Safety of Nifedipine GITS in Stable Angina: The ACTION Trial

Calcium channel blockers and mental health: a comprehensive meta-analysis of psychiatric adverse events in double-blind randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

L-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are pivotal in managing cardiovascular disorders, such as hypertension and angina pectoris. Their action on L-type calcium channels, which are not only integral to cardiovascular function but also present in the brain, prompts questions about potential effects on mental health. While previous cohort studies explored this association with mixed results, our study aims to build upon these findings by systematically investigating psychiatric adverse events (PAEs) reported in double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A systematic search identified double-blind RCTs reporting frequencies of PAEs during CCB therapy across different indications. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for dihydropyridine (DHP) and nondihydropyridine (non-DHP) CCBs against placebo and active controls. This study was registered on INPLASY (INPLASY202480075).

RESULTS

In 187 studies, encompassing 28,201 patients exposed to CCBs, several PAEs were reported, with the most common being depression, insomnia, somnolence, and agitation. Meta-analyses revealed no significant difference in PAE occurrence for CCBs vs. placebo, β-blockers, renin-angiotensin system blockers, and thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics (all P  > 0.05). Restricting the analyses to cardiovascular studies, DHP CCBs were linked to lower risks of depression and insomnia compared to placebo [odds ratio (OR) 0.84, confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.00 and OR 0.38, CI 0.15-0.99, both P  = 0.05); however, these results may be artifacts and should be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSION

Concerns about negative mental health effects of CCBs appear to be unwarranted and should not deter clinicians from prescribing them when indicated. A detected signal towards positive mental health benefits in cardiovascular patients warrants further investigation.

Anti-hypertensive medications and erectile dysfunction: focus on β-blockers

PURPOSE

Although anti-hypertensive medications, including thiazides and β-blockers (BBs) in particular, have been suggested to cause erectile dysfunction (ED) their real contribution is still conflicting. The aim of this paper is to summarize available evidence providing an evidence-based critical analysis of the topic.

METHODS

An overall comprehensive narrative review was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane search. In addition, to better understand the impact of BBs on ED a specific systematic review was also performed.

RESULTS

The negative role of centrally acting drugs, such as clonidine and α-methyldopa, is well documented althuogh limited controlled trials are available. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and calcium-channel-blockers (CCBs) have neutral (CCBs) or even positive (ACEis and ARBs) effects on erectile function. Despite some preliminary negative reports, more recent evidence does not confirm the negative impact of thiazides. BBs should be still considered the class of medications more often associated with ED, although better outcomes can be drawn with nebivolol.

CONCLUSION

Sexual function should be assessed in all patients with arterial hypertension, either at diagnosis or after the prescription of specific medications. A close related patient-physician interaction and discussion can overcome possible negative outcomes allowing a successful management of possible side effects.

The use of specific antihypertensive medication and skin cancer risk: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of hydrochlorothiazide has recently been linked to skin cancer in observational studies. This may be explained by its photosensitizing properties, but photosensitivity has also been reported for other antihypertensive drugs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare skin cancer risk among antihypertensive drug classes and individual blood pressure lowering drugs.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane and the Web of Science and included studies that investigated the association between antihypertensive medication exposure and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) or cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). We combined the extracted odds ratios (OR) using a random effects model.

RESULTS

We included 42 studies with a total of 16,670,045 subjects. Diuretics, in particular hydrochlorothiazide, were examined most frequently. Only 2 studies provided information about antihypertensive co-medication. Exposure to diuretics (OR 1.27 [1.09-1.47]) and CCB (OR 1.06 [1.04-1.09]) was associated with an increased risk for NMSC. The increased risk for NMSC was only observed in case control studies and studies that did not correct for sun exposure, skin phototype or smoking. Studies that did correct for covariates as well as cohort studies did not show a significantly increased risk for NMSC. Egger's test revealed a significant publication bias for the subgroup of diuretics and hydrochlorothiazide concerning NMSC (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The available studies investigating the potential skin cancer risk that is associated with antihypertensive medication have significant shortcomings. Also, a significant publication bias is present. We found no increased skin cancer risk when analyzing cohort studies or studies that corrected for important covariates. (PROSPERO (CRD42020138908)).

The Risk for Prostate Cancer With Calcium Channel Blockers: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND

For decades, conflicting results were published regarding the increased risk of Prostate cancer (PCa) among calcium channel blocker (CCB) users.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the association between PCa and CCB exposure and assess moderating factors.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for observational and randomized studies published until November 2020 with no language limitations, including data on the risk for PCa in CCB users compared with non-CCB users. We applied a random-effects model meta-analysis to pool results. In addition, we investigated potential moderating factors, such as CCB type, study type, participants' age, and duration of exposure, using meta-regression methods.

