The impact of prophylactic axillary node dissection on breast cancer survival--a Bayesian meta-analysis

Management of the axilla in breast cancer patients: critical review, regional modified Delphi consensus and implementation in the Tuscan breast network

PURPOSE

Data from recently trials have provided practice-changing recommendations in management of the axilla in early breast cancer (eBC). However, further controversies have been raised, resulting in heterogeneous diffusion of these recommendations. Our purpose was to obtain a better homogeneity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2021, the Tuscan Breast Network (TBN) established a consensus with the aim to update recommendations in this area. We performed a literature review on axillary management in eBC patients which led to an expert Delphi consensus aiming to explore the gray areas, build consensus and propose evidence-based suggestions for an appropriate management. Thereafter, we investigate their implementation in clinical practice.

RESULTS

(1) DCIS patients should have SLN biopsy only in case of mastectomy or in conservative surgery if tumor is in a location that would preclude future nodal sampling or in case of a mass; (2) ALND may be omitted for 1-2 positive SLN patients undergoing BCS in T1-2 tumors with 1-2 SLN positive, eligible for whole-breast irradiation and adjuvant systemic therapies; (3) consider the option of RNI in patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes and one or more high-risk characteristics; (4) the population identified in 2) should NOT undergo lymph node irradiation as an alternative to axillary surgery and (5) patients with clinically (pre-operatively) positive axilla, or undergoing primary systemic therapy, or outside the criteria reported in 2) must receive additional ALND and/or RT as per local policy.

CONCLUSION

This consensus provided a practical tool to stimulate local and national breast surgical and radiotherapy protocols.

Retrospective audit of the yield of internal mammary lymph node dissection and literature review in the management of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment of lymph node basins is prognostic and therapeutic for axillary lymph nodes (ALN) as well as internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) in breast cancer. IMLNs can be the first echelon node for the inner/central quadrants of the breast. We evaluated the yield of IMLN dissection (IMLND) mainly in patients with inner and central tumors.

METHODS

IMLND was performed in 199 patients between 2000 and 2018, 127 of whom had tumors in the inner/central quadrants. Clinico-pathological data were retrieved from Electronic Medical Records (EMR).

RESULTS

The median age was 50 (range: 24-81). Primary surgery was performed in 82 (41.2%), while 117 (58.8%) were operated post-chemotherapy. Overall, 124/199 (62.3%) had nodes identified in the specimen, more often in primary (61/82, 74.4%) than post-chemotherapy settings (63/117, 53.8%) ( P = 0.003). A median of 1 (average: 1.24, range: 0-7) lymph nodes was dissected, and 1 (average: 1.5, range: 1-4) was involved. IMLN was positive in 46/199 (23.1%) patients, not significantly different in primary (21/82, 25.6%) versus post-chemotherapy (25/117, 21.4%) settings ( P = 0.545). IMLN was involved in 44.8% of patients with ≥4 involved ALN and 8.2% with uninvolved ALN ( P < 0.001). In the absence of ALN involvement and <2cm pT size, 9% of patients had positive IMLN in inner/central quadrant tumors. In univariate analysis, ALN positivity ( P < 0.001), pT size ( P = 0.023), and grade ( P = 0.041) in primary and ALN involvement ( P = 0.011) in post-chemotherapy patients were associated with IMLN involvement. On logistic regression, tumor size (OR: 13.914, P = 0.017) and ALN involvement (OR: 11.400, P = 0.005) in primary surgery and ALN involvement (OR: 7.294, P = 0.003) in post-chemotherapy patients correlated with IMLN involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

In inner/central quadrant tumors, IMLN is more likely involved with high ALN burden and tumor size >2 cm, whereas those with ≤2cm inner/central quadrant tumors and negative ALN have <10% probability of IMLN involvement.

Who Needs Level III Lymph Node Dissection in Carcinoma Breast-Study from a Tertiary Care Center

In Indian females, breast cancer is the most common cancer with a late stage of presentation leading to one-third of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Our study is undertaken to find out predictors of level III axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer and who needs complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Retrospective study of 146 patients who undergone MRM or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with complete ALND at Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology was done, and data was analyzed to find out the frequency of level III lymph nodes and the demographic relation and its relation to positive lymph nodes in level I + II. Positive metastatic level III lymph node was found in 6% of patients, with the median age of the patient in our study with level III positivity was 48.5 years with 63% pathological stage II with 88% perinodal spread (PNS)- and lymphovascular invasion (LVI)-positive. Involvement of level III lymph node was associated with gross disease in level I + II lymph node having more than four lymph node-positive and with pT3 stage or more which has higher chances of level III lymph node involvement. Level III lymph node involvement, though rare in early-stage breast cancer, is associated with larger clinical and pathological sizes (T3 or more), more than 4 lymph node-positive in level I + II and with PNS and LVI. Hence, based on these results, we recommend that for inpatient with more than 5-cm tumor size and those with the gross disease in axilla, complete ALND is recommended.

Axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer: An overview

Standard operative management for breast carcinoma has significantly shifted from extensive procedures to minor interventions.Although axillary dissection was a fundamental component of operative management, sentinel biopsy is an actual process for axillary staging. Axillary dissection may be postponed for cases that have negative SLNs or 1 or 2 infiltrated lymph nodes undergoing breast or axillary radiation. Contrarily, axillary dissection is still the conventional management for patients with clinically positive nodes.Arm lymphedema is a frequent and overwhelming complication of axillary dissection, with a worse impact on the patient's life.Axillary reverse mapping was recently introduced to map and conserve the lymph drain of the upper limb throughout axillary dissection or sentinel biopsy. A technique based on the theory that the breast's lymphatic drainage differs from those that drain the arm, so preserving lymphatic drainage of the upper limb can prevent lymphedema, thereby not raising the risk of axillary recurrence.Therefore, this technique is the reverse of sentinel biopsy, which remove the lymph nodes that drain the breast.

