Prevalence of coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients with zero coronary artery calcium score in different age population

Current status and future perspective of coronary artery calcium score in asymptomatic individuals

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains a major cause of death, and it is important to accurately estimate the cardiovascular events risk stratification even in asymptomatic patients. The coronary artery calcium score (CACS), which is quantitatively evaluated by electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated non-contrast chest computed tomography (CT) imaging, has been reported to be useful for cardiovascular event risk stratification in large studies. In the USA and Europe, guidelines recommend the use of the CACS in borderline or intermediate-risk asymptomatic individuals based on a high level of evidence. In Japan, however, the use of CACS in clinical practice is currently limited. Although it has been reported that the prevalence and distribution of coronary artery calcification (CAC) may differ by race and ethnicity, there are few data on its usefulness in stratifying the risk of cardiovascular events in asymptomatic Japanese individuals. While it is important to establish evidence for the usefulness of CACS in the Japanese population, for widespread clinical dissemination it would be beneficial to evaluate CAC and to perform accurate cardiovascular event risk stratification from non-ECG-gated non-contrast chest CT imaging performed during medical check-up and routine clinical practice. There have been reports on the usefulness of CAC assessed by non-ECG-gated chest CT imaging and on the relationship of CAC between ECG-gated and non-ECG-gated chest CT imaging. In recent years, a more accurate method of evaluating CACS from non-ECG-gated chest CT imaging has been developed using artificial intelligence, and further development is expected in the future.

Clinical predictive factors of coronary stenosis in patients with high‑risk valvular heart disease who received diagnostic coronary angiography prior to cardiac valve surgery

Valvular heart disease (VHD) may lead to morbidities and mortality due to heart failure or sudden death. Concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is a crucial condition that needs to be explored in patients with VHD prior to cardiac valve surgery as it may increase morbidity and mortality. Patient age >40 years and mitral regurgitation are key risk factors for CAD in patients with VHD. The present study aimed to identify clinical risk factors for coronary stenosis in patients with high-risk VHD. The retrospective cohort study recruited patients aged >40 years who received cardiac valve surgery and coronary angiogram prior to cardiac valve surgery. Clinical factors predictive of coronary stenosis were computed by logistic regression analysis. There were 533 patients; 114 patients (21.38%) had coronary stenosis. Four factors were positively associated with coronary stenosis including age, male sex, mitral regurgitation and hypertension, while two factors were negatively associated with coronary stenosis, namely estimated glomerular filtration rate and rheumatic heart disease. Hypertension had the highest adjusted odds ratio at 2.596, while rheumatic heart disease had the lowest adjusted odds ratio at 0.428. Patient age >55 years showed a sensitivity and specificity of coronary stenosis of 80.70 and 37.47%, respectively. Clinical factors predictive of coronary stenosis in patients with high-risk VHD were age >55 years, male sex, mitral regurgitation and hypertension, while a high estimated glomerular filtration rate and presence of rheumatic heart disease were protective factors.

The Atherosclerotic Profile of a Young Symptomatic Population between 19 and 49 Years: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography or Coronary Artery Calcium Score?

(1) Background: Whether coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) or the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) should be used for diagnosis of coronary heart disease, is an open debate. The aim of our study was to compare the atherosclerotic profile by coronary CTA in a young symptomatic high-risk population (age, 19-49 years) in comparison with the coronary artery calcium score (CACS). (2) Methods: 1137 symptomatic high-risk patients between 19-49 years (mean age, 42.4 y) who underwent coronary CTA and CACS were stratified into six age groups. CTA-analysis included stenosis severity and high-risk-plaque criteria (3) Results: Atherosclerosis was more often detected based on CTA than based on CACS (45 vs. 27%; p < 0.001), 50% stenosis in 13.6% and high-risk plaque in 17.7%. Prevalence of atherosclerosis was low and not different between CACS and CTA in the youngest age groups (19-30 y: 5.2 and 6.4% and 30-35 y: 10.6 and 16%). In patients older than >35 years, the rate of atherosclerosis based on CTA increased (p = 0.004, OR: 2.8, 95%CI:1.45-5.89); and was higher by CTA as compared to CACS (34.9 vs. 16.7%; p < 0.001), with a superior performance of CTA. In patients older than 35 years, stenosis severity (p = 0.002) and >50% stenosis increased from 2.6 to 12.5% (p < 0.001). High-risk plaque prevalence increased from 6.4 to 26.5%. The distribution of high-risk plaque between CACS 0 and >0.1 AU was similar among all age groups, with an increasing proportion in CACS > 0.1 AU with age. A total of 24.9% of CACS 0 patients had coronary artery disease based on CTA, 4.4% > 50% stenosis and 11.5% had high-risk plaque. (4) Conclusions: In a symptomatic young high-risk population older than 35 years, CTA performed superior than CACS. In patients aged 19-35 years, the rate of atherosclerosis was similar and low based on both modalities. CACS 0 did not rule out coronary artery disease in a young high-risk population.