RESULTS

In our primary analysis, we included 18 studies. A statistically significant 5% increase in the risk for PCa was observed among CCB users (risk ratio [RR] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.10), with no significant association between the duration of exposure to CCBs and the risk for PCa (RR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.98-1.19 for exposure for < 5years and RR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.9-1.14 for exposure ≥ 5 years). The association remained statistically significant for the subgroup of dihydropyridines (RR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.05-1.22). In addition, the association was not influenced by participants' age.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

CCBs are an important modality in treating hypertension. The 5% increased risk observed in the current meta-analysis could be influenced by residual confounding factors and should not affect hypertension treatment guidelines until more studies provide additional clinical information.

Risk of hospitalized and non-hospitalized gastrointestinal bleeding in ALLHAT trial participants receiving diuretic, ACE-inhibitor, or calcium-channel blocker

OBJECTIVES

This post-trial data linkage analysis was to utilize the data of Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) participants linked with their Medicare data to examine the risk of hospitalized and non-hospitalized gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with antihypertensives.

SETTINGS

ALLHAT was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial conducted in a total of 42,418 participants aged ≥55 years with hypertension in 623 North American centers. Data for ALLHAT participants who were aged at ≥65 have been linked with their Medicare claims data.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 16,676 patients (4,480 for lisinopril, 4,537 for amlodipine, and 7,659 for chlorthalidone) with complete Medicare claims data were available for the final analysis.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidences through March 31, 2002 of hospitalized GI bleeding were 5.4%, 5.8% and 5.4% for amlodipine, lisinopril, and chlorthalidone arms, respectively, but were not statistically significant among the 3 arms after adjusting for confounders in Cox regression models. The cumulative incidences of non-hospitalized GI bleeding were also similar across the 3 arms (12.0%, 12.2% and 12.0% for amlodipine, lisinopril, and chlorthalidone, respectively). The increased risk of GI bleeding by age was statistically significant after adjusting for confounders (HR = 1.04 per year, 95% CI: 1.03-1.05). Smokers also had a significantly higher risk of having hospitalized GI bleeding (1.45, 1.19-1.76). Hispanics, those who used aspirin or atenolol in-trial, had diabetes, more education, and a history of stroke had a significantly lower risk of having GI bleeding than their counterparts. Other factors such as gender, history of CHD, prior antihypertensive use, use of estrogen in women, and obesity did not have significant effects on the risk of GI bleeding.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences on the risk of hospitalized or non-hospitalized GI bleeding among the 3 ALLHAT trial arms (amlodipine, lisinopril, and chlorthalidone) during the entire in-trial follow-up.

Antihypertensive drugs and the risk of cancer: a critical review of available evidence and perspective

: The issue of a potential danger of antihypertensive drugs related to cancer susceptibility is currently generating a major debate in the scientific community, concerns in the public and emphasized interest from the media. The present article is a thorough review of what is known on the various classes of antihypertensive drugs concerning the risk of developing different neoplasms and about the suggested pathophysiological mechanisms, whenever available. The main limitations of evidence derived from studies currently available in this setting are also discussed, high-lightening the need for newly developed approaches to generate more accurate recommendations and informed advice for physicians.

Efficacy and safety outcomes of one generic nifedipine versus ADALAT long-acting nifedipine for hypertension management

Data regarding the long-term outcomes of generic antihypertensive drugs are limited. This nationwide retrospective database analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a generic versus brand-name nifedipine for hypertension treatment. Patients who were prescribed generic or brand-name nifedipine between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013, were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The efficacy outcomes included all-cause mortality and the composite cardiovascular (CV) outcome, including CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for heart failure. Safety outcomes included headache, peripheral edema, constipation, acute kidney injury, hypotension, syncope, new diagnosis of cancer, and cancer death. Among the 98 335 patients who were eligible for analysis, 21 087 (21.4%) were prescribed generic nifedipine. Both the generic and the brand-name groups included 21 087 patients after propensity score matching. At a mean follow-up of 4.1 years, the generic nifedipine was comparable to the brand-name drug with regard to all-cause mortality (7.2% vs. 7.1%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.09) and the composite CV outcomes (11.6% vs. 11.9%; HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.92-1.03). The generic nifedipine was associated with higher rates of headache, peripheral edema, and constipation but a modest reduction in the risk of newly diagnosed cancer (7.1% vs. 7.8%; subdistribution HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.97). The risks of acute kidney injury, hypotension, syncope, and cancer death were not significantly different between the two groups. In conclusion, the generic nifedipine was comparable to the brand-name drug with regard to the risks of all-cause mortality and the composite CV outcome. The finding of cancer risk could be chance and should be interpreted with caution.

