1
|
Lee AY, Lyons AT, Makris V, Kamaraju S, Stolley MR, Neuner JM, Flynn KE. Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: a qualitative exploration of attribution of symptoms among post-menopausal women. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:265. [PMID: 38565669 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08463-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oral adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is an effective treatment for hormone receptor positive breast cancer to decrease recurrence and mortality, but adherence is poor. This study explored post-menopausal women's experiences with AET, with a particular focus on adherence to AET as well as distress and symptoms experienced prior to and during AET treatment. METHODS Participants were recruited from a hospital registry, stratified by adherence to/discontinuation of AET. Telephone interviews followed a semi-structured interview guide and were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were systematically coded using team-based coding, with analysis of themes using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS Thirty-three participants were interviewed; ages ranged from 57 to 86 years. Participants included 10 discontinued patients and 23 patients who completed their AET course or were adherent to AET at the time of interviewing. Both adherent and discontinued patients reported symptoms throughout their AET treatment course, and both attributed symptoms to factors other than AET (e.g., older age and pre-existing comorbidities). However, discontinued patients were more likely to attribute symptoms to AET and to describe difficulty managing their symptoms, with some directly citing symptoms as the reason for discontinuing AET therapy. Conversely, adherent patients were more likely to describe the necessity of taking AET, despite symptoms. CONCLUSIONS AET adherence was associated with beliefs about AET, symptom attribution, and symptom management. Routine symptom monitoring during AET and addressing both symptoms and patients' understanding of their symptoms may promote adherence to AET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Y Lee
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 52336, USA
| | - Anna T Lyons
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 52336, USA
| | - Vaia Makris
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 52336, USA
| | - Sailaja Kamaraju
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 52336, USA
| | - Melinda R Stolley
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 52336, USA
| | - Joan M Neuner
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 52336, USA
| | - Kathryn E Flynn
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 52336, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Joyce E, Tao X, Stearns V, Hayes DF, Storniolo AM, Kidwell KM, Henry NL. Polypharmacy, over-the-counter medications, and aromatase inhibitor adherence in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 204:539-546. [PMID: 38198070 PMCID: PMC11055629 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07218-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Polypharmacy is associated with negative health outcomes and decreased medication adherence. Polypharmacy is common in cancer populations, but few studies have evaluated the relationship between polypharmacy and aromatase inhibitor (AI) adherence. No studies have evaluated the relationship between over-the-counter (OTC) supplements and AI adherence. Our primary hypothesis was that polypharmacy would be associated with increased risk of premature AI discontinuation. METHODS This exploratory analysis used data from the Exemestane and Letrozole Pharmacogenetics (ELPh) trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled participants from 2005 to 2009. Included patients were female, postmenopausal, with stage 0-III breast cancer, who had completed indicated chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. Participants were randomized to adjuvant exemestane or letrozole and completed serial clinical examinations and questionnaires for two years. Concomitant medication data were collected prospectively. Cox proportion models were used for statistical analysis of the relationship between polypharmacy, OTCs, medication class, and AI adherence. RESULTS In the 490 analyzed participants, use of any prescription medications at baseline was associated with decreased risk of premature AI discontinuation (HR 0.56, p = 0.02). Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) at baseline was associated with decreased risk of premature AI discontinuation (HR 0.67, p = 0.04). Use of any OTCs was not associated with AI discontinuation. CONCLUSION Baseline use of prescription medications but not OTCs was associated with increased AI persistence. Future research is needed to understand how this can be utilized to promote AI adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Joyce
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Xueting Tao
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Vered Stearns
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Anna Maria Storniolo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Kelley M Kidwell
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rattsev I, Stearns V, Blackford AL, Hertz DL, Smith KL, Rae JM, Taylor CO. Incorporation of emergent symptoms and genetic covariates improves prediction of aromatase inhibitor therapy discontinuation. JAMIA Open 2024; 7:ooae006. [PMID: 38250582 PMCID: PMC10799747 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Early discontinuation is common among breast cancer patients taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Although several predictors have been identified, it is unclear how to simultaneously consider multiple risk factors for an individual. We sought to develop a tool for prediction of AI discontinuation and to explore how predictive value of risk factors changes with time. Materials and Methods Survival machine learning was used to predict time-to-discontinuation of AIs in 181 women who enrolled in a prospective cohort. Models were evaluated via time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), c-index, and integrated Brier score. Feature importance was analysis was conducted via Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and time-dependence of their predictive value was analyzed by time-dependent AUC. Personalized survival curves were constructed for risk communication. Results The best-performing model incorporated genetic risk factors and changes in patient-reported outcomes, achieving mean time-dependent AUC of 0.66, and AUC of 0.72 and 0.67 at 6- and 12-month cutoffs, respectively. The most significant features included variants in ESR1 and emergent symptoms. Predictive value of genetic risk factors was highest in the first year of treatment. Decrease in physical function was the strongest independent predictor at follow-up. Discussion and Conclusion Incorporation of genomic and 3-month follow-up data improved the ability of the models to identify the individuals at risk of AI discontinuation. Genetic risk factors were particularly important for predicting early discontinuers. This study provides insight into the complex nature of AI discontinuation and highlights the importance of incorporating genetic risk factors and emergent symptoms into prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilia Rattsev
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States
| | - Vered Stearns
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, United States
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, United States
| | - Daniel L Hertz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
| | - Karen L Smith
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, United States
| | - James M Rae
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
| | - Casey Overby Taylor
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peipert JD, Zhao F, Lee JW, Shen SE, Ip E, O’Connell N, Carlos RC, Graham N, Smith ML, Gareen IF, Raper PJ, Weiss M, Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Cella D, Gray R, Wagner LI. Patient-Reported Adverse Events and Early Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e243854. [PMID: 38536173 PMCID: PMC10973895 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance There is substantial interest in capturing cancer treatment tolerability from the patient's perspective using patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Objective To examine whether a PRO question, item 5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General General Physical Wellbeing Scale (GP5), was associated with early treatment discontinuation (ETD) due to adverse events. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective survey study was conducted from February to April 2023. Among participants in the ECOG-ACRIN E1A11 trial (a phase 3, parallel design trial conducted between 2013 and 2019), patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomized to receive bortezomib (VRd) or carfilzomib (KRd) plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone as induction therapy. The GP5 item was administered at baseline (pretreatment) and at 1 month, 2.8 months, and 5.5 months postbaseline. Eligible participants included patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated at community oncology practices or academic medical centers in the US. Exposures GP5 response options were "very much," "quite a bit," "somewhat," "a little bit," and "not at all." Responses at each assessment while undergoing treatment (1 month, 2.8 months, and 5.5 months) were categorized as high adverse event bother (ie, "very much," and "quite a bit") and low adverse event bother (ie, "somewhat," "a little bit," or "not at all"). In addition, change from baseline to each assessment while undergoing treatment was calculated and categorized as worsening by 1 response category and 2 or more response categories. Main Outcome and Measure ETD due to adverse events (yes vs no) was analyzed using logistic regression adjusting for treatment group, performance status, gender, race, and disease stage. Results Of the 1087 participants in the original trial, 1058 (mean [SD] age 64 [9] years; 531 receiving VrD [50.2%]; 527 receiving KRd [49.8%]) responded to item GP5 and were included in the secondary analysis. A small proportion (142 patients [13.4%]) discontinued treatment early due to AEs. For those with high adverse-effect bother, GP5 while undergoing treatment was associated with ETD at 1 month (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.20; 95% CI, 1.25-3.89), 2.8 months (aOR, 3.41; 95% CI, 2.01-5.80), and 5.5 months (aOR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.69-12.83). Worsening by 2 or more response categories on the GP5 was associated with ETD at 2.8 months (aOR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.64-5.54) and 5.5 months (aOR, 5.49; 95% CI, 1.45-20.76). Conclusions and Relevance In this survey study of the E1A11 trial, worse GP5 response was associated with ETD. These findings suggest that simple assessment of adverse-effect bother while receiving treatment is an efficient way to indicate treatment tolerability and ETD risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shu-en Shen
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward Ip
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Nathaniel O’Connell
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Ruth C. Carlos
- Univeristy of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor
| | - Noah Graham
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Department of Epidemiology and the Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Pamela J. Raper
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | | | | | | | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peipert JD, Breslin M, Basch E, Calvert M, Cella D, Smith ML, Thanarajasingam G, Roydhouse J. [Special issue PRO] Considering endpoints for comparative tolerability of cancer treatments using patient report given the estimand framework. J Biopharm Stat 2024:1-19. [PMID: 38358291 DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2024.2313060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Regulatory agencies are advancing the use of systematic approaches to collect patient experience data, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs), in cancer clinical trials to inform regulatory decision-making. Due in part to clinician under-reporting of symptomatic adverse events, there is a growing recognition that evaluation of cancer treatment tolerability should include the patient experience, both in terms of the overall side effect impact and symptomatic adverse events. Methodologies around implementation, analysis, and interpretation of "patient" reported tolerability are under development, and current approaches are largely descriptive. There is robust guidance for use of PROs as efficacy endpoints to compare cancer treatments, but it is unclear to what extent this can be relied-upon to develop tolerability endpoints. An important consideration when developing endpoints to compare tolerability between treatments is the linkage of trial design, objectives, and statistical analysis. Despite interest in and frequent collection of PRO data in oncology trials, heterogeneity in analyses and unclear PRO objectives mean that design, objectives, and analysis may not be aligned, posing substantial challenges for the interpretation of results. The recent ICH E9 (R1) estimand framework represents an opportunity to help address these challenges. Efforts to apply the estimand framework in the context of PROs have primarily focused on efficacy outcomes. In this paper, we discuss considerations for comparing the patient-reported tolerability of different treatments in an oncology trial context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Devin Peipert
- Medical Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medical Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Monique Breslin
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Ethan Basch
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Birmingham and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham-Oxford Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Cella
- Medical Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medical Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mary Lou Smith
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Research Advocacy Network, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Jessica Roydhouse
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Connell NS, Zhao F, Lee JW, Ip EH, Peipert JD, Graham N, Smith ML, Gareen IF, Carlos RC, Obeng-Gyasi S, Sparano JA, Shanafelt TD, Thomas ML, Cella D, Wagner LI, Gray R. Importance of Low- and Moderate-Grade Adverse Events in Patients' Treatment Experience and Treatment Discontinuation: An Analysis of the E1912 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:266-272. [PMID: 37801678 PMCID: PMC10824381 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite defined grades of 1 to 5 for adverse events (AEs) on the basis of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria, mild (G1) and moderate (G2) AEs are often not reported in phase III trials. This under-reporting may inhibit our ability to understand patient toxicity burden. We analyze the relationship between the grades of AEs experienced with patient side-effect bother and treatment discontinuation. METHODS We analyzed a phase III Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network trial with comprehensive AE data. The Likert response Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-GP5 item, "I am bothered by side effects of treatment" was used to define side-effect bother. Bayesian mixed models were used to assess the impact of G1 and G2 AE counts on patient side-effect bother and treatment discontinuation. AEs were further analyzed on the basis of symptomatology (symptomatic or asymptomatic). The results are given as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible interval (CrI). RESULTS Each additional G1 and G2 AEs experienced during a treatment cycle increased the odds of increased self-reported patient side-effect bother by 13% (95% CrI, 1.06 to 1.21) and 35% (95% CrI, 1.19 to 1.54), respectively. Furthermore, only AEs defined as symptomatic were associated with increased side-effect bother, with asymptomatic AEs showing no association regardless of grade. Count of G2 AEs increased the odds of treatment discontinuation by 59% (95% CrI, 1.32 to 1.95), with symptomatic G2 AEs showing a stronger association (OR, 1.75; 95% CrI, 1.28 to 2.39) relative to asymptomatic G2 AEs (OR, 1.45; 95% CrI, 1.12 to 1.89). CONCLUSION Low- and moderate-grade AEs are related to increased odds of increased patient side-effect bother and treatment discontinuation, with symptomatic AEs demonstrating greater magnitude of association than asymptomatic. Our findings suggest that limiting AE capture to grade 3+ misses important contributors to treatment side-effect bother and discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Edward H. Ip
