1
|
Rondonotti E, Spada C, Pennazio M, de Franchis R, Cadoni S, Girelli C, Hassan C, Marmo R, Riccioni ME, Scarpulla G, Soncini M, Vecchi M, Cannizzaro R. Adherence to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations of endoscopists performing small bowel capsule endoscopy in Italy. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51:818-823. [PMID: 30639228 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recently issued a technical review focused on small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). AIM To compare SBCE current practice in Italy to ESGE technical recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS A dedicated per-centre semi-quantitative questionnaire was prepared by a group of SBCE experts. One-hundred-fifty Centres were invited to participate in the data collection concerning SBCEs performed between June 2016 and June 2017. Data were compared with ESGE recommendations. RESULTS 120 Centres participated in the data collection. Current practices agreed with ESGE recommendations in 56.3% (9/16) of the issues evaluated. Differences between ESGE recommendations and current practice concerned the management of patients with pacemakers or cardiac implantable defibrillators (which was in agreement with ESGE recommendations in 31.7% and 15.8% of Centres, respectively), the SBCE setting (only 51% of SBCEs were performed as outpatients procedures), the assessment of capsule excretion (timing and modality were in agreement with ESGE recommendation in 20.0% of Centres), and in the involvement of trained nurses or fellows in training as pre-readers (7/120; 5.8%). CONCLUSIONS Although SBCE is widely used and largely available in Italy, there are still some technical, practical and organizational issues that can be modified to bridge the gap between current practice and ESGE guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Pennazio
- Division of Gastroenterology U, San Giovanni AS University-Teaching Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Sergio Cadoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, CTO Hospital, Iglesias, Italy
| | - Carlo Girelli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hospital of Busto Arsizio, Busto Arsizio, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Marmo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Curto Hospital, Polla, Italy
| | - Maria Elena Riccioni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Soncini
- Digestive Physiopathology Unit ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Renato Cannizzaro
- Division of Oncological Gastroenterology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tabet R, Nassani N, Karam B, Shammaa Y, Akhrass P, Deeb L. Pooled Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Video Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Implantable Cardiac Devices. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 2019:3953807. [PMID: 31236386 PMCID: PMC6545804 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3953807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To date, video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is still contraindicated by the FDA and the main manufacturers of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) in patients with CIED, given a theoretical electromagnetic interference and possible device malfunction. Objectives The objective of this study was to assess the safety profile and efficacy of VCE in patients with implantable cardiac devices through analyzing the risk of mutual interference. Methods A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted. Peer-reviewed original articles, published in the English language and containing "capsule endoscopy" AND "pacemaker", "defibrillator" OR "left ventricular assist device" as keywords, were selected. Studies performed in vitro, isolated case reports, and abstracts/posters were excluded. Results A total of 735 VCE procedures were performed in patients with cardiac devices in various clinical settings. Cardiac events were not seen in any case. Interference on capsule images transmission was noted in 5 cases (left ventricular assist device (LVAD)) where few images were lost when the capsule was closest to the device. Finally, interference between capsule and telemetry leads was noted in 6 cases (4 Permanent Pacemakers (PPM), 2 Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD)) leading to image artifacts. Discussion Adverse cardiac events were not seen in any study. Loss of images occurred when the VCE was in proximity to the device (only with LVAD) or after telemetry leads installation without affecting the completion rate and diagnostic yield of VCE. Conclusion VCE is safe and remains efficient in patients with cardiac devices. If cardiac monitoring is required, wired systems are preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabih Tabet
- Department of Internal Medicine at Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Najib Nassani
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology at University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Boutros Karam
- Department of Internal Medicine at Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Youssef Shammaa
- Department of Internal Medicine at Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Philippe Akhrass
- Division of Cardiology & Electrophysiology at Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| | - Liliane Deeb
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology at Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bandorski D, Kurniawan N, Baltes P, Hoeltgen R, Hecker M, Stunder D, Keuchel M. Contraindications for video capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:9898-9908. [PMID: 28018097 PMCID: PMC5143757 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i45.9898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2016] [Revised: 10/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) has been applied in the last 15 years in an increasing field of applications. Although many contraindications have been put into perspective, some precautions still have to be considered. Known stenosis of the gastrointestinal tract is a clear contraindication for VCE unless surgery is already scheduled or at least has been considered as an optional treatment modality. In patients with a higher incidence of stenosis, as in an established diagnosis of Crohn’s disease, clinical signs of obstruction, prior radiation or surgical small bowel resection, a preceding test with the self-dissolving patency capsule can override this contraindication. Endoscopic placement of the capsule should be considered in patients with swallowing disorders to avoid aspiration. Esophageal or gastric motility disorders may require endoscopic capsule transport or application of prokinetics if the real-time viewer proofs delayed transit. In pregnant women, VCE should be restricted to urgent cases where diagnosis cannot be postponed after delivery, as data on safety are missing. There is theoretical and clinical evidence that patients with implanted cardiac devices such as a pacemaker, cardioverters or left heart assist devices, can safely undergo VCE in spite of still existing contraindication by manufacturers. Children from the age of 2 years have safely undergone VCE. Although video capsules are not proven safe with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), first single cases of patients incidentally undergoing MRI with an incorporated capsule have been reported, showing susceptibility artifacts but no signs of clinical harm.
