Contribution and performance of multimodal imaging in the diagnosis and management of cardiac masses

Brain Metastases from Primary Cardiac Tumors: A Systematic Review of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis

Background: Primary cardiac tumors (PCTs) are rare entities, with only a minority being malignant and capable of distant dissemination. Among the rarest and most challenging metastatic events are brain metastases originating from cardiac tumors. Due to the heart's direct access to systemic circulation, even benign tumors such as atrial myxomas may cause cerebral embolic phenomena. Understanding the distinct biological behavior, diagnostic pathways, therapeutic strategies, and prognostic implications of these cases remains limited by the scarcity of the available literature. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and other major databases were systematically searched using specific MeSH terms and keywords related to cardiac tumors and brain metastases. After applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, nineteen studies were included, comprising sixteen single-patient case reports and three multi-patient series. Extracted data included tumor histology, cardiac and brain imaging findings, neurological presentation, treatment approaches, and patient outcomes. Results: A total of 320 patients were analyzed. Atrial myxomas represented the predominant benign tumors causing embolic cerebral events, while angiosarcomas and other cardiac sarcomas were responsible for true hematogenous brain metastases. Brain involvement was frequently hemorrhagic and manifested with seizures, focal deficits, or signs of intracranial hypertension. Cardiac echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) were essential for tumor detection, while brain MRI, including SWI and DWI sequences, and CT scanning were critical for cerebral lesion characterization. Treatment strategies varied according to tumor type and included surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. Malignant cardiac tumors correlated with a poor prognosis, with median survival post-CNS involvement ranging from 12 to 14 months. Conclusions: Brain metastases from PCTs, though rare, represent a distinct and serious clinical phenomenon. Benign tumors like myxomas mainly cause embolic cerebral events, whereas malignant tumors, particularly sarcomas, lead to true metastatic brain lesions. Recognizing this biological distinction is crucial for diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic planning. An integrated multidisciplinary approach combining advanced cardiac and neuroimaging techniques is vital for early detection and appropriate management. Despite multimodal treatment, survival remains limited, underscoring the urgent need for novel targeted therapies and improved surveillance strategies.

Preoperative multimodal imaging evaluation of a primary cardiac schwannoma of the right atrioventricular groove: a case report

Background

Cardiac schwannoma is exceedingly rare, and few literature reports are available. We reported a case of primary cardiac schwannoma that performed preoperative multimodal imaging, aiming to highlight the significance of multimodal imaging evaluation and deepen our understanding of this tumour.

Case summary

A 66-year-old man presented to our hospital, as physical examination revealed the presence of a mediastinal mass over a month. Subsequently, the patient underwent comprehensive examination. The images demonstrated the mass compressed the right coronary artery, but no invasion. Resection of the tumour by surgery was conducted, and the patient remains asymptomatic at follow-up.

Discussion

This case emphasizes the role of multimodal imaging in preoperative evaluation of such rare cardiac tumours. For benign cardiac schwannoma, the preferred treatment is surgical resection.

[18F]FDG PET imaging in the differentiation of cardiac masses: an updated systematic review and dual Meta-Analysis of diagnostic performance and parameter variability

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac masses (CMs) encompass a heterogeneous group of benign, malignant, and pseudotumoural lesions, posing diagnostic challenges due to their rarity and varied aetiologies. Given the limitations of conventional imaging modalities in differentiating benign from malignant masses, [18F]FDG PET/CT has emerged as a promising technique by providing metabolic information. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT in characterising CMs and assess semi-quantitative parameters' role in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/CT in CMs. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a random-effects model, and a secondary analysis examined differences in SUVmax between malignant and benign lesions.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies enrolling 1114 patients met inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting malignant CMs were 89.2% (95% CI: 85-92%) and 82.8% (95% CI: 78-87%), respectively. Malignant lesions exhibited significantly higher SUVmax values (range: 5.6-14.3) than benign masses (range: 1.1-5.3, p < 0.001). PET/CT proved particularly effective in cases with inconclusive findings from echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, or CT, contributing to biopsy guidance and treatment planning.

