Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer comparing cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil: a propensity score matching analysis

Recurrence rates and risk factors in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), defined in 2010, involves bleeding from the GI tract that remains unexplained after standard diagnostic procedures. OGIB, which accounts for about 5% of all GI bleeds, poses diagnostic and management challenges, particularly due to the anatomical features of the small intestine. Advances in capsule endoscopy (CE) and balloon-assisted endoscopy have improved the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape for small intestinal lesions.

Objective

To determine the recurrence rate and identify risk factors for recurrence following diagnostic and therapeutic interventions using CE and balloon-assisted endoscopy in patients with OGIB.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study at Gifu University Hospital analyzed CE procedures for patients with OGIB from 2008 to 2022. Patients underwent CE with subsequent treatments based on the findings. Statistical analyses, including Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, were used to estimate cumulative recurrence rates and identify recurrence risk factors.

Results

Out of 417 patients, 65.2% had positive CE findings, leading to therapeutic interventions in 16.3% of cases. The cumulative recurrence rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 4.3%, 9.0%, and 13.9%, respectively. Liver cirrhosis (hazard rate: 4.15, 95% confidence interval 1.88-9.18, p < 0.01) was identified as a significant risk factor for recurrence.

Conclusions

A significant recurrence rate in OGIB patients, with liver cirrhosis being a major risk factor. Despite diagnostic and therapeutic advances, a comprehensive approach including careful follow-up and consideration of risk factors is essential for management.

Unveiling the Power of Gut Microbiome in Predicting Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Responses in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The role of the gut microbiome in enhancing the efficacy of anticancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiotherapy is well acknowledged. However, there is limited empirical evidence on its predictive capabilities for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) responses in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Our study fills this gap by comprehensively analyzing the gut microbiome's influence on NICT outcomes. We analyzed 16S rRNA gene sequences from 136 fecal samples from 68 ESCC patients before and after NICT, along with 19 samples from healthy controls. After NICT, marked microbiome composition changes were noted, including a decrease in ESCC-associated pathogens and an increase in beneficial microbes such as Limosilactobacillus, Lacticaseibacillus, and Staphylococcus. Baseline microbiota profiles effectively differentiated responders from nonresponders, with responders showing higher levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria such as Faecalibacterium, Eubacterium_eligens_group, Anaerostipes, and Odoribacter, and nonresponders showing increases in Veillonella, Campylobacter, Atopobium, and Trichococcus. We then divided our patient cohort into training and test sets at a 4:1 ratio and utilized the XGBoost-RFE algorithm to identify 7 key microbial biomarkers-Faecalibacterium, Subdoligranulum, Veillonella, Hungatella, Odoribacter, Butyricicoccus, and HT002. A predictive model was developed using LightGBM, which achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 86.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 73.8% to 99.4%] in the training set, 76.8% (95% CI, 41.2% to 99.7%) in the validation set, and 76.5% (95% CI, 50.4% to 100%) in the testing set. Our findings underscore the gut microbiome as a novel source of biomarkers for predicting NICT responses in ESCC, highlighting its potential to enhance personalized treatment strategies and advance the integration of microbiome profiling into clinical practice for modulating cancer treatment responses.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of first-line systemic treatments for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of various first-line initial treatment systemic regimens for patients with unresectable esophageal squamous carcinoma(ESCC), utilizing a network meta-analysis approach.

Methods

A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials focusing on the primary treatment of esophageal cancer ESCC was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, up until November 17, 2023. The quality of the included studies was rigorously assessed using Review Manager software. Subsequently, data analysis was meticulously carried out employing R software. The first-line treatment regimens examined were: CD (Cisplatin + Docetaxel), CET-CF (Cetuximab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), CF (Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), N-CF (Nivolumab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), NI (Nivolumab + Ipilimumab), Nim-CF (Nimotuzumab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), P-CF (Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), and Ser-CF (Serplulimab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil). The Primary endpoints included the overall survival(OS),progression-free survival (PFS),objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).The secondary endpoint was adverse effects(AEs).

Results

The analysis encompassed eight studies, incorporating a total of 3,051 patients with untreated esophageal cancer. There are 45 people in the CD regimen,32 in the CET-CF regimen,1,212 in the CF regimen,447 in the N-CF regimen,456 in the NI regimen,53 in the Nim-CF regimen,447 in the P-CF regimen and 368 in the Ser-CF regimen. The network meta-analysis revealed that, in comparison to the CF regimen, the other regimens (CD, CET-CF, N-CF, NI, Nim-CF, P-CF, and Ser-CF) did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact on overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). However, Ser-CF potentially offers superior outcomes in terms of OS and PFS when juxtaposed with other regimens. Notably, N-CF was associated with a substantial increase in the objective response rate (ORR), and CET-CF markedly improved the disease control rate (DCR). In terms of adverse effects, N-CF was more likely to cause anorexia, whereas CET-CF was significantly associated with nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, and skin disorders.

