Breast conservation versus mastectomy in patients with T3 breast cancers (> 5 cm): an analysis of 37,268 patients from the National Cancer Database

Overall survival after mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy and mastectomy are currently offered as equivalent surgical options for early-stage breast cancer based on RCTs from the 1970s and 1980s. However, the treatment of breast cancer has evolved and recent observational studies suggest a survival advantage for breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to summarize the contemporary evidence regarding survival after breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy versus mastectomy for women with early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase that identified studies published between 1 January 2000 and 18 December 2023 comparing overall survival after breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy versus mastectomy for patients with unilateral stage 1-3 breast cancer was undertaken. The main exclusion criteria were studies evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy, rare breast cancer subtypes, and specific breast cancer populations. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess risk of bias, with the overall certainty of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Studies without critical risk of bias were included in a quantitative meta-analysis.

RESULTS

From 11 750 abstracts, 108 eligible articles were identified, with one article including two studies; 29 studies were excluded from the meta-analysis due to an overall critical risk of bias, 42 studies were excluded due to overlapping study populations, and three studies were excluded due to reporting incompatible results. A total of 35 observational studies reported survival outcomes for 909 077 patients (362 390 patients undergoing mastectomy and 546 687 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy). The pooled HR was 0.72 (95% c.i. 0.68 to 0.75, P < 0.001), demonstrating improved overall survival for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. The overall certainty of the evidence was very low.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides evidence suggesting a survival advantage for women undergoing breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer compared with mastectomy. Although these results should be interpreted with caution, they should be shared with patients to support informed surgical decision-making.

Oncoplastic Breast Conservation for Central Tumors: Definition, Classification, and the Analysis of Single Institution Experience

Background

Tumors in the central part of the breast are usually considered more aggressive and technically difficult, which limits breast conservation. The definition of central tumors from a surgical point of view, classification of the techniques for partial breast reconstruction, and conceptual algorithm of choice based on tumor and breast characteristics are proposed, along with the estimation of surgical and oncological safety.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of the single-institution experience, with a focus on the decision-making process for choosing the oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery technique. To evaluate the safety of breast conservation for central tumors, a comparative analysis of early surgical complications and oncological long-term results of treatment in patients with central breast tumor location and other breast tumor locations was performed.

Results

A total of 940 lumpectomies were performed in 926 patients during 15 years. The central breast tumor location group included 128 patients with 130 lumpectomies (13.8%), and the other breast tumor locations group included 798 patients with 810 lumpectomies (86.2%). We did not find any significant differences in the rate of early surgical complications and involved margins, local and systemic recurrence rates, time to progression, or overall survival between the groups.

Conclusions

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery is a safe procedure for the treatment of central tumors. In our opinion, the proposed classification of partial breast reconstruction techniques and an algorithm of their choice allow for effective restoration of the breast shape and volume according to the parameters of the tumor, breast, surgeon, and patient preferences.

Oncoplastic Augmentation Mastopexy in Breast Conservation Therapy: Retrospective Study and Postoperative Complications

BACKGROUND

Oncoplastic techniques, in conjunction with lumpectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy, have been demonstrated to achieve good aesthetic results and cancer outcomes in the treatment of patients with macromastia or significant ptosis. This study evaluated a series of patients undergoing breast conservation with concomitant oncoplastic-augmentation-mastopexy and a contralateral augmentation-mastopexy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lumpectomy for breast conservation were identified via a retrospective chart review. Inclusion criteria included patients with ptosis and preexisting breast implants or insufficient breast volume undergoing oncoplastic implant placement/exchange and mastopexy. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four consecutive patients (64 breasts, 4 unilateral procedures) were included in the study. Average age was 51.4 years, average body mass index was 27, and 38.2% were smokers/former smokers. The average operative time was 2.5 hours. Furthermore, 38.2% of patients received chemotherapy, and 82.4% of patients received breast adjuvant radiotherapy. The average length of follow-up was 11.7 months. In the sample that received radiation, the capsular contracture rate was 25%, with a 7.1% contracture revision rate. For the entire group, a total of 8 patients (23.5%) underwent revisions for either positive margins (8.8%), capsular contracture (8.8%), implant loss (2.9%), or cosmetic concerns (2.9%). One patient developed a pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncoplastic-augmentation-mastopexy is a safe technique with acceptable complication rates. This technique is best used for breast cancer patients with breast ptosis and a paucity of breast volume or preexisting implants who wish to pursue breast-conserving therapy. The revision rates are acceptable compared with single-stage cosmetic augmentation procedures as well as other oncoplastic techniques described in the literature, but patients must be clearly counseled on contracture risk.

