1
|
Aimo A, Vergaro G, González A, Barison A, Lupón J, Delgado V, Richards AM, de Boer RA, Thum T, Arfsten H, Hülsmann M, Falcao-Pires I, Díez J, Foo RSY, Chan MYY, Anene-Nzelu CG, Abdelhamid M, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Belenkov Y, Ben Gal T, Cohen-Solal A, Böhm M, Chioncel O, Jankowska EA, Gustafsson F, Hill L, Jaarsma T, Januzzi JL, Jhund P, Lopatin Y, Lund LH, Metra M, Milicic D, Moura B, Mueller C, Mullens W, Núñez J, Piepoli MF, Rakisheva A, Ristić AD, Rossignol P, Savarese G, Tocchetti CG, van Linthout S, Volterrani M, Seferovic P, Rosano G, Coats AJS, Emdin M, Bayes-Genis A. Cardiac remodelling - Part 2: Clinical, imaging and laboratory findings. A review from the Study Group on Biomarkers of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; 24:944-958. [PMID: 35488811 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
In patients with heart failure, the beneficial effects of drug and device therapies counteract to some extent ongoing cardiac damage. According to the net balance between these two factors, cardiac geometry and function may improve (reverse remodelling, RR) and even completely normalize (remission), or vice versa progressively deteriorate (adverse remodelling, AR). RR or remission predict a better prognosis, while AR has been associated with worsening clinical status and outcomes. The remodelling process ultimately involves all cardiac chambers, but has been traditionally evaluated in terms of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. This is the second part of a review paper by the Study Group on Biomarkers of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to ventricular remodelling. This document examines the proposed criteria to diagnose RR and AR, their prevalence and prognostic value, and the variables predicting remodelling in patients managed according to current guidelines. Much attention will be devoted to RR in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction because most studies on cardiac remodelling focused on this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Aimo
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vergaro
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
| | - Arantxa González
- CIMA Universidad de Navarra, and IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
- CIBERCV, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Barison
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
| | - Josep Lupón
- Institut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Institut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Rudolf A de Boer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Thum
- Clinical Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henrike Arfsten
- Clinical Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Hülsmann
- Clinical Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Javier Díez
- Center for Applied Medical Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Roger S Y Foo
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo-Lin School of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mark Yan Yee Chan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo-Lin School of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chukwuemeka G Anene-Nzelu
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo-Lin School of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Stamatis Adamopoulos
- 2nd Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Stefan D Anker
- Department of Cardiology (CVK), and Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapy (BCRT), German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Tuvia Ben Gal
- Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson, Israel
| | | | - Michael Böhm
- University of the Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Ovidiu Chioncel
- Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases 'Prof. C.C. Iliescu' Bucharest, University of Medicine Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ewa A Jankowska
- Institute of Heart Disases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Finn Gustafsson
- Heart Centre, Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - James L Januzzi
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Yuri Lopatin
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
| | - Lars H Lund
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marco Metra
- Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davor Milicic
- University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Brenda Moura
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Cardiology Department, Porto Armed Forces Hospital, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Julio Núñez
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Massimo F Piepoli
- Cardiology Division, Castelsangiovanni Hospital, Castelsangiovanni, Italy
| | - Amina Rakisheva
- Scientific Research Institute of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Arsen D Ristić
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Patrick Rossignol
- Université de Lorraine, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-Plurithématique 1433 and Inserm U1116, CHRU Nancy, F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France
| | - Gianluigi Savarese
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carlo G Tocchetti
- Cardio-Oncology Unit, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Center for Basic and Clinical Immunology Research (CISI), Interdepartmental Center of Clinical and Translational Sciences (CIRCET), Interdepartmental Hypertension Research Center (CIRIAPA), Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Sophie van Linthout
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätmedizin Berlin, BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Petar Seferovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
- Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Giuseppe Rosano
- St. George's Hospitals, NHS Trust, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Michele Emdin
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antoni Bayes-Genis
- CIBERCV, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