CONCLUSIONS

[18F]FDG PET/CT demonstrates robust diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant cardiac masses, with SUVmax as a valuable malignancy marker. Its integration into multimodal imaging strategies enhances diagnostic certainty and optimises patient management. Despite these advantages, standardised imaging protocols and further multicentre prospective studies are warranted to refine its clinical application and validate its prognostic potential.

Multimodality Imaging in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Patients With Cardiac Masses: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Cardiac masses encompass a diverse range of benign and malignant tumors as well as pseudotumors. Accurate histologic identification is essential for guiding appropriate treatment, yet the diagnostic process remains challenging. Although biopsy is traditionally the diagnostic gold standard, its invasive nature and associated risks limit its application. A noninvasive multimodality imaging approach has recently emerged as an alternative, but standardized protocols and supporting evidence are still lacking. Echocardiography is typically the initial imaging modality, with cardiac magnetic resonance recognized as the noninvasive diagnostic gold standard. Cardiac computed tomography provides complementary data to aid in diagnosis and management, while positron emission tomography serves as a third-level imaging option. This state-of-the-art review highlights the role of current multimodality imaging techniques in diagnosing and managing cardiac masses and explores future directions for their applications.

Rheumatic heart disease of the mitral valve alongside the papillary fibroelastoma of the aortic valve: A case report

Key Clinical Message

Besides thromboses, it's crucial to also consider the rare possibility of tumors like papillary fibroelastomas when evaluating worsening cardiopulmonary symptoms in patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation.

Abstract

Cardiac papillary fibroelastoma is a rare and benign endocardial tumor typically found on the aortic valve. The simultaneous occurrence of rheumatic heart disease affecting the mitral valve and papillary fibroelastoma on the aortic valve is infrequent, with limited documented instances. This unique case can enhance our understanding of the clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, management options, and implications for patient outcomes in these two conditions. We present the case of a 47-year-old woman who was admitted to the hospital due to worsening dyspnea and fatigue, during which time she discovered an aortic valve papillary fibroelastoma. Further investigations revealed two thrombi in her left atrium and left atrial appendage, along with significant rheumatic mitral valve stenosis. The patient underwent thrombectomy, mitral valve replacement, and valve-sparing aortic valve tumor resection. Following surgery, the patient's recovery was unremarkable. This case report emphasizes the need for a comprehensive evaluation in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis, considering all possible etiologies. While thrombi are typical in mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation, the rare presence of tumors like papillary fibroelastomas should be recognized, underscoring the importance of further assessment when suspicion arises. Importantly, individuals with asymptomatic cardiac papillary fibroelastomas should undergo surgical treatment to minimize the potential risk of tumoral embolization.

A rare presentation of primary cardiac myxofibrosarcoma: Case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Primary cardiac myxofibrosarcoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy, with the majority of approaching strategies relying on case reports. This article provides insights into its diagnosis and treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

This paper presents the case of a 40-year-old man with sudden onset hemoptysis, leading to the diagnosis of primary cardiac myxofibrosarcoma. Treatment involved open-heart surgery to excise the left atrium tumor, followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Unfortunately, brain metastasis developed, leading to the patient's death 1 year after initial diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Primary cardiac myxofibrosarcoma remains a clinical challenge with an unfavorable prognosis. Early diagnosis through advanced imaging is crucial, and research is needed to explore innovative treatments. This case underscores the complexities of managing this rare cardiac malignancy and highlights the necessity for ongoing investigations to enhance patient outcomes.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Versus Histopathologic Study for Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Cardiac Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The gold standard for diagnosis of cardiac tumours is histopathological examination. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a valuable non-invasive, radiation-free tool for identifying and characterizing cardiac tumours. Our aim is to understand CMR diagnosis of cardiac tumours by distinguishing benign vs. malignant tumours compared to the gold standard.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to December 2022, and the results were reviewed by 2 independent investigators. Studies reporting CMR diagnosis were included in a meta-analysis, and pooled measures were obtained. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tools from the National Institutes of Health.

