1
|
Filip CI, Cătană A, Kutasi E, Roman SA, Militaru MS, Risteiu GA, Dindelengan GC. Breast Cancer Screening and Prophylactic Mastectomy for High-Risk Women in Romania. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:570. [PMID: 38674216 PMCID: PMC11052261 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality within oncology. Risk factors, encompassing genetic and environmental influences, significantly contribute to its prevalence. While germline mutations, notably within the BRCA genes, are commonly associated with heightened breast cancer risk, a spectrum of other variants exists among affected individuals. Diagnosis relies on imaging techniques, biopsies, biomarkers, and genetic testing, facilitating personalised risk assessment through specific scoring systems. Breast cancer screening programs employing mammography and other imaging modalities play a crucial role in early detection and management, leading to improved outcomes for affected individuals. Regular screening enables the identification of suspicious lesions or abnormalities at earlier stages, facilitating timely intervention and potentially reducing mortality rates associated with breast cancer. Genetic mutations guide screening protocols, prophylactic interventions, treatment modalities, and patient prognosis. Prophylactic measures encompass a range of interventions, including chemoprevention, hormonal inhibition, oophorectomy, and mastectomy. Despite their efficacy in mitigating breast cancer incidence, these interventions carry potential side effects and psychological implications, necessitating comprehensive counselling tailored to individual cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudiu Ioan Filip
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burn Unit, Emergency District Hospital, 400535 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (C.I.F.); (G.C.D.)
- First Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Andreea Cătană
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (A.C.); (E.K.); (S.A.R.); (G.A.R.)
- Department of Oncogeneticcs, Institute of Oncology, “Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță”, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Regional Laboratory Cluj-Napoca, Department of Medical Genetics, Regina Maria Health Network, 400363 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Eniko Kutasi
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (A.C.); (E.K.); (S.A.R.); (G.A.R.)
| | - Sara Alexia Roman
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (A.C.); (E.K.); (S.A.R.); (G.A.R.)
| | - Mariela Sanda Militaru
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (A.C.); (E.K.); (S.A.R.); (G.A.R.)
- Regional Laboratory Cluj-Napoca, Department of Medical Genetics, Regina Maria Health Network, 400363 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Giulia Andreea Risteiu
- Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (A.C.); (E.K.); (S.A.R.); (G.A.R.)
| | - George Călin Dindelengan
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burn Unit, Emergency District Hospital, 400535 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (C.I.F.); (G.C.D.)
- First Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nair AG, Ko GTY, Semple JL, Lim DW. Breast Reconstruction Use and Impact on Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes Amongst Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients-A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6666-6681. [PMID: 37504349 PMCID: PMC10377939 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast reconstruction is generally discouraged in women with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) due to concerns with recurrence and poor long-term survival. We aim to determine contemporary trends and predictors of breast reconstruction and its impact on oncologic outcomes among women with IBC. A systematic literature review for all studies published up to 15 September 2022 was conducted via MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing women diagnosed with IBC undergoing a mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction were evaluated. The initial search yielded 225 studies, of which nine retrospective cohort studies, reporting 2781 cases of breast reconstruction in 29,058 women with IBC, were included. In the past two decades, immediate reconstruction rates have doubled. Younger age, higher income (>USD 25,000), private insurance, metropolitan residence, and bilateral mastectomy were associated with immediate reconstruction. No significant difference was found in overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival or recurrence rates between women undergoing versus not undergoing (immediate or delayed) reconstruction. There is a paucity of data on delayed breast reconstruction following IBC. Immediate breast reconstruction may be a consideration for select patients with IBC, although prospective data is needed to clarify its safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananya Gopika Nair
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Gary Tsun Yin Ko
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - John Laurie Semple
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Division of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - David Wai Lim
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schmidt MK, Kelly JE, Brédart A, Cameron DA, de Boniface J, Easton DF, Offersen BV, Poulakaki F, Rubio IT, Sardanelli F, Schmutzler R, Spanic T, Weigelt B, Rutgers EJT. EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Eur J Cancer 2023; 181:79-91. [PMID: 36641897 PMCID: PMC10326619 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
After a diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer, increasing numbers of patients are requesting contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), the surgical removal of the healthy breast after diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer. It is important for the community of breast cancer specialists to provide meaningful guidance to women considering CPM. This manifesto discusses the issues and challenges of CPM and provides recommendations to improve oncological, surgical, physical and psychological outcomes for women presenting with unilateral breast cancer: (1) Communicate best available risks in manageable timeframes to prioritise actions; better risk stratification and implementation of risk-assessment tools combining family history, genetic and genomic information, and treatment and prognosis of the first breast cancer are required; (2) Reserve CPM for specific situations; in women not at high risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), ipsilateral breast-conserving surgery is the recommended option; (3) Encourage patients at low or intermediate risk of CBC to delay decisions on CPM until treatment for the primary cancer is complete, to focus on treating the existing disease first; (4) Provide patients with personalised information about the risk:benefit balance of CPM in manageable timeframes; (5) Ensure patients have an informed understanding of the competing risks for CBC and that there is a realistic plan for the patient; (6) Ensure patients understand the short- and long-term physical effects of CPM; (7) In patients considering CPM, offer psychological and surgical counselling before surgery; anxiety alone is not an indication for CPM; (8) Eliminate inequality between countries in reimbursement strategies; CPM should be reimbursed if it is considered a reasonable option resulting from multidisciplinary tumour board assessment; (9) Treat breast cancer patients at specialist breast units providing the entire patient-centred pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Anne Brédart
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Psychology Institute, Psychopathology and Health Process Laboratory UR4057, Paris City University, Paris, France
| | - David A Cameron
- Edinburgh University Cancer Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Breast Unit, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital - Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Fiorita Poulakaki
- Breast Surgery Department, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece; Europa Donna - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Sardanelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tanja Spanic
- Europa Donna - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy; Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emiel J T Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nair AG, Giannakeas V, Semple JL, Narod SA, Lim DW. Contemporary Trends in Breast Reconstruction Use and Impact on Survival Among Women with Inflammatory Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:8072-8082. [PMID: 36074200 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12408-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast reconstruction is generally discouraged in women with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Nevertheless, reconstruction rates are increasing in this population. OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine contemporary trends and predictors of breast reconstruction use and its impact on mortality among IBC patients. METHODS Demographic, clinicopathologic, and follow-up data for women with non-metastatic IBC having mastectomy between 2004 and 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database. Rates and predictors of immediate breast reconstruction, along with survival outcomes between the breast reconstruction and no reconstruction groups were calculated. To account for selection bias, a propensity score analysis matching one reconstruction patient to three no reconstruction patients was performed. RESULTS A total of 4076 women with non-metastatic IBC who underwent mastectomy (388 [9.5%] with breast reconstruction and 3688 [90.5%] without) were included. The proportion of women undergoing breast reconstruction and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy increased from 6.2 to 15.3% and 12.9 to 29.6%, respectively, between 2004 and 2015. Younger age, higher annual income, metropolitan residence, and bilateral mastectomy predicted breast reconstruction use. The 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was 62.9% for women having breast reconstruction and 47.6% for women not having breast reconstruction. After propensity-matched analysis, 10-year cancer-specific survival was similar between the reconstruction (56.6%) and no reconstruction (62.2%) groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.16; p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS Breast reconstruction rates continue to rise among IBC patients, particularly young women and women with access to reconstruction. Breast reconstruction is not associated with inferior breast cancer-specific survival and can be an option for select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vasily Giannakeas
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John L Semple
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David W Lim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tesch ME, Partridge AH. Treatment of Breast Cancer in Young Adults. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-12. [PMID: 35580291 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_360970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Although breast cancer is rare and understudied in adults age 40 and younger, recent epidemiologic data show an increasing incidence of breast cancer among young women in the United States and ongoing inferior long-term outcomes. Given breast cancers arising at a young age are more likely to present at advanced stages and to have aggressive biology, multimodal treatments are often indicated. Elevated local recurrence risks and greater propensity for germline cancer predisposition mutations can impact local therapy choices. Recently, escalated systemic therapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer incorporating immunotherapy, de-escalated anti-HER2 therapy, and emerging targeted agents, including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors, for early-stage disease may be employed in younger and older patients alike, with some special considerations. Prognostic genomic signatures can spare low-risk young women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy, but management of intermediate-risk patients remains controversial. Ovarian function suppression and extended endocrine therapy are improving outcomes in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but treatment adherence is a particular problem for young patients. Young women may also face greater challenges in long-term survivorship, including impaired fertility, difficulties in psychosocial adjustment, and other treatment-related comorbidities. Consideration of these age-specific issues through dedicated multidisciplinary strategies is necessary for optimal care of young women with breast cancer.