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Noah Graham
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Department of Epidemiology and the Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Ruth C. Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY
| | | | | | - David Cella
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Robert Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith KL, Tsai HL, Lim D, Wang C, Nunes R, Wilkinson MJ, Sheng JY, Couzi R, Fetting J, Riley C, Wolff AC, Santa-Maria CA, Papathakis K, Collins-Chase L, Hilton C, Thorner E, Montanari A, Ikejiani D, Snyder C, Stearns V. Feasibility of Symptom Monitoring During the First Year of Endocrine Therapy for Early Breast Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Collected via Smartphone App. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:981-989. [PMID: 37733984 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment-associated symptoms drive early discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for breast cancer. We hypothesized that symptom monitoring with electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) during adjuvant ET will enhance symptom detection, symptom management, and persistence. METHODS Eligible patients were initiating ET for stage 0-III breast cancer. Participants completed ePRO surveys via smartphone at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Measures included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, and Vaginal Discomfort; plus Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events items assessing joint pain, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, concentration problems, and memory problems. Scores surpassing prespecified thresholds triggered alerts, and recommended symptom management pathways were provided to clinicians. The primary objective was to evaluate feasibility, assessed by survey completion rates, with targets of >65% for the baseline survey and ≥1 follow-up survey during the first 6 months. Secondary objectives included 12-month ET discontinuation rate (target: ≤15%), describing symptoms and evaluating pathway implementation. RESULTS Among 250 participants, 73.2% completed the baseline survey and 69.6% completed ≥1 follow-up survey during the first 6 months. Thirty-one percent of participants had ≥1 symptom alert at baseline and 74% had ≥1 symptom alert during follow-up. The proportions of participants for whom pathway-concordant symptom management was documented at each time point ranged from 12.8% to 36.6%. Twenty-eight participants (11.2%) discontinued ET by 12 months. CONCLUSION Symptom monitoring with ePROs during adjuvant ET is feasible. Despite infrequent documentation of pathway-concordant symptom management after symptom alerts, ePROs were associated with favorable short-term ET persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lisa Smith
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
| | - Hua-Ling Tsai
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - David Lim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
- Division of Statistics Collaborative Inc, WCG, Washington, DC
| | - Chenguang Wang
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY
| | - Raquel Nunes
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
| | - Mary J Wilkinson
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennifer Y Sheng
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rima Couzi
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John Fetting
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Carol Riley
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cesar A Santa-Maria
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Katie Papathakis
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Christie Hilton
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Elissa Thorner
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amanda Montanari
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vered Stearns
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Haussmann J, Budach W, Corradini S, Krug D, Bölke E, Tamaskovics B, Jazmati D, Haussmann A, Matuschek C. Whole Breast Irradiation in Comparison to Endocrine Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer-A Direct and Network Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4343. [PMID: 37686620 PMCID: PMC10487067 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple randomized trials have established adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) as the standard approach after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in early-stage breast cancer. The omission of WBI has been studied in multiple trials and resulted in reduced local control with maintained survival rates and has therefore been adapted as a treatment option in selected patients in several guidelines. Omitting ET instead of WBI might also be a valuable option as both treatments have distinctly different side effect profiles. However, the clinical outcomes of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI have not been formally analyzed. METHODS We performed a systematic literature review searching for randomized trials comparing BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI in low-risk breast cancer patients with publication dates after 2000. We excluded trials using any form of chemotherapy, regional nodal radiation and mastectomy. The meta-analysis was performed using a two-step process. First, we extracted all available published event rates and the effect sizes for overall and breast-cancer-specific survival (OS, BCSS), local (LR) and regional recurrence, disease-free survival, distant metastases-free interval, contralateral breast cancer, second cancer other than breast cancer and mastectomy-free interval as investigated endpoints and compared them in a network meta-analysis. Second, the published individual patient data from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) publications were used to allow a comparison of OS and BCSS. RESULTS We identified three studies, including a direct comparison of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI (n = 1059) and nine studies randomizing overall 7207 patients additionally to BCS only and BCS + WBI + ET resulting in a four-arm comparison. In the network analysis, LR was significantly lower in the BCS + WBI group in comparison with the BCS + ET group (HR = 0.62; CI-95%: 0.42-0.92; p = 0.019). We did not find any differences in OS (HR = 0.93; CI-95%: 0.53-1.62; p = 0.785) and BCSS (OR = 1.04; CI-95%: 0.45-2.41; p = 0.928). Further, we found a lower distant metastasis-free interval, a higher rate of contralateral breast cancer and a reduced mastectomy-free interval in the BCS + WBI-arm. Using the EBCTCG data, OS and BCSS were not significantly different between BCS + ET and BCS + WBI after 10 years (OS: OR = 0.85; CI-95%: 0.59-1.22; p = 0.369) (BCSS: OR = 0.72; CI-95%: 0.38-1.36; p = 0.305). CONCLUSION Evidence from direct and indirect comparison suggests that BCS + WBI might be an equivalent de-escalation strategy to BCS + ET in low-risk breast cancer. Adverse events and quality of life measures have to be further compared between these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Haussmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; (J.H.); (W.B.); (B.T.); (D.J.); (C.M.)
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; (J.H.); (W.B.); (B.T.); (D.J.); (C.M.)
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Edwin Bölke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; (J.H.); (W.B.); (B.T.); (D.J.); (C.M.)
| | - Balint Tamaskovics
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; (J.H.); (W.B.); (B.T.); (D.J.); (C.M.)
| | - Danny Jazmati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; (J.H.); (W.B.); (B.T.); (D.J.); (C.M.)
| | - Alexander Haussmann
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; (J.H.); (W.B.); (B.T.); (D.J.); (C.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peipert JD, Goble S, Isaacson J, Tang X, Wallace K, Coleman RL, Ledermann JA, Cella D. Patient-reported outcomes of maintenance rucaparib in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma in ARIEL3, a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 175:1-7. [PMID: 37262961 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare NFOSI-18 Disease Related Symptoms - Physical (DRSP), Total score, and side effect bother between maintenance rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) vs. placebo in the phase III ARIEL3 trial. METHODS ARIEL3 (NCT01968213) included patients with ovarian carcinoma who responded to second-line or later platinum-based chemotherapy. The NFOSI-18 DRS-P and Total scales were secondary endpoints. The NFOSI-18 contains a side effect impact item (GP5): "I am bothered by side effects of treatment." We compared treatment arms on change from baseline of DRS-P and Total scores using mixed models with repeated measures (MRMM). Time to first and confirmed deterioration of NFOSI-18 DRS-P and Total scales were analyzed using Cox regression. We also calculated the proportion of patients reporting moderate to high side effect bother on GP5. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort, mean change from baseline favored the placebo. Compared to placebo, rucaparib was associated with higher risk of deterioration [e.g., 4-point deteriorator definition hazard ratio (HR): 1.85; 95% CI: 1.46, 2.36; median time to first deterioration on DRSP: 1.9 vs. 7.0 months]. Confirmed deterioration results resembled those for first deterioration. Proportions of patients reporting moderate/high side effect bother on GP5 fluctuated around 20% across treatment cycles. Results in BRCA mutant and homologous recombination deficient cohorts were generally similar to those from the ITT cohort. CONCLUSION This placebo-controlled study in the maintenance therapy setting provides a unique view of the impact of PARP inhibition on the patient-reported outcomes that are commonly used in ovarian cancer clinical trials. Information regarding the adverse side effect impact of PARP inhibitors should be weighed against their clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | | | - Xiaodan Tang
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Katrine Wallace
- Clovis Oncology, Boulder, CO, USA; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eliassen FM, Blåfjelldal V, Helland T, Hjorth CF, Hølland K, Lode L, Bertelsen BE, Janssen EAM, Mellgren G, Kvaløy JT, Søiland H, Lende TH. Importance of endocrine treatment adherence and persistence in breast cancer survivorship: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:625. [PMID: 37403065 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11122-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant endocrine treatment is essential for treating luminal subtypes of breast cancer, which constitute 75% of all breast malignancies. However, the detrimental side effects of treatment make it difficult for many patients to complete the guideline-required treatment. Such non-adherence may jeopardize the lifesaving ability of anti-estrogen therapy. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the consequences of non-adherence and non-persistence from available studies meeting strict statistical and clinical criteria. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using several databases, yielding identification of 2,026 studies. After strict selection, 14 studies were eligible for systematic review. The review included studies that examined endocrine treatment non-adherence (patients not taking treatment as prescribed) or non-persistence (patients stopping treatment prematurely), in terms of the effects on event-free survival or overall survival among women with non-metastatic breast cancer. RESULTS We identified 10 studies measuring the effects of endocrine treatment non-adherence and non-persistence on event-free survival. Of these studies, seven showed significantly poorer survival for the non-adherent or non-persistent patient groups, with hazard ratios (HRs) ranging from 1.39 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.53) to 2.44 (95% CI, 1.89 to 3.14). We identified nine studies measuring the effects of endocrine treatment non-adherence and non-persistence on overall survival. Of these studies, seven demonstrated significantly reduced overall survival in the groups with non-adherence and non-persistence, with HRs ranging from 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.43) to 2.18 (95% CI, 1.99 to 2.39). CONCLUSION The present systematic review demonstrates that non-adherence and non-persistence to endocrine treatment negatively affect event-free and overall survival. Improved follow-up, with focus on adherence and persistence, is vital for improving health outcomes among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finn Magnus Eliassen
- Department of Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Vibeke Blåfjelldal
- Department of Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Thomas Helland
- Hormone Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Cathrine Fonnesbech Hjorth
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kari Hølland
- Division of Research, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Lise Lode
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bjørn-Erik Bertelsen
- Hormone Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Emiel A M Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Biosciences and Environmental Engineering, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Gunnar Mellgren
- Hormone Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jan Terje Kvaløy
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Håvard Søiland
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Tone Hoel Lende
- Department of Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Christensen Holz S. Aromatase Inhibitor Musculoskeletal Syndrome and Bone Loss: a Review of the Current Literature. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:825-831. [PMID: 37052869 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01413-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The study aims to review the literature regarding musculoskeletal complications of aromatase inhibitors and treatment options for these complications. RECENT FINDINGS Aromatase inhibitors are common medications to treat hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women and have been shown to improve survival and prevent disease recurrence. However, 20-60% patients stop treatment prematurely due to side effects. Side effects include joint stiffness and pain, tendonitis, tendon tears, muscle pain, and carpal tunnel syndrome known as aromatase inhibitor musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS) as well as bone loss. Proposed mechanisms of AIMSS include decreased estrogen levels, inflammation, and genetic factors. Switching aromatase inhibitors, exercise, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, duloxetine, acupuncture, prednisone, and bisphosphonates are some treatment options for this syndrome and will be discussed in more detail in this review. Aromatase inhibitors are important in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. As we study the incidence of side effects of these medications including bone loss and AIMSS and determine the mechanisms of these symptoms and possible treatment options, we will decrease the incidence of patients discontinuing treatment prematurely and improve symptoms, quality of life, and survival in this patient population.
