1
|
Wen X, Jiang CY, Jiang X, Chen Y, Li M. Comparative diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in detecting biochemical recurrent bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Radiol 2025; 66:312-327. [PMID: 39865667 DOI: 10.1177/02841851241307336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
BackgroundThe comparative diagnostic performance of 68Gallium (Ga)-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear.PurposeTo systematically evaluate the early detection rate of biochemical recurrent (BCR) bone metastasis in PCa utilizing 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI.Material and MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant articles up to April 2023 and extracted studies that examined the positivity rate of both 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in the context of the BCR bone metastasis of PCa patients. Random-effects model was used to compare positivity rates for two imaging modalities. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. To evaluate the methodological quality of studies, we employed Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies method. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023454118).ResultsA total of 1670 publications were originally identified; 58 studies, encompassing a cohort of 8037 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Regarding the evaluation of BCR bone metastasis, results suggest no statistically significant difference in the utilization of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT versus 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in 58 non-head-to-head studies (0.21, 95% CI=0.19-0.24 and 0.17, 95% CI=0.11-0.23; P = 0.19) and four head-to-head studies (0.16, 95% CI=0.08-0.27 and 0.16, 95% CI=0.08-0.27; P = 1.00). Meta-regression showed the study design of influenced the heterogeneity in the PET/MRI group (P < 0.01); but analysis of PET/CT did not identify the potential reason for heterogeneity.ConclusionThere was no statistically significant difference in identifying BCR bone metastasis in PCa patients between 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| | - Cheng-Yi Jiang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| | - Xu Jiang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| | - Meng Li
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abrahamsen BS, Tandstad T, Aksnessæther BY, Bogsrud TV, Castillejo M, Hernes E, Johansen H, Keil TMI, Knudtsen IS, Langørgen S, Selnæs KM, Bathen TF, Elschot M. Added Value of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT and PET/MRI in Patients With Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Impact on Detection Rates and Clinical Management. J Magn Reson Imaging 2025; 61:466-477. [PMID: 38679841 PMCID: PMC11645485 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) can change management in a large fraction of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR). PURPOSE To investigate the added value of PET to MRI and CT for this patient group, and to explore whether the choice of the PET paired modality (PET/MRI vs. PET/CT) impacts detection rates and clinical management. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. SUBJECTS 41 patients with BCR (median age [range]: 68 [55-78]). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3T, including T1-weighted gradient echo (GRE), T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) and dynamic contrast-enhanced GRE sequences, diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging, and a T1-weighted TSE spine sequence. In addition to MRI, [18F]PSMA-1007 PET and low-dose CT were acquired on the same day. ASSESSMENT Images were reported using a five-point Likert scale by two teams each consisting of a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician. The radiologist performed a reading using CT and MRI data and a joint reading between radiologist and nuclear medicine physician was performed using MRI, CT, and PET from either PET/MRI or PET/CT. Findings were presented to an oncologist to create intended treatment plans. Intrareader and interreader agreement analysis was performed. STATISTICAL TESTS McNemar test, Cohen's κ, and intraclass correlation coefficients. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS 7 patients had positive findings on MRI and CT, 22 patients on joint reading with PET/CT, and 18 patients joint reading with PET/MRI. For overall positivity, interreader agreement was poor for MR and CT (κ = 0.36) and almost perfect with addition of PET (PET/CT κ = 0.85, PET/MRI κ = 0.85). The addition of PET from PET/CT and PET/MRI changed intended treatment in 20 and 18 patients, respectively. Between joint readings, intended treatment was different for eight patients. DATA CONCLUSION The addition of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/MRI or PET/CT to MRI and CT may increase detection rates, could reduce interreader variability, and may change intended treatment in half of patients with BCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bendik S. Abrahamsen
- Department of Circulation and Medical ImagingNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs HospitalTrondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular MedicineNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| | - Bjørg Y. Aksnessæther
- Department of OncologyÅlesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital TrustÅlesundNorway
| | - Trond V. Bogsrud
- PET Imaging CentreUniversity Hospital of North NorwayTromsøNorway
- PET‐CentreAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | | | - Eivor Hernes
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Håkon Johansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSt. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
| | - Thomas M. I. Keil
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSt. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
| | - Ingerid S. Knudtsen
- Department of Circulation and Medical ImagingNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| | - Sverre Langørgen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSt. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
| | - Kirsten M. Selnæs
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSt. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
| | - Tone F. Bathen