Breast-Conserving Surgery or Mastectomy?: Impact on Survival

The early randomized controlled trials revealed no differences in survival between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. However, breast cancer treatment has undergone changes, and the results of recent population-based registry studies suggest superior long-term survival after BCS. To explore the current evidence, a systematic review and meta-ana lysis of population-based observational studies from 2010 and onward was conducted.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant literature. Keywords included "mastectomy," "breast conserving surgery," and "survival." The identified studies were narratively reviewed and effect sizes (hazard ratios [HRs]) for overall (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were combined with random-effects models.

Results

A total of 30 reports were included in the review, and results from 25 studies were included in the meta-analyses. Compared with mastectomy, BCS was associated with better OS (HR = 1.34 [1.20-1.51]; N = 1,311,600) and BCSS (HR = 1.38 [1.29-1.47]; N = 494,267). Selected subgroups of patients, based on lymph node status, age (<50 years/≥50 years), and radiation therapy after mastectomy (±), all showed better overall survival after BCS. The number (range 4-12) and type of prognostic variables adjusted for in the survival analyses of the studies did not statistically significantly moderate the differences in survival between BCS and mastectomy.

Conclusions

The combined findings from large population-based studies indicate that BCS is associated with survival benefit compared with mastectomy, suggesting that BCS be the recommended treatment of early breast cancer (T1-2N0-1M0) if a radical lumpectomy can be performed.

Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap repair is effective after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical outcome and physical condition of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by mastectomy and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap repair.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 142 patients with locally advanced breast cancer was selected from 1156 breast cancer patients in the South and North areas of The Affiliated Calmette Hospital of Kunming Medical University between May 2008 and December 2018.

RESULTS

All participants (n = 142) were women aged 40-55 years (average age 47.35 ± 0.43 years) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by mastectomy and latissimus dorsi flap repair. The median follow-up period was 16 months (range 12-24 months). For stage of disease, there were 19 cases (13%) in stage IIB, 31 cases (22%) in stage IIIA, 39 cases (28%) in stage IIIB, and 53 cases (37%) in stage IIIC, which were statistically significant with the physical condition of patients (≤ 0.001). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to shrink the tumors, and an average tumor size decrease from 10.05 ± 1.59 cm × (8.07 ± 1.54) cm to 6.11 ± 1.72 cm × (3.91 ± 1.52) cm (P < 0.001) was considered statistically significant. A t test was used for the ECOG score statistics, and the results showed that the scores were statistically significant (≤ 0.001) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted treatment option for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, and the use of a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap for post-mastectomy reconstruction may improve the patients' physical condition. Our results indicated that this strategy was safe and feasible.

Study of the protocol used to evaluate skin-flap perfusion in mastectomy based on the characteristics of indocyanine green

BACKGROUND

Indocyanine green angiography enables real-time visualization of blood vessels at depths of up to 10 mm beneath the body surface, thereby aiding the evaluation of the viability of skin flaps and predicting necrosis in surgical fields requiring good tissue perfusion. Although skin-flap necrosis also occurs in mastectomy without reconstruction, most studies have focused on reconstructive plastic surgery. Several patients undergoing mastectomy are eligible for postoperative adjuvant therapy, but complications can lead to delays in treatment and thus require prevention. However, a lack of a standard protocol for evaluating skin-flap perfusion using indocyanine green necessitates the study of its characteristics to facilitate comparison of the perfusion rate among individuals.

