1
|
Cadel L, Cimino SR, Rolf von den Baumen T, James KA, McCarthy L, Guilcher SJT. Medication Management Frameworks in the Context of Self-Management: A Scoping Review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:1311-1329. [PMID: 34163148 PMCID: PMC8216068 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s308223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Many individuals take multiple prescribed and unprescribed medications, also known as polypharmacy, which can be problematic. Improving medication self-management is important; however, most medication management frameworks focus on adherence and limit the integration of the core components of self-management. Therefore, the objective of this scoping review was to identify what is reported in the literature on medication management frameworks or models within the context of self-management. METHODS Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library) and grey literature (healthcare and government organization websites) were searched for articles that described a framework or model developed or adapted for medication management, included components of self-management and was published from January 2000 to January 2020. During the screening of titles and abstracts, 5668 articles were reviewed, 5242 were excluded and 426 were then assessed at the full-text level. Thirty-nine articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. RESULTS About half of the frameworks were newly developed (n=20), while the other half were adapted from, or applied, a previous model or framework (n=19). The majority of frameworks focused on medication adherence and most of the self-management domains were categorized as medical management, followed by emotional and role management. CONCLUSION Medication self-management is a complex process and often impacts multiple areas of an individual's life. It is important for future frameworks to incorporate a comprehensive, holistic conceptualization of self-management that is inclusive of the three self-management domains - medical, emotional and role management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Cadel
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie R Cimino
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- St. John’s Rehab, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kadesha A James
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa McCarthy
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara J T Guilcher
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maidment I, Lawson S, Wong G, Booth A, Watson A, Zaman H, Mullan J, McKeown J, Bailey S. Towards an understanding of the burdens of medication management affecting older people: the MEMORABLE realist synthesis. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:183. [PMID: 32498672 PMCID: PMC7272211 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01568-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More older people are living in the community with multiple diagnoses and medications. Managing multiple medications produces issues of unrivalled complexity for those involved. Despite increasing literature on the subject, gaps remain in understanding how, why and for whom complex medication management works, and therefore how best to improve practice and outcomes. MEMORABLE, MEdication Management in Older people: Realist Approaches Based on Literature and Evaluation, aimed to address these gaps. METHODS MEMORABLE used realism to understand causal paths within medication management. Informed by RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: and Evolving Standards) guidelines, MEMORABLE involved three overlapping work packages: 1) Realist Review of the literature (24 articles on medication management exploring causality); 2) Realist Evaluation (50 realist-informed interviews with older people, family carers and health and care practitioners, explaining their experiences); and 3) data synthesis and theorising from 1) and 2). RESULTS Medication management was viewed from the perspective of 'implementation' and structured into five stages: identifying a problem (Stage 1), getting a diagnosis and/or medications (Stage 2), starting, changing or stopping medications (Stage 3), continuing to take medications (Stage 4), and reviewing/reconciling medications (Stage 5). Three individual stages (1, 3 and 4) are conducted by the older person sometimes with family carer support when they balance routines, coping and risk. Stages 2 and 5 are interpersonal where the older person works with a practitioner-prescriber-reviewer, perhaps with carer involvement. Applying Normalisation Process Theory, four steps were identified within each stage: 1) sense making: information, clarification; 2) action: shared-decision-making; 3) reflection/monitoring; and 4) enduring relationships, based on collaboration and mutual trust. In a detailed analysis of Stage 5: Reviewing/reconciling medications, adopting the lens of 'burden', MEMORABLE identified five burdens amenable to mitigation: ambiguity, concealment, unfamiliarity, fragmentation and exclusion. Two initial improvement propositions were identified for further research: a risk screening tool and individualised information. CONCLUSIONS Older people and family carers often find medication management challenging and burdensome particularly for complex regimens. Practitioners need to be aware of this potential challenge, and work with older people and their carers to minimise the burden associated with medication management. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016043506.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Maidment
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
| | - Sally Lawson
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK
| | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Anne Watson
- Medicines Management Department, West Heath Hospital, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Rednal Road, Birmingham, B38 8HR, UK
| | - Hadar Zaman
- Bradford School of Pharmacy, School of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, N8 Richmond Building, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK
| | - Judy Mullan
- Australian Health Services Research Institute (AHSRI), iC Enterprise 1, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
| | - Jane McKeown
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Fulwood House, Old Fulwood Road, Sheffield, S10 3TH, UK
| | - Sylvia Bailey
- PPI representative, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maidment ID, Lawson S, Wong G, Booth A, Watson A, McKeown J, Zaman H, Mullan J, Bailey S. Medication management in older people: the MEMORABLE realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [PMID: 32579319 DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
The number and proportion of older people in the UK are increasing, as are multimorbidity (potentially reducing quality of life) and polypharmacy (increasing the risk of adverse drug events). Together, these complex factors are challenging for older people, informal carers, and health and care practitioners.