Trends in axillary surgery and clinical outcomes among breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastasis

Background

There is a lack of studies examining the long-term trend and survival of axillary surgery for breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastasis, especially for the patients with 3–5 node metastases.

Methods

Breast cancer patients with 1–5 sentinel node metastases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2016. Our study presented the trend of axillary surgery and assessed the long-term survival of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for those patients.

Results

Of the 41,996 patients diagnosed with T_1-2 breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation included, 34,940 had 1-2 sentinel node metastases and 7056 had 3-5 sentinel node metastases. The percentage of patients undergoing SLNB alone increased from 22.4% in 2000 to 81.0% in 2016 for patients with 1–2 sentinel node metastases, and quadrupled from 5.2% in 2009 to 20.6% in 2016 for those with 3–5 sentinel node metastases. Completion of ALND did not benefit the long-term survival of 1–2 sentinel node metastasis patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02, P = 0.539), but improved the long-term survival of 3–5 node metastasis patients (HR = 0.73, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the inferiority of SLNB to ALND in all subgroups of 3–5 sentinel node metastases.

Conclusion

For patients with T_1-2 breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation, SLNB alone was an efficient and safe surgical choice for 1–2 sentinel node metastases but not for 3–5 sentinel node metastases. It is worth noting that for patients with 3–5 node metastasis, the proportion of omitted ALND quadrupled after 2009.

•

Using SEER database, the research presents the long-term trend and survival of axillary surgery for breast cancer patients with 1-2 and 3-5 sentinel nodes metastasis.

•

For patients with T1-2 breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation, SLNB alone was efficient for 1–2 sentinel node metastases but not for 3–5 sentinel node metastases.

•

Among patients with 3–5 node metastasis, the proportion of omitted ALND quadrupled from 2009 to 2016.

Breast cancer patients with a negative axillary ultrasound may have clinically significant nodal metastasis

INTRODUCTION

The non-invasive nature of the preoperative axillary ultrasound (AUS) fits the current trend of increasingly conservative axillary management. Recent publications suggest that early disease patients with clinically and radiologically negative axillae do not require sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This study aims to determine the true extent of axillary node disease in negative preoperative AUS patients.

METHODS

A 10-year breast cancer registry was reviewed to identify women with pathologically confirmed T1-2 invasive breast cancer and a negative preoperative AUS. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Combined positive lymph node count of SLNB ± ALND was used to determine total nodal burden (TNB). Axillae were classified into low nodal burden (LNB) defined as 1-2 positive nodes and high nodal burden (HNB) defined as ≥ 3 positive nodes.

RESULTS

762 patients with negative AUS were included. There were 46.9% and 53.0% T1 and T2 tumours, respectively. 76.9% were node negative (0 LN +), 18.9% had LNB (1-2 LN +) and 4.2% had HNB (≥ 3LN +). Specifically, HNB disease was seen in 2% of T1 tumours and 6.2 % of T2 tumours with a negative AUS. In multivariate analysis, T2 strongly associated with ≥ 3 positive ALNs (OR 2.66 CI 1.09-6.51 p = 0.03) as did lymphovascular invasion (OR 3.56 CI 1.52-8.30 p =  < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that AUS in its current form cannot exclude HNB axillary metastasis to the extent of eliminating the need for surgical staging of the axilla. This may impact axillary local-regional recurrence and disease-free survival. We caution that a negative AUS has a rate of 4.2% of HNB. Therefore, in cases of negative AUS with a T2 tumour, we advocate continued use of SLNB.

Pattern of survival of breast cancer patients in a tertiary hospital in South West Nigeria

Background of the study

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in both developed and developing nations. The survival of breast cancer is increasing in developed countries with improved treatment modalities, while still very poor in developing countries. In Nigeria, few breast cancer survival data are available.

Research design

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Objectives

To determine the survival of breast cancer patients and possible factors influencing it.

Methodology

Socio-demographic and clinical variables from treatment records and case notes of breast cancer patients treated from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2008 at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University College Hospital, Ibadan. The status of patients was determined at 2 and 5 years after diagnosis. The survival of patients with breast cancer was compared using Log Rank test according to socio-demographic and clinical variables. The median survival times were obtained from the Kaplan–Meier survival curve. Cox’s proportional hazard model was fitted for those that were statistically significant in the Log Rank test. Missing data were reported as unknown, not documented or missing.

Results

A total of 378 patients were analysed. Age ranged between 22.0 and 87.0 years with mean of 47.6 (standard deviation (SD) = 11.2) years. Almost all patients were females (98.4%). More than half (55.3%) presented at stage III, 28.0% had metastasis and the stage was unknown in about 6.6% of the patients. Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most prevalent histology (89.2%). Only 124 (32.8%) patients had their histological grade stated and most of the patients had no immunohistochemistry done. All the patients had radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery. About 25.1% of the patients were lost to follow up. The 2- and 5-year survival rates were 56.4% and 37.6%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year survival rates according to stage were stage I (80.0% and 66.7%), stage II (67.7% and 57.6%), stage III (51.4% and 27.9%) and stage IV (37.9% and 13.8%). Median survival time was 41 months (95%CI = 35.0–44.0). The disease-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 66.6% and 60.3%, respectively. Median time for recurrence was 8.0 months. Level of education, height, tumour unilaterality, clinical tumour size, stage at presentation, presence of distant metastases, clinical axillary lymph node metastasis, supraclavicular node metastasis, mode of surgery and axillary clearance were found to have statistically significant association with survival.

