Effect of carteolol hydrochloride on 24-hour variation of intraocular pressure in normal-tension glaucoma

Comparison of the 24-h efficacy and safety of fixed combination carteolol/latanoprost and timolol/latanoprost in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a prospective crossover study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the 24-h efficacy and safety of fixed combination carteolol/latanoprost (LCFC) and timolol/latanoprost (LTFC) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, crossover study METHODS: Twenty-two patients pretreated with a prostaglandin analog at baseline were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either LCFC or LTFC treatment. The patients received the assigned study drug in both eyes daily in the evening (20:00). Each treatment group crossed over after a 2-month treatment period. The 24-h curves of intraocular pressure (IOP), pulse rate, and blood pressure were evaluated. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

The changes in mean daytime IOP from baseline at the end of the 2-month treatment period in the LCFC and LTFC groups were  - 0.93 and  - 1.15 mmHg, respectively. The changes in peak IOP in the 2 groups were  - 0.91 and  - 0.68 mmHg, respectively. The nighttime pulse rate in the LCFC group increased; that in the LTFC group was lower at all time points. The changes in pulse rate from baseline at 22:00, 2:00, 4:00, and 6:00 differed statistically between the 2 groups. No differences in changes from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressures were found between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The 24-h IOP curve of patients in the LCFC group was similar to that of the LTFC group, but on the basis of the pulse rate findings, the effect of LCFC on the cardiovascular system over 24 h was less than that of LTFC.

Dose- and Time-Dependent Cytotoxicity of Carteolol in Corneal Endothelial Cells and the Underlying Mechanisms

Carteolol is a non-selective β-adrenoceptor antagonist used for the treatment of glaucoma, and its abuse might be cytotoxic to the cornea. However, its cytotoxicity and underlying mechanisms need to be elucidated. Herein, we used an in vivo model of feline corneas and an in vitro model of human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs), respectively. In vivo results displayed that 2% carteolol (clinical dosage) could induce monolayer density decline and breaking away of feline corneal endothelial (FCE) cells. An in vitro model of HCECs that were treated dose-dependently (0.015625–2%) with carteolol for 2–28 h, resulted in morphological abnormalities, declining in cell viability and elevating plasma membrane (PM) permeability in a dose- and time- dependent manner. High-dose (0.5–2%) carteolol treatment induced necrotic characteristics with uneven distribution of chromatin, marginalization and dispersed DNA degradation, inactivated caspase-2/-8, and increased RIPK1, RIPK3, MLKL, and pMLKL expression. The results suggested that high-dose carteolol could induce necroptosis via the RIPK/MLKL pathway. While low-dose (0.015625–0.25%) carteolol induced apoptotic characteristics with chromatin condensation, typical intranucleosomal DNA laddering patterns, G₁ cell-cycle arrest, phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization, and apoptotic body formation in HCECs. Meanwhile, 0.25% carteolol treatment resulted in activated caspase-2, -3, -8, and -9, downregulation of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, upregulation of Bax and Bad, ΔΨm disruption, and release of cytoplasmic cytochrome c (Cyt.c) and AIF into the cytoplasm. These observations suggested that low-dose carteolol could induce apoptosis via a caspase activated and mitochondrial-dependent pathway. These results suggested that carteolol should be used carefully, as low as 0.015625% cartelol caused apoptotic cell death in HCECs in vitro.

Diurnal and 24-h Intraocular Pressures in Glaucoma: Monitoring Strategies and Impact on Prognosis and Treatment