Collapse
|
6
|
ElSherif A, Armanyous S, Gentle CK, Al-Hilli Z, Valente SA. Trends of Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy at the time of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Am J Surg 2021; 223:533-537. [PMID: 34924172 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates have substantially increased. The study aimed to examine contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at the time of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and evaluate factors contributing to CPM decision making process. METHOD Patients who developed IBTR after BCS from 2011 to 2019 were reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics, genetic testing and reconstruction details were analyzed. RESULTS Ninety-six patients had IBTR after BCS and were treated with mastectomy, with 30% electing for a CPM. Patients who underwent CPM were younger, had higher BMI and less comorbidities. A genetic mutation was identified in 19% of patients who underwent testing at the time of IBTR. Tumor characteristics and performing surgeon were not predictors for CPM, however, patients were more likely to undergo CPM if they received reconstruction of the ipsilateral breast with IBTR. CONCLUSION This study shows that age, BMI, genetic testing and breast reconstruction are factors contributing to CPM decision at the time of IBTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayat ElSherif
- Division of Breast Services, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sherif Armanyous
- Division of Breast Services, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Corey K Gentle
- Division of Breast Services, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zahraa Al-Hilli
- Division of Breast Services, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stephanie A Valente
- Division of Breast Services, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Petric J, Sadri B, van Essen P, Dean NR. Improving preoperative breast reconstruction consultations: a qualitative study on the impact of personalised audio-recordings. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2021; 21:389. [PMID: 34742266 PMCID: PMC8571820 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01534-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background To investigate the value of audio-recordings in aiding patient understanding and recall of preoperative breast reconstruction information. Methods This was a prospective cohort study. Participants were randomly allocated into either a recording group who were offered the opportunity to record their breast reconstruction explanation of surgery, or a standard information package group who received standard care. The value of having an audio-recording was assessed by semi-structured interviews and analysis of recurring themes. Results Between 21/2/19 and 19/3/20, 32 women attending consultations for breast reconstruction consented to participate in the study, 17 were randomly assigned to the recording group and 15 the standard information package group. Twenty-eight of the 32 participants completed qualitative interviews. All participants agreed that audio-recordings were a beneficial resource which allowed them to have a better understanding of the concepts discussed. Commonly reported themes included the ability to listen to the recording multiple times to refresh memory, as well as usefulness in helping to inform other family members. Participants also reported increased levels of trust in their clinician for allowing the audio-recordings. Very few participants raised any medico-legal implications of the recordings, their focus was more on the potential of the audio-recordings to alleviate the overwhelming nature of a pre-operative breast reconstruction consultation. Conclusions There was a positive response from participants to the use of audio-recordings in the setting of breast reconstruction consultations. These types of recordings could potentially be used in other complex appointments where detailed information is discussed, with similar success. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-021-01534-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josipa Petric
- Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Bahara Sadri
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Phillipa van Essen
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
| | - Nicola Ruth Dean
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.,Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ha M, Ngaage LM, Klein M, Yang A, Colohan SM, Nurudeen SM, Terhune JH, Slezak S, Rasko YM. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the setting of breast cancer diagnosis and their insurance coverage in the United States. Breast J 2021; 27:746-752. [PMID: 34528334 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is more common in the United States than the rest of the world. However, the benefit of this procedure is still under question in many breast cancer scenarios. CPM utilization in the United States is in part dependent on a patient's health insurance coverage of breast oncology surgery and any desired reconstruction. However, there are great discrepancies in the coverage provided by insurers. METHODS The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for a CPM in the setting of diagnosed breast cancer. One hundred companies were selected based on their state enrollment and market share. Their policies were identified through a Web-based search and telephone interviews, and their medical necessity criteria were extracted. RESULTS Of the 100 companies assessed, 36 (36%) had a policy for CPM. Within those, significantly more provided coverage than denied the procedure (72% vs. 25%, p < 0.0001), with the remainder providing case-by-case coverage. Eleven criteria were identified from preauthorized policies, the most common prerequisite was breast cancer diagnosis under 45 years old (n = 9, 35%). Most policies did not differentiate between gender in their policies (n = 25, 69%), but of those that did, 100% (n = 11) provided coverage for men and women, with 82% (n = 9) requiring further criteria from the female patients. CONCLUSION The coverage of CPM in the United States varies from complete denial to unrestricted approval. This may be due to conflicting reports in the literature as to the utility of the procedure. The decision to undergo this procedure must be taken with thoughtful consideration and the support of a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ha
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ledibabari M Ngaage
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marissa Klein
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Annie Yang
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Shannon M Colohan
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Suliat M Nurudeen
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Julia H Terhune
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sheri Slezak
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yvonne M Rasko
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Deliere A, Attai D, Victorson D, Kuchta K, Pesce C, Kopkash K, Sisco M, Seth A, Yao K. Patients Undergoing Bilateral Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Surgery Have the Lowest Levels of Regret: The WhySurg Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5686-5697. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10452-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
10
|
Lizarraga IM, Schroeder MC, Jatoi I, Sugg SL, Trentham-Dietz A, Hoeth L, Chrischilles EA. Surgical Decision-Making Surrounding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Comparison of Treatment Goals, Preferences, and Psychosocial Outcomes from a Multicenter Survey of Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8752-8765. [PMID: 34251554 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10426-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differences in patient characteristics and decision-making preferences have been described between those who elect breast-conserving surgery (BCS), unilateral mastectomy (UM), or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for breast cancer. However, it is not known whether preferred and actual decision-making roles differ across these surgery types, or whether surgery choice reflects a woman's goals or achieves desired outcomes. METHODS Women diagnosed with stage 0-III unilateral breast cancer across eight large medical centers responded to a mailed questionnaire regarding treatment decision-making goals, roles, and outcomes. These data were linked to electronic medical records. Differences were assessed using descriptive analyses and logistic regression. RESULTS There were 750 study participants: 60.1% BCS, 17.9% UM, and 22.0% CPM. On multivariate analysis, reducing worry about recurrence was a more important goal for surgery in the CPM group than the others. Although women's preferred role in the treatment decision did not differ by surgery, the CPM group was more likely to report taking a more-active-than-preferred role than the BCS group. On multivariate analysis that included receipt of additional surgery, posttreatment worry about both ipsilateral and contralateral recurrence was higher in the BCS group than the CPM group (both p < 0.001). The UM group was more worried than the CPM group about contralateral recurrence only (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Women with CPM were more likely to report being able to reduce worry about recurrence as a very important goal for surgery. They were also the least worried about ipsilateral breast recurrence and contralateral breast cancer almost two years postdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid M Lizarraga
- Department of Surgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mary C Schroeder
- Division of Health Services Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Ismail Jatoi
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Sonia L Sugg
- Department of Surgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Amy Trentham-Dietz
- Carbone Cancer Center and Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cheng D, Baynosa J, Cross C, Kirgan D, Williams SJ, St Hill C. Comparing the effect of distance to treatment facility on reconstruction and breast conservation therapy for early-stage invasive ductal carcinoma between the nation and the mountain region. Am J Surg 2021; 224:1049-1056. [PMID: 34001333 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our objective is to evaluate the effect of distance to facility on the use of breast conservation therapy and reconstruction for early stage breast cancer. METHODS Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we identified females, age <65, with Stage I invasive ductal carcinoma from 2004 to 2015. Using logistic regression, we compared radiation, mastectomy, and reconstruction treatment patterns. A subgroup analysis was performed within the mountain region (MR). RESULTS Nationwide, there are decreasing odds of radiation, increasing odds of mastectomy, and increasing odds of reconstruction. Patients living farther were less likely to receive radiation, more likely to undergo mastectomy, with no effect on reconstruction. Within the MR, patients living farther from their facility were less likely to receive radiation, more likely to undergo mastectomy, however, they were less likely to undergo reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS Nationwide and within the MR, patients living farther from their facility are less likely to receive radiation and more likely to undergo mastectomy. There is a disparity between the MR and the nation in use of reconstruction for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Cheng
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Medicine, USA.
| | | | - Chad Cross
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Medicine, USA; University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Public Health, USA.