Conclusion

The current evidence suggests that N-CF may provide the most favorable outcomes in terms of ORR, while CET-CF could be the optimal choice for enhancing DCR in patients with untreated esophageal cancer.

Adjuvant therapy provides no additional recurrence-free benefit for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and surgery: a multi-center propensity score match study

Purpose

The need for adjuvant therapy (AT) following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) and surgery in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate whether AT offers additional benefits in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) for ESCC patients after nICT and surgery.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted between January 2019 and December 2022 from three centers. Eligible patients were divided into two groups: the AT group and the non-AT group. Survival analyses comparing different modalities of AT (including adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy) with non-AT were performed. The primary endpoint was RFS. Propensity score matching(PSM) was used to mitigate inter-group patient heterogeneity. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analysis were employed for recurrence-free survival analysis.

Results

A total of 155 nICT patients were included, with 26 patients experiencing recurrence. According to Cox analysis, receipt of adjuvant therapy emerged as an independent risk factor(HR:2.621, 95%CI:[1.089,6.310], P=0.032), and there was statistically significant difference in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves between non-AT and receipt of AT in matched pairs (p=0.026). Stratified analysis revealed AT bring no survival benefit to patients with pathological complete response(p= 0.149) and residual tumor cell(p=0.062). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in recurrence-free survival between non-AT and adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy patients(P=0.108). However, patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited poorer recurrence survival compared to non-AT patients (p= 0.016).

Conclusion

In terms of recurrence-free survival for ESCC patients after nICT and surgery, the necessity of adjuvant therapy especially the adjuvant chemotherapy, can be mitigated.

Association of immune-related expression profile with sensitivity to chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery is one of the standard therapeutic approaches in Japan for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. Recently, the JCOG1109 study revealed that NAC with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF-NAC) is superior to NAC with cisplatin and 5-FU, and has now become the standard preoperative chemotherapy. Using a microarray system, we have previously investigated the expression profiles of endoscopic biopsy samples from patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) before DCF-NAC (preNAC) and identified 17 molecules as biomarkers predictive of a pathologically complete response to DCF-NAC. Here, we re-grouped our previous dataset based on the histopathological response grade with the addition of several microarray profiles and conducted a re-analysis using bioinformatic web tools including DAVID, GSEA, UALCAN, and CIBERSORTx. We identified 204 genes that were differentially expressed between the highly resistant and sensitive groups. Some of these differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were related to the immune response and showed higher expression in the sensitive group. UALCAN showed that high expression of 28 of the top 50 DEGs was associated with a favorable prognosis (p < 0.25), and that this reached a significant (p < 0.05) level for 18 of them, suggesting that patients with high expression of these genes might have benefited from chemotherapy and thus had a better outcome. In preNAC biopsy tissues from a DCF-sensitive case, we demonstrated the presence of cells expressing mRNA for CXCL9, one of the prognosis-related DEGs. Our results highlight the association of immune-related expression profile in preNAC ESCC with the DCF-NAC efficacy.

A novel immune-nutritional score predicts response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The role of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) has gradually attracted attention in recent years. To date, sensitive and reliable blood indicators to forecast the therapeutic response are still lacking. This study aimed to conduct a novel predictive score based on a variety of peripheral hematological immune-nutritional indicators to predict the therapeutic response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving NICT.

Methods

There were 206 ESCC patients receiving NICT retrospectively recruited. With pathological complete response (pCR) as the dependent variable, independent risk variables of various peripheral blood immune-nutritional indexes were screened by logistic regression analyses to establish an integrative score.

Results

By logical regression analyses, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) and body mass index (BMI) were independent risk factors among all immune-nutritional indices. Then, an integrative score named BMI-LMR score (BLS) was established. Compared with BMI or LMR, BLS was related to complications, especially for respiratory complication (P=0.012) and vocal cord paralysis (P=0.021). Among all patients, 61 patients (29.6%) achieved pCR after NICT. BLS was significantly related to pCR [odds ratio (OR)=0.269, P<0.001)]. Patients in high BLS cohort demonstrated higher 3-year overall survival (OS) (89.9% vs. 67.9%, P=0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (81.2% vs. 62.1%, P=0.001). BLS served as an independent factor of DFS [hazard ratio (HR) =2.044, P =0.020) and OS (HR =2.960, P =0.019).

Conclusion

The BLS, based on immune-nutritional indicators of BMI and LMR, employed as a straightforward, accurate, and useful indicator of pCR and prognostic prediction in ESCC patients undergoing NICT.

