Randomized study of prevention of gastrointestinal toxicities by nutritional support using an amino acid-rich elemental diet during chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer (KDOG 1101)

Oral nutritional supplementation in cancer patients: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We performed this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to determine the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in cancer patients undergoing chemo (radio) therapy on body weight, body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, fatigue, quality of life (QOL), patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) score and C-reactive protein (CRP).

METHODS

Appropriate search terms were used for systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, till April 2024. Both pairwise and dose-response meta-analyses were done. Random effects model was applied for analyses.

RESULTS

We found that ONS administration significantly improved weight gain [weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.18 kg; 95 % CI, 0.20 to 2.17, P = 0.019; I2 = 56.2 %, PQ-test = 0.002], fatigue scores [standard mean difference (SMD): -1.45; 95 % CI, -2.48 to -0.42, P = 0.006; I2 = 90.1 %, PQ-test< 0.001], PG-SGA scores (WMD: -1.11; 95 % CI, -2.93 to 0.70, P = 0.229; I2 = 72.4 %, PQ-test = 0.001), and QOL (SMD: 1.38; 95 % CI, 0.45 to 2.31; P < 0.001; I2 = 94.4 %, PQ-test< 0.001). The dose-response meta-analysis found a significant relationship between each 200 ml/d increase in ONS and improvement in fatigue (SMD: -7.30; 95 % CI, -10.17 to -4.42, P < 0.001; I2 = 97 %, PQ-test< 0.001) and QOL scores (SMD:7.01; 95 % CI, 3.89 to 10.12, P = 0.001; I2 = 98.3 %, PQ-test < 0.001). Based on a non-linear dose-response meta-analysis, the most significant reduction in fatigue was observed at ONS dosages of ≥400 ml/day, while the most significant improvement in QOL score was seen at ≥ 500 ml/day dosages. Our analysis also showed a significant association between higher albumin levels and ONS intake of ≥200 ml daily.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, ONS can help improve various cancer-related complications; however, further good-quality research is still needed. The study found that ONS significantly improves QoL, reduces fatigue, and promotes body weight gain in cancer patients. However, there were no significant effects on BMI, serum albumin, CRP, or PG-SGA scores.

Nutritional management during chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer

Advanced esophageal cancer is treated by chemotherapy, radiation therapy, chemoradiotherapy, and immunotherapy. However, the stenosis caused by the tumor and cancer-related chronic inflammation leads to inadequate food intake, weight loss, and nutrition problems. Given that poor pre-treatment nutritional status increases the risks of treatment-related adverse events and a poor prognosis, the nutrition guidelines recommend a pre-treatment nutritional assessment. When malnutrition is present, nutritional interventions, such as dietary guidance and enteral nutrition supplements, provided by the medical team may reduce treatment-related adverse events. However, whether nutritional intervention improves the prognosis is a topic for future research, including randomized controlled trials. This review discusses the literature on nutritional management in patients undergoing chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer.

Effects of high-protein supplementation during cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Establishing the effectiveness of high-protein supplementation in reducing cancer-related side effects is crucial.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of high-protein supplementation on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cancer therapy.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted on Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus from inception until July 2023. Randomized controlled trials administering supplements with ≥10 g protein/serving, given to 20+ adult patients undergoing cancer therapy were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the effects of high-protein supplementation on the primary outcomes of body weight and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We employed a vote-counting approach based on effect direction for secondary outcomes (that is, body composition, muscle function, hospitalization, response to cancer therapy/toxicity, survival, and systemic inflammation). Risk-of-bias (ROB) was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies involving 3701 patients with diverse cancer types were included. Patients who received high-protein supplementation lost less body weight than controls (mean difference = 1.45 kg; 95% CI: 0.42, 2.48 kg; P = 0.006; I2 = 80%). No differences in HRQoL were observed; all studies assessing HRQoL were rated as high ROB. A beneficial effect on muscle mass was found in 11 of 13 studies, although most had a high ROB due to assessment techniques. When considering higher quality studies, evidence of a beneficial effect was found in 5 of 5 studies for muscle strength, and 3 of 4 for hospitalization rate. Effects on other secondary outcomes were inconsistent or limited. No serious adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