Collapse
|
12
|
Uhelski ACR, Blackford AL, Sheng JY, Snyder C, Lehman J, Visvanathan K, Lim D, Stearns V, Smith KL. Factors associated with weight gain in pre- and post-menopausal women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01408-y. [PMID: 37261654 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01408-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Weight gain after breast cancer poses health risks. We aimed to identify factors associated with weight gain during adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). METHODS Women initiating AET enrolled in a prospective cohort. Participants completed FACT-ES plus PROMIS pain interference, depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance and physical function measures at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Treatment-emergent symptoms were defined as changes in scores in the direction indicative of worsening symptoms that exceeded the minimal important difference at 3 and/or 6 months compared to baseline. We used logistic regression to evaluate associations of clinicodemographic features and treatment-emergent symptoms with clinically significant weight gain over 60 months (defined as ≥ 5% compared to baseline) in pre- and post-menopausal participants. RESULTS Of 309 participants, 99 (32%) were pre-menopausal. The 60 months cumulative incidence of clinically significant weight gain was greater in pre- than post-menopausal participants (67% vs 43%, p < 0.001). Among pre-menopausal participants, treatment-emergent pain interference (OR 2.49), aromatase inhibitor receipt (OR 2.8), mastectomy, (OR 2.06) and White race (OR 7.13) were associated with weight gain. Among post-menopausal participants, treatment-emergent endocrine symptoms (OR 2.86), higher stage (OR 2.25) and White race (OR 2.29) were associated with weight gain while treatment-emergent physical function decline (OR 0.30) was associated with lower likelihood of weight gain. CONCLUSIONS Weight gain during AET is common, especially for pre-menopausal women. Clinicodemographic features and early treatment-emergent symptoms may identify at risk individuals. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Patients at risk for weight gain can be identified early during AET. CLINICAL TRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01937052, registered September 3, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Carson Rimer Uhelski
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Sheng
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Lehman
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David Lim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Statistics, Collaborative Inc., WCG, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Vered Stearns
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Under Armour Breast Health Innovation Center, The Skip Viragh Outpatient Cancer, Building 201 North Broadway Viragh 10th floor, Room 10291, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Karen Lisa Smith
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kuhn EP, Pirruccello J, Boothe JT, Li Z, Tosteson TD, Stahl JE, Schwartz GN, Chamberlin MD. Preventing metastatic recurrence in low-risk ER/PR + breast cancer patients-a retrospective clinical study exploring the evolving challenge of persistence with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:31-41. [PMID: 36592233 PMCID: PMC9883310 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06849-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the genomic era, more women with low-risk breast cancer will forego chemotherapy and rely on adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) to prevent metastatic recurrence. However, some of these patients will unfortunately relapse. We sought to understand this outcome. Preliminary work suggested that early discontinuation of AET, also known as non-persistence, may play an important role. A retrospective analysis exploring factors related to our breast cancer patients' non-persistence with AET was performed. METHODS Women who underwent Oncotype-DX® testing between 2011 and 2014 with minimum 5 years follow-up were included. 'Low risk' was defined as Oncotype score < 26. Outcomes of recurrence and persistence were determined by chart review. Patient, tumor and treatment factors were collected, and persistent versus non-persistent groups compared using multivariable ANOVA and Fisher Chi square exact test. RESULTS We identified six cases of distant recurrence among low-risk patients with a median follow-up of 7.7 years. Among them, five of six patients (83%) were non-persistent with AET. The non-persistence rate in our cohort regardless of recurrence was 57/228 (25%). Non-persistent patients reported more severe side effects compared with persistent patients (p = 0.002) and were more likely to be offered a switch in endocrine therapy, rather than symptom-relief (p = 0.006). In contrast, persistent patients were 10.3 times more likely to have been offered symptom-alleviating medications compared with non-persistent patients (p < 0.001). A subset analysis revealed that patients who persisted with therapy had a higher Oncotype-DX® score than patients who discontinued early (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION Metastatic recurrence in low-risk breast cancer patients may be primarily due to non-persistence with endocrine therapy. Further work is needed to optimize care for patients who struggle with side effects. To our knowledge, these are the first published data suggesting that Oncotype-DX® score may influence persistence with AET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine P Kuhn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| | - Jonathan Pirruccello
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - James T Boothe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Zhongze Li
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Tor D Tosteson
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - James E Stahl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Gary N Schwartz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Mary D Chamberlin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peipert JD, Shaunfield S, Kaiser K, Moreno PI, Fox RS, Kircher S, Mohindra N, Ip E, Zhao F, Wagner L, Cella D. How do patients interpret and respond to a single-item global indicator of cancer treatment tolerability? Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:37. [PMID: 36525100 PMCID: PMC10356672 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07484-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in patient-reported measures of cancer treatment tolerability. A global measure of bother, the FACT GP5 item ("I am bothered by side effects of treatment") is potentially useful for regulatory, research, and clinical use. To understand this item's appropriateness for capturing treatment tolerability, we conducted cognitive interviews on this item with 3 samples of cancer patients. METHODS Patients with ovarian cancer (Study 1: N = 21; on treatment), lymphoma (Study 2: N = 14; on treatment), and colorectal or lung cancer (Study 3: N = 16; treatment naïve) were interviewed about GP5's understandability and relevance to their treatment side effects. What patients think about when answering GP5 was also assessed. In all studies, the interview included both structured and open-ended questions. Qualitative data were coded to extract themes and responses to structured questions were tallied. RESULTS Most patients on treatment (Studies 1 and 2) reported that the GP5 item wording is appropriate (88%) and its meaning is clear (97%). They were very confident or confident in their response (97%) and stated that GP5 was relevant to their cancer experience (97%). When answering GP5, patients considered their treatment and specific side effects. A large proportion (40%) of the treatment-naïve (Study 3) patients reported that GP5 was not relevant to their cancer treatment, and the largest proportion responded to GP5 thinking of negative side effect expectancies. CONCLUSION This study provides assurance that GP5 is a useful indicator of treatment tolerability, and is meaningful to people with cancer, especially once they have started treatment.
Collapse
|
15
|
McLouth LE, Zheng Y, Smith S, Hodi FS, Rao UN, Cohen GI, Amatruda TT, Dakhil SR, Curti BD, Nakhoul I, Chandana SR, Bane CL, Marinier DE, Lee SJ, Sondak VK, Kirkwood JM, Tarhini AA, Wagner LI. Patient-reported tolerability of adjuvant ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) versus high-dose interferon alfa-2b for resected high-risk stage III-IV melanoma in phase III trial E1609. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:183-196. [PMID: 36029412 PMCID: PMC9839512 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03226-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Trial E1609 demonstrated superior overall survival with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (ipi3) compared to high-dose interferon (HDI) for patients with resected high-risk melanoma. To inform treatment tolerability, we compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL), gastrointestinal (GI), and treatment-specific physical and cognitive/emotional symptoms. We also compared treatment-specific concerns between all arms. METHODS We assessed HRQoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, physical and cognitive/emotional concerns using the FACT-Biologic Response Modifier subscale, and GI symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Diarrhea subscale pre-treatment and every 3 months. The primary outcome was the difference in HRQoL at 3 months between ipi3/ipi10 vs. HDI. RESULTS 549 patients (n = 158 ipi3; n = 191 ipi10; n = 200 HDI) were analyzed. 3-month completion was 58.7%. Compared to HDI, ipilimumab patients reported better HRQoL (ipi3 = 87.5 ± 14.6 vs. HDI = 74.7 ± 15.4, p < .001; ipi10 = 84.9 ± 16.5 vs. HDI, p < .001) and fewer physical (ipi3 = 22.3 ± 4.6 vs. HDI = 17.1 ± 5.4, p < .001; ipi10 = 21.8 ± 5.0 vs. HDI p < .001) and cognitive/emotional (ipi3 = 18.6 ± 4.4 vs. HDI = 15.0 ± 5.3, p < .001; ipi10 = 17.7 ± 4.8 vs. HDI p < .001) concerns, but worse GI symptoms (ipi3 = 40.8 ± 5.0 vs. HDI = 42.2 ± 2.9, p = .011; ipi10 = 39.5 ± 7.0 vs. HDI, p < .001). Fewer ipilimumab patients reported worsening treatment-specific concerns (e.g., 52% of ipi3 and 58% of ipi10 reported worsening fatigue vs. 82% HDI, p's < .001). CONCLUSION PROs demonstrated less toxicity of ipi3 compared to HDI and ipi10. Priorities for symptom management among patients receiving ipilimumab include GI toxicities, fatigue, weakness, appetite loss, arthralgia, and depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01274338, January 11, 2011 (first posted date) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01274338?term=NCT01274338&draw=2&rank=1 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie E McLouth
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 467 Healthy Kentucky Research Building, 760 Press Avenue, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
| | - Yue Zheng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephanie Smith
- Nancy N. and J.C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, St. Joseph's/Candler, Savannah, GA, USA
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Uma N Rao
- University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gary I Cohen
- Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Brendan D Curti
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nakhoul
- Regional Cancer Center at Indian Path Community Hospital, Kingsport, TN, USA
| | - Sreenivasa R Chandana
- Cancer and Hematology Centers of Western Michigan/Cancer Research Consortium of West Michigan NCORP, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Sandra J Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - John M Kirkwood
- University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Lynne I Wagner
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cho B, Pérez M, Jeffe DB, Kreuter MW, Margenthaler JA, Colditz GA, Liu Y. Factors associated with initiation and continuation of endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:837. [PMID: 35915419 PMCID: PMC9341086 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09946-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite benefits of endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, many patients do not initiate or discontinue ET against recommendations.