- Department of Circulation and Medical ImagingNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSt. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
| | - Mattijs Elschot
- Department of Circulation and Medical ImagingNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSt. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matrone F, Urso L, Girometti R, Polesel J, Sepulcri M, Pierantoni F, Artioli P, Caliò A, Campo I, Cimadamore A, Munari E, Ongaro L, Orlando V, Sachs C, Veccia A, Antonelli A, Bortolus R, Brunelli M, Caffo O, Evangelista L, Salgarello M, Basso U, De Vivo R, Gardi M, Guttilla A, Andrea Signor M, Zattoni F, Alongi F, Montesi G, Giannarini G. The expanding role of next-generation imaging in prostate cancer management: a cross-sectional survey exploring the clinical practice of uro-oncologists in North-Eastern Italy; on behalf of GUONE (Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord-Est). Ther Adv Urol 2025; 17:17562872251321971. [PMID: 40083770 PMCID: PMC11905040 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251321971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Next-generation imaging (NGI) technologies such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and total-body NGI (tbNGI) methodologies including choline, fluciclovine or PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), whole-body MRI (wbMRI), and PET/MRI are becoming increasingly available, but their use in different prostate cancer (PCa) settings is under debate. The Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord-Est (GUONE) designed a survey to explore the current clinical practice of NGI utilization in a specific macro-region in North-Eastern Italy. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted by administering an anonymous online multiple-choice questionnaire to uro-oncologists practicing in North-Eastern Italy, using the Google Forms® platform. The use of NGI was investigated in the following settings: primary staging of PCa; management of biochemical (BCR) and local recurrence (LR); re-staging in metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), non-metastatic CRPC (nmCRPC), and oligometastatic PCa (OMPC). Results In all, 100 uro-oncologists accessed and completed the survey. In primary N/M staging, the use of tbNGI increases in accordance with NCCN risk groups. Re-staging with choline and PSMA PET/CT is the prevalent choice in the case of BCR after radical prostatectomy. Moreover, when the PSA value rises, there is a parallel increased use of tbNGI. When an LR is suspected, PSMA PET/CT plus mpMRI is the most selected option. Re-staging with tbNGI (PSMA PET/CT) is preferred in mHSPC, mCRPC, and nmCRPC patients in case of progression of disease. Overall, there is a limited use of wbMRI and PET/MRI in all the settings investigated. Conclusion Our survey describes the expanding role of NGI modalities in the management of PCa patients, from primary staging and re-staging to management of advanced PCa and assessment of treatment response. Several controversial issues have emerged, which need to be addressed in prospective studies to develop a standardized and cost-effective NGI utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Matrone
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, via F. Gallini 2, Aviano 33081, Italy
| | - Luca Urso
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Rossano Girometti
- Istituto di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Medicina (DMED), Università di Udine, Udine, Italy
- Presidio Ospedaliero S. Maria della Misericordia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy
| | - Jerry Polesel
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Matteo Sepulcri
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Pierantoni
- Oncology Unit 3, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Artioli
- UOC Medicina Nucleare, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
| | - Anna Caliò
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostic, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Irene Campo
- Radiology Unit, SC Radiologia Gorizia-Monfalcone, Monfalcone, Italy
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Enrico Munari
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostic, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Ongaro
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Valentina Orlando
- Oncology Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), Trieste, Italy
| | - Camilla Sachs
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Ca’ Foncello, Treviso, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Bortolus
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostic, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Salgarello
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria IRCCS, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Umberto Basso
- Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Rocco De Vivo
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale San Bartolo, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Mario Gardi
- Urology Clinic, Azienda Ospedale Universitaria di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Andrea Guttilla
- Urology Clinic, Camposampiero Hospital, Camposampiero, Italy
| | - Marco Andrea Signor
- Radiation Therapy Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria IRCCS, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Montesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu Q, Bates A, Guntur P, Shamim SA, Nabi G. Detection Rate of PSMA PET Using Different Ligands in Men with Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:544-563. [PMID: 37770370 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the acknowledged diagnostic detection rate of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer, little is known about the quality of evidence, particularly focusing on prospective studies. Most systematic reviews are based on retrospective reports. RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies reporting the diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET (computed tomography (CT) and MR) for the detection of biochemically recurrent metastatic prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, from database until March 1, 2023 for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies using PSMA PET imaging in prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was to assess diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET imaging in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. We calculated the pooled overall diagnostic detection rate with 95% CI using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between the studies including risk of biases estimation. RESULTS A total of 6800 patients from 32 articles were included in this study. The overall detection rate of PSMA PET for prostate cancer was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63, 0.71). For histologically confirmed lymph nodes, the PPV from 13 prospective studies containing 1496 patients was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93, 0.99). We performed a subgroup analysis of PSMA PET detection rates according to categorically grouped Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) values of 0-0.5, 0.5-1.0, 1.0-2.0, and >2.0 ng/ml and obtained detection rates of 0.44, 0.63, 0.82, and 0.94, respectively. The detection rate of 18F PSMA was better in men with a PSA between 1 ng/ml and 2 ng/ml in comparison to 68Ga PSMA (0.91 with 95% CI 0.81-0.99 vs. 0.79 with 95% CI 0.73, 0.85). CONCLUSION PSMA PET imaging provides a good detection rate for the metastatic recurrence of prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. The detection rate improves significantly above a serum PSA value of 1 ng/ml. The diagnostic detection rate of 18F-PSMA is best at PSA values between 1 and 2 ng/ml, in comparison to 68Ga PSMA. This conclusion is heavily biased, further research needs to focus on better methodology to minimize the risk of biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiushuo Wu
- Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
| | - Anthony Bates
- Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Shamim Ahmed Shamim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ghulam Nabi
- Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vanden Berg RNW, Zilli T, Achard V, Dorff T, Abern M. The diagnosis and treatment of castrate-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer: A review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:702-711. [PMID: 37422523 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00688-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPCa) is emerging as a transitional disease state between localized and polymetastatic disease. This review will assess the current knowledge of castrate-sensitive OMPCa. METHODS A review of the current literature was performed to summarize the definition and classification of OMPCa, assess the diagnostic methods and imaging modalities utilized, and to review the treatment options and outcomes. We further identify gaps in knowledge and areas for future research. RESULTS Currently there is no unified definition of OMPCa. National guidelines mostly recommend systemic therapies without distinguishing oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease. Next generation imaging is more sensitive than conventional imaging and has led to early detection of metastases at initial diagnosis or recurrence. While mostly retrospective in nature, recent studies suggest that treatment (surgical or radiation) of the primary tumor and/or metastatic sites might delay initiation of androgen deprivation therapy while increasing survival in selected patients. CONCLUSIONS Prospective data are required to better assess the incremental improvement in survival and quality of life achieved with various treatment strategies in patients with OMPCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vérane Achard
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HFR Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
| | - Tanya Dorff
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Michael Abern
- Department of Urology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang R, Li Y, Wu H, Liu B, Zhang X, Zhang Z. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT versus 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1216894. [PMID: 37645433 PMCID: PMC10461474 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1216894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review in order to compare the diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in patients with biochemically recurrent after radical prostatectomy and biochemically recurrent prostate cancers (BCR) after hybrid RT and RP. Methods Up until February 2023, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for pertinent papers. Studies examining the utility of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT or PET/MRI as a screening tool for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer were included. To measure heterogeneity, we employed the I2 statistic. In cases of substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 50%), we used the random effect model to produce a forest plot. In other cases, we utilized the fixed model. Furthermore, we assessed the quality of the studies included using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies (QUADAS-2) method. Results In total, 37 studies involving 8409 patients were examined. For 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI, the combined total detection rate was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.65-0.75) and 0.71 (95% CI:0.67-0.75), respectively. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI did not substantially differ in terms of the overall detection rate for BCR (P = 0.58). The detection rate was unaffected by the PSA values (all P > 0.05). Conclusion The diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT appears to be equivalent to that of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in detecting biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Nonetheless, it should be noted that not all studies have used pathological biopsies as the gold standard. Therefore, additional larger prospective studies are needed to address this issue. Systematic review registration identifier CRD42023410039.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhongxi Zhang
