Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: how to efficiently detect hepatic abnormalities using ultrasonography

Demonstration of Hepatic Vein Abnormalities Using Contrast-Enhanced Sonography in Liver Diseases

Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) is now widely used to observe the hemodynamics of the liver. The CEUS diagnosis mainly consists of evaluating hepatic artery and portal vein flow changes in liver diseases, but it has not been widely used for the diagnosis of hepatic venous (HV) abnormalities in the clinical setting. For this background, this review tried to reconsider this problem. In short, observing HV CEUS findings, especially HV transit time, serves to largely narrow the differential diagnosis and increase the diagnostic confidence of the CEUS. However, diagnosing HV CEUS diagnosis in a wide range of liver diseases requires understanding of vascular anatomy of the upper abdomen and vascular structure of each disease. Additionally, interpreting CEUS findings of HCC should be prudent, because its drainage vessels change according to the histological progression, from the HV to the portal vein. Thus, the most important way of making use of the CEUS information is interpreting it in conjunction with the clinical data.

Contrast-Enhanced Sonography of the Liver: How to Avoid Artifacts

Contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) is a very important diagnostic imaging tool in clinical settings. However, it is associated with possible artifacts, such as B-mode US-related artifacts. Sufficient knowledge of US physics and these artifacts is indispensable to avoid the misinterpretation of CEUS images. This review aims to explain the basic physics of CEUS and the associated artifacts and to provide some examples to avoid them. This review includes problems related to the frame rate, scanning modes, and various artifacts encountered in daily CEUS examinations. Artifacts in CEUS can be divided into two groups: (1) B-mode US-related artifacts, which form the background of the CEUS image, and (2) artifacts that are specifically related to the CEUS method. The former includes refraction, reflection, reverberation (multiple reflections), attenuation, mirror image, and range-ambiguity artifacts. In the former case, the knowledge of B-mode US is sufficient to read the displayed artifactual image. Thus, in this group, the most useful artifact avoidance strategy is to use the reference B-mode image, which allows for a simultaneous comparison between the CEUS and B-mode images. In the latter case, CEUS-specific artifacts include microbubble destruction artifacts, prolonged heterogeneous accumulation artifacts, and CEUS-related posterior echo enhancement; these require an understanding of the mechanism of their appearance in CEUS images for correct image interpretation. Thus, in this group, the most useful artifact avoidance strategy is to confirm the phenomenon's instability by changing the examination conditions, including the frequency, depth, and other parameters.

Factors other than fibrosis that increase measured shear wave velocity

Shear wave elastography (SWE) is now becoming an indispensable diagnostic tool in the routine examination of liver diseases. In particular, accuracy is required for shear wave propagation velocity measurement, which is directly related to diagnostic accuracy. It is generally accepted that the liver shear wave propagation velocity reflects the degree of fibrosis, but there are still few reports on other factors that increase the shear wave propagation velocity. In this study, we reviewed such factors in the literature and examined their mechanisms. Current SWE measures propagation velocity based on the assumption that the medium has a homogeneous structure, uniform density, and is purely elastic. Otherwise, the measurement is subject to error. The other (confounding) factors that we routinely experience are primarily: (1) Conditions that appear to increase the viscous component; and (2) Conditions that appear to increase tissue density. Clinically, the former includes acute hepatitis, congested liver, biliary obstruction, etc, and the latter includes diffuse infiltration of malignant cells, various storage diseases, tissue necrosis, etc. In any case, it is important to evaluate SWE in the context of the entire clinical picture.

Refraction artifact on abdominal sonogram

Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line diagnostic tool for observing the whole abdomen. Unfortunately, a wide spectrum of refraction-related artefactual images is very frequently encountered in routine US examinations. In addition, most practitioners currently perform abdominal US examinations without sufficient knowledge of refraction artifacts (RAs). This review article was designed to present many representative RA images seen in the clinical setting, with a brief explanation of the mechanism of these images, in certain cases through an analyzed and reconstructed method using computer simulation that supports clinical observations. RAs are encountered not only with B-mode US but also with Doppler US, contrast-enhanced US, and shear wave elastography. RAs change their appearance according to the situation, but they always have a significant effect on detailed interpretation of abdominal US images. Correct diagnosis of abdominal US relies on a deep understanding of each characteristic artifactual finding, which necessitates knowledge of basic US physics. When analyzing mass lesions, computer simulation analysis helps to reveal the global images of RAs around a lesion.

The Role of Liver Imaging in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant vascular disorder characterized by spontaneous epistaxis, telangiectasia, and visceral vascular malformations. Hepatic vascular malformations are common, though a minority are symptomatic. Symptoms are dependent on the severity and exact type of shunting caused by the hepatic malformation: Arteriosystemic shunting leads to manifestations of high output cardiac failure, and arterioportal shunting leads to portal hypertension. Radiologic imaging, including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is an important tool for assessing liver involvement. Doppler ultrasonography is the first-line screening modality for HHT-related liver disease, and it has a standardized scale. Imaging can determine whether shunting is principally to the hepatic vein or the portal vein, which can be a key determinant of patients’ symptoms. Liver-related complications can be detected, including manifestations of portal hypertension, focal liver masses as well as ischemic cholangiopathy. Ultrasound and MRI also have the ability to quantify blood flow through the liver, which in the future may be used to determine prognosis and direct antiangiogenic therapy.