High-protein supplementation mitigates weight loss, improves muscle strength, and lowers hospitalization rates in patients undergoing cancer therapy. These positive clinical outcomes, along with a favorable safety profile, suggest that high-protein supplementation may be a valuable addition to medical practice. However, given the need for more robust trials and the high ROB observed in the existing studies, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution. This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42021237372.

Nutritional Intervention for the Elderly during Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review

This study aims to review existing literature on the effect of oral nutritional supplements (ONSs) during chemotherapy in older cancer patients. Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies up to March 2024. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane tool. Eligible studies included randomized, prospective, and retrospective studies evaluating the effect of ONSs in elderly (median age > 65 years) cancer patients during chemotherapy. Data regarding chemotherapy adherence, toxicity, overall survival, and nutritional status were extracted. A total of ten studies, involving 1123 patients, were included. A meta-analysis of the results was not conducted due to the scarcity and heterogeneity of results. Some ONSs were associated with reduced incidence of chemotherapy side-effects, particularly oral mucositis, and improved nutritional status. There was limited or no evidence regarding the impact of ONSs on chemotherapy adherence or overall survival. Various types of ONS were investigated, including multimodal intervention with tailored nutritional counseling, whey protein supplements, amino acids supplements (including immune nutrition supplements), and fish oil omega-3-enriched supplements. ONSs showed promise in reducing chemotherapy side-effects and improving nutritional status in older cancer patients, but further studies are needed to explore their efficacy on chemotherapy adherence and overall survival. Future research should consider both chronological age and frailty criteria, account for dietary habits, and use specific nutritional assessment like Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis.

Elemental diet preventative effects for adverse events during chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The effectiveness of an elemental diet (ED) for preventing adverse events (AEs) during chemotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) remains unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the efficacy of ED for preventing AE in EC patients during chemotherapy. Medline (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to retrieve prospective and randomized studies published before April 12, 2023. The odds ratio (OR) of each AE was calculated using Review Manger 5.4.1. The risk of bias was assessed, and a random effect model-based meta-analysis was used to analyze the available data. Four prospective and randomized studies involving 237 patients were identified after a systematic search. Regarding gastrointestinal toxicities, the findings indicated a trend toward a decrease in the risk of mucositis (OM) (OR = 0.54, 95 % CI: 0.25-1.14), constipation (OR = 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.49-1.53), and anorexia (OR = 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.32-3.05), as well as an increasing trend in the risk of diarrhea (OR = 1.48, 95 % CI: 0.79-2.79), among patients treated with ED. However, none of these reached statistical significance. For hematological toxicities, the risk of all-grade neutropenia (OR = 0.28, 95 % CI: 0.14-0.57), grade ≥ 2 leucopenia (OR = 0.43, 95 % CI: 0.22-0.84), grade ≥ 2 neutropenia (OR = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.17-0.67), and grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (OR = 0.28, 95 % CI: 0.12-0.63) was significantly decreased. There is no firm evidence confirming the preventive effect of an ED against OM or diarrhea. However, an ED may potentially be helpful in preventing neutropenia and leucopenia.

Effects of nutritional therapy on gastrointestinal microbial digestion and barrier defense markers in elderly patients with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the effects of gastrointestinal nutrition therapy on gastrointestinal microbial digestion and barrier defense markers in elderly patients with diabetes.

METHODS

A total of 120 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled at our hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. The participants in this study were randomly allocated into either the nutritional group (n = 60) who underwent gastrointestinal nutrition therapy or the control group (n = 60) who underwent conventional T2DM diet management for a period of 12 weeks. Clinical data, as well as small intestinal permeability measured by the lactulose-mannitol urine test, plasma circulating IL-6 and zonulin levels measured by ELISA, and expressions of ZO-1 and Claudin-3 in blood analyzed through Western blotting were collected.

