Evaluation of endocrine therapy and patients preferences in early breast cancer: results of Elena study

Differences in Preferences for Drug Therapy Between Patients with Metastatic Versus Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Compared with early stages (eBC) metastatic BC (mBC) is incurable. In mBC, aggressive treatment may increase the duration of survival but may also cause severe treatment side effects. A better understanding how patients with BC value different aspects of drug therapy might improve treatment effectiveness, satisfaction and adherence. This systematic review aims to identify and summarise studies evaluating patient preferences for drug therapy of BC and to compare preferences of patients with eBC and mBC.

METHODS

The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched on 22 June 2023. All studies published to this point were considered. Original studies reporting patient preferences on BC drug therapy determined by any type of choice experiment were eligible. A narrative synthesis of the effect measures presented as relative importance ratings, trade-offs (required benefit to make a therapy worthwhile) or monetary values of the treatment attributes was reported for each study. Risk of bias assessment for individual studies was performed using the checklist for observational studies from the STROBE Statement and the checklist from 'Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User's Guide'. The study protocol was registered at the PROSPERO database (CRD42022377031).

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis evaluating the preferences of patients with eBC (n = 18), mBC (n = 10) or any stage BC (n = 6) on, for example, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, hormonal therapy or CKD4/6-inhibitors using different types of choice experiments. Regardless of the stage, most patients valued treatment effectiveness in terms of survival gains higher than potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Treatment cost, mode of administration, treatment regimen and monitoring aspects were considered as least important treatment attributes. In addition, preferences concerning 16 different types of ADRs were described, showing high heterogeneity within BC stages. Yet, comparable results across BC stages were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the stage, patients with BC consistently valued survival gains as the most important attribute and were willing to accept the risk of potential ADRs. Incorporating patient preferences in shared decision making may improve the effectiveness of interventions by enhancing adherence to drug therapy in patients suffering from BC.

ESO-ESMO fifth international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY5)

We dedicate this manuscript in memory of a dear friend and colleague Bella Kaufman. The fifth International Consensus Symposium for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY5) took place virtually in October 2020, organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO). Consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer in young women were updated from BCY4 with incorporation of new evidence to inform the guidelines. Areas of research priorities as well as specificities in different geographic and minority populations were identified. This manuscript summarizes the ESO-ESMO international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).

Assessing Predictors of Tamoxifen Nonadherence in Patients with Early Breast Cancer

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is generally proposed to all patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence and death. Adherence to therapy is crucial. However, non-adherence to AET is common, with estimates of up to 50% of patients not successfully completing a five-year course of treatment, and it is significantly associated with lower survival rates and a higher risk of recurrence. Currently, no gold standard is available to assess adherence. Several studies, most of them retrospective in nature, have used both direct and indirect methods to monitor the adherence to therapy in breast cancer. The indirect method is more widely used, and it is based on pharmacy prescription refills and patient administered questionnaires. On the other hand, direct methods such as a measurement of the level of the drug or its metabolites in blood or urine are much more precise, but more expensive and not routinely implemented. In this review, we analyzed the results of the major studies focused on the adherence to tamoxifen in breast cancer patients. We identified several factors associated with poor adherence, such as the side effects of therapy, the lack of shared decision-making between the physician and patient, the context in which the discussion takes place, and whether the patients are enrolled in a clinical trial. Moreover, we discussed possible methods to improve adherence to adjuvant therapy in breast cancer.