Conclusion

A large number of the patients in our study presented at a young age, late with advanced stage disease which results in poor survival outcome.

Does axillary lymph node size predict better metastatic involvement than apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer?

BACKGROUND

It has been demonstrated that the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes (mALNs) influence disease-free and overall survival in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE

To determine if the ALN size is more accurate than the ALN apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to predict metastatic involvement in newly diagnosed breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 44 patients with breast cancer were included. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed on a 1.5-T system with sagittal T1-weighted fast spin-echo non-fat saturated, sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo non-fat saturated, axial diffusion-weighted imaging echo-planar (b values of 0 and 700 s/mm²), and non-contrast axial VIBRANT sequences. The size and the ADC value were obtained for ALN ipsilateral and contralateral to breast cancer. The reference standard was the histopathologic lymph node status.

RESULTS

mALN had a greater cortical thickness compared to contralateral non-mALN (10.3 ± 5.32 mm vs. 4 ± 1.17 mm, P ≤ 0.001). The threshold of ≥6.7 mm for predicting axillary metastatic involvement had a sensitivity and a specificity of 80.0% and 97.7%, respectively. The ADC value of mALN was significantly higher than the contralateral non-mALN (0.90 ± 0.12 × 10^-3mm²/s vs. 0.78 ± 0.12 × 10^-3mm²/s; P = 0.001). The threshold of ≥0.86 × 10^-3mm²/s had a sensitivity and a specificity of 66.7% and 76.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the cortical thickness has a better diagnostic performance in the differentiation of metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes than the lymph node ADC.

Impact of the extent of axillary surgery in patients with N2-3 disease in the de-escalation era: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Reduction of surgeries in axillary has been proved feasible in breast cancer with negative and limited involved axillary lymph nodes. However, for women with a heavy axillary burden, the extent of dissection is still arguable.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a total of 7042 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgical treatments between 2008 and 2014, 692 (9.85%) patients with the axillary staging of N2-3M0 were classified into Level I-II dissection group and Level I-III dissection group. 203 pairs of patients were matched by the propensity score.

RESULTS

The positive rate of level-III lymph nodes is 62.4% in patients who underwent Level I-III dissection. There are 67 (22.1%) patients who experienced rise in staging from N2 to N3 due to level-III dissection. With a median follow-up of 62.4 months, no significant difference was observed in RFS (P = 0.897), MFS (P = 0.610) and OS (P = 0.755) between level I-II group and level I-III group. The same results were observed in the independent analysis of neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant subgroups. The binary regression model showed the positivity of level-III is only associated with involved lymph nodes in level-II.

CONCLUSION

Additional level-III dissection has a limited impact on survival but still valuable in an accurate stage. The reduction of surgeries in axillary should be treated with discretion in breast cancer patients with a heavy axillary burden.

Merits of Level III Axillary Dissection in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Prospective, Single-Institution Study From India

PURPOSE

A complete axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection is therapeutic in node-positive breast cancer. Presently, there is no international consensus regarding anatomic levels to be addressed in complete axillary dissection. We assessed the burden of disease in level III axilla.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was assessed for 1,591 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer registered at Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, between January 2009 and December 2014.

RESULTS

A median of four (zero to 20) level III ALNs were dissected and a median of two (one to 17) nodes were positive. A total of 27.3% (434 of 1,591) patients had level III ALN metastasis, and 4.7% of patients had positive interpectoral nodes. Some 53.2% of patients had level III metastases in the presence of four or more positive level I and II ALNs. A total of 9.4% of patients had level III involvement when one to three ALNs were positive in level I and II ( P < .001). Some 53.2% of patients had level III metastases in the presence of four or more positive level I and II ALNs. On logistic regression analysis, four or more positive ALNs in level I or II ( P < .001), inner/central quadrant tumor location ( P = .013), and perinodal extension ( P < .001) were associated with level III ALN involvement. At a median follow-up of 36 months, the disease-free survival was significantly worse for level III ALN metastases on univariate analysis ( P < .001). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, histologic grade ( P = .006), four or more positive ALNs ( P < .001), hormone receptor status ( P < .001), and tumor size ( P = .037) were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The axillary nodal burden is high in patients with breast cancer in developing countries like India. One of two women with four or more positive level I and II ALNs may have residual disease in level III if it is not cleared during surgery. Intraoperative interpectoral space clearance should be considered in the presence of either palpable interpectoral lymph nodes or multiple positive ALNs.

An Update on Regional Nodal Irradiation: Indication, Target Volume Delineation, and Radiotherapy Techniques

Background

Tremendous changes have occurred in the treatment of breast cancer. This paper reviews and unifies the available data on modern axillary management of breast cancer patients with focus on the target volume delineation for regional nodal irradiation according to the most important contouring guidelines, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG).

Summary

The use of extensive radiotherapy target volumes (level I, II, III, IV) is probably not necessary for all patients to reproduce the clinical benefit shown in the available randomized trials (EORTC, MA.20, AMAROS, Z0011). Nevertheless, given the results in the MA.20 trial, where the patients received more modern systemic therapies and high irradiation doses in the medial paraclavicular region (level IV) and level II, it can be justified to include these regions completely in selected high-risk patients.