RESULTS

The nutrition group demonstrated a higher proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 7% compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the nutrition group exhibited a greater reduction in fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The concentrations of formate-tetrahydrofolate ligase and acetic CoA transferase were significantly increased in the nutrition group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Fecal analysis revealed higher levels of acetic acid and butyric acid in the nutrition group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The ratio of lactulose to mannitol was higher in the nutrition group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the nutrition group showed lower levels of IL-6 and zonulin compared to the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Personalized gastrointestinal nutrition therapy was found to enhance the production of short-chain fatty acids and preserve intestinal permeability, leading to improved gastrointestinal microbial digestion and barrier defense in elderly patients with diabetes.

Nutrition as prevention for improved cancer health outcomes: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Among adults with cancer, malnutrition is associated with decreased treatment completion, more treatment harms and use of health care, and worse short-term survival. To inform the National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention workshop, "Nutrition as Prevention for Improved Cancer Health Outcomes," this systematic review examined the evidence for the effectiveness of providing nutrition interventions before or during cancer therapy to improve outcomes of cancer treatment.

METHODS

We identified randomized controlled trials enrolling at least 50 participants published from 2000 through July 2022. We provide a detailed evidence map for included studies and grouped studies by broad intervention and cancer types. We conducted risk of bias (RoB) and qualitative descriptions of outcomes for intervention and cancer types with a larger volume of literature.

RESULTS

From 9798 unique references, 206 randomized controlled trials from 219 publications met the inclusion criteria. Studies primarily focused on nonvitamin or mineral dietary supplements, nutrition support, and route or timing of inpatient nutrition interventions for gastrointestinal or head and neck cancers. Most studies evaluated changes in body weight or composition, adverse events from cancer treatment, length of hospital stay, or quality of life. Few studies were conducted within the United States. Among intervention and cancer types with a high volume of literature (n = 114), 49% (n = 56) were assessed as high RoB. Higher-quality studies (low or medium RoB) reported mixed results on the effect of nutrition interventions across cancer and treatment-related outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Methodological limitations of nutrition intervention studies surrounding cancer treatment impair translation of findings into clinical practice or guidelines.

Effectiveness of elemental diets to prevent oral mucositis associated with cancer therapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

During chemo- or radiotherapy, oral mucositis is associated with severely affected nutrition, prolonged hospital stays, increased risk of infections, death, hindered cancer treatment, and compromised patient prognosis. Although oral mucositis management is critical, no preventive methods have been firmly established. Nutritional therapy with the oral amino acid-rich elemental diet (ED) Elental® may prevent body composition changes and oral mucositis as dose-limiting toxicities of cancer therapy. This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of ED for the prevention of grade ≥2 oral mucositis in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

METHODS

A PubMed literature search for randomized clinical trials and/or observational studies in English was conducted. Odds ratios and their confidence intervals were calculated, and fixed- or random-effects models applied.

RESULTS

Of 24 relevant studies, nine conducted in Japan (including 445 patients) were subjected to a meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was 56%. Using a random-effects model, the resulting odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.25 (0.10, 0.61). Funnel plot analysis showed no publication bias. There was no heterogeneity by study design, but esophageal cancer exhibited heterogeneity. The respective odds ratios (fixed-effects model) were 0.10 (0.03, 0.30) for observational studies and 0.48 (0.28, 0.82) for randomized control trials. The odds ratio (confidence interval) using a random-effects model was 0.35 (0.12, 0.99) for esophageal cancer; using a fixed-effects model, odds ratios were 0.07 (0.02, 0.29) for gastroenterological cancer and 0.26 (0.04, 1.60) for oral cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

The ED reduced the risk of developing oral mucositis, regardless of study design. The effectiveness was more marked in patients with gastroenterological cancer followed by esophageal cancer; ED was not effective in patients with oral cancer.