RESULTS

A total of 2,321 results was obtained; 10 studies were eligible, including one identified by citation search. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis, which presented a pooled sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 94%, a diagnostic odds ratio of 185, and an area under the curve of 0.98 for CMR diagnosis of benign vs. malignant tumours. Additionally, 4 studies evaluated whether CMR diagnosis of cardiac tumours matched specific histopathological subtypes, with 73.6% achieving the correct diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published systematic review on CMR diagnosis of cardiac tumours. Compared to histopathological results, the ability to discriminate benign from malignant tumours was good but not outstanding. However, significant heterogeneity may have had an impact on our findings.

Scope of PET imaging in the evaluation of cardiac tumors

Cardiac and pericardial masses can be categorized as neoplastic (either benign or malignant), non-neoplastic (such as thrombus or pericardial cysts), or normal variants of the cardiac structure. Diagnosing these masses can be challenging, and various imaging modalities are available, with each of them having advantages and pitfalls. Echocardiography is typically the first test used for the evaluation and detection of cardiac masses, as it is widely accessible, portable, and provides a comprehensive assessment of cardiac function and valves without the use of ionizing radiation. However, it may not be helpful in some cases, such as evaluating the extracardiac extension of the mass or characterizing tissue. On the other hand, cross-sectional imaging can provide a three-dimensional data set with excellent spatial resolution. Still, it requires ionizing radiation and intravenous iodinated contrast, and its functional evaluation of the heart may be relatively limited. 18F-FDG PET/CT helps determine 18F-FDG PET/CT is a crucial molecular imaging modality to assess and differentiate benign and malignant cardiac tumors noninvasively and helps in treatment planning and prognostication. Currently, studies evaluating the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cardiac tumors are limited to case reports and single center studies.

Acute transvenous pacemaker lead thrombosis early after implantation: A rare clinical scenario

Symptomatic thrombus formation due to a permanent pacemaker (PM) lead is a rare complication. It could be associated with serious outcome and should be suspected in patients who present with unexplained right heart failure, dyspnea, or syncope following dual-chamber PM implantation. A timely decision to perform an echocardiographic examination, followed by medical, thrombolytic, or surgical treatment can be necessary. We describe the case of an 84-year-old man who presented with syncope and hypotension a few days after PM implantation. A transesophageal echocardiography revealed a mobile mass in the right atrium attached to the pacemaker lead. Intravenous heparin allowed a complete resolution of the thrombus.

Multiparametric mapping by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in cardiac tumors

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of quantitative measurements of cardiac tumors and myocardium using parametric mapping techniques. This study aims to explore quantitative characteristics and diagnostic performance of native T1, T2, and extracellular volume (ECV) values of cardiac tumors and left ventricular (LV) myocardium.

METHODS

Patients with suspected cardiac tumors who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) between November 2013 and March 2021 were prospectively enrolled. The diagnoses of primary benign or malignant tumors were based on pathologic findings if available, comprehensive medical history evaluations, imaging, and long-term follow-up data. Patients with pseudo-tumors, cardiac metastasis, primary cardiac diseases, and prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy were excluded. Multiparametric mapping values were measured on both cardiac tumors and the LV myocardium. Statistical analyses were performed using independent-samples t-test, receiver operating characteristic, and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients diagnosed with benign (n = 54), or primary malignant cardiac tumors (n = 26), and 50 age and sex-matched healthy volunteers were included. Intergroup differences in the T1 and T2 values of cardiac tumors were not significant, however, patients with primary malignant cardiac tumors showed significantly higher mean myocardial T1 values (1360 ± 61.4 ms) compared with patients with benign tumors (1259.7 ± 46.2 ms), and normal controls (1206 ± 44.0 ms, all P < 0.05) at 3 T. Patients with primary malignant cardiac tumors also showed significantly higher mean ECV (34.6 ± 5.2%) compared with patients with benign (30.0 ± 2.5%) tumors, and normal controls (27.3 ± 3.0%, all P < 0.05). For the differentiation between primary malignant and benign cardiac tumors, the mean myocardial native T1 value showed the highest efficacy (AUC: 0.919, cutoff value: 1300 ms) compared with mean ECV (AUC: 0.817) and T2 (AUC: 0.619) values.

