Characterization of an intra-cardiac melanoma metastasis by magnetic resonance T1 and T2 mapping

Radiomics Feature Analysis Using Native T1 Mapping for Discriminating Between Cardiac Tumors and Thrombi

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Accurate differential diagnosis is essential because cardiac tumors and thrombi have different prognoses and therapeutic approaches. Native T1 map provides an objective T1 time quantifications of cardiac mass without the need for a contrast agent. We examined the diagnostic performance of radiomics features for differentiating cardiac tumors from thrombi using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging T1 mapping technique compared to that of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 22 cardiac tumors and 21 thrombi of 41 patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging from December 2013 to May 2018. Fifty-six radiomics features were extracted from native T1 images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used for feature selection and rad score extraction. The diagnostic performance of the rad score was compared to that of the native T1 value (mean T1) and LGE ratio.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the rad score was higher than that of the mean T1 and LGE ratio (0.98 vs. 0.86 vs. 0.82, p = 0.001). With the optimal cut-off value, the rad score showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 95.4%, 95.2%, and 95.2%, respectively. Combination of the rad score and mean T1 showed a significantly higher diagnostic performance than mean T1 (p = 0.019) or LGE ratio (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

The rad score derived from native T1 maps can differentiate thrombi from tumors better than the mean T1 or LGE ratio. This is valuable for determining a treatment strategy for cardiac lesions in patients who cannot tolerate contrast agents.

Cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping. Part 2: Diagnostic potential and applications

Non-invasive identification and differentiation of myocardial diseases represents the primary objectives of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) longitudinal relaxation time (T1) and extracellular volume (ECV) mapping. Given the fact that myocardial T1 and ECV values overlap throughout and within left ventricular phenotypes, a central issue to be addressed is whether and to what extent myocardial T1 and ECV mapping provides additional or superior diagnostic information to standard CMR imaging, and whether native T1 mapping could be employed as a non-contrast alternative to late gadolinium enhancement (LE) imaging. The present review aims to summarize physiological and pathophysiological alterations in native T1 and ECV values and summarized myocardial T1 and ECV alterations associated with cardiac diseases to support the translation of research findings into routine CMR imaging.

When should we use contrast material in cardiac MRI?

At present, most of the cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations rely on contrast-enhanced protocols, but noncontrast alternatives are emerging. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging for the detection of myocardial scar can be considered the main cause for the embedding of cardiac MRI into the clinical routine. The novel noncontrast technique of native T₁ mapping shows promise for tissue characterization in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy and may provide additional information over conventional LGE imaging. Technical issues, including measurements variability, still need to be resolved to facilitate a wide clinical application. Ischemia detection can be performed with contrast-based stress perfusion and contrast-free stress wall motion imaging. For coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), protocols with and without contrast material have been developed. Research on coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization has introduced new applications of contrast material. For MRA of the aorta, which traditionally relied on contrast administration, several noncontrast protocols have become available. This review provides an overview of when to use contrast material in cardiac and cardiac-related vascular MRI, summarizes the major imaging building blocks, and describes the diagnostic value of the available contrast-enhanced and noncontrast techniques. Contrast material in cardiac MRI should be used for LGE imaging for tissue characterization in ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy and may be used for stress perfusion imaging for the detection of ischemia. In cardiac-related vascular MRI, use of contrast material should be avoided, unless high-quality angiography is required that cannot be obtained with noncontrast protocols.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1551-1572.