| | - Daniel Kirgan
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Medicine, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Santiago L, Volk RJ, Checka CM, Black D, Lee J, Colen JS, Akay C, Caudle A, Kuerer H, Arribas EM. Acceptability of 3D-printed breast models and their impact on the decisional conflict of breast cancer patients: A feasibility study. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1206-1214. [PMID: 33577715 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the acceptability and impact of 3D-printed breast models (3D-BMs) on treatment-related decisional conflict (DC) of breast cancer patients. METHODS Patients with breast cancer were accrued in a prospective institutional review board-approved trial. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A personalized 3D-BM was derived from MRI. DC was evaluated pre- and post-3D-BM review. 3D-BM acceptability was assessed post-3D-BM review. RESULTS DC surveys before and after 3D-BM review and 3D-BM acceptability surveys were completed by 25 patients. 3D-BM were generated in two patients with bilateral breast cancer. The mean patient age was 48.8 years (28-72). The tumor stage was Tis (7), 1 (8), 2 (8), and 3 (4). The nodal staging was 0 (19), 1 (7), and 3 (1). Tumors were unifocal (15), multifocal (8), or multicentric (4). Patients underwent mastectomy (13) and segmental mastectomy (14) with (20) or without (7) oncoplastic intervention. Neoadjuvant therapy was given to seven patients. Patients rated the acceptability of the 3D-BM as good/excellent in understanding their condition (24/24), understanding disease size (25/25), 3D-BM detail (22/25), understanding their surgical options (24/25), encouraging to ask questions (23/25), 3D-BM size (24/25), and impartial to surgical options (17/24). There was a significant reduction in the overall DC post-3D-BM review, indicating patients became more assured of their treatment choice (p = 0.002). Reduction post-3D-BM review was also observed in the uncertainty (p = 0.012), feeling informed about options (p = 0.005), clarity about values (p = 0.032), and effective (p = 0.002) Decisional Conflict Scale subscales. CONCLUSIONS 3D-BMs are an acceptable tool to decrease DC in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lumarie Santiago
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert J Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cristina M Checka
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dalliah Black
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joanna Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jessica S Colen
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Catherine Akay
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Abigail Caudle
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Henry Kuerer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elsa M Arribas
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rosenberg SM, Dominici LS, Gelber S, Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ, Wong JS, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come S, Peppercorn JM, Borges VF, Partridge AH. Association of Breast Cancer Surgery With Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-being in Young Breast Cancer Survivors. JAMA Surg 2021; 155:1035-1042. [PMID: 32936216 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Importance Young women with breast cancer are increasingly choosing bilateral mastectomy (BM), yet little is known about short-term and long-term physical and psychosocial well-being following surgery in this population. Objective To evaluate the differential associations of surgery with quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial outcomes from 1 to 5 years following diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants Cohort study. Setting Multicenter, including academic and community hospitals in North America. Participants Women age ≤40 when diagnosed with Stage 0-3 with unilateral breast cancer between 2006 and 2016 who had surgery and completed QOL and psychosocial assessments. Exposures (for observational studies) Primary breast surgery including breast-conserving surgery (BCS), unilateral mastectomy (UM), and BM. Main Outcomes and Measures Physical functioning, body image, sexual health, anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed in follow-up. Results Of 826 women, mean age at diagnosis was 36.1 years; most women were White non-Hispanic (86.7%). Regarding surgery, 45% had BM, 31% BCS, and 24% UM. Of women who had BM/UM, 84% had reconstruction. While physical functioning, sexuality, and body image improved over time, sexuality and body image were consistently worse (higher adjusted mean scores) among women who had BM vs BCS (body image: year 1, 1.32 vs 0.64; P < .001; year 5, 1.19 vs 0.48; P < .001; sexuality: year 1, 1.66 vs 1.20, P < .001; year 5, 1.43 vs 0.96; P < .001) or UM (body image: year 1, 1.32 vs 1.15; P = .06; year 5, 1.19 vs 0.96; P = .02; sexuality: year 1, 1.66 vs 1.41; P = .02; year 5, 1.43 vs 1.09; P = .002). Anxiety improved across groups, but adjusted mean scores remained higher among women who had BM vs BCS/UM at 1 year (BM, 7.75 vs BCS, 6.94; P = .005; BM, 7.75 vs UM, 6.58; P = .005), 2 years (BM, 7.47 vs BCS, 6.18; P < .001; BM, 7.47 vs UM, 6.07; P < .001) and 5 years (BM, 6.67 vs BCS, 5.91; P = .05; BM, 6.67 vs UM, 5.79; P = .05). There were minimal between-group differences in depression levels in follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance While QOL improves over time, young breast cancer survivors who undergo more extensive surgery have worse body image, sexual health, and anxiety compared with women undergoing less extensive surgery. Ensuring young women are aware of the short-term and long-term effects of surgery and receive support when making surgical decisions is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shari Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Julia S Wong
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Steven Come
- Beth Israel Deaconess, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chu QD, Hsieh MC, Lyons JM, Wu XC. 10-Year Survival after Breast-Conserving Surgery Compared with Mastectomy in Louisiana Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 232:607-621. [PMID: 33301909 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Louisiana has the third highest breast cancer mortality in the US, despite ranking 30th in incidence. Whether surgical approach contributes to such a poor outcome is unknown. We compared outcomes of breast-conserving surgery plus radiation (BCT) vs mastectomy (MST) for Louisiana women with early-stage breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN Data on women diagnosed with Stage I-II breast cancer from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between BCT and MST. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare survival curves, and logistic regression was used to examine the association of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the type of breast cancer surgery. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS Of the 18,260 patients, 9,968 patients (54.6%) had BCT and 8,292 patients (45.4%) had MST. Compared with BCT, the MST group tended to be underinsured/Medicare/Medicaid, more impoverished, had higher stage 2 disease, were more likely to reside in rural regions, travel ≥25 miles to radiation treatment facility, be treated at low volume centers, and have T3, node positive, and poorly differentiated tumors. Ten-year OS and CSS were significantly better among those who had BCT (OS: 80.0%; 95% CI: 79.0%-81.1%; CSS: 92.7%; 95% CI: 92.1%-93.4%) than those having MST (OS: 69.3%; 95% CI: 68.0%-70.5%; CSS: 88.8%:95% CI: 87.9%-89.7%) (p < 0.05). Even after controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables, MST was associated with a 28.6% increased risk of death from all causes (hazard ratio [HR]:1.286; 95% CI:1.197-1.380) and a 29.8% increased risk of breast-cancer specific death (HR:1.298; 95% CI: 1.150-1.465). CONCLUSIONS Surgical approach, a factor that is within the control of the surgeon, has an impact on mortality for Louisiana women with early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quyen D Chu
- Department of Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA.
| | - Mei-Chin Hsieh
- Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health at LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - John M Lyons
- Our Lady of the Lake-Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health at LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The relationship between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction, complications, breast-related procedures, and costs: A population-based study of health insurance data. Surgery 2020; 168:859-867. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
16
|
Financial toxicity and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: an analysis using propensity score methods. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 183:649-659. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05805-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
17
|
Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44:323-329. [PMID: 31853610 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-019-01582-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many breast cancer patients remove their contralateral breast unaffected by cancer, commonly referred to as contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). CPM has been extensively studied and does not improve survival in patients without deleterious genetic mutation or lobular histology. Despite these limited indications, CPM rates have increased recently. We observed CPM trends in our county safety-net hospital. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of women treated for breast cancer who underwent bilateral mastectomy in our institution. RESULTS We analyzed 100 CPMs: 51% (n = 51) had bilateral breast MRI before CPM, 54% (n = 54) had genetic testing prior to CPM, and 56% (n = 30) had a deleterious genetic result. Another 12% (n = 12) had lobular histology as the primary determinant for CPM. Of patients without genetic mutation or lobular histology, 13% (n = 13) had suspicious MRI findings in the CPM side that drove the decision for CPM. Forty-seven percent (n = 47) had reconstructive surgery documented. CONCLUSION Only 42% (n = 42) of patients who underwent CPM had a documented justifiable medical reason. In the future, physician and patient education may decrease unindicated CPM. We also found that 13% of women without a medical indication chose CPM based on suspicious MRI findings, while only 8% of these MRI findings were malignant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Collapse
|
18
|
Srethbhakdi A, Brennan ME, Hamid G, Flitcroft K. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer in women at average risk: Systematic review of patient reported outcomes. Psychooncology 2020; 29:960-973. [PMID: 32201988 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in women with early, unilateral cancer is relatively high and is increasing around the world a previous study. Women choose this option for many reasons other than reducing their risk of future cancer, including symmetry, reasons related to breast reconstruction and attempting to manage fear of recurrence. This systematic review evaluated patient-reported quality of life outcomes following CPM. METHODS A literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed and PsycINFO was performed to February 2019. Abstracts and full-text articles were assessed for eligibility according to pre-determined criteria. Data were extracted into evidence tables for analysis. RESULTS A total of 19 articles met eligibility criteria and were included in analysis. These included patient-reported data from 6088 women undergoing CPM. They reported high levels of satisfaction with the decision for surgery, low levels of decisional regret and high satisfaction with cosmesis and reconstruction. Breast-specific and general quality of life was high overall but was even better in women choosing breast reconstruction after surgery. Fear of cancer recurrence was high after CPM. Depression, distress and a negative impact on body image were evident; however, levels were high in both CPM and non-CPM groups. CONCLUSIONS This study provides information that can be used by surgeons and psychologists when counselling women about the potential benefits and harms of CPM. This process must include discussion about the trade-offs such as body image issues and ongoing fear of recurrence in addition to the positive aspect of cancer risk reduction. Women are unlikely to regret their decision for CPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amilee Srethbhakdi
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Meagan E Brennan
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, Sydney, University of Notre Dame, Chippendale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geaty Hamid
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kathy Flitcroft
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Montagna G, Morrow M. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer: what to discuss with patients. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:159-166. [PMID: 32077338 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1732213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rate in the U.S. has been steadily increasing. This is of particular concern because many women who undergo this procedure are candidates for breast-conserving surgery.Areas covered: CPM's medical benefit is related to the risk of contralateral cancer development and whether CPM provides a survival benefit. Contralateral cancer rates have decreased, and CPM does not provide a survival benefit. Other potential benefits of the procedure may be improved quality of life; these data are reviewed. Research efforts have been undertaken to better understand the decision-making process of patients who consider, and ultimately undergo, this procedure.Expert opinion: Decisional traits, personal values, the desire for peace of mind, and the desire to obtain breast symmetry are important factors that drive a woman's decision to undergo CPM. Additionally, many patients lack the knowledge on how different types of breast surgery impact outcomes. To improve the shared decision-making process, a stepwise approach to address possible misconceptions, and clarify the real risks/benefits of this procedure should be utilized. A clear recommendation (for/against) should be made for every patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer who considers CPM. Communication tools to assist patients and surgeons in this process are sorely needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Effect of decision-making resources on satisfaction with decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). Am J Surg 2019; 219:1036-1038. [PMID: 31570198 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) are increasing, and there are many resources available to help patients with decision-making. We sought to determine how often these were used, and whether their use influenced satisfaction with decision to pursue CPM. METHODS CPM patients at a large academic institution were surveyed regarding factors associated with their CPM decision, and their satisfaction with the same. RESULTS Of 58 CPM patients approached to participate, 55 completed the survey with a mean SWD score of 4.85 (range 3.00-5.00). Partner opinion (47.3%), family opinion (45.5%), other cancer patients' experiences (38.2%), and informational websites (38.2%) were the most frequently cited resources used by CPM patients. On multivariate analysis, controlling for other factors affecting SWD, use of other cancer patients' experiences predicted above average SWD (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION Those who use other cancer patients' experiences to aid in their surgical decision-making enjoy a higher satisfaction with their decision.