Key Messages

High-tangent irradiation results in a similar dose distribution in axillary levels I and II compared to the AMAROS treatment field design in some patients. This supports earlier assumptions that irradiation may have accounted for the good results after sentinel lymph node dissection alone in the Z0011 trial. The ESTRO and RTOG clinical target volume (CTV) definitions cover sufficiently the metastatic lymph node hotspots, with a better coverage for the ESTRO CTV. Further, contouring according to the ESTRO would spare a significantly larger part of the healthy lymphatic system, making it our preferred contouring atlas. Modern radiotherapy techniques, such as deep inspiration breath hold, should be cautiously employed in patients treated according to the inclusion criteria of the Z0011 as it will result in a lower dose to the axillary levels.

Diagnostic value of MRI combined with ultrasound for lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: Protocol for a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are important to prevent fatal tumor progression. Axillary lymph node (ALN) status is the most significant prognostic factor for diagnosing overall survival in breast cancer patients. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is regarded as the reference standard for determining ALN status. However, ALND is an invasive therapy with high morbidity and complications such as lymphedema, seroma and nerve injury. Comparatively, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound are noninvasive and non-radiative techniques that are common imaging methods to diagnose breast cancer lymph node metastasis. Many studies have investigated the diagnostic value of MRI combined with ultrasound for breast cancer ALN metastasis, but the evidence has been insufficient to apply these modalities when diagnosing new patients.

METHODS

We will search electronic databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Database, WangFang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The language of studies is limited in English or Chinese. The final search includes articles published in June, 2018. Stata 14.0 software will be used for all statistical analyses, and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) will be utilized to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity, which will be derived from the different countries of origin of the included studies. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test will be demonstrated the inexistence of publication bias.

RESULT

This study will provide a rational synthesis of current evidences for magnetic resonance imaging combined with ultrasound for breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion of this study will provide evidence for the diagnostic value of MRI combined with ultrasound for lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.

REGISTRATION

PROS-PERO CRD42019134474.

Predicting factors for survival of breast cancer patients using machine learning techniques

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is one of the most common diseases in women worldwide. Many studies have been conducted to predict the survival indicators, however most of these analyses were predominantly performed using basic statistical methods. As an alternative, this study used machine learning techniques to build models for detecting and visualising significant prognostic indicators of breast cancer survival rate.

METHODS

A large hospital-based breast cancer dataset retrieved from the University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (n = 8066) with diagnosis information between 1993 and 2016 was used in this study. The dataset contained 23 predictor variables and one dependent variable, which referred to the survival status of the patients (alive or dead). In determining the significant prognostic factors of breast cancer survival rate, prediction models were built using decision tree, random forest, neural networks, extreme boost, logistic regression, and support vector machine. Next, the dataset was clustered based on the receptor status of breast cancer patients identified via immunohistochemistry to perform advanced modelling using random forest. Subsequently, the important variables were ranked via variable selection methods in random forest. Finally, decision trees were built and validation was performed using survival analysis.

RESULTS

In terms of both model accuracy and calibration measure, all algorithms produced close outcomes, with the lowest obtained from decision tree (accuracy = 79.8%) and the highest from random forest (accuracy = 82.7%). The important variables identified in this study were cancer stage classification, tumour size, number of total axillary lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, types of primary treatment, and methods of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Interestingly the various machine learning algorithms used in this study yielded close accuracy hence these methods could be used as alternative predictive tools in the breast cancer survival studies, particularly in the Asian region. The important prognostic factors influencing survival rate of breast cancer identified in this study, which were validated by survival curves, are useful and could be translated into decision support tools in the medical domain.

Possibility of avoiding axillary lymph node dissection by immune microenvironment monitoring in preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer

Background

The diagnosis of metastasis by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in early breast cancer surgery provides an accurate view of the state of metastases to the axillary lymph nodes, and it has now become the standard procedure. In the present study, whether omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is possible by evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) before NAC in cases without metastasis on diagnostic imaging, but with metastasis on SLNB, was retrospectively investigated.

Methods

A total of 91 patients with resectable, early-stage breast cancer, diagnosed as cT1–2, N0, M0, underwent SLNB and were treated with NAC. A semi-quantitative evaluation of lymphocytes infiltrating the peritumoral stroma as TILs in biopsy specimens of primary tumors prior to treatment was conducted.

Results

In cases with a low number of TILs, estrogen receptor expression was significantly higher (p = 0.044), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression was significantly lower than in other cases (p = 0.019). The number of TILs was significantly lower in cases in which the intrinsic subtype was hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HRBC) (p = 0.044). Metastasis to axillary lymph nodes was significantly more common in HER2-negative cases and cases with a low number of TILs (p = 0.019, p = 0.005, respectively).

Conclusions

Even if macrometastases are found on SLNB in cN0 patients, it appears that ALND could be avoided after NAC in cases with a good immune tumor microenvironment of the primary tumor.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12967-018-1692-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Axillary reverse mapping (ARM): where to go

In the past decades, breast surgeons have changed the clinical practice in the surgical treatment of breast cancer, by performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) instead of performing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in axillary lymph node clinically negative breast cancer patients. ALND can also be avoided in SLN-positive patients who meet the Z-0011 criteria. However, the postoperative complications of SLNB and ALND, such as the secondary upper extremity lymphedema, are common and need effective solutions to prevent as soon as possible. The axillary reverse mapping (ARM) technique has been developed to map and preserve arm lymphatic drainage during ALND and/or SLNB, thereby minimizing arm lymphedema. However, the success of ARM in reducing lymphedema has not been exactly determined. If ARM can be confirmed to be both effective and oncologically safe in preventing lymphedema, this technique should be recommended in the management of breast cancer treatment.

