Saliva secretion is reduced in mild reflux esophagitis patients

Factors associated with prevalence and severity of erosive tooth wear in patients with reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Extrinsic factors for erosive tooth wear (ETW) have been widely reported, but the intrinsic factors for wear remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with the prevalence of ETW in patients with reflux oesophagitis (RO). To prevent severe ETW with RO, factors associated with severity of ETW were also evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 270 patients with RO were recruited. A modified tooth wear index was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of ETW. Salivary secretion and buffering capacity were assessed prior to endoscopy. Subjects were asked to complete a medical condition and oral self-care questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify factors collectively associated with the prevalence and severity of ETW.

RESULTS

A total of 212 cases were categorized as patients with ETW (148 with mild ETW and 64 with severe ETW). Multivariate analyses indicated that saliva secretion, severity of RO and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) resistance were associated with the prevalence of ETW, whereas age, BMI and severity of RO were associated with the severity of ETW. The odds ratio of saliva secretion and BMI were less than 1, meaning that higher saliva secretion resulted in a lower prevalence of ETW and lower BMI was associated with severe ETW.

CONCLUSION

Saliva secretion, severity of RO and PPI resistance were associated with the prevalence of ETW, whereas age, BMI and severity of RO were associated with the severity of ETW. Lower saliva secretion and BMI were significant factors for ETW.

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (both reflux oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease): Prevalence and severity of erosive tooth wear and saliva properties

BACKGROUND

The prevalence between erosive tooth wear (ETW) in association with reflux oesophagitis (RO) has been reported. However, the severity of both diseases and the relationship between ETW and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The prevalence and severity of ETW were investigated in RO, NERD and healthy controls.

METHODS

135 patients with RO, 65 with NERD and 40 healthy controls were recruited for this case-control study. A modified tooth wear index was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of ETW. Salivary secretion and buffer capacity were assessed prior to endoscopy. The prevalence and severity of ETW, saliva properties among each group were analysed using Pearson's chi-squared test.

RESULTS

A total of 135 cases (56.3%) were categorised as the patient with ETW (55 with mild RO, 49 with severe RO and 31 with NERD). There was a significant relationship between the prevalence of RO and ETW, while there was no significant correlation between the prevalence of NERD and ETW. There was a significant difference related to the severity between RO and ETW. For salivary secretion, there was a significant difference between with and without ETW in patients with mild RO, severe RO and NERD. There was a significant difference between with and without ETW for salivary buffer capacity in patients with mild and severe RO.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant association of the prevalence and severity between RO and ETW. Clinical signs such as ETW and salivary buffer capacity depended on the severity of RO.

Among females older than 50 years, saliva secretion is significantly lower in non-erosive reflux disease patients than in healthy controls

BACKGROUND

Saliva secretion is significantly lower in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) than in healthy controls (HC). A previous study on HC showed that saliva secretion was lower in females than in males. Saliva secretion may be lower in female patients with NERD than in male patients. Therefore, the present study investigated sex differences in saliva secretion in patients with NERD.

METHODS

Subjects older than 50 years were included in the present study and consisted of 20 male patients with NERD, 19 male HC, 25 female patients with NERD, and 23 female HC. Saliva secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the amount and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured.

RESULTS

In males, no significant differences were observed in the amount of stimulated saliva secretion or salivary pH between NERD patients and HC. However, the acid-buffering capacity (NERD: 6.1 [5.9-6.5], HC: 6.4 [6.2-6.6]) was significantly lower in NERD patients than in HC. In females, the amount of stimulated saliva secretion (NERD: 2.6 [2.0-4.1], HC: 5.8 [3.7-7.5]), salivary pH (NERD: 7.0 [6.8-7.2], HC: 7.2 [7.0-7.2]), and the acid-buffering capacity (NERD: 5.8 [5.4-6.2], HC: 6.2 [6.0-6.5]) were significantly lower in NERD patients than in HC.

CONCLUSION

Among females older than 50 years, saliva secretion was significantly lower in NERD patients than in HC. This reduction in saliva secretion may contribute to the pathophysiology of NERD in females.

