Healing score of the Xinsorb scaffold in the treatment of de novo lesions: 6-month imaging outcomes

Dynamic changes in inflammatory responses and 3-year clinical outcomes of XINSORB scaffolds in coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is known to play a crucial role in the development of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular healing after stenting. This study aimed to investigate the dynamic changes in inflammatory responses between XINSORB and TIVOLI scaffolds and their correlation with 3-year clinical outcomes.

METHOD

A total of 140 patients in the XINSORB group and 42 patients in the TIVOLI group were included in this prospective, single-center study, conducted in Shanghai tenth People's Hospital. Blood samples were collected at baseline, 24 h, 6 months, and 12 months after stent implantation to measure high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), fibrinogen (FBG), white blood cell count (WBC), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Receiver-operating characteristic curves and proportional hazards models were generated to evaluate the relationship between 24-h postoperative inflammatory indicators and 3-year patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCE).

RESULT

The levels of hsCRP, FBG, WBC, TNF, and IL-6 reached their peak levels 24 h after stenting and then gradually decreased to levels comparable to baseline at 6 and 12 months. During the 3-year follow-up, 11.4 % of the XINSORB cohort and 9.5 % of the TIVOLI cohort experienced POCE (P = 0.948). High levels of hsCRP and IL-6 24 h after the procedure were associated with clinical endpoints, and the combination of these two biomarkers improved the predictive ability of prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences between the changes in the concentration of inflammatory biomarkers after XINSORB stents or drug-eluting stent implantation. Reduction in postoperative inflammatory levels may decrease the occurrence of clinical outcomes. This study provides insights into the dynamic changes of inflammatory responses and their correlation with clinical outcomes, which could have implications for the management of patients undergoing coronary stenting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study has been registered on the official website of the China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800014966).

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions

Percutaneous coronary intervention, which is safe, effective, and timely, has become an important treatment for coronary artery diseases and has been widely used in clinical practice. However, there are still some problems that urgently need to be solved. Permanent vessel caging through metallic implants not only prevents the process of positive vessel remodeling and the restoration of vascular physiology but also makes the future revascularization of target vessels more difficult. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) have been developed as a potential solution to avoid the above adverse reactions caused by permanent metallic devices. BRSs provide temporary support to the vessel wall in the short term and then gradually degrade over time to restore the natural state of coronary arteries. Nonetheless, long-term follow-up of large-scale trials has drawn considerable attention to the safety of BRSs, and the significantly increased risk of late scaffold thrombosis (ScT) limits its clinical application. In this review, we summarize the current status and clinical experiences of BRSs to understand the application prospects and limitations of these devices. In addition, we focus on ScT after implantation, as it is currently the primary drawback of BRS. We also analyze the causes of ScT and discuss improvements required to overcome this serious drawback and to move the field forward.