Methods
We identified variables associated with ET initiation and continuation, analyzing pooled data from two longitudinal studies at a National Cancer Institute comprehensive cancer center in St. Louis, Missouri. The sample included 533 women with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic, HR-positive breast cancer who completed interviews at enrollment and 6, 12, and 24 months after definitive surgical treatment. Logistic regression models estimated the adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (aOR [95% CI]) for each of self-reported ET initiation by the 12-month interview and continuation for ≥12 months by the 24-month interview in association with self-reported diabetes, elevated depressed mood, menopausal-symptom severity and obesity, adjusting for race, age, insurance status, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.
Results
Overall, 81.4% (434/533) of patients initiated ET, and 86.5% (371/429) continued ET ≥12 months. Patients with diabetes had lower odds of initiating ET (0.50 [0.27-0.91]). Patients reporting greater menopausal-symptom severity had lower odds of continuing ET (0.72 [0.53-0.99]).
Conclusion
Efforts to increase ET initiation among patients with diabetes and better manage severe menopausal symptoms among ET users might promote ET continuation.
Clinical trial information
ClinicalTrials.gov: #NCT00929084.
Collapse
|
17
|
Henry NL, Kim S, Hays RD, Diniz MA, Tighiouart M, Gresham G, Luu M, Cecchini RS, Yothers G, Rogatko A, Ganz PA. Toxicity Index, patient-reported outcomes, and persistence of breast cancer chemotherapy-associated side effects in NRG Oncology/NSABP B-30. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:123. [DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00489-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractAdjuvant chemotherapy improves breast cancer survival but is associated with bothersome short- and long-term toxicity. Factors associated with toxicity, especially subacute toxicity up to 2 years following chemotherapy, have not been fully elucidated. The NRG Oncology/NSABP B-30 clinical trial compared 3 different doxorubicin-, cyclophosphamide-, and docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimens given over 3–6 months. Patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer received subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy. From baseline through 24 months, 2156 patients completed questionnaires serially. We used multivariable probabilistic index models to identify factors associated with acute (>0–12 months) and subacute (>12–24 months) difficulties with pain, cognition, vasomotor symptoms, and vaginal symptoms. For all symptom domains, presence of symptoms prior to chemotherapy initiation were associated with symptoms in the subacute period (all p < 0.001). In addition, different combinations of patient factors and breast cancer treatments were associated with increased likelihood of pain, vasomotor, and vaginal symptoms in the subacute period. Consideration of pre-treatment symptoms and patient factors, as well as treatments for breast cancer, can facilitate identification of groups of patients that may experience symptoms following completion of chemotherapy. This information may be important for treatment-decision-making when alternative regimens are equivalent in benefit.
Collapse
|
18
|
Eng L, Brual J, Nagee A, Mok S, Fazelzad R, Chaiton M, Saunders D, Mittmann N, Truscott R, Liu G, Bradbury P, Evans W, Papadakos J, Giuliani M. Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100605. [PMID: 36356412 PMCID: PMC9646674 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continued smoking after a diagnosis of cancer negatively impacts cancer outcomes, but the impact of tobacco on newer treatments options is not well established. Collecting and evaluating tobacco use in clinical trials may advance understanding of the consequences of tobacco use on treatment modalities, but little is known about the frequency of reporting and analysis of tobacco use in cancer cooperative clinical trial groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify cancer cooperative group clinical trials published from January 2017-October 2019. Eligible studies evaluated either systemic and/or radiation therapies, included ≥100 adult patients, and reported on at least one of: overall survival, disease/progression-free survival, response rates, toxicities/adverse events, or quality-of-life. RESULTS A total of 91 studies representing 90 trials met inclusion criteria with trial start dates ranging from 1995 to 2015 with 14% involving lung and 5% head and neck cancer patients. A total of 19 studies reported baseline tobacco use; 2 reported collecting follow-up tobacco use. Seven studies reported analysis of the impact of baseline tobacco use on clinical outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline tobacco use: 7 reported never/ever status, 10 reported never/ex-smoker/current smoker status, and 4 reported measuring smoking intensity. None reported verifying smoking status or second-hand smoke exposure. Trials of lung and head and neck cancers were more likely to report baseline tobacco use than other disease sites (83% versus 6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Few cancer cooperative group clinical trials report and analyze trial participants' tobacco use. Significant heterogeneity exists in reporting tobacco use. Routine standardized collection and reporting of tobacco use at baseline and follow-up in clinical trials should be implemented to enable investigators to evaluate the impact of tobacco use on new cancer therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Eng
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,Prof L. Eng, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada. Tel: +1-416-946-2953; Fax: +1-416-946-6546 @Lawson_Eng@MeredithGiulia1@PMcancercentre
| | - J. Brual
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A. Nagee
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - S. Mok
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - R. Fazelzad
- Library and Information Services, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - M. Chaiton
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - D.P. Saunders
- Northeast Cancer Centre of Health Sciences North, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Canada
| | - N. Mittmann
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - R. Truscott
- Division of Prevention Policy and Stakeholder Engagement, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada
| | - G. Liu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - P.A. Bradbury
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - W.K. Evans
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - J. Papadakos
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada,Patient Education, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada
| | - M.E. Giuliani
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada,Correspondence to: Prof M. Giuliani, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada. Tel: +1-416-946-2983; Fax: +1-416-946-6546
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Association of sarcopenia with endocrine therapy toxicity in patients with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 196:323-328. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06741-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
20
|
Fleming L, Agnew S, Peddie N, Crawford M, Dixon D, MacPherson I. The impact of medication side effects on adherence and persistence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors: A quantitative systematic review. Breast 2022; 64:63-84. [PMID: 35609380 PMCID: PMC9130570 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hormone Therapy (HT) is recommended for most women with HR-positive primary breast cancer. When taken as intended, HT reduces breast cancer recurrence by 40% and mortality by one-third. The recommended duration of treatment ranges from 5 to 10 years depending on risk of recurrence and the specific HT regimen. However, recent data indicates that rates of HT non-adherence are high and research suggests this may be due to the impact of HT side effects. The contribution of side effects to non-adherence and non-persistence behaviours has rarely been systematically explored, thereby hindering the implementation of targeted intervention strategies. Our aim is to identify, evaluate and summarise the relationship between HT side effects and patterns of adherence and persistence. METHODS Electronic searches were conducted from inception and were completed by September 2021, utilising Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases. Searches included a combination of terms related to breast cancer, adherence, hormone therapy and side effects. RESULTS Sixty-two eligible papers were identified and study quality varied by study type. Most observational and cross-sectional studies were rated good quality, whereas most controlled intervention studies were rated fair quality. Three studies were rated poor quality. The most frequently measured side effects were pain, low mood, hot flashes, insomnia, anxiety, fatigue, weight gain, concentration/memory problems. CONCLUSIONS This review identified a lack of consistency in the measurement of adherence and the definition of persistence across studies. The instruments used to measure side effects also varied significantly. This variation and lack of consistency makes it difficult to evaluate and summarise the role of HT side effects in HT adherence and persistence behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sommer Agnew
- University of Strathclyde, George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola Peddie
- University of Strathclyde, George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Diane Dixon
- University of Aberdeen, Kings College, Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Association of change in health-related quality of life and treatment discontinuation in metastatic breast cancer: a post hoc, exploratory analysis of two randomized clinical trials. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:8367-8375. [PMID: 35857127 PMCID: PMC9512887 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07283-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Identifying factors associated with treatment alteration (treatment discontinuation and dose reduction) may help to attain the treatment goals for metastatic breast cancer. The value of changes in the quality of life (QOL) in predicting treatment alteration remained unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationship between changes in the QOL and treatment alteration of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Methods We merged data from two randomized clinical trials in Japan, conducted from 2006 to 2017, that included patients who were diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative and endocrine treatment-resistant breast cancer, with metastatic disease at presentation or recurrence after surgery. The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 was used to assess QOL. The association between change in time-dependent QOL (worsening by 10-point or not) and time to treatment alteration was assessed using the Cox regression models controlling for patient characteristics (age, liver metastasis, hormone status, and treatment regimen) and baseline QOL. Results Worsening physical functioning, global health status, and dyspnea were significantly associated with treatment discontinuation. Worsening role functioning, global health status, and fatigue were significantly associated with dose reduction. The threshold for defining worsening did not have a significant impact on the relationship. Conclusion Changes in QOL are associated with the probability of treatment alteration among metastatic breast cancer patients. Physical functioning, role functioning, global health status, dyspnea, and fatigue should be prioritized for symptom management in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07283-0.
