Efficacy of bispectral index monitoring during balanced propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

The Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate Combined with Esketamine for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Purpose

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate combined with esketamine for outpatient colonoscopy.

Patients and methods

A total of 150 outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. A MOAA/S score ≤3 was maintained. The primary outcome was the rate of successful colonoscopy completion. Time indicators, hemodynamic parameters, the consumption of lidocaine, esketamine, propofol and remimazolam besylate, MOAA/S scores and bispectral index (BIS) values, the lowest SpO2, body movement, the use of rescue medication, endoscopist and patient satisfaction, recall of the procedure, mini-mental state examination (MMSE), fatigue level and adverse events were recorded.

Results

Procedure completion was equivalent between groups (P > 0.05). Both induction and awakening times were significantly shorter in the P group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in colonoscopy time and discharge time (P > 0.05). The lowest SpO2 was significantly lower in the P group, while the level of fatigue was higher (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the R group (P < 0.05). Endoscopist satisfaction was significantly higher in the P group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure between groups except at T5 and T6 (P > 0.05). Both HR and RR were significantly lower in the P group from T3 to T5 (P < 0.05). BIS values were significantly lower in the P group from T3 to T5, while MOAA/S was significantly lower in the P group at T3 and T4 (P < 0.05). Pain on injection was significantly higher in the P group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Remimazolam besylate has a similar efficacy to propofol when combined with subanesthetic doses of esketamine during outpatient colonoscopy. Remimazolam besylate combined with esketamine resulted in less injection pain and more stable hemodynamics, although it prolonged induction and awakening time.

Effect of depth of anesthesia on the phase lag entropy in patients undergoing general anesthesia by propofol: A STROBE-compliant study

The PLEM100 (Inbody Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) is a device for measuring phase lag entropy (PLE), a recently developed index for the quantification of consciousness during sedation and general anesthesia. In the present study, we assessed changes in PLE along with the level of consciousness during the induction of general anesthesia using propofol. PLE was compared with the bispectral index (BIS), which is currently the most commonly used index of consciousness.After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, we enrolled 15 patients (8 men, 7 women; mean age: 37 ± 9 years; mean height: 168 ± 8 cm; mean weight; 68 ± 11 kg) undergoing nasal bone reduction. PLE and BIS sensors were attached simultaneously, and general anesthesia was induced via target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol. PLE and BIS scores were recorded when the calculated effect site concentration shown on the TCI pump was equal to the target concentrations of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 2.8, 3.0, 3.2, 3.4, and 3.5 μg/mL (and at each 0.1 μg/mL increase, thereafter). Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores were also recorded until unconsciousness was achieved. Throughout the anesthesia period, all pairs of PLE and BIS data were collected using data acquisition software.The partial correlation coefficients between OAA/S scores and PLE, and between OAA/S scores and BIS were 0.778 (P < .001) and 0.846 (P < .001), respectively. Throughout the period of anesthesia, PLE and BIS exhibited a significant positive correlation. The partial correlation coefficient prior to the loss of consciousness was 0.838 (P < .001), and 0.669 (P < .001) following the loss of consciousness. Intra-class correlation between the 2 indices was 0.889 (P < .001) and 0.791 (P < .001) prior and following the loss of consciousness, respectively.PLE exhibited a strong and predictable correlation with both BIS and OAA/S scores. These results suggest that PLE is reliable for assessing the level of consciousness during sedation and general anesthesia.

Effects of Bispectral Index-controlled Use of Magnesium on Propofol Consumption and Sedation Level in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of bispectral index-controlled use of magnesium on propofol consumption, periprocedural hemodynamic response and patient comfort.

Material

A total of 60 patients were enrolled in the study. In Group 1 (magnesium), a single dose 50 mg/kg magnesium sulfate diluted with 100 mL 0.9% NaCl was administered 10 minutes before the beginning of the procedure. Initially bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg propofol was applied. The maintenance dose of propofol was 60 mcg/kg/min. During the procedure, the propofol infusion was increased by titration until the bispectral index (BIS) value of 70 was achieved. In Group 2 (saline), 100 ml 0.9% NaCl was administered 10 minutes before the beginning of the procedure. The bolus and maintenance doses of propofol, and target BIS values were the same as those in Group 1.

Results

When BIS values were compared between the groups, the initial BIS values in the magnesium group (Group 1) were significantly higher than those of the saline group (Group 2) (p<0.05). The time to reach BIS 70 was significantly shorter in the magnesium group (p<0.05). Propofol consumption was greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 (p<0.05). The time to reach BIS 70 was significantly shorter in Group 1 (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of patient- and endoscopist-satisfaction (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The use of magnesium in addition to propofol may be an efficient and reliable option to reduce the drug consumption during colonoscopic interventions.

