Discussing HIV Status: Is It Easier After 10 Years of Antiretroviral Treatment? The ANRS CO8 APROCO-COPILOTE Cohort

The influence of HIV on return to work in stroke survivors amongst a population of the eThekwini district, Kwazulu Natal: A qualitative study

BackgroundBiomedical and biopsychosocial factors with an interaction of systems and stakeholders are considered determinants of participation in a return to work (RTW) process. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) potentiates the risk of stroke development and employees that may be productive are negatively impacted economically from resultant disability. Evidence on the influence of HIV on the RTW of stroke survivors is scarce.ObjectiveTo explore the influence of HIV in stroke survivors who either have or have not RTW.MethodsA qualitative study with a phenomenological approach using semi-structured interviews was conducted. Twelve HIV positive stroke survivors with a history of employment prior to stroke onset, were recruited from an HIV clinic database.ResultsStroke related physical and cognitive impairments impacted activities of daily living and occupational tasks. Health education aided participants to accept their HIV status and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence which promoted longevity amidst acute side effects. During the RTW effort, disclosing the HIV status, eliminating societal barriers, and having a family support structure were considered factors that might increase the desire for continuous employment and restore an acceptable quality of life.Workplace support structure, realistic goal setting, engagement with RTW-related professionals and support services, alleviation of negative employer attitudes and avoidance of undesirable workplace accommodation were noted to promote economic productivity.ConclusionDisclosing both HIV status and ART usage encourages adherence to medical care and explains subsequent absence from work. Full disclosure could result in understanding from the employer and resultant positive economic productivity.

Union break-up after HIV diagnosis among sub-Saharan African migrants in France: disclosing HIV status is linked with staying in union

Sub-Saharan African migrants living in France are particularly affected by HIV. Due to the fear of sexual transmission of the virus, those in a relationship could experience a union break-up after an HIV diagnosis. Based on data from the time-event ANRS-Parcours survey that was conducted among a representative sample of sub-Saharan migrants living with HIV (France, 2012-2013), we studied union break-ups after HIV diagnosis among people who were in a relationship at the time of their diagnosis. Women experienced a more rapid union break-up after HIV diagnosis than did men. The living conditions of men were not correlated to their risk of union break-up while among women, having a personal dwelling reduced the risk of union break-up. For both sexes, less established relationships were more likely to break up after HIV diagnosis. Having disclosed the HIV status to a partner was associated with a reduced risk of separation between partners, after adjustment on socio-economic conditions and migration characteristics.

Work-related stigma and disclosure: A daily challenge for people living with HIV

BACKGROUND

Stigma and disclosure are important work-related issues for people living with HIV (PLWH). To gain better understanding and improve the position of PLWH in the labor market, further insight in these issues is needed.

OBJECTIVE

This study reviews the scientific evidence related to work-related stigma and disclosure.

METHODS

A sensitive literature search was performed in the databases of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cinahl and Psychinfo for articles published between 1996 and 2016. All studies on PLWH in western countries and investigating disclosure or stigma in relation to work were included.

RESULTS

Of the 866 identified studies, 19 met the inclusion criteria: 4 addressed both disclosure and stigma (2 quantitative), 9 addressed only disclosure (4 quantitative) and 7 studies addressed only stigma (4 quantitative).

CONCLUSION

This review provides a unique overview of the research on work-related disclosure and stigma, which will enable health care providers to support PWLH to make well-considered decisions. However, the available literature was heterogeneous and in most studies the topics of our interest were secondary outcomes and provided only basic insight.