It is not just the drugs that matter: the nocebo effect

Biosimilars in the Era of Artificial Intelligence-International Regulations and the Use in Oncological Treatments

This research is based on three fundamental aspects of successful biosimilar development in the challenging biopharmaceutical market. First, biosimilar regulations in eight selected countries: Japan, South Korea, the United States, Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Australia, and South Africa, represent the four continents. The regulatory aspects of the countries studied are analyzed, highlighting the challenges facing biosimilars, including their complex approval processes and the need for standardized regulatory guidelines. There is an inconsistency depending on whether the biosimilar is used in a developed or developing country. In the countries observed, biosimilars are considered excellent alternatives to patent-protected biological products for the treatment of chronic diseases. In the second aspect addressed, various analytical AI modeling methods (such as machine learning tools, reinforcement learning, supervised, unsupervised, and deep learning tools) were analyzed to observe patterns that lead to the prevalence of biosimilars used in cancer to model the behaviors of the most prominent active compounds with spectroscopy. Finally, an analysis of the use of active compounds of biosimilars used in cancer and approved by the FDA and EMA was proposed.

Nocebo response intensity and influencing factors in the randomized clinical trials of functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

In this study we aimed to evaluate the nocebo response rate in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) and to explore its influencing factors.

METHODS

A literature search of the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted for all articles published up to March 2021. Randomized, parallel-designed, placebo-controlled trials on pharmacological interventions for patients with FD were included. A meta-analysis that utilized random effects to analyze the incidence of adverse events (AEs) among participants who were given placebo was conducted, and the correlation between trial characteristics and the magnitude of the nocebo response rate was analyzed.

RESULTS

Altogether, 27 studies including 1866 paitents were deemed eligible and included in the analysis. The total nocebo response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18%-33%). The most frequently reported AEs included nasopharyngitis (9%), constipation (6%), headache (5%), and diarrhea (3%). There were significant differences in nocebo response rates among studies conducted in different country or region, treatment duration, types of medication, sponsorship and different versions of the Rome criteria used for FD diagnosis. While number of centers engaged in the study, types of FD diagnosis and dosing frequency were not significantly associated with the nocebo response rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with FD exhibit notable nocebo response strength in clinical trials. The researchers should adopt a more careful approach when analyzing the relationships between AEs and interventions in such trials.

Adverse events in the placebo arm of maintenance therapy trials in advanced ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Maintenance treatment is standard of care for front-line (FL) and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) following response to chemotherapy. Adverse events (AEs) on maintenance therapies are common and usually attributable to investigational treatments but could also be unrelated. Randomised controlled trial (RCT) with blinded placebo design is the gold standard for determining the relative differences in efficacy and AEs between treatment arms. We performed a meta-analysis to quantify AE rates in placebo arms of RCTs to determine AEs not due to investigational agents.

METHODS

We performed an electronic search to identify eligible RCTs in FL and PSROC settings. Data from placebo arms were extracted and pooled using the inverse variance method to determine the risk of any AE, overall and specific grade 3 or higher (G ≥ 3) AEs, and AE-related treatment delay, reduction and discontinuation.

RESULTS

We identified 13 eligible RCTs (FL, N = 8; PSROC, N = 5) with 2224 patients who received placebo (FL, N = 1541; PSROC, N = 683). The majority experienced an AE of any grade (FL, 93.0%; PSROC, 95.2%). Substantial proportions experienced G ≥ 3 AEs (FL, 14.6%; PSROC, 18.2%). In the FL setting, AEs led to treatment delay in 14.4%, dose reduction in 4.1% and discontinuation in 2.6%. Findings were similar for PSROC: 8.4%, 5.5% and 2.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AEs not due to investigational agents are common in ovarian cancer patients in maintenance therapy RCTs. Potential explanations include the nocebo effect, residual toxicities from previous treatment or underlying disease. Further research is required to identify better approaches to assessing AEs in this population.

Withdrawal of intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Intravenous immunoglobulins are an efficacious treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Biomarkers for disease activity are lacking, making the need for ongoing treatment difficult to assess, leading to potential overtreatment and high health-care costs. Our objective was to determine whether intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal is non-inferior to continuing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and to determine how often patients are overtreated.

We performed a randomized, double-blind, intravenous immunoglobulin-controlled non-inferiority trial in seven centres in the Netherlands (Trial registration: ISRCTN 13637698; www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13637698). Adults with clinically stable chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy using intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance treatment for at least 6 months were included. Patients received either intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal (placebo) as investigational treatment or continuation of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (control). The primary outcome was the mean change in logit scores from baseline to 24-week follow-up on the patient-reported Inflammatory Rasch–Overall Disability Scale. The non-inferiority margin was predefined as between-group difference in mean change scores of −0.65. Patients who deteriorated could reach a relapse end point according to predefined criteria. Patients with a relapse end point after intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal entered a restabilization phase. All patients from the withdrawal group who remained stable were included in an open-label extension phase of 52 weeks.

