1
|
Chlebowski RT, Aragaki AK, Pan K, Nelson RA, Barac A, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, Ikramuddin FS, Johnson KC, Krok-Schoen JL, Laddu D, Pichardo MS, Snetselaar LG, LeBoff MS, Michael Y. Dietary Intervention Favorably Influences Physical Functioning: The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Dietary Modification Trial. J Acad Nutr Diet 2024:S2212-2672(24)00091-1. [PMID: 38395355 DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification randomized trial, the dietary intervention reduced breast cancer mortality by 21% (P = .02) and increased physical activity as well. OBJECTIVE Therefore, the aim was to examine whether or not these lifestyle changes attenuated age-related physical functioning decline. DESIGN In a randomized trial, the influence of 8 years of a low-fat dietary pattern intervention was examined through 20 years of cumulative follow-up. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING From 1993 to 1998, 48,835 postmenopausal women, ages 50 to 79 years with no prior breast cancer and negative baseline mammogram were randomized at 40 US clinical centers to dietary intervention or usual diet comparison groups (40 out of 60). The intervention significantly reduced fat intake and increased vegetable, fruit, and grain intake. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES In post hoc analyses, physical functioning, assessed using the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, evaluated quality or limitations of 10 hierarchical physical activities. Longitudinal physical functioning, reported against a disability threshold (when assistance in daily activities is required) was the primary study outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED Semiparametric linear mixed effect models were used to contrast physical functioning trajectories by randomization groups. RESULTS Physical functioning score, assessed 495,317 times with 11.0 (median) assessments per participant, was significantly higher in the intervention vs comparison groups through 12 years of cumulative follow-up (P = .001), representing a reduction in age-related functional decline. The intervention effect subsequently attenuated and did not delay time to the disability threshold. Among women in the dietary intervention vs comparison groups, aged 50 to 59 years, who were physically inactive at entry, a persistent, statistically significant, favorable influence on physical functioning with associated delay in crossing the disability threshold by approximately a year was seen (P value for interaction = .007). CONCLUSIONS In the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification randomized trial, a dietary intervention that significantly reduced breast cancer mortality also significantly reduced age-related functional decline through 12 years, which was attenuated with longer follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kathy Pan
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Downey, California
| | - Rebecca A Nelson
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Ana Barac
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Georgetown University, Fairfax, Virginia
| | - JoAnn E Manson
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marcia L Stefanick
- Stanford Preventive Medicine Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Farha S Ikramuddin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Karen C Johnson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jessica L Krok-Schoen
- Health Sciences School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Deepika Laddu
- Department of Physical Therapy College of Applied Health Sciences, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Margaret S Pichardo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Meryl S LeBoff
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yvonne Michael
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bjørge T, Hjellvik V, Bjørge L, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Furu K, Kvåle R, Engeland A. Incidence and prevalence of drugs used for chronic diseases in survivors of adult-onset gynaecological cancer - A nationwide cohort study. BJOG 2023; 130:770-778. [PMID: 36700296 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate both incidence and prevalence of drugs used for chronic diseases in survivors of adult-onset gynaecological cancer. DESIGN A prospective study. SETTING Population-based registries. POPULATION 1.76 million women, including 17 500 women with gynaecological cancers. METHODS Data from the Cancer Registry of Norway was linked to the Norwegian Prescription Database and other national databases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prevalence ratios (PRs) and hazard ratios (HRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), of dispensed drugs in gynaecological cancer patients (up to 15 years after diagnosis) were estimated by log-binomial and Cox regression, respectively, with cancer-free women as reference. RESULTS For gynaecological cancer patients, the incidence of drugs used for pain control was higher than in cancer-free women, especially the first 5 years after diagnosis, and the prevalence was high at least 10 years after. The prevalence of sex hormones was high in women with gynaecological cancer at least 10 years after diagnosis (cervical and ovarian cancer PR = 23, 95% CI 18-30 and PR = 29, 95% CI 15-38, respectively), but low in cancer-free women (0.3%). Patients with uterine corpus cancer had a higher prevalence of antidiabetics before and at least 10 years after diagnosis, most pronounced in women diagnosed before age 50 (PR = 10, 95% CI 5.0-21). The prevalence of antidepressants was moderately elevated in women with gynaecological cancers. CONCLUSIONS Gynaecological cancer survivors, particularly cervical and ovarian cancer survivors, had an increased long-term use of drugs for pain control and sex hormones. Survivors of uterine corpus cancer used antidiabetics more often, both before and after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tone Bjørge
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vidar Hjellvik
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen/Oslo, Norway
| | - Line Bjørge
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kari Furu
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen/Oslo, Norway
| | - Rune Kvåle
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen/Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Anders Engeland