- Institut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Azuma M, Kato S, Fukui K, Tamura K. Prediction of mitral regurgitation resolution after coronary bypass graft surgery and cardiac resynchronization therapy by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging: a case report. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS 2019; 2:yty129. [PMID: 31020205 PMCID: PMC6426028 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/yty129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Appropriate surgical management of moderate functional mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains controversial. A recent study demonstrated no survival benefit from adding mitral repair to CABG for patients with moderate functional MR. Preoperative prediction of reverse remodelling is crucial in making the decision to add mitral valve repair to CABG. Late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LGE MRI) offers a reference method to assess myocardial viability. Case summary A 60-year-old man with ischaemic cardiomyopathy was admitted to our hospital with exacerbation of heart failure symptoms. Left ventricular (LV) dilatation, severe impairment of LV systolic function, and moderate MR due to tethering were noted on transthoracic echocardiography. The mitral regurgitant jet was central. Intravenous administration of furosemide and human atrial natriuretic peptide was initiated. The patient experienced an episode of ventricular tachycardia, and coronary angiography demonstrated triple-vessel disease. On LGE MRI, subendocardial infarction with a transmural extent of 25–50% was revealed in the inferior, posterior, and lateral walls. Findings from LGE MRI suggested that myocardial viability had been preserved. After performing CABG and cardiac resynchronization therapy, LV volume was substantially decreased and moderate MR was significantly improved without surgical mitral repair. On speckle tracking echocardiography before surgery, a significant difference in the times to peak radial strain between the lateral wall (462 ms) and inferior wall (17 ms) indicated the presence of LV dyssynchrony. Left ventricular dyssynchrony was substantially improved after CABG and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator implantation. Discussion In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and moderate functional MR, acquisition of LGE MRI of the LV should be considered to evaluate the viability of LV myocardium. Findings from LGE MRI of the LV can potentially influence the surgical strategy. In patients with preserved viability of LV myocardium, functional MR could be improved after CABG without any surgical repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Azuma
- Department of Cardiology, Hodogaya Central Hospital, 43-1 Kamadaicho, Hodogaya, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shingo Kato
- Department of Cardiology, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, 6-16-1 Tomiokahigashi, Kanazawa, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazuki Fukui
- Department of Cardiology, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, 6-16-1 Tomiokahigashi, Kanazawa, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kouichi Tamura
- Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mehta NK, Kim J, Siden JY, Rodriguez-Diego S, Alakbarli J, Di Franco A, Weinsaft JW. Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance for evaluation of mitral regurgitation prior to mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9:S246-S256. [PMID: 28540067 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common cause of morbidity worldwide and an accepted indication for interventional therapies which aim to reduce or resolve adverse clinical outcomes associated with MR. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides highly accurate means of assessing MR, including a variety of approaches that can measure MR based on quantitative flow. Additionally, CMR is widely accepted as a reference standard for cardiac chamber quantification, enabling reliable detection of subtle changes in cardiac chamber size and function so as to guide decision-making regarding timing of mitral valve directed therapies. Beyond geometric imaging, CMR enables tissue characterization of ischemia and infarction in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium as well as within the mitral valve apparatus, thus enabling identification of structural substrates for MR. This review provides an overview of established and emerging CMR approaches to measure valvular regurgitation, including relative utility of different approaches for patients with primary or secondary MR. Clinical outcomes studies are discussed with focus on data demonstrating advantages of CMR for guiding diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with known or suspected MR. Comparative data is reviewed with focus on diagnostic performance of CMR in comparison to conventional assessment via echocardiography (echo). Emerging literature is reviewed concerning potential new approaches that utilize CMR tissue characterization to guide clinical decision-making in order to improve therapeutic outcomes and clinical prognosis for patients with MR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil K Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jiwon Kim
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan Y Siden
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Javid Alakbarli
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonino Di Franco
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Campbell F, Thokala P, Uttley LC, Sutton A, Sutton AJ, Al-Mohammad A, Thomas SM. Systematic review and modelling of the cost-effectiveness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with current existing testing pathways in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Health Technol Assess 2015; 18:1-120. [PMID: 25265259 DOI: 10.3310/hta18590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is increasingly used to assess patients for myocardial viability prior to revascularisation. This is important to ensure that only those likely to benefit are subjected to the risk of revascularisation. OBJECTIVES To assess current evidence on the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of CMR to test patients prior to revascularisation in ischaemic cardiomyopathy; to develop an economic model to assess cost-effectiveness for different imaging strategies; and to identify areas for further primary research. DATA SOURCES Databases searched were: MEDLINE including MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations Initial searches were conducted in March 2011 in the following databases with dates: MEDLINE including MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations via Ovid (1946 to March 2011); Bioscience Information Service (BIOSIS) Previews via Web of Science (1969 to March 2011); EMBASE via Ovid (1974 to March 2011); Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via The Cochrane Library (1996 to March 2011); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via The Cochrane Library 1998 to March 2011; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via The Cochrane Library (1994 to March 2011); NHS Economic Evaluation Database via The Cochrane Library (1968 to March 2011); Health Technology Assessment Database via The Cochrane Library (1989 to March 2011); and the Science Citation Index via Web of Science (1900 to March 2011). Additional searches were conducted from October to November 2011 in the following databases with dates: MEDLINE including MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations via Ovid (1946 to November 2011); BIOSIS Previews via Web of Science (1969 to October 2011); EMBASE via Ovid (1974 to November 2011); Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via The Cochrane Library (1996 to November 2011); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via The Cochrane Library (1998 to November 2011); Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via The Cochrane Library (1994 to November 2011); NHS Economic Evaluation Database via The Cochrane Library (1968 to November 2011); Health Technology Assessment Database via The Cochrane Library (1989 to November 2011); and the Science Citation Index via Web of Science (1900 to October 2011). Electronic databases were searched March-November 2011. REVIEW METHODS The systematic review selected studies that assessed the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CMR to establish the role of CMR in viability assessment compared with other imaging techniques: stress echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). Studies had to have an appropriate reference standard and contain accuracy data or sufficient details so that accuracy data could be calculated. Data were extracted by two reviewers and discrepancies resolved by discussion. Quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS II tool (University of Bristol, Bristol, UK). A rigorous diagnostic accuracy systematic review assessed clinical and cost-effectiveness of CMR in viability assessment. A health economic model estimated costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) accrued by diagnostic pathways for identifying patients with viable myocardium in ischaemic cardiomyopathy with a view to revascularisation. The pathways involved CMR, stress echocardiography, SPECT, PET alone or in combination. Strategies of no testing and revascularisation were included to determine the most cost-effective strategy. RESULTS Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. All were prospective. Participant numbers ranged from 8 to 52. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction in studies reporting this outcome was 24-62%. CMR approaches included stress CMR and late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CE CMR). Recovery following revascularisation was the reference standard. Twelve studies assessed diagnostic accuracy of stress CMR and 14 studies assessed CE CMR. A bivariate regression model was used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of CMR. Summary sensitivity and specificity for stress CMR was 82.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.2% to 88.7%] and 87.1% (95% CI 80.4% to 91.7%) and for CE CMR was 95.5% (95% CI 94.1% to 96.7%) and 53% (95% CI 40.4% to 65.2%) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of PET, SPECT and stress echocardiography were calculated using data from 10 studies and systematic reviews. The sensitivity of PET was 94.7% (95% CI 90.3% to 97.2%), of SPECT was 85.1% (95% CI 78.1% to 90.2%) and of stress echocardiography was 77.6% (95% CI 70.7% to 83.3%). The specificity of PET was 68.8% (95% CI 50% to 82.9%), of SPECT was 62.1% (95% CI 52.7% to 70.7%) and of stress echocardiography was 69.6% (95% CI 62.4% to 75.9%). All currently used diagnostic strategies were cost-effective compared with no testing at current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence thresholds. If the annual mortality rates for non-viable patients were assumed to be higher for revascularised patients, then testing with CE CMR was most cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000/QALY. The proportion of model runs in which each strategy was most cost-effective, at a threshold of £20,000/QALY, was 40% for CE CMR, 42% for PET and 16.5% for revascularising everyone. The expected value of perfect information at £20,000/QALY was £620 per patient. If all patients (viable or not) gained benefit from revascularisation, then it was most cost-effective to revascularise all patients. LIMITATIONS Definitions and techniques assessing viability were highly variable, making data extraction and comparisons difficult. Lack of evidence meant assumptions were made in the model leading to uncertainty; differing scenarios were generated around key assumptions. CONCLUSIONS All the diagnostic pathways are a cost-effective use of NHS resources. Given the uncertainty in the mortality rates, the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a set of scenarios. The cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that CE CMR and revascularising everyone were the optimal strategies. Future research should look at implementation costs for this type of imaging service, provide guidance on consistent reporting of diagnostic testing data for viability assessment, and focus on the impact of revascularisation or best medical therapy in this group of high-risk patients. FUNDING The National Institute of Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Campbell
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Praveen Thokala
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lesley C Uttley
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anthea Sutton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alex J Sutton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Steven M Thomas
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|