METHODS

This retrospective study focused on the characteristics of indocyanine green and established a protocol for indocyanine green angiography using laser-assisted imaging (SPY system) to predict postoperative skin-flap necrosis from intraoperative images of 30 patients who underwent mastectomy without reconstruction.

RESULTS

Our protocol predicted postoperative skin-flap necrosis as follows. First, the intravenous dose and concentration were set at 2.5 mg/mL and 0.05 mg/kg, respectively. Second, the timing of measurement was set to 100 s after the entry of indocyanine green into the skin (plateau phase); the analysis pattern was set to single frame. Third, comparisons among individuals were made using relative values.

CONCLUSIONS

We analyzed the area of postoperative flap necrosis using this protocol. We found that the intraoperative images showed decreased perfusion in that area, which was useful in predicting skin-flap necrosis, as reported by previous breast reconstruction studies.

Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients with cT3 Breast Cancer with Good Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Results in Excellent Local Control: A Comprehensive Cancer Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Many cT3 breast cancer patients are treated with mastectomy, regardless of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). We evaluated local control of cT3 patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation post-NST. In addition, we analyzed predictive characteristics for positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

METHODS

All cT3 breast cancer patients who underwent BCS after NST between 2002 and 2015 at the Netherlands Cancer Institute were included. Local recurrence-free interval (LRFI) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors for positive margins were analyzed using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 114 patients undergoing BCS post-NST, 75 had negative margins, 16 had focally positive margins, and 23 had positive margins. Of those with (focally) positive margins, 12 underwent radiotherapy, 6 underwent re-excision, and 21 underwent mastectomy. Finally, 93/114 patients were treated with BCT (82%), with an LRFI of 95.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.5-100%) after a median follow-up of 7 years. Predictors for positive margins in univariable analysis were hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) subtype, lobular carcinoma, and non-mass enhancement (NME) on pre-NST MRI. MRI response was not correlated to positive margins. In multivariable regression, the odds of positive margins were decreased in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+; odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.73; p = 0.01) and TN tumors (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.82; p = 0.028). A trend toward positive margins was observed in patients with NME (OR 2.38, 95% CI 0.98-5.77; p = 0.055).

CONCLUSION

BCT could be performed in 82% of cT3 patients in whom BCT appeared feasible on post-NST MRI. Local control in these patients was excellent. In those patients with HR+/HER2- tumors, NME on MRI, or invasive lobular carcinoma, the risk of positive margins should be considered preoperatively.

Recurrence and survival after standard versus oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer

Background

Oncoplastic techniques in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are used increasingly for larger tumours. This large cohort study aimed to assess oncological outcomes after oncoplastic BCS (OPS) versus standard BCS.

Methods

Data for all women who had BCS in three centres in Stockholm during 2010–2016 were extracted from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register. All patients with T2–3 tumours, all those receiving neoadjuvant treatment, and an additional random sample of women with T1 tumours were selected. Medical charts were reviewed for local recurrences and surgical technique according to the Hoffman–Wallwiener classification. Date and cause of death were retrieved from the Swedish Cause of Death Register.

Results

The final cohort of 4178 breast cancers in 4135 patients was categorized into three groups according to surgical technique: 3720 for standard BCS, 243 simple OPS, and 215 complex OPS. Median duration of follow up was 64 (range 24–110) months. Node-positive and large tumours were more common in OPS than in standard BCS (P < 0.001). There were 61 local recurrences: 57 (1.5 per cent), 1 (0.4 per cent) and 3 (1.4 per cent) in the standard BCS, simple OPS and complex OPS groups respectively (P = 0.368). Overall, 297 patients died, with an unadjusted 5-year overall survival rate of 94.7, 93.1 and 92.6 per cent respectively (P = 0.350). Some 102 deaths were from breast cancer, with unadjusted 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of 97.9, 98.3 and 95.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.056).

Discussion

Oncoplastic BCS is a safe surgical option, even for larger node-positive tumours, with low recurrence and excellent survival rates.