Real-Time Reverse-Transcription PCR to Quantify a Panel of 19 Genes in Breast Cancer: Relationships with Sentinel Lymph Node Invasion

At the Centre Oscar Lambret, the anticancer centre of the North of France, sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedures are routinely performed for localized (T0–T1, N0, M0) breast carcinoma without any previous treatment, in order to prevent the deleterious effects of axillary lymph node dissection. The present study was undertaken to assess if the expression in the tumor of a panel of 19 genes would allow to predict histological SLN involvement. We looked at cytokeratin 19 (CK19), mucin-1 (MUC1), mammaglobin (MGB1), cyclin D1 (CCND1), the four members of the HER/ErbB growth factor receptor family (EGFR, HER2–4), insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R), estradiol receptors (ERcx, ERβ), progesterone receptor (PR), vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF, VEGF-C), urokinase-like plasminogen activator (uPA), matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 (MMP2, MMP9), ets-related transcription factor ERM, and E-cadherin (CDH1). Their expression was quantified by real-time RT-PCR in 134 breast cancer samples and the relationships with SLN metastases were analyzed. A slight increase (35–40%) in CK19 and HER3 expression was observed in the tumors of patients with SLN metastases compared to those of patients without metastases, even if neither CK19 expression nor HER3 expression allowed to distinguish patients with micrometastases from patients with macrometastases. We conclude that the tumoral expression of biological parameters involved in cell proliferation or playing a critical role in the metastatic process, including tumor invasion and angiogenesis, is not strongly associated with SLN metastases.

Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Breast Cancer Treatment Concepts - a Retrospective Study of 1,214 Breast Cancer Patients

Background

Most breast cancer patients require lumpectomy with axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The ACOSOG Z0011-trial failed to detect significant effects of ALND on disease-free and overall survival among patients with limited sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases. Intense dose-dense chemotherapy and supraclavicular fossa radiation (SFR) are indicated for patients with extensive axillary metastases. In this multicentered study, we investigated the relevance of ALND after positive SLNB to determine adequate adjuvant therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 1,214 patients with clinically nodal negative T1-T2 invasive breast cancer undergoing surgery at Hanau City Hospital Breast cancer center.

Results

681 patients underwent ALND after SLNB. 20 patients (8.5%) from the group with 1 or 2 SLN metastases (n = 236) showed more than 3 lymph node metastases after ALND. 13 patients (31.7%) from the group with more than 2 SLN metastases (n = 41) were diagnosed with a minimum of 4 axillary lymph node metastases after ALND.

Conclusions

In 8.5% of the patients with 1 or 2 SLN metastases, ALND detected more than 3 macrometastases, setting the indication for intense dose-dense chemotherapy and SFR. More than 2 SLN metastases, T stage and grading predict lymph node metastases.

Treatment of the axila in breast cancer surgery: Systematic review of its impact on survival

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and ACOSOG-Z0011 criteria have modified axillary treatment in breast cancer surgery. We performed a systematic review of studies assessing the impact of axillary treatment on survival. The search showed 6891 potentially eligible items. Of them, 23 clinical trials and 12 meta-analyses published between 1980 and 2017 met the study criteria. The review revealed that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be omitted in patients pN0 and pN1mic, without compromising survival. In patients pN1 it is proposed not to treat the axilla or replace ALND for axillary radiotherapy. The main limitations of this study are the inclusion of old tests that do not use therapeutic targets and lack of risk categorization of relapse. In conclusion, axillary treatment can be avoided in patients without metastatic involvement or micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node. However, there is no evidence to make a recommendation of axillary treatment in N1 patients, so individualized analysis of patient risk factors is needed.

Use of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with micrometastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the current prognostic tool for clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. If the SLN reveals macrometastasis, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is recommended. However, the use of ALND in patients with micrometastasis is debated. The objective of this study was to assess the utilization of ALND in the treatment of micrometastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

An IRB approved, retrospective study of a pooled dataset of breast cancer patients with micrometastatic disease on SLN biopsy was performed. Patients diagnosed from 1999-2016 were identified via query of a single-institution National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) breast cancer database as well as a prospective tumor board.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were diagnosed with micrometastatic nodal disease. The median age at diagnosis was 56 y (range: 31-85); median follow-up time was 47 mo (range: 0-203 mo). 42/91(46.2%) patients had ALND of which 37/42 (88.1%) were a second operation; 3/42(7.1%) patients had additional positive nodes found at ALND. 44/91 (48.4%) patients received radiation. 7/91 (7.7%) patients had a recurrence, 5/7 local, including one axillary (2.1%; patient declined ALND).

CONCLUSIONS

Given that the risk of lymphedema after ALND ranges between 20%-53%, the morbidity of ALND may far exceed the likelihood of detecting further nodal involvement in women with micrometastatic disease: 7.1% in this series.

A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the newest bipolar vessel sealing system (BVSS; LigaSure™ Small Jaw) to that of conventional technique in axillary dissection.

Methods

Sixty-one patients with breast cancer were randomized to a conventional dissection surgical technique (CONV group; n = 30) by scalpel and monopolar cautery or that using a vessel sealing system (BVSS group; n = 31).

Results

There was a significant difference between both groups in the mean number of days until drain removal (6.4 ± 2.9 vs. 8.2 ± 3.8 days; P value = 0.033), and the mean total volume of drainage fluid (365.3 ± 242.2 vs. 625.1 ± 446.6 mL; P value = 0.009). The incidence of seroma was similar in both groups (43.3 vs. 37.9 %; P value = 0.673). There was no statistically significant difference in axillary dissection operating time (66 vs. 70 min; P value = 0.371), or the mean volume of blood loss (18.2 ± 31.1 vs. 20.6 ± 26.3 mL; P value = 0.663).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that BVSS is a more effective device when compared to the conventional techniques in axillary dissection.

