Changes in the quality of life score following preoperative chemotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer

Health-related quality of life assessment among patients with oesophageal cancer at Tikur Anbessa Specialised Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: a cross sectional study

Background

In low-income countries, oesophageal cancer often presents at an advanced stage, leaving patients with limited curative treatment options. Furthermore, palliative treatments such as oesophageal stents or brachytherapy are lacking. This has a detrimental effect on their quality of life. In this study, we investigated the health-related quality of life of patients with oesophageal cancer at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at Tikur Anbessa Specialised Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia. The validated Amharic version of the questionnaire of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Cancer 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) and the oesophageal cancer disease-specific questionnaire QLQ-OES18 were used to assess the quality of life of each patient.

Results

The overall mean score for the EORTC QLQ C-30 was 35.43 (SD 18.04). The mean scores for the functional scales revealed that cognitive function was the highest, whereas role function was the lowest. The symptom scale results showed the highest score for pain and the lowest for diarrhoea. Dysphagia, choking, role functioning and financial difficulty correlated with the quality of life of patients with oesophageal cancer.

Conclusion

Dysphagia, choking, role functioning and financial difficulty are important factors that affect the quality of life of patients with oesophageal cancer patients. Increasing the availability of palliative treatments for dysphagia to improve the quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer is recommended.

Relationship of weight loss to quality of life and symptom distress among postsurgical survivors of oesophageal cancer who received chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Weight loss is highly prevalent in oesophageal cancer survivors, who often experience disease-related or treatment-related symptoms and quality of life (QoL) impairment. This study aimed to explore the relationships among weight loss, symptom distress, and QoL postoperatively in patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing chemotherapy and to identify the factors influencing the QoL.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study with 101 patients and collected data on weight loss (percentage of total body mass loss), QoL (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-OES-18), and symptom distress (MDASI-GI-C). The associations among weight loss, QoL, and symptom distress were assessed using Pearson's correlation. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent factors influencing patients' QoL scores.

RESULTS

The distribution of weight loss of each stage in survivors of oesophageal cancer was 1.00% (SD: 2.48%), 4.69% (SD: 4.73%), 1.66% (SD: 5.37%), 2.83% (SD: 4.89%) respectively. The mean QoL score was 66.24 (SD 18.65). The participants' mean symptom severity and symptom interference scores were 3.30 (SD 1.74) and 2.76 (SD 1.90), respectively. Weight loss and symptom distress were negatively related to patients' QoL (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, respectively). Weight loss between 6 months before diagnosis and the time of diagnosis (p < 0.05) and symptom interference (p < 0.01) were independent predictors for the QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that oesophageal cancer survivors with larger weight reduction between 6 months before diagnosis and the time of diagnosis and more symptom distress have a worse QoL. Clinicians should focus more on patients' weight and symptom management to improve their QoL.

Study on the Application Value of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Clinical Nursing Pathway for Postoperative Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Backgrounds

To observe the value of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and clinical nursing pathway for postoperative patients with esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods

A total of 88 postoperative EC patients were divided into the radiotherapy group (RG group, 44 cases) and the chemoradiotherapy group (CRG group, 44 cases). The RG group received single three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy+clinical nursing pathway, and the CRG group was combined with chemotherapy on this basis. The 5-year overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate, pathological remission and survival rate, lymph node metastasis and survival rate, quality of life analysis, tumor-related factor level, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results

The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 93.18%, 56.82%, and 50.0% in the CRG group and 86.36%, 52.27%, and 43.18% in the RG group, respectively. The 5-year progression-free survival rate of the CRG group was 60.87%, which was clearly higher than that of the RG group (33.33%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of pCR and NpCR patients were 90.48%, 80.95%, and 61.90% and 89.55%, 44.78%, and 38.81%, respectively. The overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 81.08%, 37.84, and 24.32% and 96.08%, 66.67%, and 62.75% in patients with lymph node metastasis and nonlymph node metastasis, respectively, with statistical significant differences. The emotional function, physical function, cough, pain, and eating difficulty in the CRG group were better than those in the RG group. After treatment, serum CEA, SCC, CYFRA21-1, and CA199 levels in the CRG group were obviously downregulated compared with those in the RG group. There was no obvious difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the CRG group and the RG group.

Conclusion

Single radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy can be used as effective means in the treatment of EC. Moreover, the quality of life and survival time of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group were dramatically better than those of the single radiotherapy group, and the antitumor ability of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group was stronger.

Management of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer

This review focuses on the treatment about elderly esophageal cancer to clarify the current situation regarding our clinical question. Although there are several reviews about elderly esophageal cancer treatment, there are fundamental differences between Japan and the rest of the world. Two main differences are raised: histological differences and treatment strategies for resectable patients. We overview each status according to following clinical questions. First, there are no established evaluation criteria for frail. Second, selection criteria for surgery or non-surgery are not established. Third, few specific treatments for elderly patients (EPs) are investigated. In conclusion, there are many reports about treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for EPs, although treatment strategy is still controversial. We have to consider well-designed prospective trial to confirm specific treatment strategy according to each stage.