Impact of pre-diabetes, well-controlled diabetes, and poorly controlled diabetes on anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a two-center retrospective cohort study of 1901 patients

Patterns of infectious complications and their implication on health system costs after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Real-world data from three European centers

PURPOSE

Infectious complications occur frequently after esophagectomy leading to prolonged hospital stay and increased costs. This study aimed to analyze the pattern of infectious complications, the spectrum of associated microbiota, and its impact on health system costs in patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

All patients undergoing curative resection for histologically confirmed esophageal cancer between January 2017 and August 2022 were included. Patients' survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate. Contingency tables were applied to assess the association between microbiota and the occurrence of infectious complications and their impact on patients' survival.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-one patients who received a R0 resection for esophageal cancer were identified. Infectious complications occurred in 153 patients (34.7%). Pneumonia was the most frequent complication (28.8%) followed by anastomotic leakage (25.4%). Enterococcus and Candida species were the dominant microbiota associated with infectious complications (Candida species: OR 7.34, 95% CI 2.38-22.67) and anastomotic leakage (Enterococcus species: OR 6,15, 95% CI 1,51-24,99; Candida species: OR 7.14, 95% CI 2.48-20.56). Intensive care unit stay (mean 14.3 vs. 4.9 days, p < 0.001) and total hospital stay (mean 34.1 vs. 18.8 days, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in patients with infectious complications. Total health system costs (44.084 € vs. 25.907 €) increased after the occurrence of infectious complications.

CONCLUSION

Infectious complications after esophagectomy are predominantly associated with the presence of Enterococcus and Candida species, leading to increased health system costs. Preventive antibiotic and antimycotic treatment might result in reduction of infectious complications and lower health system costs.

[Multimorbid patients in visceral surgery-Upper gastrointestinal tract]

The treatment of multimorbid patients in oncological surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract requires a differentiated consideration of every single risk factor in order to provide a holistic assessment. This article focuses on pre-existing diseases that are particularly relevant for elective esophageal and gastric surgery and have practical clinical consequences. In this way a differtiation is made between metabolic, vascular, cardiopulmonary and organ-specific risks. The aim of this work is to provide practical guidelines for complex and multimorbid cases. Given the multifactorial interrelationships, the importance of a thorough preoperative evaluation and interdisciplinary management cannot be overemphasized.

Impact of preoperative haemoglobin A1c levels on postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery: A systematic review

AIMS

Diabetes is known to increase morbidity and mortality after major surgery. However, literature is conflicting on whether elevated preoperative haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are associated with worse outcomes following major noncardiac surgery. We aimed to investigate the effect of incremental preoperative HbA1c levels on postoperative outcomes in adults who had undergone major noncardiac surgery.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases for eligible studies published between January 2012 and July 2023. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies (cohort and case-control studies) which measured HbA1c within 6 months before surgery and compared outcomes between at least three incremental subgroups or analysed HbA1c as a continuous variable were included. The systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023391946).

RESULTS

Twenty observational studies investigating outcomes across multiple surgical types were included. Higher preoperative HbA1c levels were associated with increased odds of overall postoperative complications, postoperative acute kidney injury, anastomotic leak, surgical site infections and increased length of stay. Each 1% increase in preoperative HbA1c was associated with increased odds of these complications. No association with reoperations and 30-day mortality was identified. The literature was highly variable with respect to composite major complications, perioperative cardiovascular events, hospital readmissions, postoperative pneumonia and systemic thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggested that higher preoperative HbA1c levels were associated with increased odds of postoperative complications and extended length of stay in adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Further high-quality studies would be needed to quantify the risks posed and determine whether early intervention improves outcomes.

Low preoperative hemoglobin A1c level is a predictor of perioperative infectious complications after esophagectomy: A retrospective, single-center study

This retrospective, single-center study aimed to evaluate the impact of blood glucose (BG) markers on perioperative complications after esophagectomy in a cohort of 176 patients. Study analyses included the correlation of daily maximum BG level and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with clinicopathological factors. Maximum BG levels were significantly higher on postoperative day (POD) 0 than on PODs 2, 3, 5, and 7 (p < 0.05). Additionally, maximum BG levels on PODs 1, 2, and 7 were significantly higher in patients with preoperative HbA1c levels of ≥ 5.6% than in those with preoperative HbA1c levels of < 5.6% (p < 0.05 for all). The rates of any complications and infectious complications were higher in patients with preoperative HbA1c levels of < 5.6% than in those with preoperative HbA1c levels of ≥ 5.6% (p < 0.05 for both). A preoperative HbA1c level of < 5.6% was a significant predictor of infectious complications after esophagectomy by logistic regression analysis (p < 0.05). Maximum BG level after esophagectomy remained high in patients with high preoperative HbA1c levels, whereas a normal HbA1c level was an independent risk factor for infectious complications.

Pre- and intra-operative risk factors predict postoperative respiratory failure after minimally invasive oesophagectomy

OBJECTIVES

Severe pulmonary complications such as postoperative respiratory failure can occur after minimally invasive oesophagectomy. However, the risk factors have not been well identified. The goal of this study was to develop a predictive model for the occurrence of postoperative respiratory failure with a large sample.

METHODS

We collected data from patients with oesophageal cancer who had a minimally invasive oesophagectomy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022. Univariable and backward stepwise logistic regression analysis of 19 pre- and intra-operative factors was used before model fitting, and its performance was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve. Internal validation was assessed with a calibration plot, decision curve analysis and area under the curve with 95% confidence intervals, obtained from 1000 resamples set by the bootstrap method.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 2,386 patients, 57 (2.4%) of whom developed postoperative respiratory failure. Backward stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that age, body mass index, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, tumour location and duration of chest surgery ≥101.5 min were predictive factors. A predictive model was constructed and showed acceptable performance (area under the curve: 0.755). The internal validation with the bootstrap method proves the good agreement for prediction and reality.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity, severe diffusion dysfunction and upper segment oesophageal cancer were strong predictive factors. The established predictive model has acceptable predictive validity for postoperative respiratory failure after minimally invasive oesophagectomy, which may improve the identification of high-risk patients and enable health-care professionals to perform risk assessment for postoperative respiratory failure at the initial consultation.