CONCLUSION

Native T1 and T2 of cardiac tumors showed high heterogeneity, while myocardial native T1 values in primary malignant cardiac tumors were elevated compared to patients with benign cardiac tumors, which may serve as a new imaging marker for primary malignant cardiac tumors.

Differential diagnosis of cardiac tumors: General consideration and echocardiographic approach

Cardiac tumors may be primary (either benign or malignant) or secondary (malignant) and are first detected by echocardiography in most cases. The cardiologist often challenges their identification, the differential diagnosis and the best therapeutic approach. Malignant tumors have usually a poor prognosis, which may be significantly improved by appropriate and timely therapies. The echocardiographic aspects of benign and malignant cardiac tumors described in this article, along with a clinical evaluation may orient the differential diagnosis and aid in choosing the further steps useful to define the nature of the mass.

Diagnostic test accuracies of F-18 FDG PET for characterisation of cardiac masses compared to conventional imaging techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The present systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic performance of F-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and conventional imaging, including MRI, echocardiography, and CT, in characterising cardiac masses.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for studies comparing the diagnostic accuracies of 18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging in characterising cardiac masses, from inception of indexing to 31 July 2020, was performed. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess study quality. Sensitivity and specificity across the studies were determined, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-, respectively) were calculated, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed.

RESULTS

Of six included studies (n = 212 patients), 18F-FDG PET demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.94) and a pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80-0.94). LR syntheses yielded an overall LR+ of 7.9 (95% CI 4.3-14.6) and LR- of 0.12 (95% CI 0.07-0.22). The calculated pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 64 (95% CI 23-181). For conventional imaging, the pooled sensitivity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.81) and the pooled specificity was 0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.98). LR syntheses yielded an overall LR+ of 16.1 (95% CI 5.8-44.5) and LR- of 0.31 (95% CI 0.21-0.46). The evaluated pooled DOR was 52 (95% CI 17-155).

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracies for the characterisation of cardiac masses. Further large multicentre studies are, however, required to corroborate the diagnostic performances of 18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging for the characterisation of cardiac masses.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

No previous studies have comprehensively analysed the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with conventional imaging techniques including echocardiography, CT, and MRI. According to the current study, 18F-FDG PET/CT yielded a pooled DOR of 64, whereas other conventional imaging techniques demonstrated a DOR of 52. As such, 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated sensitivity and specificity, with a high pooled DOR comparable with other conventional imaging modalities.

Diagnosis of cardiac occupancy as metachronous carcinoma using multimodal imaging: a case report

Background

Metachronous carcinoma presenting as a cardiac malignancy is rare, and timely diagnosis is critical. We report a patient with a primary cardiac tumor who eventually died and performed an imaging-related literature review.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old Chinese male patient, who had suffered from multiple malignancies, was suddenly found to have severely reduced platelets and symptoms of decreased cardiac function. After undergoing a series of imaging examinations such as transthoracic echocardiography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography, he was found to have a large occupancy within the right heart and was finally diagnosed with a primary cardiac malignancy. Combined with the patient's previous medical history, it was judged that this time it was a metachronous carcinoma. The patient was unable to accept the risk of surgery and eventually died.

Conclusion

This is a case report reporting a cardiac malignancy. This case highlights the importance of using multiple imaging modalities to make a common diagnosis and the need for more detailed evaluation in patients with metachronous carcinoma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02645-2.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of cardiac tumors and masses

Cardiac masses diagnosis and treatment are a true challenge, although they are infrequently encountered in clinical practice. They encompass a broad set of lesions that include neoplastic (primary and secondary), non-neoplastic masses and pseudomasses. The clinical presentation of cardiac tumors is highly variable and depends on several factors such as size, location, relation with other structures and mobility. The presumptive diagnosis is made based on a preliminary non-invasive diagnostic work-up due to technical difficulties and risks associated with biopsy, which is still the diagnostic gold standard. The findings should always be interpreted in the clinical context to avoid misdiagnosis, particularly in specific conditions (e.g., infective endocarditis or thrombi). The modern multi-modality imaging techniques has a key role not only for the initial assessment and differential diagnosis but also for management and surveillance of the cardiac masses. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows an optimal non-invasive localization of the lesion, providing multiplanar information on its relation to surrounding structures. Moreover, with the additional feature of tissue characterization, CMR can be highly effective to distinguish pseudomasses from masses, as well as benign from malignant lesions, with further differential diagnosis of the latter. Although histopathological assessment is important to make a definitive diagnosis, CMR plays a key role in the diagnosis of suspected cardiac masses with a great impact on patient management. This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of cardiac masses, from clinical and imaging protocol to pathological findings.