- The First Clinical College, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Management of Patients with Recurrent and Metachronous Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer in the Era of PSMA PET. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246194. [PMID: 36551678 PMCID: PMC9777467 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) scans have higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting lymph nodes or metastatic disease relative to conventional imaging in prostate cancer staging. Since its FDA approval and incorporation into treatment guidelines, the use of PSMA PET has increased in patients undergoing initial staging, those with recurrence after initial definitive treatment, and patients with metastatic disease. Although the early detection of metastatic lesions is changing disease management, it is unclear whether this impact on management translates into clinical benefit. This review will summarize evidence pertaining to the change in patient management due to PSMA PET use and will discuss the implications of PSMA PET on treatment decisions in prostate cancer, particularly in the settings of biochemical recurrence and metachronous oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
|
8
|
Roberts MJ, Chatfield MD, Hruby G, Nandurkar R, Roach P, Watts JA, Cusick T, Kneebone A, Eade T, Ho B, Nguyen A, Tang C, McCarthy M, Francis R, Stricker P, Emmett L. Event-free survival after radical prostatectomy according to prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography and European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence risk groups. BJU Int 2022; 130 Suppl 3:32-39. [PMID: 35488182 PMCID: PMC9796546 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess European Association of Urology (EAU) risk groups for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer relative to prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) status and oncological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of a study that incorporated PSMA-PET for men with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) was undertaken. EAU risk groups were considered relative to clinical variables, PSMA-PET findings, and deployment of salvage radiotherapy (SRT). The primary oncological outcome was event-free survival (EFS) and this was analysed relative to clinical and imaging variables. An 'event' occurred if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level rose >0.2 ng/mL above nadir or additional therapies were introduced. RESULTS A total of 137 patients were included, most of whom had EAU high-risk disease (76%) and/or low PSA levels (80% <0.5 ng/mL) at the time of PSMA-PET. EAU risk group was not associated with regional nodal/distant metastasis on PSMA-PET. Regional nodal/distant metastasis on PSMA PET (compared to negative/local recurrence: hazard ratio [HR] 2.2; P = 0.002) and SRT use (vs no SRT: HR 0.44; P = 0.004) were associated with EFS. EAU high-risk status was not significantly associated with worse EFS (HR 1.7, P = 0.12) compared to EAU low-risk status. Among patients who received SRT, both regional/distant metastasis on PSMA-PET (HR 3.1; P < 0.001) and EAU high-risk status (HR 2.9; P = 0.04) were independently associated with worse EFS, which was driven by patients in the EAU high-risk group with regional/distant metastases (38%; HR 3.1, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with post-RP BCR, PSMA-PET findings and receipt of SRT predicted EFS. In patients receiving SRT, PSMA status combined with EAU risk grouping was most predictive of EFS. These findings suggest that the EAU risk groups could be improved with the addition of PSMA-PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Roberts
- Department of UrologyRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalBrisbaneQLDAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical ResearchBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Mark D. Chatfield
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical ResearchBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia,Genesis Cancer CareSydneyNSWAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Rohan Nandurkar
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Paul Roach
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia,Department of Nuclear MedicineRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Jo Anne Watts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine/WA PET ServicesSir Charles Gairdner HospitalPerthWAAustralia,Faculty of Health and Medical ScienceUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWAAustralia
| | - Thomas Cusick
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer CentreSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia,Genesis Cancer CareSydneyNSWAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Thomas Eade
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia,Genesis Cancer CareSydneyNSWAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Bao Ho
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear MedicineSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Andrew Nguyen
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia,Department of Theranostics and Nuclear MedicineSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Colin Tang
- Department of Radiation OncologySir Charles Gairdner HospitalPerthWAAustralia
| | - Michael McCarthy
- Department of Nuclear MedicineFiona Stanley HospitalPerthWAAustralia
| | - Roslyn Francis
- Faculty of Health and Medical ScienceUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWAAustralia,Department of Nuclear MedicineFiona Stanley HospitalPerthWAAustralia
| | - Phillip Stricker