Collapse
|
21
|
Squires JE, Simard SN, Asad S, Stacey D, Graham ID, Coughlin M, Clemons M, Grimshaw JM, Zhang J, Caudrelier JM, Arnaout A. Exploring reasons for overuse of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in Canada. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 26:e439-e457. [PMID: 31548812 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (cpm) in women with known unilateral breast cancer (bca) has been increasing despite the lack of supportive evidence. The purpose of the present study was to identify the determinants of cpm in women with unilateral bca. Methods This qualitative descriptive study used semi-structured interviews informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. We interviewed 74 key informants (surgical oncologists, plastic surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, nurses, women with bca) across Canada. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and an analysis for shared and discipline-specific beliefs. Results In total, 58 factors influencing the use of cpm were identified: 26 factors shared by various health care professional groups, 15 discipline-specific factors (identified by a single health care professional group), and 17 factors shared by women with unilateral bca. Health care professionals identified more factors discouraging the use of cpm (n = 26) than encouraging its use (n = 15); women with bca identified more factors encouraging use of cpm (n = 12) than discouraging its use (n = 5). The factor most commonly identified by health care professionals that encouraged cpm was lack of awareness of existing evidence or guidelines for the appropriate use of cpm (n = 44, 75%). For women with bca, the factor most likely influencing their decision for cpm was wanting a better esthetic outcome (n = 14, 93%). Conclusions Multiple factors discouraging and encouraging the use of cpm in unilateral bca were identified. Those factors identify potential individual, team, organization, and system targets for behaviour change interventions to reduce cpm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Squires
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - S N Simard
- Bloomberg School of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - S Asad
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - D Stacey
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - I D Graham
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - M Coughlin
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - M Clemons
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.,Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - J M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.,Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - J Zhang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - J M Caudrelier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - A Arnaout
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.,Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Greenup RA, Rushing C, Fish L, Campbell BM, Tolnitch L, Hyslop T, Peppercorn J, Wheeler SB, Zafar SY, Myers ER, Hwang ES. Financial Costs and Burden Related to Decisions for Breast Cancer Surgery. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15:e666-e676. [PMID: 31356147 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity is a well-recognized adverse effect of cancer care, yet little is known about how women consider treatment costs when facing preference-sensitive decisions for breast cancer surgery or how surgical treatment choice affects financial harm. We sought to determine how financial costs and burden relate to decisions for breast cancer surgery. METHODS Women (≥ 18 years old) with a history of breast cancer were recruited from the Army of Women and Sisters Network to complete an 88-item electronic survey. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to evaluate the impact of costs on surgical decisions and financial harm after breast cancer surgery. RESULTS A total of 607 women with stage 0 to III breast cancer were included. Most were white (90%), were insured privately (70%) or by Medicare (25%), were college educated (78%), and reported household incomes of more than $74,000 (56%). Forty-three percent underwent breast-conserving surgery, 25% underwent mastectomy, 32% underwent bilateral mastectomy, and 36% underwent breast reconstruction. Twenty-eight percent reported that costs of treatment influenced their surgical decisions, and at incomes of $45,000 per year, costs were prioritized over breast preservation or appearance. Overall, 35% reported financial burden as a result of their cancer treatment, and 78% never discussed costs with their cancer team. When compared with breast-conserving surgery, bilateral mastectomy with or without reconstruction was significantly associated with higher incurred debt, significant to catastrophic financial burden, treatment-related financial hardship, and altered employment. Among the highest incomes, 65% of women were fiscally unprepared, reporting higher-than-expected (26%) treatment costs. CONCLUSION Cancer treatment costs influenced decisions for breast cancer surgery, and comparably effective surgical treatments differed significantly in their risk of patient-reported financial burden, debt, and impact on employment. Cost transparency may inform preference-sensitive surgical decisions and improve patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S Yousuf Zafar
- 1Duke University, Durham, NC.,3University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Manne S, Smith B, Mitarotondo A, Frederick S, Toppmeyer D, Kirstein L. Decisional conflict among breast cancer patients considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:902-908. [PMID: 30553577 PMCID: PMC7666877 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study's goals were to characterize decisional conflict and preparedness for making the decision about having CPM among breast cancer patients considering CPM who do not carry cancer-predisposing mutation and to evaluate correlates of decisional conflict and preparedness. METHODS 93 women considering CPM completed a survey of decisional conflict and preparedness for the CPM decision, knowledge, perceived risk, self-efficacy, reasons for CPM, input from others and discussion with the doctor about CPM, and cancer worry. RESULTS Between 8% and 27% of women endorsed elevated decisional conflict. Most women were satisfied with preparatory information that they were provided. Knowledge was low. Top reasons for choosing CPM were the desire for peace of mind, lowering the chance of another breast cancer, and improving survival. CONCLUSIONS Decisional conflict is elevated in a subset of patients considering CPM. A more well-informed decision may be fostered by a comprehensive discussion about CPM with the patient's clinician, fostering self-efficacy in managing cancer worry, and helping patients understand their motivations for CPM. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians working with breast cancer patients considering CPM should discuss the CPM decision, foster self-efficacy in managing cancer worry, and help patients understand their motivations for the surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Manne
- Section of Population Science, Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA.