Predicting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in a Chinese Breast Cancer Population with 1-2 Positive Sentinel Nodes: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram

BACKGROUND

We have developed a new nomogram to predict the probability of a patient with 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) to present further axillary disease.

METHODS

Data were collected from 480 patients who were diagnosed with 1-2 positive lymph nodes and thus underwent axillary lymph node dissection between March 2005 and June 2011. Clinical and pathological features of the patients were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. The Shanghai Cancer Center Non-SLN nomogram (SCC-NSLN) was created from the logistic regression model. This new model was subsequently applied to 481 patients from July 2011 to December 2013. The predictive accuracy of the SCC-NSLN nomogram was measured by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Based on the results of the univariate analysis, the variables that were significantly associated with the incidence of non-SLN metastasis in an SLN-positive patient included lymphovascular invasion, neural invasion, the number of positive SLNs, the number of negative SLNs, and the size of SLN metastasis (P < 0.05). Using multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion, the number of positive SLNs, the number of negative SLNs, and the size of SLN metastasis were identified as independent predictors of non-SLN metastasis. The SCC-NSLN nomogram was then developed using these four variables. The new model was accurate and discriminating on both the modeling and validation groups (AUC: 0.7788 vs 0.7953). The false-negative rates of the SCC-NSLN nomogram were 3.54 and 9.29 % for the predicted probability cut-off points of 10 and 15 % when applied to patients who have 1-2 positive SLNs.

CONCLUSION

The SCC-NSLN nomogram could serve as an acceptable clinical tool in clinical discussions with patients. The omission of ALND might be possible if the probability of non-SLN involvement is <10 and <15 % in accordance with the acceptable risk determined by medical staff and patients.

Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer in 10-Year Own Material of the 4th Military Teaching Hospital with Polyclinic in Wrocław

At present, sentinel lymph node biopsy is a standard procedure to assess the advancement of breast cancer and cutaneous melanoma. The aim of the study was to assess the role of the sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of patients with breast cancer in our own material.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analyzed was medical documentation of 258 patients with initially operable breast cancer, qualified for operation with sentinel lymph node biopsy in 2004-2014 in the Department of Surgery of the 4th Military Teaching Hospital. A few hours prior to the planned surgery, radioisotope (technitium-99 sulfur colloid) was applied in the area of tumor or under the areola. 1-2 hours after administering the tracer, the lymphoscintigraphy with the labelling of the sentinel lymph node on the skin was performed.

RESULTS

On the basis of the gathered material, obtained were the following parameters: sensitivity - 100%, and specificity - 94.6%. Four cases were false negative (5.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

1. Marking the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer, based on the single visualisation method with the use of radioisotope, is a useful and effective technique. 2. The factor influencing the results of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (true positive and negative results and false negative result) was the number of the excised lymph nodes except for the sentinel lymph node. 3. Patients with estrogen receptor expression had often metastases to sentinel lymph node (145 cases - 56%). 4. The false negative rate, i.e. 5.5% in our material, is within the limits of acceptability given in the literature. 5. The sentinel lymph node biopsy performed by the experienced surgical team is a reliable diagnostic tool with a low complication rate.

Association between Lymph Node Ratio and Disease Specific Survival in Breast Cancer Patients with One or Two Positive Lymph Nodes Stratified by Different Local Treatment Modalities

PURPOSE

Results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial indicated that complete axillary node dissection (ALND) may not be warranted in some breast cancer patients with low tumor burden who are undergoing breast-conserving surgery following whole-breast irradiation. However, this study did not address patients undergoing mastectomy or those undergoing breast-conserving surgery without whole-breast radiotherapy. Given that lymph node ratio (LNR; ratio of positive lymph nodes to the total number removed) has been shown to be a prognostic factor in breast cancer, we first sought to determine the prognostic value of LNR in a low risk population comparable to that of the Z0011 trial and further to investigate whether the prognostic significance differs with local treatment modality.

METHOD

We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to identify breast cancer patients with T1-T2 tumor and 1-2 positive nodes. Patients were subclassified by the local therapy they underwent for the primary tumor. The prognostic value of LNR in predicting disease-specific survival (DSS) was examined in each treatment group.

RESULTS

A total of 53,109 patients were included. In the subgroup of 20,602 patients who underwent lumpectomy following radiotherapy, LNR was not found to be significantly associated with DSS in both the univariate and multivariate model. For the 4,664 patients treated with mastectomy following radiotherapy, 6,811 treated with lumpectomy without radiotherapy and 21,031 with mastectomy without radiotherapy, LNR independently predict DSS in each of these subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results add evidence to the concept that axillary dissection could be omitted in patients with one or two positive nodes following breast-conserving surgery and whole breast radiation.

The effect of an evidence-based medicine curriculum on breast cancer knowledge and satisfaction of surgical residents

OBJECTIVE

The current study was performed to determine if evidence-based medicine (EBM) curriculum would affect education of surgical residents.

DESIGN

A 5-year prospective study was designed to determine if EBM curriculum could improve residents' satisfaction and understanding of breast cancer management during a breast surgical oncology rotation. During the first 2 years, 45 journal articles were used. During the subsequent 3 years, journal articles were not used. The proportion of patients seen in clinic was collected as an objective measure of the "effort" made by the resident. The final assessment was a 120-question examination.

SETTING

Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ. Safety net institution with General Surgery residency program.