Collapse
|
22
|
Smith KL, Verma N, Blackford AL, Lehman J, Westbrook K, Lim D, Fetting J, Wolff AC, Jelovac D, Miller RS, Connolly R, Armstrong DK, Nunes R, Visvanathan K, Riley C, Papathakis K, Zafman N, Sheng JY, Snyder C, Stearns V. Association of treatment-emergent symptoms identified by patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant endocrine therapy discontinuation. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:53. [PMID: 35449210 PMCID: PMC9023490 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00414-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Many patients discontinue endocrine therapy for breast cancer due to intolerance. Identification of patients at risk for discontinuation is challenging. The minimal important difference (MID) is the smallest change in a score on a patient-reported outcome (PRO) that is clinically significant. We evaluated the association between treatment-emergent symptoms detected by worsening PRO scores in units equal to the MID with discontinuation. We enrolled females with stage 0-III breast cancer initiating endocrine therapy in a prospective cohort. Participants completed PROs at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Measures included PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, physical function, and sleep disturbance; Endocrine Subscale of the FACT-ES; and MOS-Sexual Problems (MOS-SP). We evaluated associations between continuous PRO scores in units corresponding to MIDs (PROMIS: 4-points; FACT-ES: 5-points; MOS-SP: 8-points) with time to endocrine therapy discontinuation using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 321 participants, 140 (43.6%) initiated tamoxifen and 181 (56.4%) initiated aromatase inhibitor (AI). The cumulative probability of discontinuation was 23% (95% CI 18-27%) at 48 months. For every 5- and 4-point worsening in endocrine symptoms and sleep disturbance respectively, participants were 13 and 14% more likely to discontinue endocrine therapy respectively (endocrine symptoms HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, p = 0.02; sleep disturbance HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29, p = 0.03). AI treatment was associated with greater likelihood of discontinuation than tamoxifen. Treatment-emergent endocrine symptoms and sleep disturbance are associated with endocrine therapy discontinuation. Monitoring for worsening scores meeting or exceeding the MID on PROs may identify patients at risk for discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lisa Smith
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Neha Verma
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Lehman
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly Westbrook
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David Lim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John Fetting
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniela Jelovac
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert S Miller
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- CancerLinQ, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Roisin Connolly
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Deborah K Armstrong
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Raquel Nunes
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carol Riley
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Katie Papathakis
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nelli Zafman
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Sheng
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vered Stearns
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Garcia SF, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Tevaarwerk AJ, Carlos RC, Yanez B, Gareen IF, Whelan TJ, Sledge GW, Cella D, Wagner LI. Fatigue and endocrine symptoms among women with early breast cancer randomized to endocrine versus chemoendocrine therapy: Results from the TAILORx patient-reported outcomes substudy. Cancer 2022; 128:536-546. [PMID: 34614209 PMCID: PMC8776586 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND TAILORx (Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment) prospectively assessed fatigue and endocrine symptoms among women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and a midrange risk of recurrence who were randomized to endocrine therapy (E) or chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy (CT+E). METHODS Participants completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Fatigue Short Form, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms at the baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Linear regression was used to model outcomes on baseline symptoms, treatment, and other factors. RESULTS Participants (n = 458) in both treatment arms reported greater fatigue and endocrine symptoms at early follow-up in comparison with the baseline. The magnitude of change in fatigue was significantly greater for the CT+E arm than the E arm at 3 and 6 months but not at 12, 24, or 36 months. The CT+E arm reported significantly greater changes in endocrine symptoms from the baseline to 3 months in comparison with the E arm; change scores were not significantly different at later time points. Endocrine symptom trajectories by treatment differed by menopausal status, with the effect larger and increasing for postmenopausal patients. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant CT+E was associated with greater increases in fatigue and endocrine symptoms at early time points in comparison with E. These differences lessened over time, and this demonstrated early chemotherapy effects more than long-term ones. Treatment arm differences in endocrine symptoms were more evident in postmenopausal patients. LAY SUMMARY Participants in TAILORx (Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment) with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and an intermediate risk of recurrence were randomly assigned to endocrine or chemoendocrine therapy. Four hundred fifty-eight women reported fatigue and endocrine symptoms at the baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Both groups reported greater symptoms at early follow-up versus the baseline. Increases in fatigue were greater for the chemoendocrine group than the endocrine group at 3 and 6 months but not later. The chemoendocrine group reported greater changes in endocrine symptoms in comparison with the endocrine group at 3 months but not later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute
- ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Center for Statistical Sciences & Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health
- Center for Statistical Sciences & Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Griffiths P, Peipert JD, Leith A, Rider A, Morgan L, Cella D, Cocks K. Validity of a single-item indicator of treatment side effect bother in a diverse sample of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:3613-3623. [PMID: 35031830 PMCID: PMC8857159 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06802-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose With higher efficacy of cancer therapies, the numbers and types of side effects experienced by patients have also increased, evidencing a need for brief assessments of side effect bother. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) includes the item “I am bothered by side effects of treatment” (GP5). This study aimed to confirm GP5’s validity in a large, diverse, real-world patient sample. Methods Real-world data were drawn from 10 Adelphi Disease Specific Programmes (DSP™) conducted between 2015 and 2019 in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA, covering 10 cancer sites. We examined correlations between GP5 responses and varied measures of patient-reported global health and the number of side effects experienced. We explored whether more advanced patients and those with worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Rating (ECOG PSR) reported greater side effect bother. Finally, we conducted differential item functioning (DIF) assessment using the Mantel–Haenszel approach. Results The sample included 6755 advanced cancer patients. GP5 responses were distributed similarly across most cancer sites. A moderate, negative correlation (rpolyserial = − 0.43) between GP5 responses and global health evidenced convergent validity. Known groups validity was evidenced by dichotomised distributions of GP5, showing expected results between cancer stage 2 vs. 3 and 4 and with ECOG PSR (p < 0.001). Little evidence of DIF was found. Conclusion GP5 exhibited evidence of validity across cancer sites and countries and appeared to measure the same construct across these countries. GP5 has significant promise as a summary indicator of side effect bother.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Peipert JD, Smith ML. Reconsidering tolerability of cancer treatments: opportunities to focus on the patient. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:3661-3663. [PMID: 35013779 PMCID: PMC9276550 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06700-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 21st Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kahn AM, Blenman KR, Sonis ST, Lustberg MB. Strategies to mitigate the toxicity of cancer therapeutics. Adv Cancer Res 2022; 155:215-244. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.acr.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
27
|
Henry NL, Unger JM, Till C, Crew KD, Fisch MJ, Hershman DL. Predictors of Pain Reduction in Trials of Interventions for Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Symptoms. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab088. [PMID: 34901744 PMCID: PMC8660068 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Almost one-half of aromatase inhibitor (AI)-treated breast cancer patients experience AI-associated musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS); 20%-30% discontinue treatment because of severe symptoms. We hypothesized that we could identify predictors of pain reduction in AIMSS intervention trials by combining data from previously conducted trials. Methods We pooled patient-level data from 3 randomized trials testing interventions (omega-3 fatty acids, acupuncture, and duloxetine) for AIMSS that had similar eligibility criteria and the same patient-reported outcome measures. Only patients with a baseline Brief Pain Inventory average pain score of at least 4 of 10 were included. The primary outcome examined was 2-point reduction in average pain from baseline to week 12. Variable cut-point selection and logistic regression were used. Risk models were built by summing the number of factors statistically significantly associated with pain reduction. Analyses were stratified by study and adjusted for treatment arm. Results For the 583 analyzed patients, the 4 factors statistically significantly associated with pain reduction were Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Functional Well-Being greater than 24 and Physical Well-Being greater than 14 (higher scores reflect better function), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index less than 50 and Modified Score for the Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatoid Affections of the Hands less than 33 (lower scores reflect less pain). Patients with all 4 factors were greater than 6 times more likely to experience at least a 2-point pain reduction (odds ratio = 6.37, 95% confidence interval = 2.31 to 17.53, 2-sided P < .001); similar results were found for secondary 30% and 50% pain reduction endpoints. Conclusions Patients with AIMSS who have lower symptom and functional distress at study entry on AIMSS intervention trials are more likely to experience meaningful pain reduction. Baseline symptom and functional status should be considered as stratification factors in future interventional trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Lynn Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Joseph M Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cathee Till
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Michael J Fisch
- Department of General Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Oza S. Aromatase Inhibitor-induced Musculoskeletal Syndrome: a Review of Rehabilitation Interventions. CURRENT PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40141-021-00318-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
29
|
Hershman DL, Neugut AI, Moseley A, Arnold KB, Gralow JR, Henry NL, Hillyer GC, Ramsey SD, Unger JM. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Long-Term Nonadherence to Aromatase Inhibitors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:989-996. [PMID: 33629114 PMCID: PMC8328987 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonadherence to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is common and increases risk of breast cancer (BC) recurrence. We analyzed factors associated with nonadherence among patients enrolled in S1105, a randomized trial of text messaging. METHODS At enrollment, patients were required to have been on an adjuvant AI for at least 30 days and were asked about financial, medication, and demographic factors. They completed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) representing pain (Brief Pain Inventory), endocrine symptoms (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms), and beliefs about medications (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine; Brief Medication Questionnaire). Our primary endpoint was AI nonadherence at 36 months, defined as urine AI metabolite assay of less than 10 ng/mL or no submitted specimen. We evaluated the association between individual baseline characteristics and nonadherence with logistic regression. A composite risk score reflecting the number of statistically significant baseline characteristics was examined. RESULTS We analyzed data from 702 patients; median age was 60.9 years. Overall, 35.9% patients were nonadherent at 36 months. Younger patients (younger than age 65 years) were more nonadherent (38.8% vs 28.6%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 2.16; P = .02). Fourteen baseline PRO scales were each statistically significantly associated with nonadherence. In a composite risk model categorized into quartile levels, each increase in risk level was associated with a 46.5% increase in the odds of nonadherence (OR = 1.47, 95% CI =1.26 to 1.70; P < .001). The highest-risk patients were more than 3 times more likely to be nonadherent than the lowest-risk patients (OR = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.97 to 5.02; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The presence of multiple baseline PRO-specified risk factors was statistically significantly associated with AI nonadherence. The use of these assessments can help identify patients for targeted interventions to improve adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn L Hershman
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alfred I Neugut
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Moseley
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Julie R Gralow
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Grace Clarke Hillyer
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott D Ramsey
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph M Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wagner LI. Patient-Reported Outcomes Bridge an Important Gap in Identifying Risk for Early Endocrine Therapy Discontinuation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:945-947. [PMID: 33585932 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne I Wagner