| | - Barbara Smith
- Center for Breast Cancer, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Anna Mitarotondo
- Section of Population Science, Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Sara Frederick
- Section of Population Science, Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Deborah Toppmeyer
- Section of Population Science, Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bedrosian I, Parker PA, Brewster AM. Who should get a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer? Cancer 2019; 125:1400-1403. [PMID: 30645775 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Bedrosian
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patricia A Parker
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abenaa M Brewster
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Squires JE, Stacey D, Coughlin M, Greenough M, Roberts A, Dorrance K, Clemons M, Caudrelier JM, Graham ID, Zhang J, Varin MD, Arnaout A. Patient decision aid for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for use in the consultation: a feasibility study. Curr Oncol 2019; 26:137-148. [PMID: 31043816 PMCID: PMC6476460 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (cpm) continue to rise internationally despite evidence-based guidance strongly discouraging its use in most women with unilateral breast cancer. The purpose of the present study was to develop and assess the feasibility of a knowledge translation tool [a patient decision aid (da)] designed to enhance evidence-informed shared decision-making about cpm. Methods A consultation da was developed using the Ottawa Patient Decision Aid Development eTraining in consultation with clinicians and knowledge translation experts. The final da was then assessed for feasibility with health care professionals and patients across Canada. The assessment involved a survey completed online (health care professionals) or by telephone (patients). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for closed-ended questions and qualitative content analysis for open-ended questions. Results The 51 participants who completed the survey included 39 health care professionals and 12 patients. The da was acceptable; 88% of participants viewed it as having the right amount of information or slightly more or less information than they would like. Almost all participants (98%) felt that the da would prepare patients to make better decisions. The aid was perceived to be usable, with 73% of participants stating that they would be willing to use or share the da. Conclusions The cpm patient da developed for the present study was viewed by health care professionals and patients across Canada to be acceptable and usable during the clinical consultation. It holds promise as a knowledge translation tool to be used by clinicians in consultation with women who have unilateral breast cancer to enhance evidence-informed and shared decision-making with respect to undergoing cpm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Squires
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - D Stacey
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - M Coughlin
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - M Greenough
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - A Roberts
- Breast Surgical Oncology Unit, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - K Dorrance
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| | - M Clemons
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - J M Caudrelier
- Department of Radiation Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
| | - I D Graham
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - J Zhang
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
| | - M Demery Varin
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - A Arnaout
- Breast Surgical Oncology Unit, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bai L, Arver B, Johansson H, Sandelin K, Wickman M, Brandberg Y. Body image problems in women with and without breast cancer 6–20 years after bilateral risk-reducing surgery – A prospective follow-up study. Breast 2019; 44:120-127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Revised: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
27
|
Advani PG, Lei X, Swanick CW, Xu Y, Shen Y, Goodwin NA, Smith GL, Giordano SH, Hunt KK, Jagsi R, Smith BD. Local Therapy Decisional Regret in Older Women With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:383-391. [PMID: 30716524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Older women with nonmetastatic breast cancer can often choose from several surgery and radiation treatment options. Little is known regarding how these choices contribute to decisional regret, which is a negative emotion reflecting the idea that another surgery or radiation decision might have been preferable. We sought to characterize the burden of and examine potential risk factors for local therapy decisional regret among a population-based cohort of older breast cancer survivors. METHODS AND MATERIALS National Medicare claims for age ≥67 female breast cancer incident in 2009 identified patients treated with lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation, brachytherapy, or endocrine therapy or mastectomy with or without radiation. We sampled 330 patients per treatment group (N = 1650), of whom 1253 agreed to receive a paper survey including the Decisional Regret Scale and EQ-5D-3L Health-Utility Scale. Local therapy regret was defined as neutral or worse response to questions regarding surgery- or radiation-related decisional regret. Local therapy regret risk factors were evaluated using a multivariable generalized linear model. Association of local therapy regret with health utility was modeled using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS The response rate was 30.2% (n = 498 of 1650); 421 surveys were included in this analysis. Median diagnosis age was 72 years, and surveys were completed 6 years after diagnosis. Overall, 23.8% of respondents (n = 100) reported experiencing local therapy decisional regret. Type of local therapy was not associated with local therapy regret. Predictors of increased regret included black race (risk ratio [RR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-3.29), high school education or less (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.27-2.75), and axillary nodal dissection (RR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.33-3.41). Local therapy regret was not associated with health utility (P = .37). CONCLUSIONS Local therapy regret afflicts nearly one quarter of our cohort of older breast cancer survivors, and it is associated with black race, less education, and more extensive nodal dissection, but not breast surgery. Regret is distinct from health utility, suggesting that it is a unique psychosocial construct that merits further study and mitigation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pragati G Advani
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Health Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cameron W Swanick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, Florida
| | - Ying Xu
- Health Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yu Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nathan A Goodwin
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Health Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Health Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Health Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Huang J, Chagpar A. Factors associated with decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy versus unilateral mastectomy. Am J Surg 2018; 218:170-174. [PMID: 30554666 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Factors associated with the decision to pursue unilateral mastectomy (UM) versus contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients, and satisfaction with this decision, remain to be elucidated. METHODS UBC patients who underwent mastectomy were surveyed regarding factors affecting their surgical decision and satisfaction with the same. RESULTS Both UM (n = 46) and CPM (n = 55) patients were satisfied with their surgical decision (mean 4.72 and 4.85 out of 5 on Satisfaction With Decision scale, respectively, p = 0.078). Most CPM patients cited the desire to lower their risk of contralateral breast cancer (96.4%) and the desire for peace of mind (94.5%) as "very important" drivers of their decision; whereas most UM patients felt not wanting to remove a normal breast (67.4%) was a "very important" driver for their decision. CONCLUSIONS Both UM and CPM patients reported high satisfaction with their surgical decisions, despite differing reasons for their respective surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Huang
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 20 York Street, 1st Floor, Suite A, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| | - Anees Chagpar
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 20 York Street, 1st Floor, Suite A, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Factors associated with the increasing trend of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Breast 2018; 40:147-155. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Revised: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
|
30
|
Parker PA, Peterson SK, Shen Y, Bedrosian I, Black DM, Thompson AM, Nelson JC, DeSnyder SM, Cook RL, Hunt KK, Volk RJ, Cantor SB, Dong W, Brewster AM. Prospective Study of Psychosocial Outcomes of Having Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women With Nonhereditary Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2630-2638. [PMID: 30044695 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.78.6442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The incidence of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has continued to increase. We prospectively examined psychosocial outcomes before and up to 18 months after surgery in women who did or did not have CPM. Methods Women with unilateral, nonhereditary breast cancer completed questionnaires before and 1, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery. Primary psychosocial measures were cancer worry and cancer-specific distress. Secondary measures were body image, quality of life (QOL), decisional satisfaction, and decisional regret. Results A total of 288 women (mean age, 56 years; 58% non-Hispanic white) provided questionnaire data, of whom 50 underwent CPM. Before surgery, women who subsequently received CPM had higher cancer distress ( P = .04), cancer worry ( P < .001), and body image concerns ( P < .001) than women who did not have CPM. In a multivariable repeated measures model adjusted for time, age, race/ethnicity, and stage, CPM was associated with more body image distress ( P < .001) and poorer QOL ( P = .02). There was a significant interaction between time point and CPM group for cancer worry ( Pinteraction < .001), suggesting that CPM patients had higher presurgery cancer worry, but their postsurgery worry decreased over time and was similar to the worry of patients who did not have CPM. QOL was similar between CPM groups before surgery but declined 1 month after surgery and remained lower than patients who did not have CPM after surgery ( Pinteraction = .05). Conclusion These results may facilitate informed discussions between women and their physicians regarding CPM. Fear and worry may be foremost concerns at the time surgical decisions are made, when women may not anticipate the adverse future effect of CPM on body image and QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia A Parker
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Yu Shen
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Isabelle Bedrosian
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Dalliah M Black
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Jonathan C Nelson
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Sarah M DeSnyder
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Robert L Cook
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Robert J Volk
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Scott B Cantor
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Wenli Dong
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| | - Abenaa M Brewster
- Patricia A. Parker, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Susan K. Peterson, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Dalliah M. Black, Alastair M. Thompson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Kelly K. Hunt, Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Wenli Dong, and Abenaa M. Brewster, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Jonathan C. Nelson and Robert L. Cook, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Silva TS, Russell VR, Henry FP, Thiruchelvam PTR, Hadjiminas DJ, Al-Mufti R, Hogben RK, Hunter J, Wood S, Jallali N, Leff DR. Streamlining Decision Making in Contralateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Impact of PREDICT and BOADICEA Computations. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3057-3063. [PMID: 30019305 PMCID: PMC6132413 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6593-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Patients with sporadic breast cancer (BC) have low contralateral breast cancer risk (CLBCR; approximately 0.7% per annum) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) offers no survival advantage. CPM with autologous reconstruction (AR) has major morbidity and resource implications. Objective The aim of this study was to review the impact of PREDICT survival estimates and lifetime CLBCR scores on decision making for CPM in patients with unilateral BC. Methods Of n = 272 consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy and AR, 252 were included. Five- and 10-year survival was computed with the PREDICT(V2) online prognostication tool, using age and clinicopathological factors. Based on family history (FH) and tumor biology, CLBCR was calculated using validated BODICEA web-based software. Survival scores were correlated against CLBCR estimates to identify patients receiving CPM with ‘low’ CLBCR (< 30% lifetime risk) and poor prognosis (5-year survival < 80%). Patients with ‘high’ CLBCR receiving unilateral mastectomy (UM) were similarly identified (UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence [NICE] criteria for CPM, ≥ 30% lifetime BC risk). Justifications motivating CPM were investigated. Results Of 252 patients, 215 had UM and 37 had bilateral mastectomy and AR. Only 23 (62%) patients receiving CPM fulfilled the NICE criteria. Of 215 patients, 5 (2.3%) failed to undergo CPM despite high CLBCR and good prognosis. CPMs were performed, at the patient’s request, for no clear justification (n = 8), contralateral non-invasive disease, and/or FH (n = 5), FH alone (n = 4) and ipsilateral cancer recurrence-related anxiety (n = 3). Conclusion In the absence of prospective risk estimates of CLBCR and prognosis, certain patients receive CPM and reconstruction despite modest CLBCR, yet a proportion of patients with good prognoses and substantial risk are not undergoing CPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Francis Patrick Henry
- Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Judith Hunter
- Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Wood
- Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Navid Jallali
- Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Richard Leff
- Breast Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. .,Department of Surgery and Cancer, BioSurgery and Surgical Technology, 10th Floor, QEQM Wing, St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Braude L, Kirsten L, Gilchrist J, Juraskova I. The development of a template for psychological assessment of women considering risk-reducing or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A national Delphi consensus study. Psychooncology 2018; 27:2349-2356. [PMID: 29966172 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPM) are increasingly prevalent strategies to reduce breast cancer risk. Given the associated physical and emotional challenges, presurgical psychological assessment is frequently recommended for this population, yet limited research exists to guide this. This study aimed to reach a consensus on the most relevant content and format of a psychological consultation prior to RRM/CPM. METHODS A modified two-round online Delphi study was conducted Australia-wide. Expert participants (n = 25), including psychologists, surgeons, nurses, oncologists, genetic specialists, and researchers completed a round-one survey, informed by a literature review, previous qualitative study and expert clinicians' input. This required participants to rate their agreement with 36 statements regarding potential content of a psychological consultation and provide feedback on format/structure. A round-two survey comprised items that had not reached consensus and six new items suggested by participants. Parameters for statement consensus were set a priori at >75% agreement. RESULTS Expert participants indicated agreement with the majority of statements (39/42, 92.8%), endorsing that the assessment should include (1) patient understanding of the RRM/CPM procedure/cancer risk, (2) potential physical/emotional impact of surgery, (3) informed decision-making, and (4) past/current psychological issues (anxiety and body image). A provisional assessment template and user manual is provided. CONCLUSIONS This research culminated in a consensus-based template to guide psychological assessment of women considering RRM/CPM. This enables health professionals to assess suitability for surgery and preempt challenges within a standardised framework. Future evaluation of the acceptability and effectiveness of the template in clinical settings is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Braude
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Laura Kirsten
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Sydney West Cancer Network, Kingswood, NSW, Australia
| | - Jemma Gilchrist
- Mind My Health Clinical Psychology, Norwest Private Hospital, NSW, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ager B, Jansen J, Porter D, Phillips KA, Glassey R, Butow P. Development and pilot testing of a Decision Aid (DA) for women with early-stage breast cancer considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Breast 2018; 40:156-164. [PMID: 29857282 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Describe the development, acceptability and feasibility of a Decision Aid (DA) for women with early-stage breast cancer (BC) at average contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). METHODS The DA was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. It provides evidence-based information about CPM in a booklet format combining text, graphs and images of surgical options. Twenty-three women with a history of early-stage breast cancer were interviewed in person or over the phone using a 'think aloud approach'. Framework analysis was used to code and analyse data. RESULTS Twenty-three women participated in the study. Mean age of participants was 58.6 years and time since diagnosis ranged from 14 months to 21 years. Five women had CPM and eighteen had not. Women strongly endorsed the DA. Many felt validated by a section on appearance and found information on average risk of recurrence and metastases helpful, however, noted the importance of discussing personal risk with their surgeon. Many requested more information on surgery details (time taken, recovery) and costs of the different options. CONCLUSION The DA was acceptable to women, including the format, content and proposed implementation strategies. Practical and financial issues are important to women in considering treatment options. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Women appreciate information about CPM at diagnosis and emphasised the importance of discussing potential downsides of the procedure in addition to benefits. The DA was considered acceptable to facilitate such discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Ager
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - J Jansen
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia; Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - D Porter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - K A Phillips
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - R Glassey
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | | | - P Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Carbine NE, Lostumbo L, Wallace J, Ko H. Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 4:CD002748. [PMID: 29620792 PMCID: PMC6494635 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002748.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent progress in understanding the genetic basis of breast cancer and widely publicized reports of celebrities undergoing risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) have increased interest in RRM as a method of preventing breast cancer. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2004 and previously updated in 2006 and 2010. OBJECTIVES (i) To determine whether risk-reducing mastectomy reduces death rates from any cause in women who have never had breast cancer and in women who have a history of breast cancer in one breast, and (ii) to examine the effect of risk-reducing mastectomy on other endpoints, including breast cancer incidence, breast cancer mortality, disease-free survival, physical morbidity, and psychosocial outcomes. SEARCH METHODS For this Review update, we searched Cochrane Breast Cancer's Specialized Register, MEDLINE, Embase and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 9 July 2016. We included studies in English. SELECTION CRITERIA Participants included women at risk for breast cancer in at least one breast. Interventions included all types of mastectomy performed for the purpose of preventing breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently abstracted data from each report. We summarized data descriptively; quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity of study designs and insufficient reporting. We analyzed data separately for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM). Four review authors assessed the methodological quality to determine whether or not the methods used sufficiently minimized selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, and attrition bias. MAIN RESULTS All 61 included studies were observational studies with some methodological limitations; randomized trials were absent. The studies presented data on 15,077 women with a wide range of risk factors for breast cancer, who underwent RRM.Twenty-one BRRM studies looking at the incidence of breast cancer or disease-specific mortality, or both, reported reductions after BRRM, particularly for those women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Twenty-six CRRM studies consistently reported reductions in incidence of contralateral breast cancer but were inconsistent about improvements in disease-specific survival. Seven studies attempted to control for multiple differences between intervention groups and showed no overall survival advantage for CRRM. Another study showed significantly improved survival following CRRM, but after adjusting for bilateral risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (BRRSO), the CRRM effect on all-cause mortality was no longer significant.Twenty studies assessed psychosocial measures; most reported high levels of satisfaction with the decision to have RRM but greater variation in satisfaction with cosmetic results. Worry over breast cancer was significantly reduced after BRRM when compared both to baseline worry levels and to the groups who opted for surveillance rather than BRRM, but there was diminished satisfaction with body image and sexual feelings.Seventeen case series reporting on adverse events from RRM with or without reconstruction reported rates of unanticipated reoperations from 4% in those without reconstruction to 64% in participants with reconstruction.In women who have had cancer in one breast, removing the other breast may reduce the incidence of cancer in that other breast, but there is insufficient evidence that this improves survival because of the continuing risk of recurrence or metastases from the original cancer. Additionally, thought should be given to other options to reduce breast cancer risk, such as BRRSO and chemoprevention, when considering RRM. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS While published observational studies demonstrated that BRRM was effective in reducing both the incidence of, and death from, breast cancer, more rigorous prospective studies are suggested. BRRM should be considered only among those at high risk of disease, for example, BRCA1/2 carriers. CRRM was shown to reduce the incidence of contralateral breast cancer, but there is insufficient evidence that CRRM improves survival, and studies that control for multiple confounding variables are recommended. It is possible that selection bias in terms of healthier, younger women being recommended for or choosing CRRM produces better overall survival numbers for CRRM. Given the number of women who may be over-treated with BRRM/CRRM, it is critical that women and clinicians understand the true risk for each individual woman before considering surgery. Additionally, thought should be given to other options to reduce breast cancer risk, such as BRRSO and chemoprevention when considering RRM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora E Carbine
- Georgetown University Lombardi Cancer CenterTranslational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC)WashingtonD.C.USA20007
| | | | | | - Henry Ko
- University of SydneyNHMRC Clinical Trials CentreK25 ‐ Medical Foundation Building92‐94 Parramatta Rd.,CamperdownNSWAustralia2050
- Academic Medicine Research Institute, Duke‐NUS Graduate Medical SchoolCentre for Health Services Research, SingHealthSingaporeSingapore169857
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kenny R, Reed M, Subramanian A. Mastectomy for risk reduction or symmetry in women without high risk gene mutation: A review. Int J Surg 2018; 50:60-64. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
36
|
Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives. World J Surg 2018; 41:1454-1465. [PMID: 28243695 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-3895-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Regret is a powerful motivating factor in medical decision making among patients and surgeons. Regret can be particularly important for surgical decisions, which often carry significant risk and may have uncertain outcomes. We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on patient and physician regret in the surgical setting. METHODS A search of the English literature between 1986 and 2016 that examined patient and physician self-reported decisional regret was carried out using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases. Clinical studies performed in patients and physicians participating in elective surgical treatment were included. RESULTS Of 889 studies identified, 73 patient studies and 6 physician studies met inclusion criteria. Among the 73 patient studies, 57.5% examined patients with a cancer diagnosis, with breast (26.0%) and prostate (28.8%) cancers being most common. Interestingly, self-reported patient regret was relatively uncommon with an average prevalence across studies of 14.4%. Factors most often associated with regret included type of surgery, disease-specific quality of life, and shared decision making. Only 6 studies were identified that focused on physician regret; 2 pertained to surgical decision making. These studies primarily measured regret of omission and commission using hypothetical case scenarios and used the results to develop decision curve analysis tools. CONCLUSION Self-reported decisional regret was present in about 1 in 7 surgical patients. Factors associated with regret were both patient- and procedure related. While most studies focused on patient regret, little data exist on how physician regret affects shared decision making.