Bispectral index monitoring of sedation depth during endoscopy: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The Bispectral Index (BIS) provides an objective measure of the level of sedation and general anesthesia. We performed this meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized clinical trials to clarify whether BIS monitoring is helpful in enhancing intraprocedual safety, shortening procedure duration or promoting recovery during sedation for endoscopic procedures.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]) databases, reference lists of articles as well as relevant articles from "Google Scholar" were searched until May 31st, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BIS with clinical signs for titration of sedation depth during endoscopy were screened and identified if they reported one of the following outcome measures: intraprocedual safety (hemodynamic stability and cardiorespiratory complications such as hypoxia, hypertension/hypotension, and bradycardia/tachycardia), procedure duration, recovery time and patient/endoscopist's satisfaction.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twelve studies with 13 RCTs recruiting 1372 patients were identified with great inter-trial heterogeneity. Meta-analysis found that BIS monitoring of sedation depth was associated with lower incidences of intraprocedural hypoxia (P=0.009) compared with clinical signs which was not confirmed by TSA. Meta-analysis and TSA found that the endoscopic procedure duration (P=0.143), recovery time (P=0.083), satisfaction scores from both the cases (P=0.085) and endoscopists (P=0.125) and the incidences of hypertension/ hypotension (P=0.639) or heart rates (P=0.201) were similar between BIS and control group.

CONCLUSIONS

More high-quality large-sampled RCTs are needed to confirm whether BIS monitoring for endoscopy sedation helps reduce intraprocedural hypoxia. BIS monitoring fails to shorten procedure duration, promote recovery or boost satisfaction among patients and endoscopists.

The effect of bispectral index monitoring on cognitive performance following sedation for outpatient colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring can positively affect cognitive performance through decreasing the use of sedative agents. We aimed to evaluate the effect of BIS monitoring on early cognitive performance among patients undergoing sedation for colonoscopy.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Randomized, controlled trial in a university hospital.

METHODS

100 patients were randomized into two groups. In the monitored group (n = 50), the depth of anesthesia was monitored using the BIS, and BIS scores were maintained between 60 and 80. In the usual care group (n = 50), BIS monitoring was not performed. To determine the patients' baseline cognitive performance levels, the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Trieger dot test (TDT) and clock drawing test (CDT) were used. The patients' post-procedure cognitive performance levels were determined when they were classified as ready for discharge.

RESULTS

The total volume (mg) of propofol used [median (range) IQR] in the sedation procedure was lower in the monitored group [100 (50-200) 100-140] than in the usual care group [150 (75-200) 100-200] (P < 0.001). The discharge scores [mean (SD)] using MMSE and CDT were higher in the monitored group [26 (3) and 3 (1), respectively] than in the usual care group [23 (3) and 2 (1), respectively] (P = 0.002 and P = 0.002, respectively). The discharge scores using TDT [mean (SD)] were lower in the monitored group [11 (7)] than in the usual care group [15 (11)] (P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

BIS monitoring among sedated patients was associated with lower propofol use and smaller decline in cognitive performance.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12617000134325).

Bispectral index-guided sedation in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a retrospective control study

OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive therapy for elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who were refused surgical aortic valve replacement because of the high perioperative risk. Traditionally, this procedure has been done under general anesthesia, but more recently local anesthesia and sedation have become popular. This research assessed the effectiveness of transfemoral TAVI under bispectral index (BIS)-guided sedation.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective control analysis, clinical data, including demographic characteristics, echocardiography, periprocedural data, and main complications, were collected and assessed in 113 patients undergoing TAVI through the femoral artery under general anesthesia (GA group, n=36) and under BIS-guided sedation (SED group, n=77).

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics and echocardiographic parameters between the two groups were similar (P>0.05). Two (2.6%) of patients were moved from BIS-guided sedation to general anesthesia for surgical reasons. Procedures were significantly shorter in the SED group than in the GA group ((127.10±44.43) min vs. (165.90±71.62) min, P=0.004). Patients in the SED group lost less blood and received significantly fewer red blood cells and catecholamines than those in the GA group (5.19% vs. 22.22%, P=0.017 and 67.53% vs. 97.22%, P<0.001). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter and there were fewer pulmonary complications in the SED group than in the GA group. Thirty-day mortality was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

BIS-guided sedation is a feasible and safe approach for transfemoral TAVI. The anesthesiologist should choose the best anesthetic method according to the team's experience.

Depth of anaesthesia monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Processed electroencephalogram-based depth of anaesthesia monitoring devices provide an additional method to monitor level of consciousness during procedural sedation and analgesia. The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether using a depth of anaesthesia monitoring device improves the safety and efficacy of sedation.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (CENTRAL; Medline; CINAHL) were searched up to May 2015.

REVIEW METHODS

Randomised controlled trials that compared use of a depth of anaesthesia monitoring device to a control group who received standard monitoring during procedural sedation and analgesia were included. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment (Cochrane risk of bias tool) were performed by two reviewers. Safety outcomes were hypoxaemia, hypotension and adverse events. Efficacy outcomes were amount of sedation used, duration of sedation recovery and rate of incomplete procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 16 trials (2138 participants) were included. Evidence ratings were downgraded to either low or moderate quality due to study limitations and imprecision. Meta-analysis of 8 trials (766 participants) found no difference in hypoxaemia (RR 0.87; 95% CI=0.67-1.12). No statistically significant difference in hypotension was observed in meta-analysis of 8 trials (RR 0.96; 95% CI=0.54-1.7; 942 participants). Mean dose of propofol was 51mg lower for participants randomised to depth of anaesthesia monitoring (95% CI=-88.7 to -13.3mg) in meta-analysis of results from four trials conducted with 434 participants who underwent interventional endoscopy procedures with propofol infusions to maintain sedation. The difference in recovery time between depth of anaesthesia and standard monitoring groups was not clinically significant (standardised mean difference -0.41; 95% CI=-0.8 to -0.02; I²=86%; 8 trials; 809 participants).