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Flannery MA, Culakova E, Canin BE, Peppone L, Ramsdale E, Mohile SG. Understanding Treatment Tolerability in Older Adults With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2150-2163. [PMID: 34043433 PMCID: PMC8238902 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marie A. Flannery
- University of Rochester Medical Center, School of Nursing, Rochester, NY
| | - Eva Culakova
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Beverly E. Canin
- SCOREboard Stakeholder Advisory Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Luke Peppone
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Erika Ramsdale
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yanez B, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Carlos RC, Sadigh G, Garcia SF, Gareen IF, Whelan TJ, Sledge GW, Cella D, Wagner LI. Association of Modifiable Risk Factors With Early Discontinuation of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:2780917. [PMID: 34137783 PMCID: PMC8377561 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Early discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is problematic among breast cancer survivors, with previous studies suggesting that up to 50% of women do not adhere to the recommended full 5 years of ET treatment. OBJECTIVE To identify the association between early discontinuation of ET in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) and modifiable risk factors, polypharmacy, and types of additional medications such as antidepressants and opioids. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This post hoc analysis includes a subgroup of 954 patients with breast cancer in TAILORx, a randomized clinical trial conducted from April 7, 2006, to October 6, 2010. All participants received a diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer and started ET within a year of study entry. Analyses were conducted in the intent-to-treat population. Statistical analysis took place from January 15, 2020, to April 6, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Participants completed measures on cancer-related health-related quality of life including physical well-being and social well-being prior to initiating ET. Early discontinuation of ET was defined as discontinuation less than 4 years from initiation for reasons other than death or recurrence. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate discontinuation, and Cox proportional hazards regression joint prediction models were used to analyze the association between rates of adherence to ET with patient-level factors. RESULTS A total of 954 women (mean [SD] age, 56.6 [8.9] years) were included in this analysis. In a joint model, receipt of chemoendocrine therapy (vs receipt of ET only; hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.92; P = .02) and age older than 40 years (vs ≤40 years; HR for 41-50 years, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85; P = .02; HR for 51-60 years, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.60; P = .001; HR for 61-70 years, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18-0.86; P = .02; and HR for >70 years, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.77; P = .02) were associated with a lower probability of early discontinuation of ET. Adjusted for these factors, a history of depression compared with no history of depression (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.19-2.77; P = .005), worse physical well-being compared with better physical well-being (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.30-3.45; P = .002), and worse social well-being compared with better social well-being (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.20-3.13; P = .006) were individually and significantly associated with a higher probability of early discontinuation of ET. Only antidepressant use at study baseline was associated with early discontinuation (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.23-2.84; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial, baseline patient-reported health-related quality of life components, such as poor social well-being, poor physical well-being, and comorbid depression, were significant risk factors for early discontinuation of endocrine therapies. These results support systematic screening for patient-reported outcomes and depressive symptoms to identify women at risk for discontinuation of ET. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00310180.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Ruth C. Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor
| | - Gelareh Sadigh
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sofia F. Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Timothy J. Whelan
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - George W. Sledge
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Center Palo Alto, Stanford, California
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hertz DL, Smith KL, Zong Y, Gersch CL, Pesch AM, Lehman J, Blackford AL, Henry NL, Kidwell KM, Rae JM, Stearns V. Further Evidence That OPG rs2073618 Is Associated With Increased Risk of Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Patients Receiving Aromatase Inhibitors for Early Breast Cancer. Front Genet 2021; 12:662734. [PMID: 34211496 PMCID: PMC8239354 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.662734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aromatase inhibitors (AI) reduce recurrence and death in patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer. Treatment-related toxicities, including AI-induced musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS), are common and may lead to early AI discontinuation. The objective of this study was to replicate previously reported associations for candidate germline genetic polymorphisms with AIMSS. Methods Women with stage 0-III HR + breast cancer initiating adjuvant AI were enrolled in a prospective clinic-based observational cohort. AIMSS were assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PRO) including the PROMIS pain interference and physical function measures plus the FACT-ES joint pain question at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. For the primary analysis, AIMSS were defined as ≥ 4-point increase in the pain interference T-score from baseline. Secondary AIMSS endpoints were defined as ≥ 4-point decrease in the physical function T-score from baseline and as ≥ 1-point increase on the FACT-ES joint pain question from baseline. The primary hypothesis was that TCL1A rs11849538 would be associated with AIMSS. Twelve other germline variants in CYP19A1, VDR, PIRC66, OPG, ESR1, CYP27B1, CYP17A1, and RANKL were also analyzed assuming a dominant genetic effect and prespecified direction of effect on AIMSS using univariate logistic regression with an unadjusted α = 0.05. Significant univariate associations in the expected direction were adjusted for age, race, body mass index (BMI), prior taxane, and the type of AI using multivariable logistic regression. Results A total of 143 participants with PRO and genetic data were included in this analysis, most of whom were treated with anastrozole (78%) or letrozole (20%). On primary analysis, participants carrying TCL1A rs11849538 were not more likely to develop AIMSS (odds ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-3.07, p = 0.56). In the statistically uncorrected secondary analysis, OPG rs2073618 was associated with AIMSS defined by worsening on the FACT-ES joint pain question (OR = 3.33, p = 0.004), and this association maintained significance after covariate adjustment (OR = 3.98, p = 0.003). Conclusion Carriers of OPG rs2073618 may be at increased risk of AIMSS. If confirmed in other cohorts, OPG genotyping can be used to identify individuals with HR + early breast cancer in whom alternate endocrine therapy or interventions to enhance symptom detection and implement strategies to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L Hertz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Karen Lisa Smith
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Yuhua Zong
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Christina L Gersch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Andrea M Pesch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jennifer Lehman
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Kelley M Kidwell
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - James M Rae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Vered Stearns
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy on prognosis in small hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2021; 28:1087-1095. [PMID: 33886077 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-021-01245-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has been previously established. However, significant adverse events related to endocrine therapy cannot be ignored. T1 breast cancer is expected to have a good prognosis. Therefore, adjuvant endocrine therapy for T1a breast cancer patients is controversial. Thus, in this study, we examined the effect of endocrine therapy on the prognosis of T1N0 hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients in each tumor size group, and re-considered the application of endocrine therapy. METHODS We retrospectively obtained clinical and pathological data from medical records of 7635 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer at Aichi Cancer Hospital between January 2000 and December 2017. The primary end point of our analysis was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end points were distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). The log-rank test, cumulative survival generated curves with Kaplan-Meier methods and the hazard ratio (HR) calculated with a Cox regression model were used to assess the effects of endocrine therapy on prognosis. RESULTS The 5-year DFS was worse in the non-endocrine therapy (non-ET) group (78%) than the endocrine therapy (ET) group (95%) in the T1c population (p < 0.001, HR 0.25). However, there was no statistically significant difference in DFS between the ET and the non-ET groups in T1a (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.9314, HR 0.94) and T1b (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.1481HR 0.53) breast cancer. The OS, DDFS, and BCSS of the patients also showed that endocrine therapy was associated with improvement of the prognosis in the T1c group, but not in the T1a and T1b groups. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant endocrine therapy may be essential for T1c breast cancer patients. In contrast, this therapy should be discussed for T1a and T1b luminal breast cancer patients under some circumstances, such as suffering from adverse events.
Collapse
|
35
|
Gadisa DA, Wang SH, Yimer G. The Impact of AC and AC-T Chemotherapy's Toxicities on Quality of Life Among Women with Breast Cancer in Ethiopia: A Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes Study. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2021; 13:107-132. [PMID: 33658844 PMCID: PMC7917350 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s289014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aimed to evaluate the quality of life patterns and the effects of AC and AC-T chemotherapy's toxicities on QoL among Ethiopian women with breast cancer. METHODS QoL was measured at baseline and at every end of two cycles, for the median of 8 cycles among 146 breast cancer women on AC and AC-T chemotherapy, using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 instruments. The effect of QoL score, socio-demographic, and clinical variables at baseline were adjusted for the effect of chemotherapy's toxicities on QoL. RESULTS Overall QoL, all functional scales (except cognitive functioning, body image, future perspectives, and sexual functioning) and symptom scales (except dyspnea, insomnia, pain score, arm, and breast symptoms) of EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 deteriorated significantly both clinically and statistically, in particular, during the first two cycles of chemotherapy. After the end of cycle 2 or 4, except for cognitive, social functioning, and financial difficulties of the patients, almost all other QoL dimensions were improved towards pretreatment score by the end of cycle 8. In addition to age, educational status, and tumor stage, the Global Health Status (-10.55≤B≤-7.71, P≤0.013), and the functional scales (-25.320≤B≤-6.351, P≤0.033) of EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 were significantly affected at least by one of the AC and AC-T chemotherapy's toxicity such as grade≥2 fatigue, dysgeusia, constipation, dry mouth, vomiting, oral mucositis, skin hyperpigmentation and/or peripheral neuropathy than their lower grade. Grade≥2 fatigue, dysgeusia, oral mucositis, constipation, peripheral neuropathy, anemia arthralgia/myalgia, dry mouth, diarrhea, constipation, and/or skin hyperpigmentation were positively predicted for the deterioration of symptoms scale of EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 (4.819≤B≤26.451, P≤0.043). CONCLUSION Quality of life among Ethiopian breast cancer patients on AC and AC-T regimens significantly deteriorated particularly during the first two cycles of chemotherapy. In addition to the age, tumor stage and educational status of the patients, grade≥2 fatigue, dysgeusia, constipation, oral mucositis, dry mouth, peripheral neuropathy, and skin hyperpigmentation due to AC and AC-T chemotherapy were frequently associated with deterioration of different scales/items QoL. Hence, devising different strategies to improve the deteriorated QoL due to chemotherapy's toxicities particularly during the first two cycles has paramount importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diriba Alemayehu Gadisa
- Pharmacy Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Shu-Hua Wang
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Ben Franklin TB Control Program, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Getnet Yimer
- Ohio State Global One Health Initiative, Office of International Affairs, The Ohio State University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zhao H, Lei X, Niu J, Zhang N, Duan Z, Chavez-MacGregor M, Giordano SH. Prescription Patterns, Initiation, and 5-Year Adherence to Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy Among Commercially Insured Patients With Breast Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e794-e808. [PMID: 33596096 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are used as adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) for early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Treatment for 5 years reduces cancer mortality by 30%. Despite this benefit, adherence to AHT has been suboptimal. Here, we evaluated AHT initiation and patient adherence in women with private health insurance. MATERIALS AND METHODS Female patients with breast cancer ≥ 18 years of age who underwent mastectomy or lumpectomy between 1999 and 2015 were identified in the IBM MarketScan Research Database. AHT initiation and adherence rates were estimated for all AHT users regardless of HR+ status. Initiation rates were standardized using HR+ breast cancer incidence rates in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Adherence was defined as medication possession ratio ≥ 80%. Risk ratios, odds ratios, and their 95% CIs were calculated for factors associated with patients' initiation and adherence. RESULTS Among 80,224 patients, the raw initiation rate was 71.8% and the standardized rate was 87.5%. We found 61.2% patients initiated treatment with AIs and 38.8% with tamoxifen. Patients' 1-year adherence rate was 84.4% and the 5-year rate was 65.2%. Prescription by mail-in order, using a single AHT regimen, 50 to 69 years of age, monthly out-of-pocket drug payment ≤ $11, in US dollars, no depression, no comorbidity, living in the Northeast, treatment in recent years, and receipt of a combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery were associated with better adherence. CONCLUSION Five-year AHT adherence rates are low among female patients with breast cancer with private health insurance. Effective approaches to improve AHT adherence are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Zhao
