Extracapsular extension in the positive sentinel lymph node: a marker of poor prognosis in cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients?

Are Clinically Node-Negative Patients with a Positive Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Biopsy Appropriate Candidates for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy?

BACKGROUND

Whether cN0 patients with image-detected nodal metastases are appropriate for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or should proceed directly to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial. We sought to determine how often ALND is needed with upfront surgery and to identify factors associated with ≥ 3 positive SLNs after a positive preoperative lymph node (LN) biopsy.

METHODS

Patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer and a positive LN biopsy treated from 2014 to 2022 were identified from a prospective database. Patients who received NAC were excluded. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between women with 1-2 positive SLNs and ≥ 3 positive SLNs.

RESULTS

Of 90 eligible patients, 66 (73%) had 1-2 positive SLNs and 24 (27%) had ≥ 3 positive SLNs. The median patient age was 62 years, median tumor size was 2.2 cm, and 16 women (18%) received a mastectomy. There was no difference in body mass index, tumor size, histology, grade, multifocality, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and receptor status between groups. On multivariable analysis, having ≥ 3 positive SLNs was associated with > 1 abnormal LN on preoperative imaging (odds ratio [OR] 4.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-14.0; p = 0.01), microscopic extracapsular extension in the SLNs (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.25-13.7; p = 0.025), and a higher median number of SLNs removed (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10-1.88; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 70% of women with cT1-2 breast cancer with image-detected nodal metastases had < 3 positive SLNs and did not require ALND. To avoid multiple trips to the operating room, frozen section can be considered in women with multiple abnormal LNs on imaging.

Size of Extranodal Extension in the Sentinel Lymph Node as a Predictor of Prognosis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The presence of extranodal extension (ENE) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can predict non-SLN metastases in breast cancer (BC) patients; however, the prognostic relevance of its extent remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to examine the predictive role of ENE in SLNs measured by its widest dimension (WD), highest dimension (HD), and the WD/HD ratio for non-SLN involvement, overall, and disease-free survival (OS, DFS) in cT1-2N0 BC patients with positive SLNs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 511 women with cT1-2N0 BC and positive SLNs undergoing axillary lymph node dissection were retrospectively enrolled. The associations of ENE's WD, HD, and WD/HD ratio with non-SLN metastases, 5-year OS, and DFS were established through a multivariable modeling approach.

RESULTS

SLNs were ENE-positive in 149 (29.16%) participants, and 133 (26.03%) had non-SLN metastases. During the median 60 (16-60)-month follow-up, 69 (13.50%) patients experienced recurrences, and 62 (12.13%) died. The numbers of SLNs, non-SLNs, and total axillary LNs involved differed between the ENE-negative and ENE-positive groups, as well as between the WD/HD ≤ 1.2 and WD/HD > 1.2 subgroups (all P-values were < .001). Multivariable analyses showed significant associations of the WD/HD ratio > 1.2 with non-SLN involvement, OS, and DFS (P-values were .003, < .001, and .005, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Despite no predictive value of ENE's WD and HD, the WD/HD ratio > 1.2 was an independent predictor of non-SLN involvement, mortality, and recurrence. ENE's WD/HD ratio could be a valuable indicator for cT1-2N0 BC individuals with positive SLNs for whom further axillary treatment may be beneficial.

Radiologic Extranodal Extension of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prognostic Utility and Diagnostic Performance

BACKGROUND. Pathologic extranodal extension (ENE) in metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) has been associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the prognostic utility of radiologic ENE and its diagnostic performance in predicting pathologic ENE in patients with NSCLC. METHODS. This retrospective study included 382 patients (mean age, 67 ± 10 [SD] years; 297 men, 85 women) diagnosed with NSCLC and clinical N1 or N2 disease between January 2010 and December 2016. Two thoracic radiologists reviewed staging chest CT examinations to record subjective overall impression for radiologic ENE (no ENE, possible/probable ENE, or unambiguous ENE), reviewing 30 examinations in consensus and the remaining examinations independently. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the utility of radiologic ENE in predicting overall survival (OS). Prognostic utility of radiologic ENE was also assessed in patients with clinical N2a disease. In patients who underwent surgery, sensitivity and specificity were determined of radiologic unambiguous ENE in predicting pathologic ENE. RESULTS. The 5-year OS rates for no ENE, possible/probable ENE, and unambiguous ENE were 44.4%, 39.1%, and 20.9% for reader 1 and 45.7%, 36.6%, and 25.6% for reader 2, respectively. Unambiguous ENE was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS (reader 1: adjusted HR, 1.72, p = .008; reader 2: adjusted HR, 1.56, p = .03), whereas possible/probable ENE was not (reader 1: adjusted HR, 1.18, p = .33; reader 2: adjusted HR, 1.21, p = .25). In patients with clinical N2a disease, 5-year OS rate in patients with versus without unambiguous ENE for reader 1 was 22.2% versus 40.6% (p = .59) and for reader 2 was 27.6% versus 41.0% (p = .49). In 203 patients who underwent surgery (66 with pathologic ENE), sensitivity and specificity of radiologic unambiguous ENE for predicting pathologic ENE were 11% and 93% for reader 1 and 23% and 87% for reader 2. CONCLUSION. Radiologic unambiguous ENE was an independent predictor of worse OS in patients with NSCLC. The finding had low sensitivity but high specificity for pathologic ENE. CLINICAL IMPACT. Radiologic ENE may have a role in NSCLC staging workup and treatment selection.