Calcium channel blockers and breast cancer incidence: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence

Controversy exists regarding the potential association between taking calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and the development of breast cancer. As a positive association would have important public health implications due to the widespread use of CCBs, this study aimed to incorporate new evidence to determine whether an association is likely to exist. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to 28 June 2016 for relevant literature. References and citing articles were checked and authors contacted as necessary. Two authors independently selected articles and extracted data. Twenty-nine studies were reviewed; 26 were non-randomised studies (NRS). Meta-analysis of study data where adjustment for 'confounding by indication' was judged to be present suggests that an association, if any, is likely to be modest in magnitude (pooled odds/risk ratio 1.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.15, I²=0%, 8 sub-studies; pooled hazard ratio 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.03, I²=35%, 9 sub-studies)). There are credible study data showing an increased relative risk with long-term use of CCBs, but the results of our meta-analysis and of meta-regression of log relative risk against minimum follow-up time are mixed. The current summative evidence does not support a clear association between taking CCBs and developing breast cancer. However, uncertainty remains, especially for long-term use and any association might not be uniform between different populations and/or breast cancer sub-types. We thus recommend further NRS in settings where CCB use is highly prevalent and population-based cancer, prescription and health-registries exist, to resolve this continuing uncertainty. PROSPERO, CRD42015026712.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the association between the use of calcium channel blockers and gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Due to their potential anti-platelet effect, it is suggested that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are associated with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). However, results from previous studies are conflicting.

AIM

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies to clarify the association between CCBs and GIB.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Trial Register databases up to January 2015. Studies that evaluated exposure to CCBs reporting GIB outcomes were included in the meta-analysis. The inverse variance method with random effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (four RCTs, eleven case-control and two cohort studies) were included in the meta-analysis. The summary risk ratio (RR) for GIB was 1.17 (95% CI 1.01-1.36) for CCB users vs. non-users. Subgroup analysis showed that CCB use was associated with a moderately higher risk of lower GIB (RR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.17-2.84) but not upper GIB. However, data from four RCTs did not support association between CCBs and GIB (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.05). Subgroup analyses further showed that the increased risk of GIB among CCB users was only observed in studies that failed to adjust for prior history of GIB (RR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.34-2.08) or use of anti-ulcer drugs (RR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.19-1.65).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed a marginal association between calcium channel blocker use and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. This association is of dubious clinical significance, as the effects of different comparators or adjustment for confounding factors render this association nonsignificant.

Spectroscopic investigation on the food components-drug interaction: the influence of flavonoids on the affinity of nifedipine to human serum albumin

Nifedipine (NDP) is used extensively for the clinical treatment of a number of cardiovascular diseases. Herein, the interaction between human serum albumin (HSA) and NDP and the influence of flavonoids, rutin and baicalin, on their binding properties were investigated in vitro by means of fluorescence and absorption spectroscopy. The fluorescence of HSA was quenched remarkably by NDP and the quenching mechanism was considered as static quenching by forming a complex. The results of thermodynamic parameters indicate that both hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions play the main role in the binding process and the binding process was spontaneous. The binding distance between the amino acid residue of HSA and NDP is 2.608 nm, which indicates that the energy transfer from HSA to NDP can occur with high probability. The decreased association constants and the increased binding distance of NDP binding to HSA in the presence of flavonoids were both due to their competitive binding to the site I of HSA. The results obtained from synchronous fluorescence and three-dimensional fluorescence spectra showed that the interaction between HSA and NDP caused the conformational changes of HSA and the synergism effects of NDP and flavonoids induced the further conformational changes of HSA.

Cardiovascular risk, drugs and erectile function--a systematic analysis

AIMS

Erectile dysfunction is a major problem with an increasing prevalence in cardiovascular high-risk patients due to its association with cardiovascular risk factors. Drugs used for evidence-based treatment of cardiovascular diseases have been reported to decrease erectile function, but possible mechanisms are poorly characterised.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Registry search were performed including manuscripts until January 2010. Searching terms are: 'erectile dysfunction or impotence' in combination with 'ACE-inhibitors', 'angiotensin', 'beta-blockers', 'calcium antagonist' and 'diuretics'. Animal studies, letters, reviews, case-reports and manuscripts other than English language and trials dealing with combination treatment are excluded.

RESULTS

Analysis of literature revealed five epidemiological trials evaluating the effect of different cardiovascular drugs on erectile function. There were eight trials evaluating the effect of beta-blockers, five trials evaluating the effect of ace-inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor-blockers and one trial evaluating the effect of diuretics on erectile function. Results of these trials demonstrate that only thiazide diuretics and beta-blockers except nebivolol may adversely influence erectile function. ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor-blockers and calcium-channel-blockers are reported to have no relevant or even a positive effect on erectile function.

CONCLUSION

Inappropriate patients' concerns about adverse effects of cardiovascular drugs on erectile function might limit the use of important medications in cardiovascular high-risk patients. Knowledge about the effects of drug-treatments on erectile function and about the major role of the endothelium in penile function might improve patients' adherence to evidence based treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Microwave Heating in Conjunction with UV Irradiation: a Tool for the Oxidation of 1,4-Dihydropyridines to Pyridines

Microwave heating is used for the preparation of 1,4-dihydropyridines and then, in conjunction with UV irradiation, is used for the efficient oxidation of the 1,4-dihydropyridines to pyridines. The oxidation reactions are performed in a sealed vessel using oxygen as the oxidant and an electrodeless discharge lamp as the irradiation source.