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen/Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vaz-Luis I, Masiero M, Cavaletti G, Cervantes A, Chlebowski RT, Curigliano G, Felip E, Ferreira AR, Ganz PA, Hegarty J, Jeon J, Johansen C, Joly F, Jordan K, Koczwara B, Lagergren P, Lambertini M, Lenihan D, Linardou H, Loprinzi C, Partridge AH, Rauh S, Steindorf K, van der Graaf W, van de Poll-Franse L, Pentheroudakis G, Peters S, Pravettoni G. ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on Cancer Survivorship: promoting high-quality survivorship care and research in Europe. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1119-1133. [PMID: 35963481 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increased number of cancer survivors and the recognition of physical and psychosocial challenges, present from cancer diagnosis through active treatment and beyond, led to the discipline of cancer survivorship. DESIGN AND METHODS Herein, we reflected on the different components of survivorship care, existing models and priorities, in order to facilitate the promotion of high-quality European survivorship care and research. RESULTS We identified five main components of survivorship care: (i) physical effects of cancer and chronic medical conditions; (ii) psychological effects of cancer; (iii) social, work and financial effects of cancer; (iv) surveillance for recurrences and second cancers; and (v) cancer prevention and overall health and well-being promotion. Survivorship care can be delivered by structured care models including but not limited to shared models integrating primary care and oncology services. The choice of the care model to be implemented has to be adapted to local realities. High-quality care should be expedited by the generation of: (i) focused and shared European recommendations, (ii) creation of tools to facilitate implementation of coordinated care and (iii) survivorship educational programs for health care teams and patients. The research agenda should be defined with the participation of health care providers, researchers, policy makers, patients and caregivers. The following patient-centered survivorship research areas were highlighted: (i) generation of a big data platform to collect long-term real-world data in survivors and healthy controls to (a) understand the resources, needs and preferences of patients with cancer, and (b) understand biological determinants of survivorship issues, and (ii) develop innovative effective interventions focused on the main components of survivorship care. CONCLUSIONS The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) can actively contribute in the efforts of the oncology community toward (a) promoting the development of high-quality survivorship care programs, (b) providing educational material and (c) aiding groundbreaking research by reflecting on priorities and by supporting research networking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Vaz-Luis
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif; UMR 981, Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
| | - M Masiero
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan; Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan
| | - G Cavaletti
- Experimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA, Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - E Felip
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon; Catolica Medical School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - P A Ganz
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Hegarty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - J Jeon
- Exercise Medicine Center for Cancer and Diabetes Patients (ICONS), Department of Sport Industry, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Shinchon Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - C Johansen
- Centre for Cancer Late Effect Research (CASTLE), Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - F Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, U1086 Anticipe, Unicaen Normandy Universtity, Caen, France
| | - K Jordan
- Department for Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam; Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Koczwara
- Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - P Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - D Lenihan
- International Cardio-Oncology Society, Tampa, USA
| | - H Linardou
- Fourth Oncology Department & Comprehensive Clinical Trials Center, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - A H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - S Rauh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Esch, Luxembourg
| | - K Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - W van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam
| | - L van de Poll-Franse
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, Department of Psycological Research, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht; CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - S Peters
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan; Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pan K, Ray RM, Cauley JA, Shadyab AH, Hurria A, Chlebowski RT. Trajectory of recurrent falls in post-menopausal breast cancer survivors and in matched cancer-free controls. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 180:767-775. [PMID: 32076891 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05576-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cross-sectional studies suggest that falls are prevalent among older breast cancer survivors. However, fall risk in this population has not been comprehensively examined. Therefore, we compared fall risk in older women post-breast cancer diagnosis to fall risk before cancer diagnosis and to risk in cancer-free matched controls. METHODS Among 2019 women in the Women's Health Initiative with localized breast cancer diagnosed at age ≥ 60 years with fall assessment data for 3 years pre-diagnosis and 3 years post-diagnosis, recurrent fall risk post-diagnosis was compared to risk in 2019 cancer-free controls matched by age, year of WHI entry, and baseline fall frequency. Generalized estimating equations under a logistic regression model were used to compare fall recurrence in breast cancer survivors and controls. Multi-variable models were adjusted for the matching factors, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and multiple chronic conditions. RESULTS In breast cancer survivors aged 70.8 years (mean) at diagnosis, over the 3-year pre-diagnosis interval, recurrent falls were reported by 18.5%. Over the 3-year post-diagnosis interval, recurrent falls were reported by 21.8% of breast cancer survivors and 20.0% of controls over the same time period (P = 0.27). Recurrent fall risk did not differ between breast cancer survivors and control women (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92-1.25), even after multi-variable adjustment. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to prior reports, older breast cancer survivors were not more likely to experience recurrent falls than age-matched counterparts. These findings underscore the need for incorporation of cancer-free control populations in survivorship studies to distinguish cancer sequelae from processes related to aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Pan
- The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, 1124 W. Carson Street, Building N-18, Torrance, CA, 90502, USA.
