See one, do twenty-five, teach one: the implementation of sentinel node dissection in breast cancer

National adoption of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: lessons learned from the Canadian experience

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer has not been readily adopted into Canadian surgical practice in comparison with the United States. We sought to evaluate current national practice patterns and explore barriers to direct efforts to improve the adoption of SLNB in Canada. All active (n = 1413) general surgeons in Canada were surveyed by mail. Surgeon demographics, practice patterns, skill acquisition and attitudes towards SLNB were assessed. The response rate was 63% (n = 889). Of the 506 (57%) surgeons who treated breast cancer, half were community based with breast surgery comprising <25% of their practices. Most (70%) performed <or=5 breast surgeries/month. Almost all (96%) believed SLNB was standard of care or an acceptable alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Of these, 306 (61%) performed SLNB. Predictors of performing SLNB were breast/oncology fellowship (p = 0.03) or greater percentage of practice dedicated to breast (p = 0.02) but not region, type of practice (community versus academic), gender or year of residency completion. Reasons for performing SLNB were decreased morbidity (85%) and enhanced staging (59%) as opposed to competitive pressure (13%). The majority (75%) performed SLNB as a stand-alone procedure for T1/T2 cancers and high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (70%). Almost half (46%) abandoned back up ALND after 30 or fewer cases even though the majority (75%) acknowledged the false-negative rate should be <5%. Most (76%) learned SLNB through mentoring or a formal course/residency. Of the 197 (39%) not performing SLNB, 53% felt that inadequate access to nuclear medicine and gamma probe equipment was the predominant barrier. SLNB has been adopted into Canadian surgical practice. The majority of surgeons believe that SLNB is an acceptable alternative to ALND, with 61% now performing SLNB compared to 27% in 2001. Barriers to implementation appear to be related to inadequate resources as opposed to lack of belief in the procedure.

Surgeon and community factors affecting breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether the results of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are related to practice and community factors.

METHODS

This prospective study included more than 300 surgeons from a variety of practice environments. Most surgeons had minimal experience with SLN biopsy prior to this study. Patients underwent attempted SLN biopsy, followed by completion axillary dissection. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess factors related to the SLN identification rate and the false negative rate.

RESULTS

A total of 4131 patients were enrolled. SLN identification rate was 93%; the false negative (FN) rate was 7.9%. The only factor that was significantly associated with improved SLN identification rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12 to 2.36, P = .0126) and FN rate (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.32 to 4.79, P = .0073) was surgeon experience (>20 SLN cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon experience is the major factor that contributes to improved SLN biopsy results. SLN biopsy can be performed equally well by community and academic surgeons.

Sentinel node skills verification and surgeon performance: data from a multicenter clinical trial for early-stage breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Marked variations in sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) technique have been identified, and definitive qualifications for SLND performance remain controversial. Based on previous reports and expert opinion, we predicted that 20 to 30 cases of SLND with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) would enable surgeons to identify sentinel lymph nodes (SLN).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

In 1999, the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group initiated a prospective trial, Z0010, to evaluate micrometastatic disease in the SLN and bone marrow of women with early-stage breast cancer. Eligible patients included women with biopsy-proven T1/T2 breast cancer and clinically negative lymph nodes who were candidates for lumpectomy and SLND.

METHODS

Participating surgeons were required to document 20 to 30 SLNDs followed by immediate ALND with failure rates less than 15%. Prior fellowship or residency training in SLND provided exemption from skill requirements. Data for 5237 subjects and 198 surgeons were available for analysis.

RESULTS

Surgeons from academic (48.4%), community (28.6%), or teaching-affiliated (19.8%) institutions qualified with 30 SLND + ALND cases (64.6%), 20 cases (22.2%), or exemption (13.1%). Participants used blue dye + radiocolloid in 79.4%, blue dye alone in 14.8%, and radiocolloid alone in 5.7% of cases, achieving a 98.7% SLN identification rate. Patient factors associated with increased SLND failure included increased body mass index and age, whereas tumor location, stage, and histology, presence of nodal metastases, and number of positive nodes were not. Surgeon accrual of fewer than 50 patients was associated with increased SLND failure; however, SLND technique, specific skill qualification, and institution type were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a standard skill requirement, surgeons from a variety of institutions achieved an acceptably low SLND failure rate in the setting of a large multicenter trial, validating the incorporation of SLND into clinical practice.

