Iranian Gender-Nonconforming Children Will Not Benefit from the Omission of Gender Incongruence in Children Diagnosis

Reliability and Clinical Utility of Gender Identity-Related Diagnoses: Comparisons Between the ICD-11, ICD-10, DSM-IV, and DSM-5

Purpose: The World Health Organization general assembly approved the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) in 2019 which will be implemented in 2022. Gender identity-related diagnoses were substantially reconceptualized and removed from the mental health chapter so that the distress criterion is no longer a prerequisite. The present study examined reliability and clinical utility of gender identity-related diagnoses of the ICD-11 in comparison with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5, ICD-10, and DSM-IV. Methods: Sixty-four health care providers assessed six videos of two children, two adolescents, and two adults referred for gender incongruence. Each provider rated one pair of videos with three of the four classification systems (ICD-11, DSM-5, ICD-10, and DSM-IV-TR). This resulted in 72 ratings for the adolescent and adult diagnoses and 59 ratings for the children's diagnoses. Results: Interrater agreement rates for each instrument ranged from 65% to 79% for the adolescence/adulthood diagnoses and from 67% to 94% for the childhood diagnoses and were comparable regardless of the system used. Only agreement rates for ICD-11 were significantly better than those for DSM-5 for both age categories. Clinicians evaluated all four systems as convenient and easy to use. Conclusion: In conclusion, both classification systems (DSM and ICD) and both editions (DSM-IV and DSM-5 and ICD-10 and ICD-11) of gender identity-related diagnoses seem reliable and convenient for clinical use.

A Qualitative Study of the Acceptability of the Proposed ICD-11 Gender Incongruence of Childhood Diagnosis Among Transgender Adults Who Were Labeled Due to Their Gender Identity Since Childhood

For the forthcoming ICD-11, the ICD-10 category of Gender Identity Disorder of Childhood has been reformulated as Gender Incongruence of Childhood (GIC) and moved out of the mental disorders chapter. Proponents of eliminating the GIC diagnosis altogether claim that it is unnecessary and inherently harmful, although they do not eschew the diagnosis for adolescents and adults. Using a qualitative methodology, this study examined the impact of receiving a diagnosis related to gender identity as a child among transgender people who had had this experience, and evaluated participants' views of the acceptability and usefulness of the ICD-11 GIC proposal. Participants receiving health services at a specialized public clinic for transgender health in Mexico City who had received some form of diagnosis in childhood were referred to participate in a semistructured interview. A sample of 12 transgender people (eight transgender women and four transgender men; ages 18-49) was necessary to reach saturation. Diagnoses received were non-specific rather than formal gender identity diagnoses, were experienced by participants as negative, and were used to justify potentially harmful interventions. However, when participants reviewed the ICD-11 proposals for GIC, all indicated that the category was necessary and important and could have a range of personal, familial, and social benefits. They agreed with its placement in a new chapter on Conditions Related to Sexual Health and endorsed the proposed definition and name of the category. Although this study involved a small and specific sample, the results raise questions about the claim that the diagnosis is inherently harmful and universally deplored by transgender people.