Anatomical site and size of sentinel lymph node metastasis predicted additional axillary tumour burden and breast cancer survival

AIMS

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the current standard assessment for tumour burden in axillary lymph node (ALN). However, not all SLN+ patients have ALN metastasis. The prognostic implication of SLN features is not clear. We aimed to evaluate predictive factors for ALN metastasis and the clinical value of SLN features.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 228 SLN+ and 228 SLN- (with matched year and grade) cases were included. Clinicopathological features in SLN, ALN and primary tumours, treatment data and survival data were analysed according to ALN status and outcome. Except for larger tumour size and the presence of LVI (both P < 0.001), no significant differences were found in SLN- and SLN+ cases. Only 31.8% of SLN+ cases with ALN dissection had ALN metastasis. The presence of macrometastases (MaM), extranodal extension (ENE), deeper level of tumour invasion in SLN and more SLN+ nodes were associated with ALN metastasis (P ≤ 0.025). Moreover, isolated tumour cells (ITC) and level of tumour invasion in SLN were independent adverse prognostic features for disease-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival, respectively. Interestingly, cases with ITC located in the subcapsular region have better survival than those in cortex (OS: χ²  = 4.046, P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified features in SLN, i.e. the level of tumour invasion at SLN and tumour size in SLN as useful predictors for both ALN metastasis and breast cancer outcome. The presence of ITC, particularly those with a deeper invasion in SLN, portended a worse prognosis. Proper attention should be taken for their management.

Characterization of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement and Its Clinicopathological Characteristics in Stage II-IIIA Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact and clinicopathological characteristics of extracapsular lymph node involvement (ECLNI) in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain unknown in the context of the eighth edition N classification.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 279 patients with stage II-IIIA LUAD who underwent lobectomy and lymphadenectomy. The correlations of ECLNI presence and clinicopathological profiles were analyzed. We also assessed the impact of ECLNI on the postoperative survival of pN1 and pN2 LUAD patients.

RESULTS

ECLNI-positive status was more common in patients with high lymph node yield and in patients with multiple stations involved. The logistic regression model identified tumor spread through air spaces, micropapillary component, cribriform component, and nodal stage as predictive factors for ECLNI presence. LUAD patients with ECLNI presence had an increased risk of locoregional recurrence compared with those without (p < 0.001). Presence of ECLNI was confirmed as an independent risk factor for worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) in the entire cohort. Among the 61 patients with ECLNI(+)pN2 disease, our analysis revealed that adjuvant radiation was a significant predictor of improved RFS and OS. In addition, ECLNI status provides additional precision in stratifying pN1 and pN2 patients with significantly different RFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that ECLNI remains a strong prognosticator of unfavorable OS and RFS for LUADs in the context of the eighth edition N classification. Adjuvant radiation should be actively considered for pN1b and pN2 LUAD patients with ECLNI presence.

Extranodal Tumor Deposits in the Axillary Fat Indicate the Need for Axillary Dissection Among T1-T2cN0 Patients with Positive Sentinel Nodes

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial demonstrated the safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in T1-T2cN0 patients with fewer than three positive sentinel nodes (SLNs) undergoing breast-conservation therapy. While microscopic extracapsular extension (mECE) > 2 mm is associated with increased nodal burden, the significance of extranodal tumor deposits (ETDs) in the axillary fat is uncertain.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with T1-T2cN0 breast cancer undergoing sentinel node biopsy and ALND for SLN metastases from January 2010 to December 2018 were identified. ETDs were defined as intravascular tumor emboli or metastatic deposits in the axillary fat. Clinicopathologic characteristics and nodal burden were compared by ETD status.

RESULTS

Among 1114 patients, 113 (10%) had ETDs: 81 (72%) were intravascular tumor emboli and 32 (28%) were soft tissue deposits. Patients with ETDs had larger tumors (median 2.2 vs. 2.1 cm; p = 0.033) and more often had mECE (83% vs. 44%; p < 0.001). On univariable analysis, presence of ETDs (odds ratio [OR] 9.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.36-14.68), larger tumors (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.25-1.72), and mECE (OR 10.73, 95% CI 6.86-16.78) were associated with four or more additional positive non-SLNs (NSLNs; all p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, ETDs remained associated with four or more positive NSLNs (OR 5.67, 95% CI 3.53-9.08; p < 0.001). ETDs were strongly associated with four or more positive NSLNs (OR 7.15, 95% CI 4.04-12.67) among patients with one to two positive SLNs (n = 925).

CONCLUSIONS

Among T1-T2cN0 patients with SLN metastases, ETDs are strongly associated with four or more positive NSLNs at ALND. Even among those who may otherwise meet the criteria for omission of ALND, the presence of ETDs in axillary fat warrants consideration of ALND.