We included 60 patients, of whom 29 were randomized to intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal and 31 to continuation of treatment. The mean age was 58 years (SD 14.7) and 67% was male. The between-group difference in mean change Inflammatory Rasch–Overall Disability Scale scores was −0.47 (95% CI −1.24 to 0.31), indicating that non-inferiority of intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal could not be established. In the intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal group, 41% remained stable for 24 weeks, compared to 58% in the intravenous immunoglobulin continuation group (−17%; 95% CI −39 to 8). Of the intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal group, 28% remained stable at the end of the extension phase. Of the patients in the restabilization phase, 94% restabilized within 12 weeks.

In conclusion, it remains inconclusive whether intravenous immunoglobulin withdrawal is non-inferior compared to continuing treatment, partly due to larger than expected confidence intervals leading to an underpowered study. Despite these limitations, a considerable proportion of patients could stop treatment and almost all patients who relapsed were restabilized quickly. Unexpectedly, a high proportion of intravenous immunoglobulin-treated patients experienced a relapse end point, emphasizing the need for more objective measures for disease activity in future trials, as the patient-reported outcome measures might not have been able to identify true relapses reliably. Overall, this study suggests that withdrawal attempts are safe and should be performed regularly in clinically stable patients.

The Right to Know and not to Know: Predictive Genetic Diagnosis and Non-diagnosis

The expansion of genetic diagnostic potential in the direction of future contingencies (risks) creates temptations and compulsions for timely knowledge and responsible-sometimes radical-prevention. In the area of mamma carcinoma, the 'Angelina Jolie effect' has not only been a media topic but has had real consequences. The undisputed right to knowledge is increasingly taking on the character of a general recommendation or even norm for society as a whole, regardless of the possibly toxic consequences of discovering a predisposition. In an "enlightened knowledge society" in which health and illness increasingly "appear as products of our own actions" (Giovanni Maio), not wanting to know is difficult; thus, it is all the more significant that this concept has found widespread recognition in current law. Its legal practical implementation, however, presents several questions that have not yet been fully clarified, for example in connection with incidental medical findings or family members affected as third parties. It is also unclear how, in the age of next-generation sequencing and the standardizing digitalization of medicine and society, it will be possible to counteract the cultural bias in favour of knowledge, even outside the law.

Nocebo Response in the Pharmacological Management of Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

The role of a nocebo response in managing urology patients is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the nocebo response in randomized placebo-controlled overactive bladder (OAB) trials of pharmacological treatment by investigating the adverse events in the placebo arms.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify potential randomized controlled trials published from 1998 to November 2019. After evaluating the risk of bias in the selected studies, all selected full-text articles were included due to their overall acceptable quality. We extracted the event rate of the most commonly reported adverse events in the placebo arms of OAB trials, and finally, we performed a meta-analysis to calculate the cumulative rate of certain adverse events. The primary outcomes were the event rate of adverse events in the placebo arms of OAB trials of pharmacological treatment, and differences in adverse events in the placebo groups based on drug type and routes of administration.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

After a systematic search and risk of bias assessment, 57 trials comprising 15 446 patients were included in this systematic review. We selected 13 commonly reported adverse events for the meta-analysis. Owing to the possible differences in study samples and design, we used a random model for the analysis. The average age of the patients was 59.5 yr and 79.8% were female. Dry mouth was the most commonly evaluated adverse event reported in 57 studies comprising 15 324 patients; the mean event rate was 4.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.042-0.057, p < 0.001). Constipation was the second most commonly reported adverse event in 49 studies comprising 14 556 patients; the mean event rate of constipation was 2.6% (95% CI 0.022-0.031, p < 0.001). The event rate of headache was evaluated in 33 studies comprising 10 202 patients, with a mean event rate of 3.1% (95% CI 0.026-0.037, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dry mouth, constipation, headache, and nasopharyngitis were the most prevalent events in the included studies. The nocebo response plays a statistically significant role in causing and/or facilitating adverse events. Health care providers should have a better understanding of the positive and negative expectations associated with therapies to achieve the best possible outcomes for each individual patient. Finally, identification of the real effect of nocebo requires studies that also include a no-treatment arm. Research could help us better understand and potentially modify the nocebo response.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this meta-analysis of 57 studies comprising 15 446 patients, we reviewed the adverse events extracted from the placebo arms of randomized controlled trials studying therapies for overactive bladder. Dry mouth, constipation, headache, and urinary tract infection were the most common adverse events. Adverse events varied based on the drug type and the route of administration. Negative expectations from the therapy and giving verbal information to the patient can cause/alleviate adverse events.

Statins and muscle pain

Introduction: Statins remain among the most frequently prescribed drugs and constitute a cornerstone in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, muscle symptoms are often reported from patients on statins. Muscle symptoms are frequently reported as adverse events associated with statin therapy.Areas covered: In the present narrative review, statin-associated muscle pain is discussed. It elucidates potential mechanisms and possible targets for management.Expert opinion: In general, the evidence in support of muscle pain caused by statins is in some cases equivocal and not particularly strong. Reported symptoms are difficult to quantify. Rarely is it possible to establish a causal link between statins and muscle pain. In randomized controlled trials, statins are well tolerated, and muscle-pain related side-effects is similar to placebo. There are also nocebo effects of statins. Exchange of statin may be beneficial although all statins have been associated with muscle pain. In some patients reduction of dose is worth trying, especially in primary prevention Although the benefits of statins outweigh potential risks in the vast majority of cases, careful clinical judgment may be necessary in certain cases to manage potential side effects on an individual basis.