Collapse
|
4
|
Moneghini D, Lipari A, Missale G, Minelli L, Cengia G, Bontempi L, Curnis A, Cestari R. Lack of interference between small bowel capsule endoscopy and implantable cardiac defibrillators: an 'in vivo' electrophysiological study. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 4:216-20. [PMID: 27087949 PMCID: PMC4804376 DOI: 10.1177/2050640615608570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Accepted: 09/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capsule endoscopy is a widely performed procedure for small bowel investigation. Once swallowed by the patient, the capsule transmits images to an external recorder over a digital radiofrequency communication channel. Potential electromagnetic interferences with implantable cardiac devices have been postulated. Clinical studies on the safety of capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac defibrillators are lacking. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess potential mutual electromagnetic interferences between capsule and defibrillators. METHODS This study used the Given M2A video capsule system. Ten different types of defibrillators were tested in a clinical setting. Before capsule ingestion, defibrillator electrical therapies were switched off. During capsule endoscopy patients were monitored with cardiac telemetry. At the end of capsule endoscopy the following defibrillator's parameters were analysed: change in device settings; inappropriate shocks; inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapy; inappropriate sensing or pacing; noise detection; device reset; programming changes; permanent electrical damages. Any technical problem related to capsule image transmission was recorded. RESULTS Neither defibrillator malfunction nor interference in sensing or pacing was recorded; conversely, no capsule malfunction potentially caused by defibrillators was registered. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that capsule endoscopy can be safely performed in patients with cardiac defibrillators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Moneghini
- U.O. Chirurgia Endoscopica Digestiva, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Lipari
- Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia ed Elettrostimolazione, Università degli Studi, Brescia, Italy
| | - Guido Missale
- U.O. Chirurgia Endoscopica Digestiva, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Minelli
- U.O. Chirurgia Endoscopica Digestiva, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Cengia
- U.O. Chirurgia Endoscopica Digestiva, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Bontempi
- Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia ed Elettrostimolazione, Università degli Studi, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonio Curnis
- Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia ed Elettrostimolazione, Università degli Studi, Brescia, Italy
| | - Renzo Cestari
- U.O. Chirurgia Endoscopica Digestiva, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nie Z, Li Z, Huang R, Liu Y, Li J, Wang L. A statistical frame based TDMA protocol for human body communication. Biomed Eng Online 2015; 14:65. [PMID: 26155949 PMCID: PMC4495947 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-015-0061-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Human body communication (HBC) using the human body as the transmission medium, which has been regarded as one of the most promising short-range communications in wireless body area networks (WBAN). Compared to the traditional wireless networks, two challenges are existed in HBC based WBAN. (1) Its sensor nodes should be energy saving since it is inconvenient to replace or recharge the battery on these sensor nodes; (2) the coordinator should be able to react dynamically and rapidly to the burst traffic triggered by sensing events. Those burst traffic conditions include vital physical signal (electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram etc.) monitoring, human motion detection (fall detection, activity monitoring, gesture recognition, motion sensing etc.) and so on. To cope with aforementioned challenges, a statistical frame based TDMA (S-TDMA) protocol with multi-constrained (energy, delay, transmission efficiency and emergency management) service is proposed in this paper. Methods The scenarios where burst traffic is often triggered rapidly with low power consumption and low delay is handled in our proposed S-TDMA. A beacon frame with the contained synchronous and poll information is designed to reduce the possibility of collisions of request frames. A statistical frame which broadcasts the unified scheduling information is adopted to avoid packet collisions, idle listening and overhearing. Dynamic time slot allocation mechanism is presented to manage the burst traffic and reduce the active period in each beacon period. An emergency mechanism is proposed for vital signals to be transmitted. The theory analysis is proceed and the result is evaluated in the hardware platform. Results To verify its feasibility, S-TDMA was fully implemented on our independently-developed HBC platform where four sensor nodes and a coordinator are fastened on a human body. Experiment results show that S-TDMA costs 89.397 mJ every 20 s when the payload size is 122 bytes, 9.51% lower than Lightweight MAC (LMAC); the average data latency of S-TDMA is 6.3 ms, 7.02% lower than Preamble-based TDMA (PB-TDMA); the transmission efficiency of S-TDMA is 93.67%, 4.83% higher than IEEE 802.15.6 carrier sense multiple access/collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) protocol. Conclusions With respect to the challenges of HBC based WBANs, a novel S-TDMA protocol was proposed in this paper. Compared to the traditional protocols, the results demonstrate that S-TDMA successfully meets the delay and transmission efficiency requirements of HBC while keeping a low energy consumption. We also believe that our S-TDMA protocol will promote development of HBC in wearable applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zedong Nie
- Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518005, China.