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia,Department of UrologySt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia,Department of Theranostics and Nuclear MedicineSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alberto M, Yim A, Papa N, Siva S, Ischia J, Touijer K, Eastham JA, Bolton D, Perera M. Role of PSMA PET-guided metastases-directed therapy in oligometastatic recurrent prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:929444. [PMID: 36059632 PMCID: PMC9433573 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.929444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) has been proposed as an intermediary state between localised disease and widespread metastases, with varying definitions including 1, 3, or ≤5 visceral or bone metastasis. Traditional definitions of OMPC are based on staging with conventional imaging, such as computerised tomography (CT) and whole-body bone scan (WBBS). Novel imaging modalities such as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) have improved diagnostic utility in detecting early metastatic prostate cancer (PC) metastases compared with conventional imaging. Specifically, meta-analytical data suggest that PSMA PET is sensitive in detecting oligometastatic disease in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) post-radical treatment of PC. Recent trials have evaluated PSMA PET-guided metastases-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic recurrent disease, typically with salvage surgery or radiotherapy (RT). To date, these preliminary studies demonstrate promising results, potentially delaying the need for systemic therapy. We aim to report a comprehensive, multidisciplinary review of PSMA-guided MDT in OMPC. In this review, we highlight the utility of PMSA PET in biochemically recurrent disease and impact of PSMA PET on the definition of oligometastatic disease and outline data pertaining to PSMA-guided MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Alberto
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Arthur Yim
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nathan Papa
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Ischia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karim Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - James A. Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Marlon Perera,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Salerno KE, Turkbey B, Lindenberg L, Mena E, Schott EE, Brennan AK, Roy S, Shankavaram U, Patel K, Cooley-Zgela T, McKinney Y, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Choyke P, Citrin DE. Detection of failure patterns using advanced imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence following low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:442-450. [PMID: 35523680 PMCID: PMC9253070 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) This study describes the pattern of failure in patients with biochemical (BCR) recurrence after low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy as a component of definitive treatment for prostate cancer. METHODS Patients with BCR after LDR brachytherapy ± external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were enrolled on prospective IRB approved advanced imaging protocols. Patients underwent 3T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI); a subset underwent prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET/CT. Pathologic confirmation was obtained unless contraindicated. RESULTS Between January 2011 and April 2021, 51 patients with BCR after brachytherapy (n = 36) or brachytherapy + EBRT (n = 15) underwent mpMRI and were included in this analysis. Of 38 patients with available dosimetry, only two had D90<90%. The prostate and seminal vesicles were a site of failure in 66.7% (n = 34) and 39.2% (n = 20), respectively. PET/CT (n = 32 patients) more often identified lesions pelvic lymph nodes (50%; n = 16) and distant metastases (18.8%; n = 6), than mpMRI. Isolated nodal disease (9.8%; n = 5) and distant metastases (n = 1) without local recurrence were uncommon. Recurrence within the prostate was located in the transition zone in 48.5%, central or midline in 45.5%, and anterior in 36.4% of patients. CONCLUSION In this cohort of patients with BCR after LDR brachytherapy ± EBRT, the predominant recurrence pattern was local (prostate ± seminal vesicles) with frequent occurrence in the anterior prostate and transition zone. mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT provided complementary information to localize sites of recurrence, with PSMA PET/CT often confirming mpMRI findings and identifying occult nodal or distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian E Salerno
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Esther Mena
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Erica E Schott
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Alexandra K Brennan
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Soumyajit Roy
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Uma Shankavaram
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Krishnan Patel
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Theresa Cooley-Zgela
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Yolanda McKinney
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Center for Interventional Oncology, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Peter A Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Peter Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Role of 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:631-637. [PMID: 35438666 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the prospective literature on the role of 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI as a tool for functional imaging in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR), particularly with respect to detection efficacy and impact on management. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed in July 2021, focusing on original prospective studies looking at PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in BCR. RESULTS We included 20 prospective studies reporting on 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI. Pooled PSMA PET positivity was 66.6% out of 2110 patients. The only factor consistently reported as associated with PSMA PET positivity was PSA level at the time of the study. Analysis of PSMA PET positivity rates in differing PSA ranges confirmed increasing positivity with increasing PSA levels. No significant adverse reactions were reported in the 20 studies, but only 6 studies mentioned safety or adverse reactions. A major change of management occurred in 42.7% of all patients scanned with PSMA PET/CT and more specifically 63.2% of those patients positive on PSMA PET/CT. There are no long-term studies that prove a survival benefit from these changes in management. CONCLUSION There is prospective evidence for efficacy of PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in localizing disease recurrence in BCR, which increases with increasing PSA level at the time of scanning. There are no reported significant adverse effects related to the PSMA PET ligands. There is evidence of major change in management but no evidence for whether this achieves any improvement in outcome.
