Daily Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Continuation Among Women from Durban, South Africa, Who Initiated PrEP as Standard of Care for HIV Prevention in a Clinical Trial

Patterns of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis use Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Accessing Routine Sexual and Reproductive Health services in South Africa

PURPOSE

This study describes the patterns of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) initiated on daily oral PrEP for the prevention of HIV, within routine sexual and reproductive health services in South Africa.

METHODS

We analysed clinical and survey data from a nested cohort of 967 AGYW initiated on oral PrEP between January 2019 and December 2021 in four geographical clusters in South Africa. We describe the periods of PrEP use, and the proportion who discontinued and subsequently restarted PrEP. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with early PrEP discontinuation, PrEP use for ≥4 months and PrEP restart.

RESULTS

PrEP use for ≤1 month was high (68.6%), although 27% returned and restarted PrEP; and 9% restarted more than once. Initiating PrEP at a mobile clinic (AOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.51 - 2.93) and having a partner known to be HIV negative or whose HIV status was unknown (AOR 7.11, 95% CI 1.45 - 34.23; AOR 6.90, 95% CI 1.44 - 33.09) were associated with PrEP use for ≤1 month. AGYW receiving injectable contraceptives were more likely to restart PrEP (AOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.10 - 2.35). Compared to those aged 15-17 years, participants 18 - 20 and 21 - 24 years were less likely to restart PrEP (AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 - 0.74; AOR 0.60, 95%, CI 0.41 - 0.87), as were those initiating PrEP at a mobile clinic compared to a fixed facility (AOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 - 0.92).

DISCUSSION

Although early PrEP discontinuation was high, it appears that PrEP use is frequently cyclical in nature. Further research is needed to determine if these cycles of PrEP correlate to periods of perceived or actual vulnerability to HIV, which may also be cyclical. PrEP delivery presents a unique opportunity to address multiple unmet health needs of young people.

Willingness to use long-acting injectable PrEP among HIV-negative/unknown men who have sex with men in mainland China: A cross-sectional online survey

BACKGROUND

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk of HIV acquisition. Long-acting injectable-pre-exposure prophylaxis (LAI-PrEP), requiring less frequent dosing, is being studied as an alternative method to daily oral HIV PrEP. With the addition of this potential new prevention method, it expands the scope for a wider user choice and is expected to increase the acceptability and uptake of HIV prevention measures. The aim of our study was to explore the willingness to use LAI-PrEP and associated influential factors.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from December 2020 to March 2021 through banner advertisements on web- and mobile app-based platforms on Blued, a large gay Chinese social media platform. MSM in our cross-sectional study was HIV-negative and currently lived in mainland China. Participants were asked about their willingness to use LAI-PrEP and reasons why they might be or not be willing to use LAI-PrEP. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the factors associated with the willingness to use LAI-PrEP.

RESULTS

In total, 969 participants met the inclusion criteria and finished the survey. Nearly twenty percent (19.5%) of participants had never tested for HIV; 66.8% of MSM had multiple male partners; and 51.6% of MSM engaged in condomless sex with their partner. About three-fifths (66.3%) of MSM were aware of PrEP, and only 3.9% of MSM had used PrEP before. The willingness to use LAI-PrEP among MSM was 74.0% (95% CI: 71.4%-76.6%). MSM with higher education levels were less likely to show a willingness to use LAI-PrEP (AOR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.38-0.84). Participants who had a history of HIV test (AOR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.11-2.55), were willing to use daily oral PrEP (AOR = 10.64, 95%CI:7.43-15.21), had multiple male sexual partners (AOR = 1.33, 95%CI:0.93-1.90), who used rush popper(AOR = 1.49, 95%CI:1.05-2.13), and who were aware of PEP (AOR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.02-2.70) were more likely to show willingness to use LAI-PrEP.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, MSM had quite high awareness but low uptake of PrEP. As LAI-PrEP is expected to be approved for use in China in the future, our study of MSM highlights the need for key population-focused education programs about PrEP and healthy sexual behavior. This study also provides some evidence for LAI-PrEP use among the Chinese MSM population in the future.

Male partners' support and influence on pregnant women's oral PrEP use and adherence in Malawi

Introduction

Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective HIV prevention method for pregnant and postpartum women, but adherence barriers exist. Understanding the role of male partners in supporting PrEP use may inform strategies to support PrEP adherence among pregnant and breastfeeding women.

Methods

To understand male partners' involvement in women's use of PrEP, we conducted in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Lilongwe, Malawi who had recently decided to use PrEP (n = 30) and their male partners (n = 20) in the context of a PrEP adherence trial. Women were purposively recruited to ensure variation in their partners' HIV status. Interviews were conducted in Chichewa using a semistructured guide. We followed a thematic approach to analyze the interview data.