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jiangong Niu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Zhigang Duan
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.,Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.,Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kaptein AA, Schoones JW, van der Meer PB, Matsuda A, Murray M, Heimans L, Kroep JR. Psychosocial determinants of adherence with oral anticancer treatment: 'we don't need no education'. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:87-95. [PMID: 33151764 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1843190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given the potentially fatal consequences of inadequate adherence with oral anticancer treatment in persons with cancer, understanding the determinants of adherence is vital. This paper aims at identifying psychosocial determinants of adherence to oral anticancer treatment. METHODS We reviewed the literature on psychosocial determinants of adherence with oral anticancer treatment, based on published literature in English, from 2015 to present. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Emcare, and PsychINFO, with 'cancer', 'medication adherence', 'psychology', and 'oral anticancer treatment' as search terms. The obtained 608 papers were screened by two independent reviewers. RESULTS In the 25 studies identified, illness perceptions, medication beliefs, health beliefs, and depression were found to be the major psychosocial determinants of adherence to oral anticancer treatment; sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were found to be of no major importance. The quality of the identified studies as assessed by two independent reviewers was found to be acceptable overall. The majority of papers were from North America and focused on patients with breast cancer; sample size varied from 13 to 1371; adherence was assessed with questionnaires derived from various theoretical models, pill counts and electronic pharmacy records; illness perceptions reflecting adaptive coping, and medication beliefs reflecting high necessity and low concerns were found to be associated with adherence. CONCLUSION Psychosocial concepts are major determinants of adherence with oral anticancer treatment. 'Beliefs about medicines' and 'illness perceptions' in particular determine adherence with this treatment. Studies aiming at impacting adherence would benefit from interventions with a solid basis in behavioral theory in order to help health care providers explore and address illness perceptions and medication beliefs. Pre-consultation screening of adherence behavior may be a helpful supportive approach to improve adherence. Blaming the victim ('patients should be educated about the importance of adherence') is better replaced by encouraging health professionals to identify and address maladaptive psychosocial determinants of adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian A. Kaptein
- Department of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan W. Schoones
- Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pim B. van der Meer
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ayako Matsuda
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michael Murray
- School of Psychology, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| | - Lotte Heimans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Judith R. Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Steffen McLouth LE, Zhao F, Owonikoko TK, Feliciano JL, Mohindra NA, Dahlberg SE, Wade JL, Srkalovic G, Lash BW, Leach JW, Leal TA, Aggarwal C, Cella D, Ramalingam SS, Wagner LI. Patient-reported tolerability of veliparib combined with cisplatin and etoposide for treatment of extensive stage small cell lung cancer: Neurotoxicity and adherence data from the ECOG ACRIN cancer research group E2511 phase II randomized trial. Cancer Med 2020; 9:7511-7523. [PMID: 32860331 PMCID: PMC7571824 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group trial E2511 recently demonstrated a potential benefit for the addition of veliparib to cisplatin-etoposide (CE) in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in a phase II randomized controlled trial. Secondary trial endpoints included comparison of the incidence and severity of neurotoxicity, hypothesized to be lower in the veliparib arm, and tolerability of the addition of veliparib to CE. Physician-rated and patient-reported neurotoxicity was also compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients randomized to veliparib plus CE (n = 64) or placebo plus CE (n = 64) completed the 11-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity (questionnaire pre-treatment, end of cycle 4 [ie 3 months after randomization] and 3 months post-treatment [ie 6-months]). Adherence analysis was based on treatment forms. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION No significant differences in mean or magnitude of change in neurotoxicity scores were observed between treatment arms at any time point. However, patients in the placebo arm reported worsening neurotoxicity from baseline to 3-months (M difference = -1.5, P = .045), compared to stable neurotoxicity in the veliparib arm (M difference = -0.2, P = .778). Weakness was the most common treatment-emergent (>50%) and moderate to severe (>16%) symptom reported, but did not differ between treatment arms. The proportion of adherence to oral therapy in the overall sample was 75%. Three percent of patients reported clinically significant neurotoxicity that was not captured by physician assessment. Neurotoxicity scores were not different between treatment arms. The addition of veliparib to CE appeared tolerable, though weakness should be monitored. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01642251.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie E. Steffen McLouth
- Department of Behavioral ScienceCenter for Health Equity TransformationUniversity of Kentucky College of MedicineLexingtonKYUSA
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute & ECOG‐ACRIN Biostatistics CenterBostonMAUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Department of Social Sciences & Health PolicyWake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNCUSA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jackisch C, Kreienberg R, Blettner M, Harbeck N, Lück HJ, Haidinger R, Schmitt DC, Schulte H, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Zaun S, Hadji P. Assessment of Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Participating in the PACT Trial: The Impact of Additional Patient Information Material Packages and Patient Compliance. Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 15:236-245. [PMID: 32774217 DOI: 10.1159/000500771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer patients' self-understanding of their disease can impact their quality of life (QoL); the relationship between compliance and QoL is poorly understood. Patients and Methods The Patient's Anastrozole Compliance to Therapy (PACT) program, a prospective, randomized study, investigated the effect of additional patient information material (IM) packages on compliance with adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. The QoL subanalysis presented here examined the impact of IM packages on QoL and the association between QoL and compliance. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires were completed at baseline, 12 and 24 months, or study termination to assess health-related QoL and disease-related symptoms. Results Of the 4,844 patients randomized to standard therapy or standard therapy + IM packages (1:1), 4,253 were available for QoL analysis. No difference in QoL was observed between groups at baseline. IM packages did not have a statistically significant impact on patient QoL at the 12- or 24-month follow-up. Compliant patients experienced improvement in multiple items across the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 scales at 12 months. However, those results should be interpreted carefully due to limitations in the statistical analyses. Conclusions Provision of IM packages did not influence patients' QoL or satisfaction with care during AI therapy. Compliant patients appear to experience improved QoL compared to noncompliant patients, perhaps indicating a more self-empowered perception of their condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maria Blettner
- Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center of Bone Health, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Polchai N, Sa-Nguanraksa D, Numprasit W, Thumrongtaradol T, O-Charoenrat E, O-Charoenrat P. A Comparison Between the Online Prediction Models CancerMath and PREDICT as Prognostic Tools in Thai Breast Cancer Patients. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:5549-5559. [PMID: 32753968 PMCID: PMC7354915 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s258143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Web-based prognostic calculators have been developed to inform about the use of adjuvant systemic treatments in breast cancer. CancerMath and PREDICT are two examples of web-based prognostic tools that predict patient survival up to 15 years after an initial diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to validate the use of CancerMath and PREDICT as prognostic tools in Thai breast cancer patients. Patients and Methods A total of 615 patients who underwent surgical treatment for stage I to III breast cancer from 2003 to 2011 at the Division of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand were recruited. A model-predicted overall survival rate (OS) and the actual OS of the patients were compared. The efficacy of the model was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results For CancerMath, the predicted 5-year OS was 88.9% and the predicted 10-year OS was 78.3% (p<0.001). For PREDICT, the predicted 5-year OS was 83.1% and the predicted 10-year OS was 72.0% (p<0.001). The actual observed 5-year OS was 90.8% and the observed 10-year OS was 82.6% (p<0.001). CancerMath demonstrated better predictive performance than PREDICT in all subgroups for both 5- and 10-year OS. In addition, there was a marked difference between CancerMath and observed survival rates in patients who were older as well as patients who were stage N3. The area under the ROC curve for 5-year OS in CancerMath and 10-year OS was 0.74 (95% CI; 0.65-0.82) and 0.75 (95% CI; 0.68-0.82). In the PREDICT group, the area under the ROC curve for 5-year OS was 0.78 (95% CI; 0.71-0.85) and for 10-year OS, it was 0.78 (95% CI; 0.71-0.84). Conclusion CancerMath and PREDICT models both underestimated the OS in Thai breast cancer patients. Thus, a novel prognostic model for Thai breast cancer patients is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuanphan Polchai
- Division of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Doonyapat Sa-Nguanraksa
- Division of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Warapan Numprasit
- Division of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Thanawat Thumrongtaradol
- Division of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Eng O-Charoenrat
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Pornchai O-Charoenrat
- Division of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Xue Ting O, May LM, Jingxiang H, Huma J. A case of exemestane induced pseudocellulitis. Dermatol Ther 2020; 33:e13428. [PMID: 32301203 DOI: 10.1111/dth.13428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Exemestane is an aromatase inhibitor increasingly incorporated into the treatment of hormone sensitive breast cancer. Pseudocellulitis describes an uncomplicated inflammation of the dermis and hypodermis from a noninfectious etiology. It presents with erythema, swelling, warmth and tenderness of the affected skin. We report a case of a 47-year-old Indian woman who presented with 2-day history of redness and swelling of her left lower limb. There were no other symptoms. She was recently switched from tamoxifen to aromasin as adjuvant treatment for her breast cancer. Examination revealed erythema, edema, and warmth over the left lower limb. Laboratory investigations and doppler ultrasound scan were unremarkable. Skin punch biopsy showed dermal inflammatory infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes and scattered eosinophils and neutrophils, concentrated in the superficial and deep perivascular regions suggestive of a leukocytoclastic vasculitis. The diagnosis of exemestane induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis presenting as pseudocellulitis was made. She was given a course of systemic and topical steroids with completere solution of lesion within 2 weeks. This is the first reported case of exemestane induced pseudocellulitis to our knowledge. Dermatologists and clinicians should be aware of this peculiar adverse drug reaction to avoid misdiagnosis and prevent unnecessary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ooi Xue Ting
- Department of Internal Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Liau MeiQi May
- Division of Dermatology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Huang Jingxiang
- Department of Pathology, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jaffar Huma
- Division of Dermatology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Representation of CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and UGT1A4 Polymorphisms within Croatian Breast Cancer Patients' Population. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17103692. [PMID: 32456253 PMCID: PMC7277422 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes (DME) could have a critical role in individual responses to anastrozole. Frequency of CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3 and UGT1A4*2 SNPs in 126 Croatian breast cancer (BC) patients and possible association with anastrozole-induced undesirable side effects were analyzed. Eighty-two postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC treated with anastrozole and 44 postmenopausal ER-positive BC patients before hormonal adjuvant therapy were included in the study. Genomic DNA was genotyped by TaqMan Real-Time PCR. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The homozygotes for the variant G allele of CYP3A5*3 were predominant (88%), and the homozygotes for the reference A allele were not detected. While homozygotes for the variant G allele of CYP3A4*1B were not detected, predominantly wild type homozygotes for A allele (94%) were present. CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 SNPs were in 84.3% linkage disequilibrium (D’ = 0.843) and 95.1% (D’ = 0.951) in group treated with anastrozole and w/o treatment, respectively. Homozygotes for the A allele of UGT1A4*2 were not detected in our study groups. Although the variant CYP3A5*3 allele, which might result in poor metabolizer phenotype and more pronounced side effects, was predominant, significant association with BMD changes induced by anastrozole were not confirmed.