| | - Roberta M Ray
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Arti Hurria
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Rowan T Chlebowski
- The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA, 1124 W. Carson Street, Building N-18, Torrance, CA, 90502, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Michael YL, Wu C, Pan K, Seguin-Fowler RA, Garcia DO, Zaslavsky O, Chlebowski RT. Postmenopausal Breast Cancer and Physical Function Change: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68:1029-1036. [PMID: 31977067 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES While breast cancer and associated therapies can influence physical function (PF), findings for breast cancer's effects on PF among postmenopausal women are not consistent. This research evaluates the effect of breast cancer on change in PF. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study analyzed using difference-in-differences (DID) method to compare the changes in PF over time between women with and without breast cancer, by invasive status, stage, and age. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Women's Health Initiative participants, aged 50 to 79 years at baseline, with four completed functional status assessments were eligible for inclusion (mean age = 62.1 ± 6.9 years). Women with breast cancer diagnosed between the 3rd and 11th enrollment year (n = 1636) were compared to women without breast cancer (n = 35 660). MEASUREMENTS PF was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 at baseline and years 3, 11, and 12. RESULTS Compared with women without breast cancer, women with breast cancer experienced greater PF decline (P < .0001), after adjustment for age, race, education, income, study/trial arm, and body mass index. Overall, functional declines were greatest among women with invasive breast cancer (DID = -4.87; 95% confidence interval = -7.12 to -2.62). In stratified analyses, the breast cancer effect on PF was greater among women in older age groups. CONCLUSION Women diagnosed with breast cancer experienced a significant decline in PF beyond what is observed in typical aging in this cohort. To optimally address survivorship issues, disease sequelae need to be distinguished from normal aging in studies incorporating a cancer-free comparison group. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1029-1036, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne L Michael
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chengyi Wu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathy Pan
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | | | - David O Garcia
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Oleg Zaslavsky
- Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Rowan T Chlebowski
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pan K, Hurria A, Chlebowski RT. Breast cancer survivorship: state of the science. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 168:593-600. [PMID: 29332134 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4650-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Only recently has breast cancer survivorship earned formal recognition as a research discipline. Complicating survivorship research is the frequent overlap between aging and treatment sequelae. The ACS/ASCO 2016 Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline (Guideline) reflects comprehensive literature review through April 2015, while the jointly sponsored, inaugural Cancer Survivorship Symposium in 2016 (Symposium) reflects ongoing research activity in the area. Together, these platforms provide an opportunity to examine the use of randomized trials and controlled studies in survivorship care research. METHODS All 236 citations from the Guideline and all 250 abstracts from the Symposium were reviewed independently by two authors and assigned to prospectively determined categories. RESULTS Guideline citations were most frequently reviews (n = 88, 37.3%) and non-randomized, non-controlled studies (n = 51, 21.6%). Thirty-seven (15.7%) randomized trials were cited. Only 9% of Guideline recommendations were based on randomized clinical trial evidence, while 64% were based on evidence level "0" (expert opinion, clinical practice, etc.). Symposium abstracts consisted largely of non-randomized, non-controlled studies (n = 113, 45.2%), with ten completed randomized trials (4%). Few Guideline citations or Symposium abstracts incorporated matched, cancer-free controls. CONCLUSIONS Based on the literature underlying the ASCO Guideline as well as a survey of the Cancer Survivorship Symposium abstracts, a significant proportion of the survivorship literature at least through 2015 consisted of non-randomized, non-controlled studies. To optimally address survivorship issues, cancer therapy sequelae need to be distinguished from normal aging in studies incorporating cancer-free controls, and randomized clinical trials are needed to inform intervention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Pan
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1124 W. Carson St., N16, Torrance, CA, 90502, USA.
| | - Arti Hurria
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Rowan T Chlebowski
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Survivorship care for postmenopausal breast cancer patients in Ireland: What do women want ? Eur J Oncol Nurs 2017; 28:69-76. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Revised: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|