4
|
Hilpert P, Randall AK, Sorokowski P, Atkins DC, Sorokowska A, Ahmadi K, Aghraibeh AM, Aryeetey R, Bertoni A, Bettache K, Błażejewska M, Bodenmann G, Borders J, Bortolini TS, Butovskaya M, Castro FN, Cetinkaya H, Cunha D, David OA, DeLongis A, Dileym FA, Domínguez Espinosa ADC, Donato S, Dronova D, Dural S, Fisher M, Frackowiak T, Gulbetekin E, Hamamcıoğlu Akkaya A, Hansen K, Hattori WT, Hromatko I, Iafrate R, James BO, Jiang F, Kimamo CO, King DB, Koç F, Laar A, Lopes FDA, Martinez R, Mesko N, Molodovskaya N, Moradi K, Motahari Z, Natividade JC, Ntayi J, Ojedokun O, Omar-Fauzee MSB, Onyishi IE, Özener B, Paluszak A, Portugal A, Relvas AP, Rizwan M, Salkičević S, Sarmány-Schuller I, Stamkou E, Stoyanova S, Šukolová D, Sutresna N, Tadinac M, Teras A, Tinoco Ponciano EL, Tripathi R, Tripathi N, Tripathi M, Vilchinsky N, Xu F, Yamamoto ME, Yoo G. The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and within Nations: A 35-Nation Study. Front Psychol 2016; 7:1106. [PMID: 27551269 PMCID: PMC4976670 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Theories about how couples help each other to cope with stress, such as the systemic transactional model of dyadic coping, suggest that the cultural context in which couples live influences how their coping behavior affects their relationship satisfaction. In contrast to the theoretical assumptions, a recent meta-analysis provides evidence that neither culture, nor gender, influences the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction, at least based on their samples of couples living in North America and West Europe. Thus, it is an open questions whether the theoretical assumptions of cultural influences are false or whether cultural influences on couple behavior just occur in cultures outside of the Western world. METHOD In order to examine the cultural influence, using a sample of married individuals (N = 7973) from 35 nations, we used multilevel modeling to test whether the positive association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction varies across nations and whether gender might moderate the association. RESULTS RESULTS reveal that the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction varies between nations. In addition, results show that in some nations the association is higher for men and in other nations it is higher for women. CONCLUSIONS Cultural and gender differences across the globe influence how couples' coping behavior affects relationship outcomes. This crucial finding indicates that couple relationship education programs and interventions need to be culturally adapted, as skill trainings such as dyadic coping lead to differential effects on relationship satisfaction based on the culture in which couples live.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hilpert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of WashingtonSeattle, DC, USA; Department of Psychology, University of ZurichZurich, Switzerland
| | - Ashley K Randall
- Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA
| | | | - David C Atkins
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, DC, USA
| | | | - Khodabakhsh Ahmadi
- Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran
| | - Ahmad M Aghraibeh
- Department of Psychology, College of Education, King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Anna Bertoni
- Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan Milan, Italy
| | - Karim Bettache
- Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Guy Bodenmann
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jessica Borders
- Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Tiago S Bortolini
- Graduate Program in Morphological Sciences, Federal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de Janeiro, Brazil; Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience Unit, D'Or Institute for Research and EducationRio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Marina Butovskaya
- Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia
| | - Felipe N Castro
- Laboratory of Evolution of Human Behavior, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil
| | - Hakan Cetinkaya
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Languages History and Geography, Ankara University Ankara, Turkey
| | - Diana Cunha
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Oana A David
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Anita DeLongis
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fahd A Dileym
- Department of Psychology, King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Silvia Donato
- Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan Milan, Italy
| | - Daria Dronova
- Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia
| | - Seda Dural
- Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Izmir University of Economics Izmir, Turkey
| | - Maryanne Fisher
- Department of Psychology, Saint Mary's University Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Wallisen T Hattori
- Department of Public Health, Medical School, Federal University of Uberlândia Uberlândia, Brazil
| | - Ivana Hromatko
- Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Bawo O James
- Department of Clinical Services, Federal Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital Benin-City, Nigeria
| | - Feng Jiang