The present review casts a critical eye on intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring and its value in current and future glaucoma care. Crucially, IOP is not fixed, but varies considerably during the 24-h cycle and between one visit and another. Consequently, a single IOP measurement during so-called office hours is insufficient to characterize the real IOP pathology of a patient with glaucoma. To date IOP remains the principal and only modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of glaucoma. Only by evaluating IOP characteristics (mean, peak and fluctuation of IOP) at diagnosis and after IOP-lowering interventions can we appreciate the true efficacy of therapy. Unfortunately, a major limiting factor in glaucoma management is lack of robust IOP data collection. Treatment decisions, advancement of therapy and even surgery are often reached on the basis of limited IOP evidence. Clearly, there is much room to enhance our decision-making and to develop new algorithms for everyday practice. The precise way in which daytime IOP readings can be used as predictors of night-time or 24-h IOP characteristics remains to be determined. In practice it is important to identify those at-risk glaucoma patients for whom a complete 24-h curve is necessary and to distinguish them from those for whom a daytime curve consisting of three IOP measurements (at 10:00, 14:00 and 18:00) would suffice. By employing a staged approach in determining the amount of IOP evidence needed and the rigour required for our monitoring approach for the individual patient, our decisions will be based on more comprehensive data, while at the same time this will optimize use of resources. The patient’s clinical picture should be the main factor that determines which method of IOP monitoring is most appropriate. A diurnal or ideally a 24-h IOP curve will positively impact the management of glaucoma patients who show functional/anatomical progression, despite an apparently acceptable IOP in the clinic. The potential impact of nocturnal IOP elevation remains poorly investigated. The ideal solution in the future is the development of non-invasive methods for obtaining continuous, Goldmann equivalent IOP data on all patients prior to key treatment decisions. Moreover, an important area of future research is to establish the precise relationship between 24-h IOP characteristics and glaucoma progression.

[Evaluation of the Association between Topical Prostaglandin F2α Analogs and Asthma Using the JADER Database: Comparison with β-Blockers]

　Prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) analog formulations are the most commonly used drugs for glaucoma treatment. They are known to be superior to β-blockers for reducing intraocular pressure and can be effective all through the day. Because of the action, topical β-blockers are contraindicated for patients with bronchial asthma. PGF2α is also known to act as a constrictor of the respiratory tract. The present study aims to analyze the relationship between PGF2α analogs and asthma. In addition, we utilized β-blockers and combined formulations of both contents to evaluate for comparison with PGF2α analogs. Data from Japanese adverse drug event reports (JADERs) from April 2004 to January 2016 were used for analysis. The drugs of interest were 4 PGF2α analogs, 4 β-blockers, and 2 combined formulations of both. For quantitative signal detection, the reporting odds ratios (RORs) with Haldane-Anscombe 1/2 correction were calculated. The corrected RORs (95%CI) were detected to be 4.73 (2.30-9.75) for PGF2α analogs, 4.61 (1.82-11.7) for β-blockers, and 28.7 (12.1-68.1) for combined formulations. Our results suggest that not only topical β-blockers but also PGF2α analogs are associated with asthma, and the combined formulations have stronger associations with asthma than when administered alone. Therefore, further clinical research will be necessary, and careful attention should be paid to any glaucoma patient using PGF2α analogs for asthma symptoms.

Twenty-Four-Hour Variation of Intraocular Pressure in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Treated with Triple Eye Drops

Objectives. To evaluate 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) variation in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) treated with triple eye drops. Subjects and Methods. The IOP was measured in 74 eyes in 74 POAG patients (seated) on triple therapy (PG analogue, β-blocker, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor) at about every 3 hours. Results. The peak IOP was 13.5 ± 3.1 at 1:00, and the trough IOP was at 12.6 ± 2.4 mmHg at 7:00. The IOP at 7:00 was significantly lower than that at 10:00, 1:00, and 3:00 (p < 0.05). Based on the time of the peak IOP, we classified the patients into two groups: diurnal (28 eyes) and nocturnal types (37 eyes). There was significant difference at the spherical equivalent between diurnal and nocturnal types (p = 0.014). To assess the influence of reflective error, we conducted subanalysis for two groups: high myopic (26 eyes, ≤−6D) and low/nonmyopic (24 eyes, ≥−2D) groups. In the low/nonmyopia group, the IOP was significantly higher at 1:00 and 3:00 than at 13:00, 16:00, and 7: 00 (p < 0.05). Conclusion. The mean of IOP elevated outside of clinic hour in the POAG patients on triple therapy. The low/nonmyopia patient should be carefully treated because the IOP of the patients at night elevated significantly.