Characteristics of proton pump inhibitor-resistant severe reflux esophagitis and efficacy of vonoprazan in elderly (older than 75 years) and non-elderly groups

Background and Aim

Previous studies on age differences in proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-resistant reflux esophagitis (RE) have found that stenosis and bleeding complications were significantly more common in the elderly than in the non-elderly. We sought to examine differences between two groups of elderly (75 years or older) and non-elderly (<75 years) patients with (PPI)-resistant severe RE and also the efficacy of vonoprazan (VPZ) in these patients.

Methods

There were 14 patients in the elderly group and 15 in the non-elderly group. Information was obtained on patient background (sex, body mass index [BMI], gastric mucosal atrophy, and the presence of hernia and collagen disease), and all patients underwent the saliva secretion test and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The saliva secretion test (amount of saliva secreted, salivary pH, and the acid-buffering capacity) was performed by chewing sugar-free gum for 3 min before EGD. The efficacy of VPZ in both groups was also assessed.

Results

Saliva secretion, sex, BMI, and the presence of gastric mucosal atrophy did not significantly differ between the two groups. The number of hernias larger than 4 cm was significantly higher in the elderly PPI-resistant group, and significantly more patients had collagen disease in the non-elderly group. The efficacy of VPZ was not significantly different between the two groups; however, 10 patients in the non-elderly group had collagen disease, and 4 did not achieve esophageal mucosal healing even with VPZ 20 mg.

Conclusion

The number of large hernias (>4 cm) was significantly higher in the elderly group, while significantly more non-elderly patients had collagen disease. In the non-elderly group with scleroderma, the efficacy of VPZ 20 mg may not be sufficient.

Lemborexant Attenuates Regurgitation without Worsening Objective Parameters on Reflux Monitoring in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Insomnia: A Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Study

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal hypersensitivity is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Since sleep disturbance causes esophageal hypersensitivity, hypnotics may ameliorate GERD. However, zolpidem prolongs esophageal acid clearance. Lemborexant is a new hypnotic with higher efficacy and fewer adverse events than zolpidem. Therefore, the present study investigated the effects of lemborexant on GERD.

METHODS

Patients with heartburn and/or regurgitation and insomnia who did not take acid suppressants or hypnotics in the last month were recruited. Symptom assessments using GerdQ and reflux monitoring were performed before and after a 28-day treatment with 5 mg lemborexant at bedtime. The primary outcome was a change in the total GerdQ score, excluding the score for insomnia. Secondary outcomes were changes in each GerdQ score and the following parameters on reflux monitoring: the acid exposure time (AET), number of reflux events (RE), acid clearance time (ACT), and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (age 45.0 [33.3-56.0], 11 females [68.8%]) completed the intervention (1 patient did not tolerate the second reflux monitoring). The total GerdQ score, excluding the score for insomnia, did not significantly change (8.0 [6.0-9.0] before vs. 7.0 [6.3-9.0] after p = 0.16). GerdQ showed the significant attenuation of regurgitation (2.0 [2.0-3.0] vs. 1.0 [0-2.8] p = 0.0054) but not heartburn (2.5 [1.0-3.0] vs. 1.0 [0.3-2.0] p = 0.175). No significant differences were observed in AET, RE, ACT, or PSPW index before and after the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Lemborexant attenuated regurgitation without the worsening of objective reflux parameters. A randomized placebo-controlled study is warranted in the future.

Significantly Lower Saliva Secretion in Females With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Healthy Subjects Than in Males

OBJECTIVE

Saliva secretion in healthy subjects is lower in females than in males. The present study investigated sex differences in saliva secretion in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls.

METHODS

This case-control study included 39 (male/female: 16/23) with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 49 (25/24) patients with mild reflux esophagitis, 45 (23/22) with severe reflux esophagitis (A1), and 46 (24/22) healthy controls. Saliva secretion was examined as follows: before endoscopy, patients chewed sugar-free gum for three minutes, and the amount and pH of saliva before and after acid loading as an index of acid-buffering capacity were evaluated. The relationships between saliva secretion and body mass index, height, and weight were also examined.