Results

Most male partners were receptive to women using PrEP during pregnancy because it eased their fears of the woman and baby acquiring HIV. Men often played a key role in women's PrEP adherence by providing daily reminders and encouragement to adhere to their medication. The majority of women appreciated this support from the men as it lessened the burden of remembering to take their medications daily on their own and aided their adherence. However, several women who lacked male partner support spoke of wanting their partners to be more involved. Many men living with HIV found the mutual support beneficial for their antiretroviral therapy adherence, while men without HIV or with status unknown appreciated knowing that the family was protected. While most men were open to women continuing PrEP beyond the current study, some would only support it if women were still at risk for acquiring HIV.

Conclusion

In this study, male partners were strongly motivated to support the PrEP adherence of their female partners as a way of ensuring that the pregnant women and unborn babies were protected against HIV. Promoting disclosure and tangible support that arises organically among men may be helpful, but programs to enhance this support and identify ways to support women who do not receive support from their partners or do not wish to disclose their PrEP use to partners may be needed.

Point-of-Care Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Improves HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Initiation in Pregnant Women in Antenatal Care in Cape Town, South Africa, 2019 to 2021

Background

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programs present a platform for diagnostic STI testing in low- and middle-income countries, and availability of targeted STI testing has been hypothesized to influence PrEP use. We evaluated the association of STI testing modality and PrEP uptake among pregnant women in antenatal care.

Methods

We enrolled pregnant, HIV-uninfected women (≥16 years) at their first antenatal visit with follow-up through 12 months postpartum. Women were offered oral PrEP and tested for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) using a point-of-care (Cepheid, August 2019–November 2020) or laboratory-based (Thermofisher, December 2020–October 2021) test. We compared the proportion of women initiating and continuing PrEP by STI test adjusting for confounders.

Results

We evaluated 1194 women (median age=26 years [IQR:22–31]) with a STI result (46% POC and 54% laboratory-based). The prevalence of any STI was the same in POC-tested (28%) and laboratory-tested (28%) women — 25% versus 23% for CT (p-value=0.35) and 7% versus 9% for NG (p-value=0.11). Mean time from testing to result was 0 for POC and 26 days for laboratory testing and mean time from testing to treatment was 3 for POC and 38 days for laboratory testing. Receiving a POC STI test was associated with higher PrEP initiation compared to women receiving a laboratory-based test (90% versus 78%; adjusted odds ratio=2.1; 95% CI:1.5–2.9), controlling for age, gravidity, STI diagnosis, intimate partner violence, gestational age, employment, HIV risk perception, and cohabiting status.

Conclusion

POC STI testing, offering same-day results and treatment initiation, may increase PrEP initiation among pregnant women in antenatal care.

A study of HIV-uninfected pregnant women in South Africa found that women offered point-of-care STI testing had a higher odds of initiating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis than women offered laboratory-based testing.

Stepped care to optimize pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectiveness in pregnant and postpartum women (SCOPE-PP) in South Africa: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

HIV incidence among pregnant and postpartum women remains high in South Africa. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use remains suboptimal in this population, particularly during the postpartum period when women's engagement with routine clinic visits outside PrEP decreases. Key barriers to sustained PrEP use include the need for ongoing contact with the health facility and suboptimal counseling around effective PrEP use.

METHODS

Stepped Care to Optimize PrEP Effectiveness in Pregnant and Postpartum women (SCOPE-PP), is a two-stepped unblinded, individually randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to optimize peripartum and postpartum PrEP use by providing a stepped package of evidence-based interventions. We will enroll 650 pregnant women (> 25 weeks pregnant) who access PrEP at a busy antenatal clinic in Cape Town at the time of recruitment and follow them for 15 months. We will enroll and individually randomize pregnant women > 16 years who are not living with HIV who are either on PrEP or interested in starting PrEP during pregnancy. In step 1, we will evaluate the impact of enhanced adherence counselling and biofeedback (using urine tenofovir tests for biofeedback) and rapid PrEP collection (to reduce time required) on PrEP use in early peripartum compared to standard of care (SOC) (n = 325 per arm). The primary outcome is PrEP persistence per urine tenofovir levels and dried blood spots of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) after 6-months. The second step will enroll and individually randomize participants from Step 1 who discontinue taking PrEP or have poor persistence in Step 1 but want to continue PrEP. Step 2 will test the impact of enhanced counseling and biofeedback plus rapid PrEP collection compared to community PrEP delivery with HIV self-testing on PrEP use (n = up to 325 postpartum women). The primary outcome is PrEP continuation and persistence 6-months following second randomization (~ 9-months postpartum). Finally, we will estimate the cost effectiveness of SCOPE-PP vs. SOC per primary outcomes and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted in both Step 1 and 2 using micro-costing with trial- and model-based economic evaluation.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide novel insights into optimal strategies for delivering PrEP to peripartum and postpartum women in this high-incidence setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05322629 : Date of registration: April 12, 2022.