Collapse
|
43
|
Burstein HJ. Adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women: making treatment choices based on the magnitude of benefit. Breast 2020; 48 Suppl 1:S89-S91. [PMID: 31839170 DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(19)31132-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancers account for the vast majority of early stage breast cancers, particularly in postmenopausal women. Adjuvant endocrine therapy is an essential component of multimodality therapy for such cancers, lowering the risk of local-regional and of metastatic recurrence, improving overall survival, and enabling "less" in the way of breast or axillary surgery and radiation therapy for many women. In the past decade, advances in adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women include widespread use of aromatase inhibitors instead of or in sequence with tamoxifen, and use of extended durations of endocrine treatment beyond the classical "5 years" of recommended therapy. However, the judicious use of these treatments to optimize outcomes depends on considering features of the tumor stage and biology and careful attention to and management of symptoms related to these treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold J Burstein
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
de Boer AZ, de Glas NA, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Dekkers OM, Siesling S, de Munck L, de Ligt KM, Liefers GJ, Portielje JEA, Bastiaannet E. Effect of omission of surgery on survival in patients aged 80 years and older with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1145-1153. [PMID: 32259294 PMCID: PMC7496090 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery is increasingly being omitted in older patients with operable breast cancer in the Netherlands. Although omission of surgery can be considered in frail older patients, it may lead to inferior outcomes in non-frail patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of omission of surgery on relative and overall survival in older patients with operable breast cancer. METHODS Patients aged 80 years or older diagnosed with stage I-II hormone receptor-positive breast cancer between 2003 and 2009 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. An instrumental variable approach was applied to minimize confounding, using hospital variation in rate of primary surgery. Relative and overall survival was compared between patients treated in hospitals with different rates of surgery. RESULTS Overall, 6464 patients were included. Relative survival was lower for patients treated in hospitals with lower compared with higher surgical rates (90·2 versus 92·4 per cent respectively after 5 years; 71·6 versus 88·2 per cent after 10 years). The relative excess risk for patients treated in hospitals with lower surgical rates was 2·00 (95 per cent c.i. 1·17 to 3·40). Overall survival rates were also lower among patients treated in hospitals with lower compared with higher surgical rates (48·3 versus 51·3 per cent after 5 years; 15·0 versus 19·7 per cent after 10 years respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 1·07, 95 per cent c.i. 1·00 to 1·14). CONCLUSION Omission of surgery is associated with worse relative and overall survival in patients aged 80 years or more with stage I-II hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Future research should focus on the effect on quality of life and physical functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Z de Boer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - N A de Glas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - O M Dekkers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - L de Munck
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - K M de Ligt
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - G J Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
St Germain D, Denicoff A, Torres A, Kelaghan J, McCaskill-Stevens W, Mishkin G, O'Mara A, Minasian LM. Reporting of health-related quality of life endpoints in National Cancer Institute-supported cancer treatment trials. Cancer 2020; 126:2687-2693. [PMID: 32237256 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of capturing and reporting health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in clinical trials has been increasingly recognized in the oncology field. As a result, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) began to provide support for correlative HRQOL studies in cancer treatment trials. The current study was conducted to assess the publication rate of HRQOL correlative studies in NCI-supported treatment trials and to identify potential factors positively or negatively associated with publication rates. METHODS The NCI conducted a retrospective review of existing NCI databases to identify cancer treatment trials that had obtained additional NCI funding for the assessment of HRQOL and to determine the extent to which funded HRQOL studies have been completed and published in a peer-reviewed journal. RESULTS Of the 108 included trials, 58 (54%) had a parent trial (PT) publication; of these, 36 trials (62%) had a published HRQOL result: 20 as an independent publication and 16 that were included and/or reported in the PT publication. The length of time between trial activation and closure, as well as the specific cancer, appeared to be associated with the publication rates. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study demonstrated that approximately 45% of the PT publications were followed by a HRQOL publication within 1 year, to allow the knowledge to be used in patient treatment decision making. The authors believe the current analysis is an important first step toward a better understand of the challenges that researchers face when reporting HRQOL endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane St Germain
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Andrea Denicoff
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Andrea Torres
- Health, Environment, Analytics, Resilience & Social Group, ICF, Fairfax, Virginia
| | - Joseph Kelaghan
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Grace Mishkin
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ann O'Mara
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lori M Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Roydhouse JK, King-Kallimanis BL, Roy P, Weinstock C, Krol D, Daniels SR, Suzman DL, Beaver JA, Kluetz PG. Exploration of baseline patient-reported side effect bother from cancer therapy. Clin Trials 2020; 17:332-337. [PMID: 32153216 DOI: 10.1177/1740774520910389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient reports of expected treatment side effects are increasingly collected as part of the assessment of patient experience in clinical trials. A global side effect item that is patient-reported has the potential to inform overall tolerability. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the completion and distribution of such a global single-item measure of side effect burden in five cancer clinical trials. METHODS Data from five trials from internal Food and Drug Administration databases that included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General single-item measure of overall side effect burden (i.e. impact on degree of bother) were analyzed. Completion rates for the side effect bother item, items adjacent to this item, and two non-adjacent items on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General that are related to health-related quality of life were calculated at the baseline assessment and at the 3-month assessment. To evaluate the distribution, the percentage of patients reporting high levels (quite a bit or very much bother) of side effect bother at baseline and 3 months was assessed. RESULTS Completion rates for all items were at least 80% regardless of time point or trial population. However, in three of the five trials, completion rates for the side effect bother item were lower at baseline compared to adjacent and non-adjacent items. This difference was not observed at 3 months. Up to 9.4% of patients reported high levels of side effect bother at baseline. CONCLUSION Patients may enter trials already reporting some bother from side effects. This can make interpretation of results with respect to the investigational agent under study challenging. Patients may skip an item evaluating side effect bother at baseline, suggesting some difficulty with interpretation of what is being asked. Further study of the wording and utility of a baseline side effect bother assessment is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pourab Roy
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Chana Weinstock
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Danielle Krol
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Selena R Daniels
- Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Daniel L Suzman
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Julia A Beaver
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Paul G Kluetz
- Oncology Center of Excellence, Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Value Lies in the Eye of the Patients: The Why, What, and How of Patient-reported Outcomes Measures. Clin Ther 2020; 42:25-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
48
|
Dorfman CS, Arthur SS, Kimmick GG, Westbrook KW, Marcom PK, Corbett C, Edmond SN, Shelby RA. Partner status moderates the relationships between sexual problems and self-efficacy for managing sexual problems and psychosocial quality-of-life for postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy. Menopause 2019; 26:823-832. [PMID: 30994574 PMCID: PMC7081279 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Past studies indicate that >90% of breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) experience menopausal symptoms including sexual problems (eg, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia); however, research examining the impact of these problems on quality-of-life is limited. This cross-sectional study examined (1) the impact of sexual problems and self-efficacy for coping with sexual problems (sexual self-efficacy) on quality-of-life (ie, psychosocial quality-of-life and sexual satisfaction), and (2) partner status as a moderator of these relationships. METHODS Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking AET completed measures of sexual problems (Menopause-Specific Quality-of-Life [MENQOL] sexual subscale], sexual self-efficacy, psychosocial quality-of-life (MENQOL psychosocial subscale), and sexual satisfaction (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General item). RESULTS Bivariate analyses showed that women reporting greater sexual problems and lower sexual self-efficacy had poorer quality-of-life and less sexual satisfaction (all P-values < 0.05). Partner status moderated the relationship between sexual problems and psychosocial quality-of-life (P = 0.02); at high levels of sexual problems, unpartnered women experienced poorer psychosocial quality-of-life than partnered women. Partner status also moderated the relationship between self-efficacy and psychosocial quality-of-life (P = 0.01). Self-efficacy was unrelated to psychosocial quality-of-life for partnered women; for unpartnered women, low self-efficacy was associated with poorer quality-of-life. Partner status did not moderate the relationships between sexual problems or self-efficacy with sexual satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Greater sexual problems and lower sexual self-efficacy were associated with poorer psychosocial quality-of-life and sexual satisfaction among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking AET. Interventions to address sexual problems and sexual self-efficacy, particularly among unpartnered women, may be beneficial for improving the well-being of postmenopausal breast cancer survivors on AET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Sarah S Arthur
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - Cheyenne Corbett
- Duke Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Sara N Edmond
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidity & Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Victorson D, Schalet BD, Kundu S, Helfand BT, Novakovic K, Penedo F, Cella D. Establishing a common metric for self-reported anxiety in patients with prostate cancer: Linking the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer with PROMIS Anxiety. Cancer 2019; 125:3249-3258. [PMID: 31090933 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anxiety is a common patient concern and clinical endpoint in prostate cancer outcomes research. It is measured using different self-report instruments that are not directly comparable, thereby making clinical trials, clinical performance measurement, and comparative effectiveness research challenging when anxiety is the outcome of interest. The objective of the current study was to enable a common reporting metric of anxiety so that scores on commonly used anxiety measures could be converted into Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores for ease of application, interpretation, and comparability. METHODS Using an internet health panel, a total of 806 men with clinically localized prostate cancer completed items from the National Institutes of Health PROMIS Anxiety Short Form (version 7a) and the 18-item Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC). A common metric was created using analyses based on item response theory, producing score crosswalk tables. The linking relationships were evaluated by resampling small subsets and estimating confidence intervals for the differences between the observed and linked PROMIS scores. RESULTS Results of factor analysis and item response theory model fit supported the hypothesis that both scales measure essentially the same concept. Therefore, crosswalk tables appear to be justified and increasingly robust with increasing sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS MAX-PC Anxiety results can be expressed on the PROMIS Anxiety metric for the purposes of clinical performance measurement, clinical trial outcomes, comparative effectiveness research, and other efforts to compare anxiety results across studies that use any one of these measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Victorson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Benjamin D Schalet
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Shilajit Kundu
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brian T Helfand
- Division of Urology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Kristian Novakovic
- Division of Urology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Frank Penedo
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.,Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bedi JS, Mayo RM, Chen L, Dickes L, Sherrill WW, Jones K. Factors associated with longer endocrine therapy use by South Carolina Medicaid-insured breast cancer survivors. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2019; 26:36-42. [PMID: 30885081 DOI: 10.1177/1078155219835297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study is to determine demographic, clinical, and pharmaceutical factors that are associated with longer endocrine therapy usage duration. METHODS South Carolina Central Cancer Registry incidence data linked with South Carolina Medicaid prescription claims and administrative data were used. The study included a sample (N = 1399) of female South Carolina Medicaid recipients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 who filled at least one ET prescription. A series of multiple regression models were built to explore the association of demographic, clinical, and pharmaceutical factors with the endocrine therapy usage duration. RESULTS Multiple linear regression analysis showed that none of the demographic or clinical factors tested were significantly associated with the endocrine therapy usage duration. However, the type of endocrine therapy taken as well as receipt of the prescriptions that could have been used to alleviate side-effects (adrenals, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, anti-inflammatory agents, and vitamins) were significantly associated. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the potential value of concurrent prescriptions for improving the endocrine therapy usage duration, with an optimal intervention point before 14 months post ET initiation. This work informs further research needed to test pharmacologic interventions that may significantly increase the endocrine therapy duration as well as other nonpharmacologic strategies for side-effect management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie S Bedi
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Rachel M Mayo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Liwei Chen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Lori Dickes
- Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Windsor W Sherrill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Karyn Jones
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|