1
|
Browne IM, McLaughlin RA, Weadick CS, O'Sullivan S, McSorley LM, Hadi DK, Millen SJ, Higgins MJ, Crown JP, Prichard RS, McCartan DP, Hill AD, Connolly RM, Noonan SA, O'Mahony D, Murray C, O'Hanlon-Brown C, Hennessy BT, Quinn CM, Kelly CM, O'Reilly S, Morris PG, Walshe JM. Irish national real-world analysis of the clinical and economic impact of 21-gene oncotype DX® testing in early-stage, 1-3 lymph node-positive, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2025; 209:189-199. [PMID: 39365509 PMCID: PMC11785674 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07486-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The treatment landscape of Oestrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) breast cancer is evolving, with declining chemotherapy use as a result of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® testing. Results from the SWOG S1007 RxPONDER trial suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy may benefit some premenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative disease with 1-3 positive lymph nodes (N1), and a Recurrence Score® (RS) of ≤ 25. Postmenopausal women with similar characteristics did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. We examine the clinical and economic impact of Oncotype DX® testing on treatment decisions in patients with N1 disease in Ireland using real world data. METHODS From March 2011 to October 2022, a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study was performed of patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative N1 breast cancer, who had Oncotype DX testing across 5 of Ireland's largest cancer centres. Patients were classified into low risk (RS 0-13), intermediate risk (RS 14-25) and high risk (RS > 25). Data were collected via electronic patient records. Information regarding costing was provided primarily by pre-published sources. RESULTS A total of 828 N1 patients were included in this study. Post Oncotype DX testing, 480 patients (58%) were spared chemotherapy. Of the patients who had a change in chemotherapy recommendation based on Oncotype DX testing, 271 (56%), 205 (43%), 4 (1%) had a RS result of 0-13, 14-25 and > 25 respectively. Use of Oncotype DX testing was associated with a 58% reduction in chemotherapy administration overall. This resulted in estimated savings of over €6 million in treatment costs. Deducting the assay cost, estimated net savings of over €3.3 million were achieved. Changes in the ordering demographics of Oncotype DX tests were identified after RxPONDER data were presented, with increased testing in women ≥ 50 years and a reduction in proportion of tests ordered for women < 50 years. CONCLUSION Between 2011 and 2022, assay use resulted in a 58% reduction in chemotherapy administration and net savings of over €3.3 million.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I M Browne
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - R A McLaughlin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C S Weadick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - S O'Sullivan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - L M McSorley
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - D K Hadi
- Department of Medical Oncology, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | | | - M J Higgins
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - J P Crown
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - R S Prichard
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D P McCartan
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Dk Hill
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R M Connolly
- Cancer Research @ UCC, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Cork University Hospital/University College Cork Cancer Centre, Cork, Ireland
| | - S A Noonan
- Cancer Research @ UCC, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Cork University Hospital/University College Cork Cancer Centre, Cork, Ireland
| | - D O'Mahony
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bon Secours Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - C Murray
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - C O'Hanlon-Brown
- Department of Medical Oncology, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - B T Hennessy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C M Quinn
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - C M Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - S O'Reilly
- Cancer Research @ UCC, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Cork University Hospital/University College Cork Cancer Centre, Cork, Ireland
| | - P G Morris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J M Walshe
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peters AL, Hall PS, Jordan LB, Soh FY, Hannington L, Makaranka S, Urquhart G, Vallet M, Cartwright D, Marashi H, Elsberger B. Enhancing clinical decision support with genomic tools in breast cancer: A Scottish perspective. Breast 2024; 75:103728. [PMID: 38657322 PMCID: PMC11061332 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Oncotype DX Breast RS test has been adopted in Scotland and has been the subject of a large population-based study by a Scottish Consensus Group to assess the uptake of the recurrence score (RS), evaluate co-variates associated with the RS and to analyse the effect it may have had on clinical practice. MATERIALS & METHODS Pan-Scotland study between August 2018-August 2021 evaluating 833 patients who had a RS test performed as part of their diagnostic pathway. Data was extracted retrospectively from electronic records and analysis conducted to describe change in chemotherapy administration (by direct comparison with conventional risk assessment tools), and univariate/multivariate analysis to assess relationship between covariates and the RS. RESULTS Chemotherapy treatment was strongly influenced by the RS (p < 0.001). Only 30 % of patients received chemotherapy treatment in the intermediate and high risk PREDICT groups, where chemotherapy is considered. Additionally, 55.5 % of patients with a high risk PREDICT had a low RS and did not receive chemotherapy. There were 17 % of patients with a low risk PREDICT but high RS who received chemotherapy. Multivariate regression analysis showed the progesterone receptor Allred score (PR score) to be a strong independent predictor of the RS, with a negative PR score being associated with high RS (OR 4.49, p < 0.001). Increasing grade was also associated with high RS (OR 3.81, p < 0.001). Classic lobular pathology was associated with a low RS in comparison to other tumour pathology (p < 0.01). Nodal disease was associated with a lower RS (p = 0.012) on univariate analysis, with menopausal status (p = 0.43) not influencing the RS on univariate or multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Genomic assays offer the potential for risk-stratified decision making regarding the use of chemotherapy. They can help reduce unnecessary chemotherapy treatment and identify a subgroup of patients with more adverse genomic tumour biology. A recent publication by Health Improvement Scotland (HIS) has updated guidance on use of the RS test for NHS Scotland. It suggests to limit its use to the intermediate risk PREDICT group. Our study shows the impact of the RS test in the low and high risk PREDICT groups. The implementation across Scotland has resulted in a notable shift in practice, leading to a significant reduction in chemotherapy administration in the setting of high risk PREDICT scores returning low risk RS. There has also been utility for the test in the low risk PREDICT group to detect a small subgroup with a high RS. We have found the PR score to have a strong independent association with high risk RS. This finding was not evaluated by the key RS test papers, and the potential prognostic information provided by the PR score as a surrogate biomarker is an outstanding question that requires more research to validate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Peters
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Gartnavel Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 1053 Great Western Rd, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK; Cancer Research UK (CRUK) Scotland Institute, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK.