| | - Zhao Li
- Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518005, China.
| | - Renwei Huang
- Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518005, China.
| | - Yuhang Liu
- Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518005, China.
| | - Jingzhen Li
- Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518005, China.
| | - Lei Wang
- Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518005, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koulaouzidis A, Iakovidis DK, Karargyris A, Plevris JN. Optimizing lesion detection in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: from present problems to future solutions. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 9:217-35. [PMID: 25169106 DOI: 10.1586/17474124.2014.952281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This review presents issues pertaining to lesion detection in small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The use of prokinetics, chromoendoscopy, diagnostic yield indicators, localization issues and the use of 3D reconstruction are presented. The authors also review the current status (and future expectations) in automatic lesion detection software development. Automatic lesion detection and reporting, and development of an accurate lesion localization system are the main software challenges of our time. The 'smart', selective and judicious use (before as well as during SBCE) of prokinetics in combination with other modalities (such as real time and/or purge) improves the completion rate of SBCE. The tracking of the capsule within the body is important for the localization of abnormal findings and planning of further therapeutic interventions. Currently, localization is based on transit time. Recently proposed software and hardware solutions are proposed herein. Moreover, the feasibility of software-based 3D representation (attempt for 3D reconstruction) is examined.
Collapse
|
7
|
Li Z, Carter D, Eliakim R, Zou W, Wu H, Liao Z, Gong Z, Wang J, Chung JW, Song SY, Xiao G, Duan X, Wang X. The Current Main Types of Capsule Endoscopy. HANDBOOK OF CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY 2014:5-45. [DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9229-5_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2025]
|
8
|
Suture marker lesion detection in the colon by self-stabilizing and unmodified capsule endoscopes: pilot study in acute canine models. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77:272-9. [PMID: 23317692 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2012] [Accepted: 10/09/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capsule endoscopy is a noninvasive method for examining the small intestine. Recently, this method has been used to visualize the colon. However, the capsule often tumbles in the wider colon lumen, resulting in potentially missed pathology. In addition, the capsule does not have the ability to distend collapsed segments of the organ. Self-stabilizing capsule endoscopy is a new method of visualizing the colon without tumbling and with the ability to passively distend colon walls. OBJECTIVE To quantitatively compare the detection rate of intraluminal suture marker lesions for colonoscopy by using a custom-modified, self-stabilizing capsule endoscope (SCE); an unmodified capsule endoscope (CE) of the same brand; and a standard colonoscope. DESIGN Four mongrel dogs underwent laparotomy and the implantation of 5 to 8 suture markers to approximate colon lesions. Each dog had both capsule endoscopy and self-stabilizing capsule endoscopy, administered consecutively in random order. In each case, the capsule was inserted endoscopically into the proximal lumen of the colon followed by pharmacologically induced colon peristalsis to propel it distally through the colon. Blinded standard colonoscopy was performed by an experienced gastroenterologist after the capsule endoscopies. SETTING Experimental study in a live canine model. SUBJECTS Four dogs. INTERVENTION Laparotomy, capsule endoscopy, colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Comparison of the marker detection rate of the SCE to that of the unmodified MiroCam CE and a colonoscope. RESULTS The average percentages of the marker detection rate for unmodified capsule endoscopy, self-stabilizing capsule endoscopy, and colonoscopy, respectively, were 31.1%, 86%, and 100% (P < .01), with both self-stabilizing capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy performing significantly better than the unmodified capsule endoscopy. LIMITATIONS Acute canine model, suture markings poorly representative of epithelial polyps, limited number of animals. CONCLUSION The proposed self-stabilizing capsule endoscope delivered a significant improvement in detection rates of colon suture markings when compared with the unmodified capsule endoscope.
Collapse
|
9
|
Park SJ, Kim WH. A look into the small bowel in Crohn's disease. Clin Endosc 2012; 45:263-8. [PMID: 22977814 PMCID: PMC3429748 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2012.45.3.263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2012] [Revised: 07/27/2012] [Accepted: 07/30/2012] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Crohn's disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease that can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract, with the small bowel (SB) being the most commonly affected site. In some patients, refractory inflammation or chronic strictures of the SB are responsible for a debilitating course of the disease that might lead to severely reduced quality of life. Therefore, SB imaging is a crucial element in diagnosing and/or managing SB CD, and continues to evolve because of technologic advances. SB endoscopy (capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy) and cross-sectional radiologic imaging (computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography) have become key players to diagnose and/or manage CD. In everyday practice, the choice of the imaging modalities is based on the presence and availability of the techniques and of experienced operators in each institute, clinical usefulness, safety, and cost. Here, SB endoscopy and radiologic imaging in suspected or known CD patients will be addressed and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Jung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|