Distinct hypermethylation profile of primary breast cancer is associated with sentinel lymph node metastasis

PURPOSE

Gene promoter region hypermethylation is a significant event in primary breast cancer. However, its impact on tumor progression and potential predictive implications remain relatively unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We conducted hypermethylation profiling of 151 primary breast tumors with association to known prognostic factors in breast cancer using methylation-specific PCR for six known tumor suppressor and related genes: RASSF1A, APC, TWIST, CDH1, GSTP1, and RAR-beta2. Furthermore, correlation with sentinel lymph node (SLN) tumor status was assessed as it represents the earliest stage of metastasis that is readily detected. Hypermethylation for any one gene was identified in 147 (97%) of 151 primary breast tumors. The most frequently hypermethylated gene was RASSF1A (81%).

RESULTS

Hypermethylation of the CDH1 was significantly associated with primary breast tumors demonstrating lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.008), infiltrating ductal histology (P = 0.03), and negative for the estrogen receptor (P = 0.005), whereas RASSF1A and RAR-beta2 gene hypermethylation were significantly more common in estrogen receptor-positive (P < 0.001) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (P < 0.001) tumors, respectively. In multivariate analysis, hypermethylation of GSTP1 and/or RAR-beta2 was significantly associated with patients having macroscopic SLN metastasis compared with those with microscopic or no sentinel node metastasis (odds ratio, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-10.4; P < 0.001). In paired SLN metastasis, CDH1 was the most frequently methylated gene (90%) and provides evidence in patients corroborating its role in the clinical development of metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Hypermethylation profiling of primary breast tumors is significantly associated with known pathologic prognostic factors and may have additional clinical and pathologic utility for assessing patient prognosis and predicting early regional metastasis.

Assessment of the Current Medicare Reimbursement System for Breast Cancer Operations

BACKGROUND

Medicare determines procedural reimbursement by means of formulas considering physician work, practice, and liability expenses. Since no mechanism exists to consider outcomes in calculating reimbursements, we hypothesized that Medicare reimbursements do not correlate with outcomes for different breast cancer operations.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 240 patients with T1, 2N0M0 breast cancer in three surgical treatment arms: segmental mastectomy with axillary node dissection (SM&ALND ; n = 42); SM with sentinel node dissection (SM&SLND ; n = 96); and mastectomy without reconstruction (MRM; n = 102). Outcome parameters of complications, hospital stay, analgesic usage, and days to return to work were correlated with procedure reimbursements.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 26 months. SM&SLND patients rarely required hospital stays (14%) in comparison with either SM&ALND (96%) or MRM patients (99%) (P < 0.001). SM&ALND and MRM patients required 9 and 10 median days of narcotics, respectively, versus 1 day in the SLND group (P < 0.001). SM&SLND patients returned to work at a median of 3 days, in comparison with 19 for SM&ALND and 26 for MRM patients (P < 0.001). Complications were more common in the MRM group (67% numbness/10% pain) and the SM&ALND group (56%/9%) than in the SM&SLND group (0%/1%). Reimbursements were inversely correlated with outcomes. MRM was reimbursed the highest, at an average of 1,075.03 dollars, with SM&ALND at 882.72 dollars. SM&SLND was reimbursed at 642.00 dollars.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicare reimbursements for breast cancer operations do not correlate with outcomes. Less-invasive procedures are paid for at lower rates despite better outcomes and fewer complications. The data from this study raise the question of the impact of reimbursement on breast procedure selection.

Selective Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for Breast Cancer in the United States