Comparison of the ductal carcinoma in situ between White Americans and Chinese Americans

Currently, the wide-spread use of screening mammography has led to dramatic increases in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, DCIS of Chinese Americans, the largest Asian subgroup in American, has rarely been comprehensively studied over the past decade. This work compared the DCIS characteristics and prognosis of Chinese American patients with White Americans in the USA to determine the characteristics and prognosis of DCIS patients of Chinese Americans.The data were obtained using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. The diagnosis and treatment variables between the two groups were compared by means of Chi-square tests. Survival was determined with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model.From 1975 to 2016, 81,745 White Americans and 2069 Chinese Americans were diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ. Compared with the white patients, the Chinese Americans were younger (P < .001) with smaller tumors (P < .001) and higher family income (P < .001). DCIS patients of Chinese American group accounted for a higher percentage of all breast cancers than the whites (P < .001). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, Chinese American was an independent favorable prognostic factor in terms of overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.684; 95% CI, 0.593-0.789; P < .001) compared with the white group.In conclusion, DCIS characteristics of the Chinese group, which exhibited a higher proportion of younger age, a higher DCIS ratio, and a better prognosis, were distinct from those of the White Americans.

Disease-free and overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: breast-conserving surgery compared to mastectomy in a large single-centre cohort study

PURPOSE

The extended role of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in the neoadjuvant setting may raise concerns on the oncologic safety of BCS compared to mastectomy. This study compared long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between patients treated with BCS and mastectomy.

METHODS

All breast cancer patients treated with NAC from 2008 until 2017 at the Amphia Hospital (the Netherlands) were included. Disease-free and overall survival were compared between BCS and mastectomy with survival functions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to determine prognostic variables for disease-free survival.

RESULTS

561 of 612 patients treated with NAC were eligible: 362 (64.5%) with BCS and 199 (35.5%) with mastectomy. Median follow-up was 6.8 years (0.9-11.9). Mastectomy patients had larger tumours and more frequently node-positive or lobular cancer. Unadjusted five-year disease-free survival was 90.9% for BCS versus 82.9% for mastectomy (p = .004). Unadjusted five-year overall survival was 95.3% and 85.9% (p < .001), respectively. In multivariable analysis, clinical T4 (cT4) (HR 3.336, 95% CI 1.214-9.165, p = .019) and triple negative disease (HR 5.946, 95% CI 2.703-13.081, p < .001) were negative predictors and pathologic complete response of the breast (HR 0.467, 95% CI 0.238-0.918, p = .027) and axilla (HR 0.332, 95% CI 0.193-0.572, p = .001) were positive predictors for disease-free survival. Mastectomy versus BCS was not a significant predictor for disease-free survival when adjusted for the former variables (unadjusted HR 2.13 (95%CI: 1.4-3.24), adjusted HR 1.31 (95%CI: 0.81-2.13)). In the BCS group, disease-free and overall survival did not differ significantly between cT1, cT2 or cT3 tumours.

CONCLUSION

BCS does not impair disease-free and overall survival in patients treated with NAC. Tumour biology and treatment response are significant prognostic indicators.

Breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy in the surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma measuring 4 cm or greater

BACKGROUND

The safety of breast conservation therapy (BCT) has not been demonstrated in large ILC tumors, potentially contributing to the higher mastectomy rates seen in ILC.

METHODS

We queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients with ILC measuring ≥4 cm and evaluated difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) between those treated with BCT versus mastectomy using a multivariate model.

RESULTS

Of 180 patients, 30 (16.7%) underwent BCT and 150 (83.3%) underwent mastectomy. Patients undergoing mastectomy were younger (56.6 vs. 64.3 years, p = 0.003) and had larger tumors (7.2 vs. 5.4 cm, p < 0.001). While tumor size, nodal stage, receptor subtype, and margin status were significantly associated with RFS, there was no difference in RFS at 5 (p = 0.88) or 10 (p = 0.65) years for individuals undergoing BCT versus mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with ILC ≥4 cm, BCT provides similar tumor control as mastectomy, provided that negative margins are achieved.