1
|
Lu H, Mehta AH, Oxenham AJ. Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG. CURRENT RESEARCH IN NEUROBIOLOGY 2022; 3:100061. [PMID: 36386860 PMCID: PMC9647176 DOI: 10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) has been traditionally recorded with few electrodes and is often measured as the voltage difference between mastoid and vertex electrodes (vertical montage). As high-density EEG recording systems have gained popularity, multi-channel analysis methods have been developed to integrate the ASSR signal across channels. The phases of ASSR across electrodes can be affected by factors including the stimulus modulation rate and re-referencing strategy, which will in turn affect the estimated ASSR strength. To explore the relationship between the classical vertical-montage ASSR and whole-scalp ASSR, we applied these two techniques to the same data to estimate the strength of ASSRs evoked by tones with sinusoidal amplitude modulation rates of around 40, 100, and 200 Hz. The whole-scalp methods evaluated in our study, with either linked-mastoid or common-average reference, included ones that assume equal phase across all channels, as well as ones that allow for different phase relationships. The performance of simple averaging was compared to that of more complex methods involving principal component analysis. Overall, the root-mean-square of the phase locking values (PLVs) across all channels provided the most efficient method to detect ASSR across the range of modulation rates tested here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Lu
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Anahita H. Mehta
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Andrew J. Oxenham
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mylonas D, Sjøgård M, Shi Z, Baxter B, Hämäläinen M, Manoach DS, Khan S. A Novel Approach to Estimating the Cortical Sources of Sleep Spindles Using Simultaneous EEG/MEG. Front Neurol 2022; 13:871166. [PMID: 35785365 PMCID: PMC9243385 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.871166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Sleep spindles, defining oscillations of stage II non-rapid eye movement sleep (N2), mediate sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Spindles are disrupted in several neurodevelopmental, neuropsychiatric, and neurodegenerative disorders characterized by cognitive impairment. Increasing spindles can improve memory suggesting spindles as a promising physiological target for the development of cognitive enhancing therapies. This effort would benefit from more comprehensive and spatially precise methods to characterize spindles. Spindles, as detected with electroencephalography (EEG), are often widespread across electrodes. Available evidence, however, suggests that they act locally to enhance cortical plasticity in the service of memory consolidation. Here, we present a novel method to enhance the spatial specificity of cortical source estimates of spindles using combined EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data constrained to the cortex based on structural MRI. To illustrate this method, we used simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings from 25 healthy adults during a daytime nap. We first validated source space spindle detection using only EEG data by demonstrating strong temporal correspondence with sensor space EEG spindle detection (gold standard). We then demonstrated that spindle source estimates using EEG alone, MEG alone and combined EEG/MEG are stable across nap sessions. EEG detected more source space spindles than MEG and each modality detected non-overlapping spindles that had distinct cortical source distributions. Source space EEG was more sensitive to spindles in medial frontal and lateral prefrontal cortex, while MEG was more sensitive to spindles in somatosensory and motor cortices. By combining EEG and MEG data this method leverages the differential spatial sensitivities of the two modalities to obtain a more comprehensive and spatially specific source estimation of spindles than possible with either modality alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Mylonas
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- *Correspondence: Dimitrios Mylonas
| | - Martin Sjøgård
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Zhaoyue Shi
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Carle Illinois Advanced Imaging Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, United States
| | - Bryan Baxter
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Matti Hämäläinen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Dara S. Manoach
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Sheraz Khan
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reconstructing subcortical and cortical somatosensory activity via the RAMUS inverse source analysis technique using median nerve SEP data. Neuroimage 2021; 245:118726. [PMID: 34838947 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This study concerns reconstructing brain activity at various depths based on non-invasive EEG (electroencephalography) scalp measurements. We aimed at demonstrating the potential of the RAMUS (randomized multiresolution scanning) technique in localizing weakly distinguishable far-field sources in combination with coinciding cortical activity. As we have shown earlier theoretically and through simulations, RAMUS is a novel mathematical method that by employing the multigrid concept, allows marginalizing noise and depth bias effects and thus enables the recovery of both cortical and subcortical brain activity. To show this capability with experimental data, we examined the 14-30 ms post-stimulus somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) responses of human median nerve stimulation in three healthy adult subjects. We aim at reconstructing the different response components by evaluating a RAMUS-based estimate for the primary current density in the nervous tissue. We present source reconstructions obtained with RAMUS and compare them with the literature knowledge of the SEP components and the outcome of the unit-noise gain beamformer (UGNB) and standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA). We also analyzed the effect of the iterative alternating sequential technique, the optimization technique of RAMUS, compared to the classical minimum norm estimation (MNE) technique. Matching with our previous numerical studies, the current results suggest that RAMUS could have the potential to enhance the detection of simultaneous deep and cortical components and the distinction between the evoked sulcal and gyral activity.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bénar CG, Velmurugan J, López-Madrona VJ, Pizzo F, Badier JM. Detection and localization of deep sources in magnetoencephalography: A review. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2021.100285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