Lymph node status is the most reliable prognostic indicator for breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are the first draining lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer to spread from the primary site. Although the therapeutic role of selective sentinel lymphadenectomy (SSL) in breast cancer has not been determined, the practical significance is that it is being used as a staging procedure, so that a negative SLN can spare a patient more extensive axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with its associated morbidity. If the SLN is negative, the negative predictive value of the remaining nodal basin for breast cancer exceeds 95%. SSL selects out one or a few SLNs and permits more extensive study of the nodes by the pathologist. Such extensive examination would not be practical for the many nodes yielded by a standard ALND. SSL is rapidly evolving into a standard approach for staging primary breast cancer in the United States, without the maturation of results from clinical trials.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy has become an important tool for axillary lymph node staging in women with early-stage breast cancer. This review examines data regarding the staging accuracy, indications and technical aspects of the procedure, and clinical trials investigating the technique. Multiple studies now confirm that sentinel lymphadenectomy accurately stages the axilla and is associated with less morbidity than axillary dissection. Blue dye, radiocolloid, or both can be used to identify the sentinel node, and several injection techniques may be used successfully. Many patient factors previously thought to affect accuracy of the procedure have now been shown to be of limited significance. The indications for the procedure are expanding, and the histopathologic evaluation of the sentinel node and the role of lymphoscintigraphy have been clarified. Clinical trials are now underway that will determine the prognostic significance of micrometastases and the therapeutic benefit of axillary dissection in women with and without sentinel node metastases. Incorporation of sentinel lymphadenectomy into routine clinical practice will maintain accurate axillary staging with lower morbidity and improved quality of life for women with early-stage breast cancer.

Sentinel lymph node dissection and the current status of American trials on breast lymphatic mapping

The current national sentinel lymph node (SLN) clinical trials for breast carcinoma address the prognostic and therapeutic utility of SLN dissection (SLND) in women with early-stage, clinically node-negative breast cancer. Following completion of these studies, overall survival, disease-free survival, morbidity, and quality of life of patients will be compared. Surgeon participation is crucial to the ongoing success of clinical trials in the field of breast cancer surgery.

The learning curve in sentinel node biopsy: the ALMANAC experience

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is a minimally invasive procedure to stage the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Like any new surgical procedure, it is associated with a learning curve. This article describes the learning curve as part of the ALMANAC trial. The first phase of this trial is a validation phase in which surgeons perform SNB followed by an immediate axillary dissection in a consecutive series of 40 patients with invasive breast cancer. Each surgeon completes a mandatory program of proctored training during this phase. Surgeons who achieve a localization rate of 90% or more and a false-negative rate of 5% or less are eligible to proceed to the randomized phase. All 13 surgeons who completed 40 procedures as part of the validation phase of the ALMANAC trial achieved the set target. This study shows that a standardized training program allows surgeons to achieve a satisfactory localization rate and an acceptable false-negative rate after 40 SNBs.

Training and mentoring surgeons in lymphatic mapping

Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and selective lymphadenectomy for solid malignancies is a novel technique, having been introduced into surgical practice in the last 12 years. Dissemination of this technique among surgeons has followed a course similar to that found with the introduction of new laparoscopic techniques. A case series from a leading institution forms the core of the surgical literature for the new operation and is followed by additional case series, which offer technical refinements. Distinct from the laparoscopic techniques, however, sentinel node methodology offers a proficiency assessment through completion lymphadenectomy. Several completed clinical trials using sentinel lymph node technology have afforded a means for training and mentoring surgeons to perform the procedure. These multi-institutional studies and mentoring programs represent an initial step towards development of a more structured framework to evaluate new surgical procedures.

The Optimal Number of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Focused Pathologic Examination

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure provides an alternative method for assessing the axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer. The SLN is typically subjected to a focused pathologic examination involving the examination of multiple tissue levels and/or keratin immunohistology. The number of SLNs submitted may vary widely, in some cases rivaling that of a complete axillary dissection (CAD). We examined our experience over the last 2 years in order to determine the optimal number of SLNs for focused pathologic evaluation. All SLN cases for the years 2000 and 2001 were retrieved from the files of the Pathology Department at Magee-Womens Hospital and were tabulated to determine the average number of SLNs per case, the number of SLNs submitted, the actual SLN that was positive for each case, the type of metastasis, and the average number of SLNs per case for each surgeon. There were 662 operative cases that yielded 1576 SLN accessions and 1758 total SLNs. The range of SLNs submitted was 1 to 11. Overall there was a mean of 2.4 SLNs accessioned per case and a mean of 2.7 SLNs per case. A study of the statistics of SLNs submitted by seven surgeons yielded two distinct groups, with one group submitting virtually all of the cases where there were consistently more than four SLNs per case. Ninety-seven percent of positive SLNs were discovered in the first three SLNs submitted, regardless of surgeon identity. The SLNs beyond numbers one to three yielded positive results by keratin in only four cases. Focused pathologic examination of SLNs was most effective for the first three SLNs submitted for any given case. The variation in the number of SLNs submitted per case was different based upon the different practice patterns of surgeons. It is suggested that for more than three SLNs submitted, simple routine lymph node examination would be appropriate.