PARTICIPANTS

Postgraduate year 2 general surgery residents.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, 30 postgraduate year 2 residents were involved. Univariate analysis showed that female sex (p = 0.04), residents with peer-reviewed publications (p = 0.03), younger age (p = 0.04), American Board of Surgery in-service training examination score (p = 0.01), and clinical effort (p < 0.01) were associated with higher scores. Although residents taught using the journal articles scored 7 points higher on the final examination, this was not significant (p = 0.10). Multivariate analysis showed that American Board of Surgery in-service training examination score and clinic efficiency remained statistically significant. Residents who were taught using the EBM curriculum had significantly higher satisfaction (4.4 vs 3.5, p = 0.001) compared with those who did not go through the EBM curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates that an EBM curriculum significantly improved resident satisfaction with the rotation. The EBM curriculum may improve residents' breast cancer knowledge. The most important predictor of resident performance was the effort of resident.

Prediction of macrometastasis in axillary lymph nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer and the utility of the SUV lymph node/tumor ratio using FDG-PET/CT

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is important for improving the prognosis of patients with node-positive breast cancer. However, ALND can be avoided in select micrometastatic cases, preventing complications such as lymphedema or paresthesia of the upper limb. To appropriately omit ALND from treatment, evaluation of the axillary tumor burden is critical. The present study evaluated a method for preoperative quantification of axillary lymph node metastasis using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

METHODS

The records of breast cancer patients who received radical surgery at the Gifu University Hospital (Gifu, Japan) between 2009 and 2014 were reviewed. The axillary lymph nodes were preoperatively evaluated by PET/CT. Lymph nodes were dissected by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or ALND and were histologically diagnosed by experienced pathologists. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured in both the axillary lymph node (SUV-LN) and primary tumor (SUV-T). The SUV-LN/T ratio (NT ratio) was calculated by dividing the SUV-LN by the SUV-T, and the efficacies of the NT ratio and SUV-LN were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The diagnostic performance was also compared between the techniques with the McNemar test.

RESULTS

A total of 171 operable invasive breast cancer patients were enrolled, comprising 69 node-positive patients (macrometastasis (Mac): n = 55; micrometastasis (Mic): n = 14) and 102 node-negative patients (Neg). The NT ratio for node-positive patients was significantly higher than in node-negative patients (0.5 vs. 0.316, respectively, P = 0.041). The NT ratio for Mac patients (0.571) was significantly higher than in Mic (0.227) and Neg (0.316) patients (P <0.01 and P = 0.021, respectively). The areas under the curves (AUCs) by ROC analysis for the NT ratio and SUV-LN were 0.647 and 0.811, respectively (P <0.01). In patients with an SUV-T ≥2.5, the modified AUCs for the NT ratio and SUV-LV were 0.757 and 0.797 (not significant).

CONCLUSION

The NT ratio and SUV-LN are significantly higher in patients with axillary macrometastasis than in those with micrometastasis or no metastasis. The NT ratio and SUV-LN can help quantify axillary lymph node metastasis and may assist in macrometastasis identification, particularly in patients with an SUV-T ≥2.5.

T-stage and positive sentinel nodes ratio are the useful factors to predict non-sentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients with macro-metastasis in the sentinel node

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines recommend completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in case of a sentinel lymph node (SN) metastasis larger than 2 mm (macrometastasis). However in many patients of those, the non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSN) contain no further metastasis, indicating that axillary lymph node dissection provides no benefit. To identify cases who could have undergone omission of the ALND with confidence, we have retrospectively evaluated the predictive factors of NSN metastasis with positive macrometastasis in the SN.

METHODS

This study was based on a retrospective database of 420 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) for breast cancer, of whom 61 patients had SN macrometastasis intra- and postoperatively. We examined predictive factors of NSN involvement in 51 cases of these 61 patients who underwent cALND. All clinical and histological variables were analyzed according to NSN status, by using Mann-Whitney U test, univariate and multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

T stage and the proportion of involved SNs among all identified SNs (SN ratio) were correlated with NSN metastasis. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that T stage and SN ratio were the independent predictive factor of NSN metastasis. The area under ROC curve for SN ratio was 0.71. The best cut off value of SN ratio was 0.667. Negative predictive value to NSN metastasis in cases with both T2 and more than 0.667 of SN ratio was 85.7%.

CONCLUSION

In patients with invasive breast cancer and macrometastasis of SN, T stage and SN ratio were useful for prediction of NSN metastasis.

X-ray CT guided fault-free photothermal ablation of metastatic lymph nodes with ultrafine HER-2 targeting W18O49 nanoparticles

Designing high accuracy in the diagnosing and fault-freely eliminating lymphatic metastasis of breast malignancy, to avoid the invasiveness and complications caused by traditional assays, is of great therapeutic importance. To this end, theranostic W18O49 nanoparticles targeting to human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER-2) over-expressed breast malignancy were synthesized via polyol method. By taking advantage of their high X-ray attenuating and photothermotherapy potency, lymph nodes in the mice bearing HER-2 positive metastasis could be clearly distinguished under CT guidance and selectively eliminated by laser ablation. The therapeutic efficacy was further confirmed by the significantly extended survival period. These finding evidenced the potential of these nanoparticles for imaging guided photothermal ablation of HER-2 positive breast malignancy.

Positive sentinel lymph node: the evolution of axillary surgery and intraoperative assessment of sentinel lymph nodes

SUMMARY 

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been the treatment for breast cancer in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy metastasis for prognostic information, local control and maybe for a small survival benefit. In recent years, clinicians have been questioning the need for axillary dissection in patients with positive SLN as the rate of axillary recurrences remains low when no ALND is performed in this group. Several variables incorporated in nomograms have been examined to predict axillary metastasis in patients with SLN metastasis and these nomograms have helped to determine which patients can spare the morbidity of the ALND. The combined multimodality in breast cancer treatments and the improvement in targeted therapies based in tumor biology have contributed to the low recurrence rates in early-stage breast cancer. As the multimodal treatment and the screening programs will improve, more patients with SLN metastasis will spare an ALND without compromising their oncologic outcome.