5
|
Dinh C, Samuelsson JG, Hunold A, Hämäläinen MS, Khan S. Contextual MEG and EEG Source Estimates Using Spatiotemporal LSTM Networks. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:552666. [PMID: 33767606 PMCID: PMC7985163 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.552666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Most magneto- and electroencephalography (M/EEG) based source estimation techniques derive their estimates sample wise, independently across time. However, neuronal assemblies are intricately interconnected, constraining the temporal evolution of neural activity that is detected by MEG and EEG; the observed neural currents must thus be highly context dependent. Here, we use a network of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) cells where the input is a sequence of past source estimates and the output is a prediction of the following estimate. This prediction is then used to correct the estimate. In this study, we applied this technique on noise-normalized minimum norm estimates (MNE). Because the correction is found by using past activity (context), we call this implementation Contextual MNE (CMNE), although this technique can be used in conjunction with any source estimation method. We test CMNE on simulated epileptiform activity and recorded auditory steady state response (ASSR) data, showing that the CMNE estimates exhibit a higher degree of spatial fidelity than the unfiltered estimates in the tested cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Dinh
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Charlestown, MA, United States.,Institute for Medical Engineering, Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - John G Samuelsson
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (HST), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Alexander Hunold
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany
| | - Matti S Hämäläinen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sheraz Khan
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Charlestown, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Samuelsson JG, Peled N, Mamashli F, Ahveninen J, Hämäläinen MS. Spatial fidelity of MEG/EEG source estimates: A general evaluation approach. Neuroimage 2021; 224:117430. [PMID: 33038537 PMCID: PMC7793168 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Low spatial resolution is often cited as the most critical limitation of magneto- and electroencephalography (MEG and EEG), but a unifying framework for quantifying the spatial fidelity of M/EEG source estimates has yet to be established; previous studies have focused on linear estimation methods under ideal scenarios without noise. Here we present an approach that quantifies the spatial fidelity of M/EEG estimates from simulated patch activations over the entire neocortex superposed on measured resting-state data. This approach grants more generalizability in the evaluation process that allows for, e.g., comparing linear and non-linear estimates in the whole brain for different signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), number of active sources and activation waveforms. Using this framework, we evaluated the MNE, dSPM, sLORETA, eLORETA, and MxNE methods and found that the spatial fidelity varies significantly with SNR, following a largely sigmoidal curve whose shape varies depending on which aspect of spatial fidelity that is being quantified and the source estimation method. We believe that these methods and results will be useful when interpreting M/EEG source estimates as well as in methods development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John G Samuelsson
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (HST), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Noam Peled
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Fahimeh Mamashli
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jyrki Ahveninen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Matti S Hämäläinen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rezaei A, Antonakakis M, Piastra M, Wolters CH, Pursiainen S. Parametrizing the Conditionally Gaussian Prior Model for Source Localization with Reference to the P20/N20 Component of Median Nerve SEP/SEF. Brain Sci 2020; 10:E934. [PMID: 33287441 PMCID: PMC7761863 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10120934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In this article, we focused on developing the conditionally Gaussian hierarchical Bayesian model (CG-HBM), which forms a superclass of several inversion methods for source localization of brain activity using somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and field (SEF) measurements. The goal of this proof-of-concept study was to improve the applicability of the CG-HBM as a superclass by proposing a robust approach for the parametrization of focal source scenarios. We aimed at a parametrization that is invariant with respect to altering the noise level and the source space size. The posterior difference between the gamma and inverse gamma hyperprior was minimized by optimizing the shape parameter, while a suitable range for the scale parameter can be obtained via the prior-over-measurement signal-to-noise ratio, which we introduce as a new concept in this study. In the source localization experiments, the primary generator of the P20/N20 component was detected in the Brodmann area 3b using the CG-HBM approach and a parameter range derived from the existing knowledge of the Tikhonov-regularized minimum norm estimate, i.e., the classical Gaussian prior model. Moreover, it seems that the detection of deep thalamic activity simultaneously with the P20/N20 component with the gamma hyperprior can be enhanced while using a close-to-optimal shape parameter value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atena Rezaei
- Computing Sciences, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Hervanta Campus, P.O. Box 1001, 33014 Tampere, Finland;
| | - Marios Antonakakis
- Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, D-48149 Münster, Germany; (M.A.); (M.P.); (C.H.W.)
| | - MariaCarla Piastra
- Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, D-48149 Münster, Germany; (M.A.); (M.P.); (C.H.W.)