How many cases are enough for accreditation in sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer?

BACKGROUND

There is considerable argument concerning the number of sentinel node biopsy cases with axillary dissection that surgeons should perform before they are eligible on abandoning axillary dissection in negative sentinel node patients.

DATA SOURCES

Papers that (1) address directly or indirectly the subject of credentialing or of learning curve, (2) report on a surgeon's performance, (3) are reported as feasibility or learning curve studies, or both, (4) discuss the learning curve issue, and (5) express an expert's opinion on the learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of procedures of the learning curve can not be fixed for all surgeons. Only surgeons in specialized breast cancer centers can succeed in meeting current recommendations with 20 to 30 cases. Surgeons from affiliated community hospitals will need more than 30 cases, whereas broad-based surgeons might need as many as 60 cases with their current caseload. Not all surgeons will be able to offer the procedure to their patients by the current recommendations.

A Validation Trial of Subdermal Injection Compared with Intraparenchymal Injection for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is increasingly being used as an accurate and less morbid surrogate for axillary dissection. However, a standardized technique in the biopsy of SLNs is not used. Some authors propose subdermal injection to be as accurate as peritumoral intraparenchymal injection (IPI). Our objective is to determine whether the SLNs identified by subdermal injection truly represent SLNs and match those found with IPI. Specific end points of the study were 1) successful localization of the SLN by the IPI of isosulfan blue or the radiocolloid intradermal injection, 2) successful uptake of radiocolloid and isosulfan blue on individual SLN, and 3) determination of the frequency with which the radiocolloid injection detected the “gold standard” blue SLN. SLNs were found in 71 of 73 cases (success rate = 97%). Blue SLNs were identified in 64 patients (88%). SLNs in 61 patients (84%) were radioactive. A total of 112 SLNs were identified in 71 patients (1.6 nodes/patient). Seventy-six of 87 SLNs found with IPI were also radioactive (concordance of 87%). All SLNs harboring metastatic cancer (16 patients) were found by both techniques, being both blue and radioactive. Our results support the concept of shared lymphatic pathways in the breast with a high degree of communication between the subdermal lymphatics and the intraparenchymal lymphatics. The success in identification of the SLN is made simpler and improved by the addition of subdermal radiocolloid injection.

Institutional Learning Curve for Sentinel Node Biopsy at a Community Teaching Hospital

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLB) is gaining popularity as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer staging. Although publications have described the inherent learning curve few have analyzed actual performance in community hospitals. This study analyzes the institutional learning curve for SLB in a community teaching hospital without a formal sentinel node credentialing policy. We conducted an analysis of the initial 96 SLBs performed by 15 general surgeons over a 34-month period. The main outcomes were rate of identification of sentinel node and accuracy of SLB. Overall SLB was successful in identifying one or more sentinel nodes (mean = 2.2) in 73 per cent of attempted cases. There were marked differences in performance of individual surgeons; identification rates varied from 25 to 100 per cent. Only one surgeon performed more than 15 procedures during the study period. Nineteen of 21 cases with positive nodes were correctly characterized (sensitivity = 90.5%; 95% confidence interval = 76–100%; false negative rate = 9.5%). Our institutional learning curve was longer than high-volume individual experiences published in the literature, with a lower rate of sentinel node identification. SLB appears to be sensitive for detecting malignancy, but the small number of patients with positive nodes in our series limits our conclusions. The marked variability in individual surgeon performances and the slow rate of overall improvement in our institution suggest a need for a formalized policy for SLB training.

Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: a model for implementation of new surgical techniques

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal experience required to minimize the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Before abandoning routine axillary dissection in favor of SLN biopsy for breast cancer, each surgeon and institution must document acceptable SLN identification and false-negative rates. Although some studies have examined the impact of individual surgeon experience on the SLN identification rate, minimal data exist to determine the optimal experience required to minimize the more crucial false-negative rate.