Collapse
|
37
|
Hegde JV, Wang X, Attai DJ, DiNome ML, Kusske A, Hoyt AC, Hurvitz SA, Weidhaas JB, Steinberg ML, McCloskey SA. Assessing the Effect of Lifetime Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk on the Selection of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Unilateral Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 18:e205-e218. [PMID: 29050918 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rates are rising, with fear implicated as a contributing factor. This study used a contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk stratification tool to assess whether the selection of CPM is reflective of future CBC risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study evaluated 404 women with unilateral breast cancer treated with breast conservation, unilateral mastectomy, or bilateral mastectomy within a single multidisciplinary clinic. Women were evaluated by the Manchester risk tool to calculate lifetime CBC risk. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate whether CBC risk was associated with CPM, and the clinical rationale for prophylactic mastectomy justification was recorded. RESULTS Sixty-two percent underwent breast conservation, 18% unilateral mastectomy, and 20% bilateral mastectomy. In the CPM cohort, 36% had > 20% calculated lifetime CBC risk. In the invasive cohort, younger age (odds ratio 2.65, P < .0001) and genetic mutation positivity (odds ratio 35.39, P = .019) independently predicted CPM. Other contributing factors included benign contralateral breast findings (29%) and recommendations against breast conservation due to disease burden (28%). Six percent selected CPM as a result of an unsubstantiated fear regarding breast cancer. CONCLUSION The majority of women (63%) who selected CPM had < 20% CBC risk. In these lower-risk women selecting CPM, factors increasing reasonable fear dominated surgical choice (81% of this subset).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John V Hegde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Deanna J Attai
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Maggie L DiNome
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Amy Kusske
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Anne C Hoyt
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sara A Hurvitz
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joanne B Weidhaas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Susan A McCloskey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Allain DC, Sweet K, Agnese DM. Management Options after Prophylactic Surgeries in Women with BRCA Mutations: A Review. Cancer Control 2017; 14:330-7. [PMID: 17914333 DOI: 10.1177/107327480701400403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although breast cancer is relatively common, only about 5% of cases are due to inheritance of highly penetrant cancer susceptibility genes. The majority of these are caused by mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which are also associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Increased surveillance, chemoprevention, and prophylactic surgeries are standard options for the effective medical management of mutation carriers. However, optimal management of female carriers who choose to undergo prophylactic surgeries is still poorly understood. Methods The authors provide an overview of the current literature regarding medical management options for women carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and the implications for those individuals who have chosen to undergo prophylactic surgeries. Results BRCA mutation carriers who opt for prophylactic surgeries are still at risk for development of malignancy, and appropriate monitoring is warranted. Conclusions There are limited data on the appropriate medical management for BRCA mutation carriers after prophylactic surgeries. However, a management plan can be extrapolated from the general management recommendations for surveillance and other risk-reducing strategies in BRCA-positive individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn C Allain
- Clinical Cancer and Human Cancer Genetics Programs and Department of Internal Medicine, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Trends in Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Young Women Diagnosed With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 18:e179-e185. [PMID: 28941977 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 07/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although it is known that the risk of a second breast cancer event among young women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is higher than in older women, the effect of current treatment options on long-term outcomes in this subgroup of women remains poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate national treatment trends and determine their effect on second breast cancer risk and overall survival among young women diagnosed with DCIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 1998 to 2011 were used to analyze 3648 DCIS patients younger than age 40 years. RESULTS Among all treatment options, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with radiation therapy (BCS + RT) was the most prevalent (36.1%) followed by mastectomy (MTX) without contralateral prophylactic MTX (CPM; 25.8%), BCS alone (22.2%), and MTX with CPM (15.8%). Risk of a second ipsilateral event was > 5-fold and > 2-fold lower within 2 years and 5 years of initial DCIS diagnosis, respectively, in women who received BCS + RT compared with BCS alone; and overall survival was 3-fold higher in women who received BCS + RT. However, MTX with or without CPM did not show an increase in overall survival compared with BCS + RT. In addition, although the percentage of young women who receive MTX with CPM has increased in recent years, MTX with CPM did not show an increased benefit in survival compared with MTX without CPM. CONCLUSION The results of our study suggest that more aggressive treatments do not offer survival benefits over BCS + RT; thus, clinical treatment options in young women with DCIS should be carefully considered.
Collapse
|
40
|
Collins K, Gee M, Clack A, Wyld L. The psychosocial impact of contralateral risk reducing mastectomy (CRRM) on women: A rapid review. Psychooncology 2017; 27:43-52. [PMID: 28453892 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Revised: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES For women who have been diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer, there is an increasing trend for them to request removal of the contralateral healthy breast, the so-called contralateral risk reducing mastectomy (CRRM). The current literature is only just beginning to identify patient-reported reasons for undergoing CRRM and associated patient-reported outcomes. It is also unclear whether women at moderate/high risk of developing a subsequent primary contralateral breast cancer report similar outcomes to those considered to be at low/average risk. This lack of knowledge provides the rationale for this review. METHODS A rapid review methodology was undertaken to identify and explore the published research literature focused on the longer term (>5 y) psychosocial impacts on women who undergo CRRM. RESULTS Fifteen studies were identified. No UK studies were identified. High satisfaction and psychosocial well-being were consistently reported across all studies. Reducing the risk of a subsequent contralateral breast cancer and therefore reducing cancer-related anxiety, and satisfaction with cosmesis, were key themes running across all studies explaining satisfaction. Dissatisfaction was associated with adverse effects such as poor cosmesis, body image changes, femininity, sexual relationships, reoperations for acute and longer term complications, and reconstructive problems. CONCLUSIONS Satisfaction and psychological well-being following CRRM was consistently high across all studies. However, the findings suggest women need to be more fully informed of the risks and benefits of CRRM and/or immediate/delayed reconstruction to support informed decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Collins
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Melanie Gee
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anna Clack
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Academic Unit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Baptiste DF, MacGeorge EL, Venetis MK, Mouton A, Friley LB, Pastor R, Hatten K, Lagoo J, Clare SE, Bowling MW. Motivations for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy as a function of socioeconomic status. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2017; 17:10. [PMID: 28143474 PMCID: PMC5286852 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-017-0366-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Despite no demonstrated survival advantage for women at average risk of breast cancer, rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) continue to increase. Research reveals women with higher socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to select CPM. This study examines how indicators of SES, age, and disease severity affect CPM motivations. Methods Patients (N = 113) who underwent CPM at four Indiana University affiliated hospitals completed telephone interviews in 2013. Participants answered questions about 11 CPM motivations and provided demographic information. Responses to motivation items were factor analyzed, resulting in 4 motivational factors: reducing long-term risk, symmetry, avoiding future medical visits, and avoiding treatments. Results Across demographic differences, reducing long-term risk was the strongest CPM motivation. Lower income predicted stronger motivation to reduce long-term risk and avoid treatment. Older participants were more motivated to avoid treatment; younger and more-educated patients were more concerned about symmetry. Greater severity of diagnosis predicted avoiding treatments. Conclusions Reducing long-term risk is the primary motivation across groups, but there are also notable differences as a function of age, education, income, and disease severity. To stop the trend of increasing CPM, physicians must tailor patient counseling to address motivations that are consistent across patient populations and those that vary between populations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12905-017-0366-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dadrie F Baptiste
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 202, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Present address: William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA
| | - Erina L MacGeorge
- Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 234 Sparks Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
| | - Maria K Venetis
- Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, BRNG 2264, 100 North University Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2098, USA
| | - Ashton Mouton
- Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, BRNG 2264, 100 North University Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2098, USA
| | - L Brooke Friley
- Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, BRNG 2264, 100 North University Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2098, USA.,Present address: Department of Communication and Media, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Dr., Corpus Christi, TX, 78412, USA
| | - Rebekah Pastor
- Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, BRNG 2264, 100 North University Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2098, USA.,Present address: CoreClarity, PO Box 863692, Plano, TX, 75086, USA
| | - Kristen Hatten
- Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, BRNG 2264, 100 North University Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2098, USA.,Present address: School of Communication, Western Michigan University, 1903 W Michigan Ave., Kalamazoo, MI, 49008, USA
| | - Janaka Lagoo
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 202, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Present address: Ariadne Labs, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Susan E Clare
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 E. Superior Street, Lurie 4-113, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Monet W Bowling
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 202, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. .,Present address: Hendricks Regional Health, 1000 East Main Street, Danville, IN, 46122, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Women's preferences for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy following unilateral breast cancer: What risk-reduction makes it worthwhile? Breast 2016; 31:233-240. [PMID: 27969575 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Revised: 10/23/2016] [Accepted: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) reduces the risk of contralateral breast cancer (BC) following unilateral BC, but may not increase survival in BRCA1/2 mutation negative women. Despite this, and the risk for adverse physical and psychological impact, uptake is increasing in BRCA1/2 mutation negative women. We aimed to quantify the degree of reduction in lifetime contralateral BC risk women required to justify CPM, and to explore demographic, disease and psychosocial predictors of preferences using Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) as a theoretical framework. Reasoning behind preferences was also examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS 388 women previously diagnosed with unilateral BC, of negative or unknown BRCA1/2 status, were recruited from an advocacy group research database. Two hypothetical risk trade-off scenarios were used to quantify the reduction in lifetime contralateral BC risk that women judged necessary to justify CPM, using a 5% and 20% baseline. Demographic, disease and PMT measures were assessed using a questionnaire. RESULTS Most women required their risk to be more than halved from a 5% or 20% baseline to justify CPM. Polarised preferences were also common, with some women consistently accepting or refusing CPM independent of risk/benefit trade-offs. Preferences were associated with coping self-efficacy and having a prior CPM. Explanations for judging CPM worthwhile included reducing or eliminating contralateral BC risk, attaining breast symmetry and reducing worry. CONCLUSION Risk-reduction preferences were highly variable. Decisive factors in women's preferences for CPM related to clinical, psychological and cosmetic outcomes, but not to demographic or disease characteristics.