RESULTS

The amount of saliva secreted was significantly lower in females than in males in all four groups (NERD, mild reflux esophagitis, severe reflux esophagitis, and healthy controls). Salivary pH and acid-buffering capacity were similar in all groups. The amount of saliva secreted positively correlated with height and body weight, albeit more strongly with height.

CONCLUSION

A sex difference in saliva secretion exists in GERD patients, similar to healthy controls. Saliva secretion was significantly lower in female GERD patients than in male GERD patients.

Differences in salivary secretion and epidermal growth factor concentrations in mild reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Sex differences in salivary secretion have been reported among healthy subjects. In the present study, salivary secretion and salivary epidermal growth factor (EGF) concentrations were investigated in mild reflux esophagitis patients, non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients, and healthy controls by matching the sex ratio.

METHODS

Thirty-three (male:female = 11:22) patients with NERD, 33 (11:22) with mild reflux esophagitis, and 33 (11:22) healthy controls were recruited for this case-control study. Salivary secretion was assessed as follows: each patient chewed sugar-free gum for 3 min prior to endoscopy, and the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, and salivary pH after acid loading as an index of the acid-buffering capacity were measured. Salivary EGF concentrations were measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, or the acid-buffering capacity between the mild reflux esophagitis and NERD groups. However, the amount of saliva secretion and the acid-buffering capacity in the mild reflux esophagitis group and the amount of saliva secretion, salivary pH, and the acid-buffering capacity in the NERD group were significantly lower than those in the healthy control group. No significant differences were noted in salivary EGF concentrations between the mild reflux esophagitis and NERD groups.

CONCLUSION

After matching the sex ratio, the saliva secretion was significantly lower in patients with mild reflux esophagitis and NERD than in healthy controls. However, no significant differences were observed in the amount of saliva secretion or salivary EGF concentrations between both groups.

Salivary biomarkers and esophageal disorders

Saliva is a complex physiologic fluid that contains an abundance of biological analytes, or biomarkers. Recent research has shown that these biomarkers may be able to convey the physiologic health of a person. Work has been done linking derangements in these salivary biomarkers to a wide variety of pathologic disorders ranging from oncologic diseases to atopic conditions. The specific area of interest for this review paper is esophageal disorders. Particularly because the diagnosis and management of esophageal disorders often includes invasive testing such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy, prolonged pH monitoring, and biopsy. The aim of this review will be to explore salivary biomarkers (pepsin, bile, epidermal growth factor, and micro-RNA) that are being studied as they relate specifically to esophageal disorders. Finally, it will explore the benefits of salivary testing and identify areas of possible future research.

Determinants of reflux perception in patients with non-erosive reflux disease who have reflux-related symptoms on potassium-competitive acid blocker therapy

BACKGROUND

This study investigated potential determinants of reflux perception in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) who had reflux-related symptoms on potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) therapy.

METHODS

This study included 23 patients with reflux-related symptoms despite P-CAB therapy. Esophageal impedance-pH monitoring was performed on P-CAB and the following potential determinants of reflux perception were investigated: reflux nadir pH value; change in pH (baseline-nadir); bolus clearance time; reflux extent; proportions of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline reflux episodes; and proportions of liquid and mixed reflux episodes.

RESULTS

Overall, ≥ 90% of all and symptomatic reflux episodes were weakly acidic reflux and 63% of symptomatic reflux episodes were reflux episodes with pH ≥ 5. There were no significant differences regarding potential determinants between symptomatic and asymptomatic reflux episodes. However, the proportion of symptomatic reflux episodes was significantly greater with pH < 5 (13.8%) than with pH ≥ 5 (9.5%) (P = 0.0431). In reflux episodes with pH < 5, the proportion of symptomatic reflux episodes was significantly greater in proximal sites (20.6%) than in distal sites (10.6%) (P = 0.0178). Conversely, in reflux episodes with pH ≥ 5, there was no significant difference regarding reflux perception according to reflux extent (proximal: 9.6% vs. distal: 9.0%, P = 0.9337).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with P-CAB-resistant NERD, reflux symptoms were mainly caused by reflux episodes with pH ≥ 5 on P-CAB therapy. The proportions of symptomatic reflux episodes among reflux sites differed according to reflux pH value; thus, the mechanisms of reflux perception may differ according to reflux pH value.