Collapse
|
12
|
Oprea-Lager DE, Cysouw MC, Boellaard R, Deroose CM, de Geus-Oei LF, Lopci E, Bidaut L, Herrmann K, Fournier LS, Bäuerle T, deSouza NM, Lecouvet FE. Bone Metastases Are Measurable: The Role of Whole-Body MRI and Positron Emission Tomography. Front Oncol 2021; 11:772530. [PMID: 34869009 PMCID: PMC8640187 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic tumor deposits in bone marrow elicit differential bone responses that vary with the type of malignancy. This results in either sclerotic, lytic, or mixed bone lesions, which can change in morphology due to treatment effects and/or secondary bone remodeling. Hence, morphological imaging is regarded unsuitable for response assessment of bone metastases and in the current Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST1.1) guideline bone metastases are deemed unmeasurable. Nevertheless, the advent of functional and molecular imaging modalities such as whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) has improved the ability for follow-up of bone metastases, regardless of their morphology. Both these modalities not only have improved sensitivity for visual detection of bone lesions, but also allow for objective measurements of bone lesion characteristics. WB-MRI provides a global assessment of skeletal metastases and for a one-step "all-organ" approach of metastatic disease. Novel MRI techniques include diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) targeting highly cellular lesions, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for quantitative assessment of bone lesion vascularization, and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) combining anatomical and functional sequences. Recommendations for a homogenization of MRI image acquisitions and generalizable response criteria have been developed. For PET, many metabolic and molecular radiotracers are available, some targeting tumor characteristics not confined to cancer type (e.g. 18F-FDG) while other targeted radiotracers target specific molecular characteristics, such as prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands for prostate cancer. Supporting data on quantitative PET analysis regarding repeatability, reproducibility, and harmonization of PET/CT system performance is available. Bone metastases detected on PET and MRI can be quantitatively assessed using validated methodologies, both on a whole-body and individual lesion basis. Both have the advantage of covering not only bone lesions but visceral and nodal lesions as well. Hybrid imaging, combining PET with MRI, may provide complementary parameters on the morphologic, functional, metabolic and molecular level of bone metastases in one examination. For clinical implementation of measuring bone metastases in response assessment using WB-MRI and PET, current RECIST1.1 guidelines need to be adapted. This review summarizes available data and insights into imaging of bone metastases using MRI and PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs C.F. Cysouw
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christophe M. Deroose
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS – Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luc Bidaut
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Laure S. Fournier
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Radiology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hopital europeen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tobias Bäuerle
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nandita M. deSouza
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederic E. Lecouvet
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Galgano SJ, Calderone CE, Xie C, Smith EN, Porter KK, McConathy JE. Applications of PET/MRI in Abdominopelvic Oncology. Radiographics 2021; 41:1750-1765. [PMID: 34597228 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
With PET/MRI, the strengths of PET and MRI are combined to allow simultaneous image acquisition and near-perfect image coregistration. MRI is increasingly being used for staging and restaging of abdominopelvic oncologic lesions, including prostate, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, neuroendocrine, cervical, and rectal cancers. Fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT has long been considered a cornerstone of oncologic imaging, and the development of multiple targeted radiotracers has led to increased research on and use of these agents in clinical practice. Thus, simultaneously performed PET/MRI enables the acquisition of complementary imaging information, with distinct advantages over PET/CT and MR image acquisitions. The authors provide an overview of PET/MRI, including descriptions of the major differences between PET/MRI and PET/CT, as well as case examples and treatment protocols for patients with commonly encountered malignancies in the abdomen and pelvis. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N325, Birmingham, AL 35249
| | - Carli E Calderone
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N325, Birmingham, AL 35249
| | - Charlies Xie
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N325, Birmingham, AL 35249
| | - Elainea N Smith
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N325, Birmingham, AL 35249
| | - Kristin K Porter
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N325, Birmingham, AL 35249
| | - Jonathan E McConathy
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JT N325, Birmingham, AL 35249