Neoadjuvant Triplet Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil versus Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus S-1 for Advanced Esophageal Squamous cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study examines whether neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin plus S-1 (DCS) therapy is superior to docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with resectable advanced ESCC at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2019 underwent either neoadjuvant DCF therapy or DCS therapy, followed by radical esophagectomy. Prior to August 2014, we usually used neoadjuvant DCF therapy; we then completely transitioned to using neoadjuvant DCS therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients received one of these triplet regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy: DCF therapy to 67 patients and DCS therapy to 77 patients. After propensity score matching, 55 patients in each group were selected as matched cohorts. There was no significant difference between the groups in complete response (DCF = 7.3%, DCS = 9.1%) or in partial response (DCF = 45.4%, DCS = 52.7%). The pathological response rate was 23.8% for grade 2 and 18.2% for grade 3 in the DCF group, compared with 30.9% and 14.5% in the DCS group. Independent predictive factors for recurrence-free survival were poor clinical response and pathological response ≤1b. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were poor clinical response, anastomotic leakage, and pathological response ≤1b. Duration of hospital stays in the DCS group was significantly shorter than those of the DCF group (6.0 vs. 15.0 days, p < 0.001). Expenses of drug and hospitalization for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the DCS group were also significantly lower than those of the DCF group (265.7 vs. 550.3 USD, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable advanced ESCC did not result in significantly higher clinical and pathological response than neoadjuvant DCF therapy. However, neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable ESCC required comparatively shorter hospital stays and incurred lower costs, making it an attractive therapeutic option.

Comprehensive nutritional index predicts clinical outcomes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

No study has reported the clinical outcomes of comprehensive nutritional index (CNI) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (nICT).

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 233 ESCC patients who underwent nICT. Principal component analysis was performed to establish the CNI based on 5 indexes including body mass index, usual body weight percentage, total lymphocyte count, albumin and hemoglobin. The relationships between the CNI and therapeutic response, postoperative complications and prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-nine and 84 patients were assigned to the high and low CNI group, respectively. The incidences of respiratory complications (33.3% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.013) and vocal cord paralysis (17.9% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.025) in low CNI were significantly higher than those in high group, respectively. Seventy (30.0%) patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR). High CNI patients achieved a better pCR rate than those with low CNI (41.6% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001). The CNI served as an independent pCR predictor [odds ratio (OR) = 0.167, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.074-0.377, P < 0.001)]. High CNI patients had better 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (85.4% vs. 52.6%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (85.5% vs. 64.5%, P < 0.001) than those with low CNI, respectively. The CNI served as an independent prognostic score regarding DFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.878, 95% CI = 2.214-6.792, P < 0.001)] and OS (HR = 4.386, 95% CI = 2.006-9.590, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Based on nutrition-related indicators, the pretreatment CNI serves as a sensitive and effective predictor of therapeutic response, postoperative complications and prognosis in ESCC receiving nICT.

Does time to esophagectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma affect outcomes?

Objectives

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) is a novel pattern for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and the time to surgery (TTS) is recommended as 4-6 weeks. However, there were some patients with prolonged TTS(&gt; 6 weeks). This study aimed to explore whether prolonged TTS (&gt; 6 weeks) would affect the outcomes.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with locally advanced ESCC between January 2020 and March 2022 and undergoing esophagectomy following nICT were identified based on a prospectively collected database. Primary outcome measures were pathological complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary outcomes were 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity, surgical time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital expense.

Results

Total of 95 patients were included for analysis, with 52 patients in the standard TTS group and 43 patients in the prolonged TTS group. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The prolonged group had a median 18 days longer TTS(P&lt;0.001). The pCR rate was 23.08% (12/52) in the standard group and 16.28% (7/43) in the prolonged group (P=0.41). Multivariate regression analysis further indicated that TTS wasn’t an independent factor in predicting pCR (P=0.41). The median follow-up time was 10.5 months in the standard TTS group and 11.2 months in the prolonged TTS group. A total of five recurrences occurred with two events in the standard TTS group and three events in the prolonged TTS group, and no significant difference was observed in DFS(P=0.60). Both groups were comparable in postoperative hospital stays, total hospital stay, hospital expenses, and comprehensive complications index (CCI). The complications and major complications were also similar in both groups. Spearman test further indicated that there was no linear correlation among TTS with hospital expenses, postoperative hospital stays, hospital stay, CCI index, lymph nodes moved number, or surgical time, with a p-value of 0.48, 0.63, 0.80, 0.92, 0.09, 0.38 respectively.

Conclusions

Based on present evidence, TTS after completion of nICT is not of major importance concerning pathological response, disease-free survival, and short-term postoperative outcomes.