- Department of Organization and Human Resources Management, Central University of Finance and Economics Beijing, China
| | | | - David B King
- Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Fırat Koç
- Department of Anatomy, Baskent University Ankara, Turkey
| | - Amos Laar
- School of Public Health, University of Ghana Legon, Ghana
| | - Fívia De Araújo Lopes
- Laboratory of Evolution of Human Behavior, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil
| | - Rocio Martinez
- Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada Granada, Spain
| | - Norbert Mesko
- Institute of Psychology, University of Pécs Pécs, Hungary
| | | | - Khadijeh Moradi
- Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Razi University Kermanshah, Iran
| | | | - Jean C Natividade
- Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Joseph Ntayi
- Faculty of Computing and Management Science, Makerere University Business School Kampala, Uganda
| | - Oluyinka Ojedokun
- Department of Pure & Applied Psychology, Adekunle Ajasin University Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria
| | - Mohd S B Omar-Fauzee
- School of Education and Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia Sintok, Malaysia
| | - Ike E Onyishi
- Department of Psychology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Barış Özener
- Department of Anthropology, Istanbul University Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Anna Paluszak
- Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Alda Portugal
- Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Madeira Funchal, Portugal
| | - Ana P Relvas
- Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Muhammad Rizwan
- Institute of Clinical Psychology, University of Karachi Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Ivan Sarmány-Schuller
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Constantine The Philosopher University in Nitra Nitra, Slovakia
| | - Eftychia Stamkou
- Department of Social Psychology, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stanislava Stoyanova
- Department of Psychology, South-West University "Neofit Rilski" Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
| | - Denisa Šukolová
- Department of Psychology, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
| | - Nina Sutresna
- Faculty of Sports and Health Education, Indonesia University of Education Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Meri Tadinac
- Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Andero Teras
- Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia
| | - Edna L Tinoco Ponciano
- Institute of Psychology, University of the State of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ritu Tripathi
- Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore Bangalore, India
| | - Nachiketa Tripathi
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Guwahati, India
| | - Mamta Tripathi
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Guwahati, India
| | - Noa Vilchinsky
- Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Feng Xu
- Department of Psychology, University of ZurichZurich, Switzerland; Department of Education for Students, Guangdong Construction PolytechnicGuangdong, China
| | - Maria E Yamamoto
- Laboratory of Evolution of Human Behavior, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil
| | - Gyesook Yoo
- Department of Child & Family Studies, Kyung Hee University Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dillon LM, Nowak N, Weisfeld GE, Weisfeld CC, Shattuck KS, Imamoğlu OE, Butovskaya M, Shen J. Sources of Marital Conflict in Five Cultures. EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY 2015; 13:147470491501300101. [PMCID: PMC10480830 DOI: 10.1177/147470491501300101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2014] [Accepted: 11/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This analysis of previously collected data examined four fitness-relevant issues for their possible role in marital conflict. These were sex, finances, division of labor, and raising children, selected in light of their pertinence to sex differences in reproductive strategies. Over 2,000 couples in five diverse cultures were studied. Marital conflict was assessed by the Problems with Partner scale, which was previously shown to demonstrate measurement invariance across cultures and genders. All four issues were significantly related to perceived marital problems in almost all cases. Thus, conflict tended to arise around issues relevant to reproductive strategies. A few cultural idiosyncrasies emerged and are discussed. In all cultures, wives reported more problems than husbands. Another important issue was kindness. The results suggest that a key factor in marital success or failure may be kindness necessary to sustain this prolonged and intimate relationship of cooperation for raising one's offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M. Dillon
- Graduate Medical Education, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
| | - Nicole Nowak
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| | | | | | | | - Olcay E. Imamoğlu
- Department of Psychology, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Marina Butovskaya
- Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
| | - Jiliang Shen
- Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, China
| |
Collapse
|