency-Doubling Technology and the Moorfields Motion Displacement Test for Glaucoma

PURPOSE

Portable perimetric testing could be useful for community-based glaucoma screening programs. Frequency-doubling technology (FDT) and the Moorfields motion displacement test (MDT) are portable perimeters that have shown promise as potential screening tools for glaucoma. This study's goal was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of FDT and MDT for visual field defects and glaucoma.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study.

PARTICIPANTS

A consecutive series of patients aged ≥ 50 years who presented to a glaucoma clinic in South India and had never undergone Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) visual field testing in the past.

METHODS

Participants underwent 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard HFA perimetry, FDT perimetry, MDT perimetry, and iPad perimetry using visualFields Easy in random order. Ophthalmologist grades of HFA and optic nerve head photographs were used as reference standards for glaucoma and field defect presence. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various parameters for each test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

Overall, 292 eyes from 173 participants were included, with 112 eyes classified as moderate or worse glaucoma. For moderate or worse glaucoma detection, the best parameter on FDT was mean deviation (MD) (AUROC, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.89) and the best parameter on MDT was global probability of true damage (GPTD) (AUROC, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.91). When specificity was set to 90%, the sensitivity for detection of moderate or worse glaucoma was 55% (95% CI, 39%-68%) for FDT MD and 62% (95% CI 52%-71%) for MDT GPTD.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency-doubling technology and MDT perimetry had fair diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma detection when administered to naïve test takers in this South Indian population. Although not appropriate for use as a sole glaucoma screening test, these perimetric tests may be useful as ancillary tests.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli

PURPOSE

Perimetry is used clinically to assess glaucomatous ganglion cell loss. It has been proposed that frequency-doubling stimuli are better than the conventional size III perimetric stimulus in preferentially stimulating magnocellular (M) versus parvocellular (P) ganglion cells. However, little is known about how primate ganglion cells respond to perimetric stimuli. The authors recorded contrast responses of M and P ganglion cells to size III and frequency-doubling stimuli and compared contrast gain of M and P cells to these stimuli to assess the ability of these stimuli to preferentially stimulate M versus P cells.

METHODS

Data were recorded from 69 macaque retinal ganglion cells, by an in vivo preparation, at eccentricities of 5° to 15°. The size III stimulus was a circular luminance increment 26 min arc in diameter, 200 ms in duration. The frequency-doubling stimulus was a sinusoidal grating (0.5 cyc/deg) temporally modulated in counterphase at 13 Hz. A Michaelis-Menten function was fit to each cell's contrast responses to assess contrast gain.

RESULTS

For both size III and frequency-doubling stimuli, ganglion cell responses increased linearly at low contrasts, and then the increase slowed at high contrasts (saturation). The mean (± SE) difference in estimated log contrast gain between M and P cells for the size III stimulus was significantly higher than that for the frequency-doubling stimulus (1.24 ± 0.09 vs. 0.89 ± 0.13; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The size III stimulus was superior to the frequency-doubling stimulus in preferentially stimulating M cells versus P cells.