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carsten H. Wolters
- Institute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Malmedyweg 15, D-48149 Münster, Germany; (M.A.); (M.P.); (C.H.W.)
- Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Sampsa Pursiainen
- Computing Sciences, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Hervanta Campus, P.O. Box 1001, 33014 Tampere, Finland;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fahimi Hnazaee M, Wittevrongel B, Khachatryan E, Libert A, Carrette E, Dauwe I, Meurs A, Boon P, Van Roost D, Van Hulle MM. Localization of deep brain activity with scalp and subdural EEG. Neuroimage 2020; 223:117344. [PMID: 32898677 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
To what extent electrocorticography (ECoG) and electroencephalography (scalp EEG) differ in their capability to locate sources of deep brain activity is far from evident. Compared to EEG, the spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio of ECoG is superior but its spatial coverage is more restricted, as is arguably the volume of tissue activity effectively measured from. Moreover, scalp EEG studies are providing evidence of locating activity from deep sources such as the hippocampus using high-density setups during quiet wakefulness. To address this question, we recorded a multimodal dataset from 4 patients with refractory epilepsy during quiet wakefulness. This data comprises simultaneous scalp, subdural and depth EEG electrode recordings. The latter was located in the hippocampus or insula and provided us with our "ground truth" for source localization of deep activity. We applied independent component analysis (ICA) for the purpose of separating the independent sources in theta, alpha and beta frequency band activity. In all patients subdural- and scalp EEG components were observed which had a significant zero-lag correlation with one or more contacts of the depth electrodes. Subsequent dipole modeling of the correlating components revealed dipole locations that were significantly closer to the depth electrodes compared to the dipole location of non-correlating components. These findings support the idea that components found in both recording modalities originate from neural activity in close proximity to the depth electrodes. Sources localized with subdural electrodes were ~70% closer to the depth electrode than sources localized with EEG with an absolute improvement of around ~2cm. In our opinion, this is not a considerable improvement in source localization accuracy given that, for clinical purposes, ECoG electrodes were implanted in close proximity to the depth electrodes. Furthermore, the ECoG grid attenuates the scalp EEG, due to the electrically isolating silastic sheets in which the ECoG electrodes are embedded. Our results on dipole modeling show that the deep source localization accuracy of scalp EEG is comparable to that of ECoG. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Deep and subcortical regions play an important role in brain function. However, as joint recordings at multiple spatial scales to study brain function in humans are still scarce, it is still unresolved to what extent ECoG and EEG differ in their capability to locate sources of deep brain activity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study presenting a dataset of simultaneously recorded EEG, ECoG and depth electrodes in the hippocampus or insula, with a focus on non-epileptiform activity (quiet wakefulness). Furthermore, we are the first study to provide experimental findings on the comparison of source localization of deep cortical structures between invasive and non-invasive brain activity measured from the cortical surface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Wittevrongel
- Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elvira Khachatryan
- Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arno Libert
- Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelien Carrette
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ine Dauwe
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alfred Meurs
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul Boon
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Roost
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marc M Van Hulle
- Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Andersen LM, Jerbi K, Dalal SS. Can EEG and MEG detect signals from the human cerebellum? Neuroimage 2020; 215:116817. [PMID: 32278092 PMCID: PMC7306153 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The cerebellum plays a key role in the regulation of motor learning, coordination and timing, and has been implicated in sensory and cognitive processes as well. However, our current knowledge of its electrophysiological mechanisms comes primarily from direct recordings in animals, as investigations into cerebellar function in humans have instead predominantly relied on lesion, haemodynamic and metabolic imaging studies. While the latter provide fundamental insights into the contribution of the cerebellum to various cerebellar-cortical pathways mediating behaviour, they remain limited in terms of temporal and spectral resolution. In principle, this shortcoming could be overcome by monitoring the cerebellum's electrophysiological signals. Non-invasive assessment of cerebellar electrophysiology in humans, however, is hampered by the limited spatial resolution of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in subcortical structures, i.e., deep sources. Furthermore, it has been argued that the anatomical configuration of the cerebellum leads to signal cancellation in MEG and EEG. Yet, claims that MEG and EEG are unable to detect