New curative approach using embolization followed by moderate-dose radiotherapy after surgical failure for large right heart metastasis

•

Rapid improvement observed in a patient with a large cardiac metastasis.

•

There is today no curative therapeutic option when the tumor is inoperable.

•

Transcoronary tumor embolization plus moderate targeted radiotherapy should be a new option for tumor control.

Purpose

Cardiac metastasis is a rare fatal event. An intracavitary right tumor mainly in the ventricle is difficult to manage. Literature reports suggest that cardiac surgery in oligometastatic patients could offer median survival of 1 year. We investigated salvage treatment comprising transcoronary tumor embolization followed 15 days later by cardiac radiotherapy (40.5 Gy/15 fractions).

Cases

We report two cases of severe right cardiac metastasis with a history of abdominal cancer managed by this salvage treatment following residual cardiac mass after previous cardiac surgery.

Conclusion

Both symptomatic patients improved progressively and were locally controlled for at least 1 year without toxicity.

Differential and prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived scoring algorithm in cardiac tumors

OBJECTIVES

To establish a scoring algorithm based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters for differentiating between benign and malignant cardiac tumors and for predicting outcome.

METHODS

Patients referred for CMR for suspected cardiac tumors were prospectively enrolled. Tumors were categorized as benign or malignant based on pathology, imaging, and clinical information. The CMR protocol included cine, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, first-pass perfusion, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Variables independently associated with malignancy in the multivariable logistic analysis were used to construct the scoring algorithm, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to assess the ability to discriminate malignant from benign tumors. The ability of the score to predict outcome (all-cause mortality) was also assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 105 enrolled patients, 74 had benign and 31 had malignant tumors. In multivariable analysis, the independent predictors of malignant tumors were invasiveness (odds ratio, OR = 11.4, 2 points), irregular border (OR = 5.8, 1 point), and heterogenous LGE (OR 10.6, 2 points). The area under curves (AUC) of the scoring algorithm was 0.912 (cut-off score of 5) and showed significantly higher AUCs than individual variables (all P < 0.05) in differentiating benign and malignant tumors. After median follow-up of 18.2 months, mortality was significantly higher in patients with a score of 5 than in patients with score ≤ 4.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoring algorithm based on CMR-detected invasiveness, irregularity of border, and heterogenous LGE is an effective method for differentiating malignant from benign cardiac tumors and for predicting outcome.

Cardiac Masses: The Role of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis

Cardiac masses are space occupying lesions within the cardiac cavities or adjacent to the pericardium. They include frequently diagnosed clinical entities such as clots and vegetations, common benign tumors such as myxomas and papillary fibroelastomas and uncommon benign or malignant primary or metastatic tumors. Given their diversity, there are no guidelines or consensus statements regarding the best diagnostic or therapeutic approach. In the past, diagnosis used to be made by the histological specimens after surgery or during the post-mortem examination. Nevertheless, evolution and increased availability of cardiovascular imaging modalities has enabled better characterization of the masses and the surrounding tissue. Transthoracic echocardiography using contrast agents can evaluate the location, the morphology and the perfusion of the mass as well as its hemodynamic effect. Transesophageal echocardiography has increased spatial and temporal resolution; hence it is superior in depicting small highly mobile masses. Cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac computed tomography are complementary providing tissue characterization. The scope of this review is to present the role of cardiovascular imaging in the differential diagnosis of cardiac masses and to propose a step-wise diagnostic algorithm, taking into account the epidemiology and clinical presentation of the cardiac masses, as well as the availability and the incremental value of each imaging modality.