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Regmi SK, Sathianathen N, Stout TE, Konety BR. MRI/PET Imaging in elevated PSA and localized prostate cancer: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:3117-3129. [PMID: 34430415 PMCID: PMC8350235 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the recent milestones in MRI and PET based imaging and evaluate their evolving role in the setting of elevated PSA as well as localized prostate cancer. BACKGROUND The importance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PET based imaging for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer cannot be understated. Accurate staging has become another significant milestone with the use of PET scans, particularly with prostate specific radiotracers like 68-Gallium Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (68Ga-PSMA). Integrated PET/MRI systems are commercially available and can be modulated to evaluate the unique needs of localized as well as recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar using the MeSH compliant and other keywords that included prostate cancer, PSA, mpMRI, PET CT, PET/MRI. CONCLUSIONS mpMRI has now established itself as the gold-standard of local prostate imaging and has been incorporated into international guidelines as part of the diagnostic work-up of prostate cancer. PSMA PET/CT has shown superiority over conventional imaging even in staging of localized prostate cancer based on recent randomized control data. Imaging parameters from PET/MRI have been shown to be associated with malignancy, Gleason score and tumour volume. As mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT become more ubiquitous and established; we can anticipate more high-quality data, cost optimization and increasing availability of PET/MRI to be ready for primetime in localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subodh K. Regmi
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Thomas E. Stout
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Timm B, Farag M, Liodakis P, Angus D, Lim Joon D, Bolton D. Vesico-urethral anastomosis sampling: a forgotten tool for guiding salvage radiation after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2021; 127 Suppl 1:23-29. [PMID: 33973332 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the utility of vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA)-directed biopsy in the setting of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) in patients who have undergone evaluation by gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography with computed tomography (68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT). METHODS We completed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained dataset from January 2015 to August 2020. Patient demographics were recorded for those who experienced BCR, as defined by a rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level to above 0.2 ng/mL, who had a 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT that did not demonstrate recurrence within the prostate bed, and who subsequently underwent a transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS)-guided biopsy directed at the VUA. Histological reporting of the biopsies was undertaken in order to determine whether the benefits of salvage radiation therapy (SRT) could be justified by the presence of cancer cells. RESULTS Eighteen patients who had a 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and underwent VUA-directed biopsy were identified as having BCR. 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans demonstrated avidity at the VUA in none of the patients, although two out of 18 patients showed avidity in the seminal vesicles and two out of 18 patients showed avidity within regional lymph nodes. Histology from the TPUS-guided, VUA-directed biopsies demonstrated no prostatic tissue in six out of 18 and presence of prostatic tissue in 12 out of 18 of patients, respectively. In 7 out of 18 cases, there was histological evidence of recurrent PCa at the VUA in the absence of a positive 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan. CONCLUSION This study highlights the potential value of VUA-directed biopsy. We are reminded that a negative 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT does not exclude local recurrence and that the addition of a VUA-directed biopsy may aid in the decision-making process for patients with BCR following RP, especially when 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT is locally negative. When the result of both 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and VUA-directed biopsy are negative, it should encourage clinicians to share decision-making in regard to undertaking SRT vs continuing BCR surveillance. This may delay the possible side effects associated with SRT, despite its excellent PSA failure-free survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brennan Timm
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,North Eastern Urology, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - Matthew Farag
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - Peter Liodakis
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,North Eastern Urology, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - David Angus
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,North Eastern Urology, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - Daryl Lim Joon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
