Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio change predicts histological response to and oncological outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy is the standard treatment for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan. Triplet chemotherapy is the standard neoadjuvant regimen. Inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are well-known prognostic factors for esophageal cancer. However, their usefulness in patients with resectable advanced disease undergoing esophagectomy after neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy is unknown.

METHOD

We examined 144 ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy between January 2015 and December 2020 to investigate the relationship between inflammatory markers and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Optimal marker cutoff values for RFS were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Patients were divided into high and low NLR groups (NLR cutoff, 3.0).

RESULTS

NLR was high in 61 patients and low in 83. Univariate analyses demonstrated that low NLR was significantly associated with worse RFS (p = 0.049). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that high NLR was an independent predictor of RFS (odds ratio, 1.911; 95% confidence interval, 1.098-3.327; p = 0.022). RFS significantly differed between the low and high NLR groups. RFS did not significantly differ between the patients when stratified according to the other inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative NLR is an easily obtained and useful predictor of RFS in patients with resectable advanced ESCC treated with neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy.

The Clinical Impact of Change in the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio During the Perioperative Period in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Gastrectomy

AIM

Recently, change in the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (cNLR) has been shown to be a promising prognostic inflammation marker in some malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the cNLR in gastric cancer patients who received curative gastrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study included 450 patients who underwent curative treatment for gastric cancer between 2013 and 2017 at Kanagawa Cancer Center. The cNLR was defined as follows: cNLR = NLR at 1 month after surgery-NLR at 1 week before surgery. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters of the increased cNLR and decreased cNLR groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The OS stratified by each clinical factor was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed using a cutoff value of cNLR at 0.762. When comparing the patient background factors between the increased cNLR (≥ 0.762) and decreased cNLR (< 0.762) groups, there were no significant differences in age, sex, T status, or N status. In the increased cNLR group, the OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 87.5% and 77.3%, respectively, while those in the decreased cNLR group were 92.8% and 87.3%, which amounted to a statistically significant difference (p = 0.041). The univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with OS showed that cNLR was a significant prognostic factor. When the postoperative course was compared between the two groups, the incidence rates of postoperative surgical complications and other-cause death were significantly higher in the increased cNLR group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The cNLR is one of the significant risk factors in gastric cancer patients. Our results suggested that the changes of inflammation status during perioperative periods might be a promising prognostic factor for gastrointestinal cancer patients.

The combination of baseline neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and dynamic changes during treatment can better predict the survival of osteosarcoma patients

Background

Osteosarcoma is a primary malignant bone tumor with a high metastatic potential that accounts for a significant proportion of all bone tumors. The prognosis for patients with metastatic or recurrence disease remains poor. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has become a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer. Recent evidence suggests that the dynamic changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) during treatment may be more informative in predicting patient prognosis, but the value of dynamic NLR in osteosarcoma has not yet been determined.

Methods

This retrospective study retrospectively analyzed the clinical information of 251 osteosarcoma patients diagnosed and treated in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, explored the impact of baseline NLR and changes in NLR during treatment on the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients, and further combined baseline NLR with Delta NLR to build an NLR staging system.

Results

The results showed that both baseline NLR and delta NLR had some predictive ability for the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients (P = 6.90e-4, P = 0.022). Patients with high baseline NLR were more likely to have a decrease in delta NLR (P = 1.24e-10). The NLR stage had a better predictive ability than baseline NLR and delta NLR, and was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in osteosarcoma patients HR: 2.456 (1.625-3.710) (P = 1.97e-05).

Conclusion

NLR has value in continuous monitoring, and continuous monitoring of NLR can better predict the survival of osteosarcoma patients compared to baseline NLR.

Microscopic venous invasion is a predictor of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is Japan's most effective treatment modality for advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the prognosis is not as expected. This study aimed to examine prognostic factors in patients with pathologically ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between December 2008 and July 2021. The patients were divided into the neoadjuvant chemotherapy effective group and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group according to the pathological diagnosis. Clinicopathological data, prognosis, and recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients (121 males, 22 females; median age, 67 years) were included in this study. Of these, 34 patients were classified into the effective group and the remaining 109 patients were assigned to the ineffective group. The ineffective group had significantly worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival than the effective group (p = 0.0192 and p = 0.0070, respectively). In the ineffective group, multivariate analysis demonstrated that microscopic venous invasion was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.44; 95% confidence interval 1.13-5.30) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.43; 95% confidence interval 1.24-4.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic venous invasion was associated with poor survival and cancer recurrence in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Studies have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgical resection improves the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) nay be a prognostic biomarker in various types of cancer. Despite the noTable changes in the tumor and its microenvironment during NAC, it remains unclear how the NLR changes and which values (before or after NAC) best predict prognosis. The present study aimed to analyze changes in the NLR before and after NAC, and to determine which was a better prognostic factor. This study retrospectively analyzed 338 consecutive patients with ESCC who received NAC followed by curative resection. NLRs before (pre-NLR) and after (post-NLR) NAC were calculated, after which the impact of NAC on NLR, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well as the relationship between hematological toxicities and NLR, was evaluated. Cutoff values for pre- and post-NLR were 3.7 and 2.5, respectively. Patients with high post-NLR had a worse OS (P=0.0001) and 3-year RFS (P=0.03) than those with low post-NLR. Multivariate analysis identified high post-NLR, pN1 and clinical response as independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, post-NLR was revealed as a better prognostic factor than pre-NLR for patients receiving NAC followed by surgical resection.