Objectives
MEMORABLE (MEdication Management in Older people: Realist Approaches Based on Literature and Evaluation) aimed to understand how medication management works and propose improvements.
Design
A realist approach informed three work packages, combining a realist review of secondary data with a realist evaluation of primary interview data, in a theory-driven, causal analysis.
Setting
The setting was in the community.
Participants
Older people, informal carers, and health and care practitioners.
Interventions
Studies relating to medication management and to reviewing and reconciling medications; and realist-informed interviews.
Main outcome measures
Not applicable.
Data sources
MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and EMBASE were searched (all searched from January 2009 to July 2017; searched on 1 August 2017). Supplementary articles were identified by the Research Team. Data were also obtained through interviews.
Review methods
Searches of electronic databases were supplemented by citation-tracking for explanatory contributions, as well as accessing topic-relevant grey literature. Following RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) guidelines, articles were screened and iteratively analysed with interview data, to generate theory-informed (normalisation process theory) explanations.
Results
Developing a framework to explain medication management as a complex intervention across five stages: identifying problem (Stage 1), starting, changing or stopping medications (Stage 3) and continuing to take medications (Stage 4), where older people, sometimes with informal carers, make individual decisions and follow routines that fit medication management into their day-to-day lives, engendering a sense of control. In getting diagnosis and/or medications (Stage 2) and reviewing/reconciling medications (Stage 5), older people and practitioners share decision-making in time-limited contacts: involving four steps – sense-making, relationships, action and reflection/monitoring (normalisation process theory); and conceptualising burden – through a detailed analysis of Stage 5, generating a theoretical framework and identifying five burden types amendable to mitigation: ambiguity, concealment, unfamiliarity, fragmentation and exclusion. Proposing interventions: risk identification – a simple way of identifying older people and informal carers who are not coping, at risk and who need appropriate help and support; and individualised information – a short, personalised record and reference point, co-produced and shared by older people, informal carers and practitioners that addresses the experience of living with multimorbidities and polypharmacy.
Limitations
Few studies directly address the complexity of medication management as a process and how it works. Limitations included, having identified the overall complexity, the need to focus the analysis on reviewing/reconciling medications (Stage 5), the exclusion of non-English-language literature, the focus on non-institutionalised populations and the broad definition of older people.
Conclusions
MEMORABLE explored the complexity of medication management. It highlighted the way interpersonal stages in the medication management process, notably reviewing/reconciling medications, contribute to the mitigation of burdens that are often hidden.
Future work
Co-produced studies to scope and trial the two proposed interventions; studies to extend the detailed understanding of medication management, linked to burden mitigation; and a study to clarify the medication management outcomes wanted by older people, informal carers and practitioners.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016043506.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 26. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian D Maidment
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sally Lawson
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anne Watson
- Medicines Management Department, West Heath Hospital, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust, West Heath, UK
| | - Jane McKeown
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hadar Zaman
- Bradford School of Pharmacy, School of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Judy Mullan
- Australian Health Services Research Institute (AHSRI), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Sylvia Bailey
- Patient and public involvement representative, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|