von Eyben FE, Soydal C, von Eyben R. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Patients with PSA Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy or External Beam Radiotherapy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11040622. [PMID: 33808350 PMCID: PMC8066852 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to summarize clinical characteristics associated with Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) scans as patients were restaged for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Our analyses included multiple cox regression analyses. The study evaluated 95 patients with rising values of PSAs after RP and after EBRT. Sixty 63% of patients had a positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan. Twelve patients (13%) had a positive site in the prostate bed, 29 patients (30%) had a positive site in the regional lymph nodes, and 19 (20%) had positive sites in distant organs. After four years follow-up, 21 patients (22%) died. Using multiple Cox regression analyses, the number of positive sites on the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan significantly predicted overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0001), whereas risk score and regional locations of the positive sites were not significant in the multiple Cox regression analyses. Our study indicates that the specific findings of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans are important because detailed findings of the scans predict the outcome after salvage treatment of patients with PSA relapse examined with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cigdem Soydal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey;
| | - Rie von Eyben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94350, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Papa N, Perera M, Murphy DG, Lawrentschuk N, Evans M, Millar JL, Bolton D. Patterns of primary staging for newly diagnosed prostate cancer in the era of prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography: A population-based analysis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:649-654. [PMID: 33666330 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There has been a growing body of evidence highlighting the improved sensitivity and specificity for prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) in advanced prostate cancer imaging. We aimed to assess prostate cancer staging practice patterns in Australia using population-based data. SUBJECT AND METHODS We extracted data on men diagnosed with prostate cancer between October 2016 and December 2018 from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-Vic). We evaluated trends and comparisons between patients receiving PET/CT (with or without conventional imaging (CImg)), and CImg alone, and analysed imaging modality as predictor of clinical regional node positive disease (cN1 vs cN0/X), metastatic disease (cM1 vs cM0/X), and treatment received. RESULTS In total, 6139 patients in the registry had either a staging PET scan (n = 889, 14%), CImg without PET scan (n = 2464, 40%), or no recorded PET or CImg (n = 2786, 45%). The proportion of allimaged patients who received staging PET increased from 19% to 36% from the first to last three-month period, and in the high-risk category the increase was 23-43%. After adjustment for grade group, PET vs CImg-only patients were observed to have a higher proportion of cN1 disease (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.90-3.20) but not cM1 disease (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.84-1.44). CONCLUSIONS Our registry data highlights the rapid uptake of PET imaging, particularly in high-risk disease. Based on this data, we highlight the increased diagnosis of nodal disease, thus potentially optimizing patient selection prior to definitive treatment for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Papa
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melanie Evans
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy L Millar
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Keegan NM, Bodei L, Morris MJ. Seek and Find: Current Prospective Evidence for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Imaging to Detect Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 7:267-278. [PMID: 33744163 PMCID: PMC8371443 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Men with biochemically relapsed prostate cancer face a clinical conundrum. Depending on the detected distribution of disease, treatment goals may range from cure with focal therapy to palliative with systemic therapy to expectant observation. Retrospective studies of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging demonstrate higher disease detection rates than conventional imaging. OBJECTIVE This review focuses on available prospective evidence for diagnostic use of PSMA-based imaging to accurately restage recurrent prostate cancer and explores the potential clinical impact, near future uses, and challenges for PSMA-based imaging in this setting. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for prospective studies with primary, secondary, or exploratory endpoints evaluating PSMA-based imaging for patients with recurrent prostate cancer published in English in the past 10 yrs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We reviewed 48 prospective studies evaluating the role of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) in recurrent prostate cancer. These studies establish the diagnostic accuracy and safety of PSMA PET using the 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL radiotracers even at lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (0.5 ≤ PSA < 1.0 ng/m: disease detection rate 51-78%). The use of PSMA PET has been shown to result in changes in management in up to two-thirds of patients. CONCLUSIONS There is now higher-level regulatory-quality prospective evidence for PSMA-based imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. There is prospective evidence of superiority over cross-sectional imaging and bone scintigraphy, as well as for the alterations in disease management as a result of PSMA-based imaging. PATIENT SUMMARY When the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is rising after primary therapy, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is excellent at detecting and localizing prostate cancer, even at low PSA levels. Those who benefit best from treatment modifications based on PSMA PET findings are yet to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh M Keegan
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|