| | - P S Hall
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK
| | - L B Jordan
- Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, NHS Tayside, Department of Pathology, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - F Y Soh
- Raigmore Hospital, NHS Highland, Department of Oncology, Inverness IV2 3UJ, UK
| | - L Hannington
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Gartnavel Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 1053 Great Western Rd, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - S Makaranka
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Department of Breast Surgery, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK
| | - G Urquhart
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Department of Oncology, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK
| | - M Vallet
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK
| | - D Cartwright
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Gartnavel Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 1053 Great Western Rd, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK; Cancer Research UK (CRUK) Scotland Institute, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK
| | - H Marashi
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Gartnavel Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 1053 Great Western Rd, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - B Elsberger
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Department of Breast Surgery, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McSorley LM, Tharmabala M, Al Rahbi F, Keane F, Evoy D, Geraghty JG, Rothwell J, McCartan DP, Greally M, O’Connor M, O’Mahony D, Keane M, Kennedy MJ, O’Reilly S, Millen SJ, Crown JP, Kelly CM, Prichard RS, Quinn CM, Walshe JM. Real-World Analysis of the Clinical and Economic Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score (RS) in Invasive Lobular Early-Stage Breast Carcinoma in Ireland. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1302-1310. [PMID: 38534931 PMCID: PMC10969553 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: This study, using real-world data, assesses the impact of RS testing on treatment pathways and the associated economic consequences of such testing. This paper pertains to lobular breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was undertaken between 2011 and 2019 on a cross-section of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative, lymph node-negative, early-stage breast cancer patients. All patients had ILC and had RS testing in Ireland. The patient population is representative of the national population. Patients were classified as low (RS ≤ 25) or high (RS > 25) risk. Patients aged ≤50 were stratified as low (RS 0-15), intermediate (RS 16-25), or high risk (RS > 25). Results: A total of 168 patients were included, most of whom had grade 2 (G2) tumors (n = 154, 92%). Overall, 155 patients (92.3%) had low RS (≤25), 12 (7.1%) had high RS (>25), and 1 (0.6%) had unknown RS status. In 29 (17.5%) patients aged ≤50 at diagnosis, RS was ≤15 in 16 (55%), 16-20 in 6 (21%), 21-25 in 5 (17%), >25 in 1 (3.5%), and unknown in 1 (3.5%). Post RS testing, 126 patients (78%) had a change in chemotherapy recommendation; all to hormone therapy. In total, only 35 patients (22%) received chemotherapy. RS testing achieved a 75% reduction in chemotherapy use, resulting in savings of €921,543.84 in treatment costs, and net savings of €387,283.84. Conclusions: The use of this test resulted in a 75% reduction in chemotherapy and a significant cost savings in our publicly funded health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynda M. McSorley
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mehala Tharmabala
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fathiya Al Rahbi
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fergus Keane
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis Evoy
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - James G. Geraghty
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jane Rothwell
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Damian P. McCartan
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Megan Greally
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Miriam O’Connor
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E Waterford, Ireland
| | - Deirdre O’Mahony
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bon Secours Hospital, T12 DV56 Cork, Ireland
| | - Maccon Keane
- Department of Medical Oncology, Galway University Hospitals, H91 YR71 Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Seamus O’Reilly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, T12 DC4A Cork, Ireland
| | | | - John P. Crown
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Catherine M. Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, D07 R2WY Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ruth S. Prichard
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cecily M. Quinn
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Janice M. Walshe
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parker G, Hunter S, Ghazi S, Hayeems RZ, Rousseau F, Miller FA. Decision impact studies, evidence of clinical utility for genomic assays in cancer: A scoping review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0280582. [PMID: 36897859 PMCID: PMC10004522 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision impact studies have become increasingly prevalent in cancer prognostic research in recent years. These studies aim to evaluate the impact of a genomic test on decision-making and appear to be a new form of evidence of clinical utility. The objectives of this review were to identify and characterize decision impact studies in genomic medicine in cancer care and categorize the types of clinical utility outcomes reported. METHODS We conducted a search of four databases, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science, from inception to June 2022. Empirical studies that reported a "decision impact" assessment of a genomic assay on treatment decisions or recommendations for cancer patients were included. We followed scoping review methodology and adapted the Fryback and Thornbury Model to collect and analyze data on clinical utility. The database searches identified 1803 unique articles for title/abstract screening; 269 articles moved to full-text review. RESULTS 87 studies met inclusion criteria. All studies were published in the last 12 years with the majority for breast cancer (72%); followed by other cancers (28%) (lung, prostate, colon). Studies reported on the impact of 19 different proprietary (18) and generic (1) assays. Across all four levels of clinical utility, outcomes were reported for 22 discrete measures, including the impact on provider/team decision-making (100%), provider confidence (31%); change in treatment received (46%); patient psychological impacts (17%); and costing or savings impacts (21%). Based on the data synthesis, we created a comprehensive table of outcomes reported for clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review is a first step in understanding the evolution and uses of decision impact studies and their influence on the integration of emerging genomic technologies in cancer care. The results imply that DIS are positioned to provide evidence of clinical utility and impact clinical practice and reimbursement decision-making in cancer care. Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/hm3jr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Parker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Hunter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samer Ghazi
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Z. Hayeems
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francois Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry, and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Fiona A. Miller
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Right Sizing Systemic Therapy for Patients with Breast Cancer. Where are we Today? CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00463-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
6
|
Yordanova M, Hassan S. The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score ® Assay in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Canadian Experience. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:2008-2020. [PMID: 35323363 PMCID: PMC8947241 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has changed dramatically with use of the 21-gene Recurrence Score® (RS) Assay. While the utility of the assay was initially demonstrated among node-negative patients, recent studies have also demonstrated the assay's prognostic and predictive value in node-positive patients. In Canada, the RS assay is reimbursed by provincial health insurance plans, but not all provinces have approved the use of the assay for patients with node-positive disease. Here, we provide an overview of the clinical factors that influence physician recommendation of the RS assay and, alternatively, the impact of the RS assay on patient treatment decisions in Canada. We performed a comprehensive review of the impact of the assay upon physician treatment decisions and cost in node-positive breast cancer patients within Canada and other countries. Furthermore, we evaluated biomarkers that can predict the RS result, in addition to other genomic assays that predict recurrence risk among node-positive patients. Overall, the 21-gene RS assay was shown to be a cost-effective tool that significantly reduced the use of chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariya Yordanova
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada;
| | - Saima Hassan
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3T5, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), l’Institut de Cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weymann D, Laskin J, Jones SJM, Roscoe R, Lim HJ, Renouf DJ, Schrader KA, Sun S, Yip S, Marra MA, Regier DA. Early-stage economic analysis of research-based comprehensive genomic sequencing for advanced cancer care. J Community Genet 2021; 13:523-538. [PMID: 34843087 PMCID: PMC8628132 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00557-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic research is driving discovery for future population benefit. Limited evidence exists on immediate patient and health system impacts of research participation. This study uses real-world data and quasi-experimental matching to examine early-stage cost and health impacts of research-based genomic sequencing. British Columbia’s Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) single-arm program applies whole genome and transcriptome analysis (WGTA) to characterize genomic landscapes in advanced cancers. Our cohort includes POG patients enrolled between 2014 and 2015 and 1:1 genetic algorithm–matched usual care controls. We undertake a cost consequence analysis and estimate 1-year effects of WGTA on patient management, patient survival, and health system costs reported in 2015 Canadian dollars. WGTA costs are imputed and forecast using system of equations modeling. We use Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to explore survival differences and inverse probability of censoring weighted linear regression to estimate mean 1-year survival times and costs. Non-parametric bootstrapping simulates sampling distributions and enables scenario analysis, revealing drivers of incremental costs, survival, and net monetary benefit for assumed willingness to pay thresholds. We identified 230 POG patients and 230 matched controls for cohort inclusion. The mean period cost of research-funded WGTA was $26,211 (SD: $14,191). Sequencing costs declined rapidly, with WGTA forecasts hitting $13,741 in 2021. The incremental healthcare system effect (non-research expenditures) was $5203 (95% CI: 75, 10,424) compared to usual care. No overall survival differences were observed, but outcome heterogeneity was present. POG patients receiving WGTA-informed treatment experienced incremental survival gains of 2.49 months (95% CI: 1.32, 3.64). Future cost consequences became favorable as WGTA cost drivers declined and WGTA-informed treatment rates improved to 60%. Our study demonstrates the ability of real-world data to support evaluations of only-in-research health technologies. We identify situations where precision oncology research initiatives may produce survival benefit at a cost that is within healthcare systems’ willingness to pay. This economic evidence informs the early-stage healthcare impacts of precision oncology research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Weymann
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Janessa Laskin
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Steven J M Jones
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Robyn Roscoe
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Howard J Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Daniel J Renouf
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sophie Sun
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Stephen Yip
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Marco A Marra
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Dean A Regier
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|