METHODS

Analysis was performed of a large prospective multiinstitutional study involving 226 surgeons. SLN biopsy was performed using blue dye, radioactive colloid, or both. SLN biopsy was performed with completion axillary LN dissection in all patients. The impact of surgeon experience on the SLN identification and false-negative rates was examined. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent factors in addition to surgeon experience associated with these outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 2,148 patients were enrolled in the study. Improvement in the SLN identification and false-negative rates was found after 20 cases had been performed. Multivariate analysis revealed that patient age, nonpalpable tumors, and injection of blue dye alone for SLN biopsy were independently associated with decreased SLN identification rates, whereas upper outer quadrant tumor location was the only factor associated with an increased false-negative rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons should perform at least 20 SLN cases with acceptable results before abandoning routine axillary dissection. This study provides a model for surgeon training and experience that may be applicable to the implementation of other new surgical technologies.

Sentinel node investigation in breast cancer: detailed analysis of the yield from step sectioning and immunohistochemistry

AIMS

To evaluate in detail the extent to which step sectioning and immunohistochemical examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in patients with breast cancer reveal additional node positive patients, to arrive at a sensitive yet workable protocol for histopathological SN examination.

METHODS

This study comprised 86 women with one or more positive SN after a successful SN procedure for clinical stage T1-T2 invasive breast cancer. SNs were lamellated into pieces of approximately 0.5 cm in size. One initial haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained central cross section was made for each block. When negative, four step ribbons were cut at intervals of 250 microm. One section from each ribbon was stained with H&E, and one was used for immunohistochemistry (IHC).

RESULTS

When taking the cumulative total of detected metastases at level 5 as 100%, the percentage of SN positive patients increased from 80%, 83%, 85%, 87% to 88% in the H&E sections through levels 1 to 5, and with IHC these values were 86%, 90%, 94%, 98%, and 100%. Three of nine patients in whom metastases were detected at levels 3-5 only had metastases in the subsequent axillary lymph node dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple level sectioning of SNs (five levels at 250 microm intervals) and the use of IHC detects additional metastases up to the last level. Although more levels of sectioning might increase the yield even further, this protocol ensures a reasonable workload for the pathologist with an acceptable sensitivity when compared with the published literature.

Multidisciplinary approach to selective sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer

Although the role of axillary lymph node dissection is controversial with respect to survival benefits, its role as a staging procedure has been well established since nodal involvement is the most reliable prognostic indicator for patients with breast cancer. Selective sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection is gaining acceptance as a useful staging procedure because it is minimally invasive and spares approximately 70-80% of the patients a more extensive axillary lymph node dissection. The evolving techniques for selective SLN dissection using blue dye and radiotracer methods are reviewed in this article. Based on the classic definition of the breast lymphatic drainage and recently published articles addressing the issue of peritumoral and intradermal injections, a possible new and simplified approach using intradermal injection may identify the axillary SLN more quickly and reliably. This article emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the identification of SLNs by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy performed by expert nuclear medicine physicians, the intraoperative mapping and harvesting of SLNs by well trained surgeons and the meticulous examination of SLNs by experienced pathologists. Therefore, to achieve the highest rate of accuracy regarding SLN status, it is imperative that a multidisciplinary team with close communication and cooperation be formed. The clinical significance of SLNs will be determined by results from follow-up and clinical trials.

Ex vivo sentinel node mapping in carcinoma of the colon and rectum

OBJECTIVE

Increasing evidence supports that the sentinel node (SN) is at greatest risk for harboring metastatic disease. This study describes a novel technique to identify the SN in colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Within 30 minutes of resection, colorectal specimens were injected submucosally with isosulfan blue in four quadrants. Blue lymphatic channels were identified in the mesentery and followed to the blue-stained SN(s), which were then harvested. The specimen was fixed in formalin and subsequently analyzed in the usual fashion. Blue-stained nodes that were negative by hematoxylin and eosin staining were further analyzed by immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

During a 6-month period, 26 patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum undergoing routine resection were studied. There were 18 men and 8 women ranging in age from 29 to 86 years (median 66). Blue-stained SNs were identified in 24 of 26 specimens. The mean number of SNs identified per patient was 2.8 +/- 1.6. Seventy-three SNs were identified from a total of 479 lymph nodes harvested. The mean number of nodes identified per patient was 18.4 +/-7. A total of 67 lymph nodes in 12 patients were identified by hematoxylin and eosin staining to have evidence of metastatic disease. Fourteen (20%) of these nodes in six patients were stained blue. However, with immunohistochemical staining, only one blue node did not have evidence of metastatic tumor in a lymphatic basin with tumor present. Four patients (29%) whose lymphatic basins were negative by hematoxylin and eosin staining were upstaged by immunohistochemical staining of the SN.