cerebellar activity have been challenged by an increasing number of studies over the last decade. Here we address this controversy and survey reports in which electrophysiological signals were successfully recorded from the human cerebellum. We argue that the detection of cerebellum activity non-invasively with MEG and EEG is indeed possible and can be enhanced with appropriate methods, in particular using connectivity analysis in source space. We provide illustrative examples of cerebellar activity detected with MEG and EEG. Furthermore, we propose practical guidelines to optimize the detection of cerebellar activity with MEG and EEG. Finally, we discuss MEG and EEG signal contamination that may lead to localizing spurious sources in the cerebellum and suggest ways of handling such artefacts. This review is to be read as a perspective review that highlights that it is indeed possible to measure cerebellum with MEG and EEG and encourages MEG and EEG researchers to do so. Its added value beyond highlighting and encouraging is that it offers useful advice for researchers aspiring to investigate the cerebellum with MEG and EEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lau M Andersen
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Denmark; NatMEG, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Karim Jerbi
- Computational and Cognitive Neuroscience Lab (CoCo Lab), Psychology Department, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; MEG Unit, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarang S Dalal
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kandemir AL, Litvak V, Florin E. The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings. Neuroimage 2020; 219:117057. [PMID: 32540355 PMCID: PMC7443703 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be a very efficient treatment option for movement disorders and psychiatric diseases. To better understand DBS mechanisms, brain activity can be recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG) with the stimulator turned on. However, DBS produces large artefacts compromising MEG data quality due to both the applied current and the movement of wires connecting the stimulator with the electrode. To filter out these artefacts, several methods to suppress the DBS artefact have been proposed in the literature. A comparative study evaluating each method’s effectiveness, however, is missing so far. In this study, we evaluate the performance of four artefact rejection methods on MEG data from phantom recordings with DBS acquired with an Elekta Neuromag and a CTF system: (i) Hampel-filter, (ii) spectral signal space projection (S3P), (iii) independent component analysis with mutual information (ICA-MI), and (iv) temporal signal space separation (tSSS). In the sensor space, the largest increase in signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio was achieved by ICA-MI, while the best correspondence in terms of source activations was obtained by tSSS. LCMV beamforming alone was not sufficient to suppress the DBS-induced artefacts. Phantom MEG measurement with Elekta Neuromag and CTF MEG system with DBS. Systematic comparison of cleaning algorithms to remove DBS artefact from MEG data. Sensor level ICA-MI yielded the best results. Source level: tSSS provided the best correspondence to recording without DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Levent Kandemir
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Vladimir Litvak
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Esther Florin
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Samuelsson JG, Sundaram P, Khan S, Sereno MI, Hämäläinen MS. Detectability of cerebellar activity with magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41:2357-2372. [PMID: 32115870 PMCID: PMC7244390 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Electrophysiological signals from the cerebellum have traditionally been viewed as inaccessible to magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). Here, we challenge this position by investigating the ability of MEG and EEG to detect cerebellar activity using a model that employs a high‐resolution tessellation of the cerebellar cortex. The tessellation was constructed from repetitive high‐field (9.4T) structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of an ex vivo human cerebellum. A boundary‐element forward model was then used to simulate the M/EEG signals resulting from neural activity in the cerebellar cortex. Despite significant signal cancelation due to the highly convoluted cerebellar cortex, we found that the cerebellar signal was on average only 30–60% weaker than the cortical signal. We also made detailed M/EEG sensitivity maps and found that MEG and EEG have highly complementary sensitivity distributions over the cerebellar cortex. Based on previous fMRI studies combined with our M/EEG sensitivity maps, we discuss experimental paradigms that are likely to offer high M/EEG sensitivity to cerebellar activity. Taken together, these results show that cerebellar activity should be clearly detectable by current M/EEG systems with an appropriate experimental setup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John G Samuelsson
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (HST), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Padmavathi Sundaram
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sheraz Khan
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Martin I Sereno
- Department of Psychology and Neuroimaging Center, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.,Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matti S Hämäläinen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|