Collapse
|
43
|
Hunt KK, Euhus DM, Boughey JC, Chagpar AB, Feldman SM, Hansen NM, Kulkarni SA, McCready DR, Mamounas EP, Wilke LG, Van Zee KJ, Morrow M. Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Working Group Statement on Prophylactic (Risk-Reducing) Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 24:375-397. [PMID: 27933411 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5688-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Over the past several years, there has been an increasing rate of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) surgeries. Since publication of the 2007 SSO position statement on the use of risk-reducing mastectomy, there have been significant advances in the understanding of breast cancer biology and treatment. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the current literature as a resource to facilitate a shared and informed decision-making process regarding the use of risk-reducing mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Monica Morrow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Subsequent risk of ipsilateral and contralateral invasive breast cancer after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: incidence and the effect of radiotherapy in a population-based cohort of 10,090 women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 159:553-63. [PMID: 27624164 PMCID: PMC5021731 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3973-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effect of different treatment strategies on the risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer (IBC) in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS Up to 15-year cumulative incidences of ipsilateral IBC (iIBC) and contralateral IBC (cIBC) were assessed among a population-based cohort of 10,090 women treated for DCIS in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2004. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate associations of treatment with iIBC risk. RESULTS Fifteen years after DCIS diagnosis, cumulative incidence of iIBC was 1.9 % after mastectomy, 8.8 % after BCS+RT, and 15.4 % after BCS alone. Patients treated with BCS alone had a higher iIBC risk than those treated with BCS+RT during the first 5 years after treatment. This difference was less pronounced for patients <50 years [hazard ratio (HR) 2.11, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.35-3.29 for women <50, and HR 4.44, 95 % CI 3.11-6.36 for women ≥50, P interaction < 0.0001]. Beyond 5 years of follow-up, iIBC risk did not differ between patients treated with BCS+RT or BCS alone for women <50. Cumulative incidence of cIBC at 15 years was 6.4 %, compared to 3.4 % in the general population. CONCLUSIONS We report an interaction of treatment with age and follow-up period on iIBC risk, indicating that the benefit of RT seems to be smaller among younger women, and stressing the importance of clinical studies with long follow-up. Finally, the low cIBC risk does not justify contralateral prophylactic mastectomies for many women with unilateral DCIS.
Collapse
|
45
|
Hieken TJ, Boughey JC. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and its impact on quality of life. Gland Surg 2016; 5:439-43. [PMID: 27562384 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2016.05.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bilateral mastectomy and the retreat from breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 159:15-30. [PMID: 27475088 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3909-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the consequences for breast cancer patients of the trend away from breast conservation in favor of bilateral and contralateral mastectomy. The methods are followed from the review of the literature from 1991 to 2015. Breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy, introduced into mainstream practice in the 1980s and 1990s, respectively, are now the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer. Disruptive change has unexpectedly supervened in the guise of bilateral mastectomy for cancer or prophylaxis and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. These operations are now being resorted to at a rate which cannot be explained by any of the biological imperatives related to breast cancer and related diseases. This phenomenon extends across the Western world and beyond, driven by patients' cancer concern, a misunderstanding of what surgery can and cannot achieve and preserve, and the current popular media/cultural environment. These developments and their consequences for patients are reviewed. Surgical complications, especially those related to reconstruction, are unusually common. Of equal or greater concern are the physical, esthetic, psychosocial, psychosexual morbidities, and other adverse sequelae of these operations.
Collapse
|
47
|
Boughey JC, Attai DJ, Chen SL, Cody HS, Dietz JR, Feldman SM, Greenberg CC, Kass RB, Landercasper J, Lemaine V, MacNeill F, Margenthaler JA, Song DH, Staley AC, Wilke LG, Willey SC, Yao KA. Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Additional Considerations and a Framework for Shared Decision Making. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3106-11. [PMID: 27469118 PMCID: PMC4999472 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5408-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deanna J Attai
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, UCLA Health Burbank Breast Care, Burbank, CA, USA
| | | | - Hiram S Cody
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jill R Dietz
- Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Rena B Kass
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Fiona MacNeill
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Julie A Margenthaler
- Department of Surgery, Center for Advanced Medicine, Breast Health Center, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - David H Song
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Lee G Wilke
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Shawna C Willey
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Katharine A Yao
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in patients with sporadic breast cancer. Benefits and hazards. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:913-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.04.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2016] [Revised: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
49
|
Murphy BL, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, Glazebrook KN, Hieken TJ. Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Women with T4 Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3365-70. [PMID: 27364506 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5367-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for women with unilateral breast cancer is increasing. The authors were interested in assessing whether this trend extended to patients with T4 disease. METHODS We identified 92 patients from our prospective breast surgery registry with unilateral clinical T4 M0 disease who underwent mastectomy at our institution from October 2008 to July 2015. Patient, tumor, and treatment variables were compared between patients who did and those who did not undergo CPM, and the reasons patients elected CPM were ascertained. RESULTS Of the 92 patients, 33 (36 %) underwent a CPM, including 25 of 55 patients (45 %) with inflammatory breast cancer. Immediate breast reconstruction was performed for 11 of the 92 patients (12 %), including 4 CPM patients. Pathology showed benign findings in all 33 CPM cases, including 3 patients with atypical hyperplasia. The primary reason for CPM reported by the patients included fear of occult current or future breast cancer in 12 cases (36 %), symmetry in 11 cases (33 %), avoidance of future chemotherapy in 5 cases (15 %), deleterious BRCA mutation in 2 cases (6 %), contralateral benign breast disease in 2 cases (6 %), and medical oncologist recommendation in 1 cases (3 %). Patients selecting CPM were younger and more likely to have undergone BRCA testing. CONCLUSIONS A substantial rate of CPM was observed among women undergoing mastectomy for unilateral T4 breast cancer despite the considerable risk of mortality from their index cancer. The reasons for selection of CPM paralleled those reported for patients with early-stage disease. The most common motivation was fear of occult current or future breast cancer and included the desire to avoid further chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Amy C Degnim
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yao K, Sisco M, Bedrosian I. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health 2016; 8:213-23. [PMID: 27382334 PMCID: PMC4922807 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s82816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been an increasing trend in the use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in the United States among women diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer, particularly young women. Approximately one-third of women <40 years old are undergoing CPM in the US. Most studies have shown that the CPM trend is mainly patient-driven, which reflects a changing environment for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. The most common reason that women choose CPM is based on misperceptions about CPM’s effect on survival and overestimation of their contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk. No prospective studies have shown survival benefit to CPM, and the CBC rate for most women is low at 10 years. Fear of recurrence is also a big driver of CPM decisions. Nonetheless, studies have shown that women are mostly satisfied with undergoing CPM, but complications and subsequent surgeries with reconstruction have been associated with dissatisfaction with CPM. Studies on surgeon’s perspectives on CPM are sparse but show that the most common reasons surgeons discuss CPM with patients is because of a suspicious family history or for a patient who is a confirmed BRCA mutation carrier. Studies on the cost–effectiveness of CPM have been conflicting and are highly dependent on patient’s quality of life after CPM. Most recent guidelines for CPM are contradictory. Future areas of research include the development of interventions to better inform patients about CPM, modification of the guidelines to form a more consistent statement, longer term studies on CBC risk and CPM’s effect on survival, and prospective studies that track the psychosocial effects of CPM on body image and sexuality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine Yao
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery
| | - Mark Sisco
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|