CONCLUSIONS

Ex vivo mapping of the colon and rectum is technically feasible and may provide a useful approach to the ultrastaging of colorectal carcinoma.

Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine the first decade of experience with minimal access surgery, with particular attention to issues of training surgeons already in practice, and to provide a set of recommendations to improve technical training for surgeons in practice.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Concerns about the adequacy of training in new techniques for practicing surgeons began almost immediately after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The concern was restated throughout the following decade with seemingly little progress in addressing it.

METHODS

A preliminary search of the medical literature revealed no systematic review of continuing medical education for technical skills. The search was broadened to include educational, medical, and psychological databases in four general areas: surgical training curricula, continuing medical education, learning curve, and general motor skills theory.

RESULTS

The introduction and the evolution of minimal access surgery have helped to focus attention on technical skills training. The experience in the first decade has provided evidence that surgical skills training shares many characteristics with general motor skills training, thus suggesting several ways of improving continuing medical education in technical skills.

CONCLUSIONS

The educational effectiveness of the short-course type of continuing medical education currently offered for training in new surgical techniques should be established, or this type of training should be abandoned. At present, short courses offer a means of introducing technical innovation, and so recommendations for improving the educational effectiveness of the short-course format are offered. These recommendations are followed by suggestions for research.

Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer: university research tool or community practice?

There is considerable controversy regarding the introduction and granting of credentials for sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. Given the workload of the average general surgeon and current procedural guidelines, two to three years would be required to demonstrate competence before a surgeon might perform sentinel lymphadenectomy without an immediate completion axillary node dissection. This article reviews issues related to the introduction of sentinel lymphadenectomy in the general surgeon's armamentarium.

Comprehensive review of sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is a minimally invasive technique to stage axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. The complications associated with SLND are minimal, especially when compared to routine axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and it can be performed with an overall identification rate of greater than 90% and a false-negative rate less than 5%. Despite this, SLND is not ready to replace routine axillary dissection, since we have no long-term results for these patients. What the clinical recurrence rates will be in women who undergo SLND only and how that will translate into survival rates has yet to be discovered. SLND is also a difficult technique to perform, as documented in the early SLND studies. It is imperative that each individual surgeon perform a series of cases in which SLND is combined with immediate ALND, so that identification rates and false-negative rates can be determined. Once a track record of successfully performed SLND has been established, SLND can be solely used for node-negative women. It is strongly recommended that all surgeons join one of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored clinical trials for SLND in early breast cancer, so that many of these questions concerning SLND can finally be answered.

[Sentinel node and operable breast cancer: utilization of blue dye injection. Pilot study]

STUDY AIM

Sentinel node detection in breast cancer can be realized with colorimetric and isotopic procedures often associated. The aim of this study was to report results obtained with blue dye injection only.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From September 1998 to July 1999, blue dye injection was performed in 73 consecutive patients (mean age: 51 years, range: 36-71 years); 51/70 70% were post-menopausal and half of them were under substitute hormonal treatment; 70% of cancers were discovered through routine mammography. There were 12 bilateral cancers, six of them synchronous, and 84% of cancers were located in the external quadrants. Individualization of sentinel node was performed through blue dye injection into the tumor in case of preoperative diagnosis or in the tumoral site in case of discovery of the cancer through extemporaneous histological examination.

RESULTS

71 out of 73 cancers were classified pT1 and 70% measured 10 mm and over. Individualization of sentinel node failed in two obese patients. Sentinel node invasion concerned one node (n = 7), two nodes (n = 1) and three nodes (n = 1). Conservative treatment was performed in 72 patients out of 73; in case of sentinel node invasion, axillary irradiation was performed without reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Blue dye injection for sentinel node individualization is an accurate technique in selected patients in case of small tumors. Reoperation can be avoided and replaced by axillary irradiation in case of N+ tumors. Duration of hospitalization was 48 hours or under in 70/73 patients. Nevertheless isotopic procedure must be recommended as a routine technique in learning centers and for most surgical teams.