[Sentinel node invasion: is it necessary to perform axillary lymph node dissection? Randomized trial SERC]

Contribution of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is questioned for positive sentinel node (SN), micro-metastasis and isolated tumor cells but also for macro-metastasis. The aim of this work is to precise why a prospective randomized trial is necessary and the design of this trial. Why? For positive SN, the scientific level evidence appears insufficient for validation of ALND omission as a new standard. Rational is presented with non-sentinel node involved rate and number of NSL involved at complementary ALND, axillary recurrence rate, disease free survival rate and adjuvant treatment decision impact. How? The proposed Sentinelle Envahi et Randomisation du Curage (SERC) trial will randomly assign to observation only or complementary ALND with positive SN. The aim is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of ALND omission versus ALND.

A case of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast involving extensive lymph node metastasis

We herein report a case of invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) involving extensive lymph node metastasis with no recurrence for over 7 years. A 41-year-old female presented with pain and a swelling mass in the left axillary region, which had been present for several months. The tumor measured 1.6 cm in diameter in the middle of upper area of the left breast. Based on the findings of a core needle biopsy the pathological diagnosis was IMPC or mucinous carcinoma. The cytology of the left axillary lymph node was positive for metastatic carcinoma. The patient underwent a left mastectomy and a left axillary dissection (level I to III). The postoperative pathological diagnosis was IMPC with mucin production, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes was 59. The patient was given adjuvant chemotherapy (four courses of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and four courses of docetaxel), radiation for the left chest wall, supraclavicular and internal thoracic area, and then received tamoxifen for 5 years. The patient has remained recurrence-free for over 7 years. IMPC is known to be an aggressive histological type associated with a high incidence of lymph node metastasis and a poor prognosis. It seems that long-term survival was obtained by performing sufficient medical treatment. Prognostic factors other than the number of lymph node metastases may also exist.

Sentinel lymph node status and axillary lymph node dissection in the surgical treatment of breast cancer

Axillary lymph node dissection has been traditionally perceived as a therapeutic and a staging procedure and unselectively removes all axillary lymph nodes. There still remains some controversy as concerns the survival benefit associated with axillary clearance. Sentinel lymph node biopsy removes the most likely sites of regional metastases, the lymph nodes directly connected with the primary tumour. It allows a more accurate staging and a selective indication for clearing the axilla, restricting this to patients who may benefit of it. Axillary dissection was performed in all patients during the learning phase of sentinel lymphadenectomy, but later only patients with metastasis to a sentinel node underwent this operation. Currently, even some patients with minimal sentinel node involvement, including some with macrometastasis may skip axillary clearance. This review summarizes the changes that have occurred in the surgical management of the axilla, the evidences and controversies behind these changes, along with current recommendations. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(6), 203–215.

Treatment plan for breast cancer with sentinel node metastasis

Lymph node involvement is considered to be one of the most important independent prognostic factors in breast cancer. In patients without palpable lymphadenopathies, the method of choice for determining this involvement is the sentinel lymph node biopsy. In the presence of macrometastases, the current standard is to perform axillary lymph node dissection in spite of the knowledge that the involvement of non-sentinel lymph nodes is approximately 50%. When lymph node involvement is micrometastasic, the decision as to whether or not to proceed with lymphadenectomy remains in dispute. We set out, on the basis of the current scientific evidence and our own experience, to create guidelines that allow us to individualise each case and decide whether or not to perform a lymphadenectomy. We will discuss the arguments that support our position.

[Breast cancer and axillary area: state of the art and perspectives]

A therapeutic surgical de-escalation has been observed since many years with an actual prolongation for axillary lymph node area treatment. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) omission has been studied before and after validation of sentinel node (SN) biopsy procedure. A non-inferiority of ALND omission has been reported in case of non-involved SN. ALND omission has been studied in case of SN involvement without consensus in relation with scientific level of proof and with selective indications. The purpose of this work is to make a synthesis of the experiences on this subject then to envisage the current and future perspectives.

Predicting the likelihood of additional lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer: validation of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram

AIM

To identify important clinicopathological parameters that are most helpful in predicting additional non-sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis among patients with a positive SLN biopsy in the Singapore breast cancer population.

METHODS

A total of 1409 patients who underwent SLN biopsy were reviewed over a 5 year period from July 2004 to October 2009. A Singapore General Hospital (SGH) nomogram was developed from predictors in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram using 266 patients with primary invasive breast cancer and a positive SLN biopsy who subsequently had an axillary lymph node dissection. The SGH nomogram was calibrated using bootstrapped data, while the MSKCC nomogram was calibrated using SGH data. The performance of these two nomograms was compared with the calculation of the area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve and adequacy indices.

RESULTS

The MSKCC nomogram achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.716 (range 0.653-0.779) in our study population, while the SGH nomogram, which used only three pathological parameters, lymphovascular invasion, number of positive and negative SLN biopsies, achieved an AUC of 0.750 (range 0.691-0.808). The SGH nomogram with a higher adequacy index (0.969) provided better estimates compared with the MSKCC nomogram (0.689).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the MSKCC nomogram was validated in our local patient population. The SGH nomogram showed promise to be equally, if not, more predictive as a model in our own population, while using only three pathological parameters.