CONCLUSIONS

Depth of anaesthesia monitoring did impact sedation titration during interventional procedures with propofol infusions. For this reason, it seems reasonable for anaesthetists to utilise a depth of anaesthesia monitoring device for select populations of patients if it is decided that limiting the amount of sedation would be beneficial for the individual patient. However, there is no need to invest in purchasing extra equipment or training staff who are not familiar with this technology (e.g. nurses who do not routinely use a depth of anaesthesia monitoring device during general anaesthesia) because there is no high quality evidence suggestive of clear clinical benefits for patient safety or sedation efficacy.

Effects of bispectral index monitoring as an adjunct to nurse-administered propofol combined sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The efficacy of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring during colonoscopic sedation is debated. We aimed to determine whether BIS monitoring was useful for propofol dose titration, and to evaluate differences in sedative administration between expert and inexperienced medical personnel during colonoscopy procedures that required moderate sedation.

METHODS

Between February 2012 and August 2013, 280 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo a screening colonoscopy participated in this study and were randomly allocated to the expert or inexperienced endoscopist group. Each group was further divided into either a BIS or a modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAA/S) subgroup. Trained nurses administered combined propofol sedation and monitored sedation using either the BIS or MOAA/S scale.

RESULTS

The mean BIS value throughout the procedure was 74.3 ± 6.7 for all 141 patients in the BIS group. The mean total propofol dose administered in the BIS group was higher than that in the MOAA/S group, independently of the endoscopists' experience level (36.9 ± 29.6 and 11.3 ± 20.7, respectively; p < 0.001). The total dose of propofol administered was not significantly different between the inexperienced endoscopist group and the expert endoscopist group, both with and without the use of BIS (p = 0.430 and p = 0.640, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with monitoring using the MOAA/S score alone, BIS monitoring was not effective for titrating the dose of propofol during colonoscopy, irrespective of colonoscopist experience.

Bispectral Index Versus Standard Monitoring in Sedation for Endoscopic Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Bispectral index (BIS ) monitoring has been used as an objective measurement tool for sedation depth and has been proposed as a guidance to reduce the risk of intraprocedural over-sedation. However, the results of several studies evaluating the benefits of BIS monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy were not consistent.

AIMS

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the reduction in total consumption of administrated propofol and recovery time under BIS during gastrointestinal endoscopy.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, WEB of SCIENCE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for articles published through March 2015. After screening, the reviewers extracted information on 11 randomized controlled trials. A total of 1039 patients (526 in BIS and 513 in non-BIS group) were included in this study.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses showed that the total propofol consumption (the pooled standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.28 to -0.01) was significantly lower in the BIS group than in the non-BIS group, although mean propofol consumption was not significantly different. Recovery time (the pooled SMD: -0.04 [95% CI -0.46 to 0.38, P = 0.85]), procedure time (the pooled SMD: 0.13 [95% CI -0.03 to 0.29, P = 0.11]), adverse events, and satisfaction-related outcomes were not significantly superior in the BIS group when compared with the non-BIS group.

CONCLUSIONS

This first meta-analysis showed that BIS monitoring appears to be an effective and safe method for avoiding unnecessary administration of propofol and for providing adequate sedation during endoscopic procedures.

Patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with remifentanil-propofol mixture for colonoscopy

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia and sedation (PCAS) with remifentanil-propofol mixture for colonoscopy.

METHODS: Eighty patients were randomly allocated into either a PCAS group or a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) group. In the PCAS group, remifentanil-propofol mixture was pumped at 0.01 mL/(kg•min) after an initial bolus of 3 mL of the mixture (1 mL mixture containing propofol 3 mg and remifentanil 10 μg). The amount of each bolus delivered was 1 mL and the lockout time was 1 min. In the TIVA group, patients received fentanyl 1 μg/kg, midazolam 0.02 mg/kg and propofol (dosage titrated). Cardiorespiratory parameters and auditory evoked response index (AAI) were continuously monitored during the procedure. Recovery from anesthesia was assessed with the Aldrete scale and the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the satisfaction of patients and endoscopists.

RESULTS: No statistical differences were observed in the VAS score of patients (9.58 vs 9.50) or satisfaction of endoscopists (9.43 vs 9.30) between the two groups. A significant decline in mean arterial blood pressure and AAI was recorded in the TIVA group (P < 0.05). Recovery time was significantly shorter in the PCAS group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: PCAS with remifentanil-propofol mixture provides better hemodynamic stability, lighter sedation and faster recovery compared with TIVA.

Endoscopic sedation: from training to performance

Adequate sedation and analgesia are considered essential requirements to relieve patient discomfort and pain and ultimately to improve the outcomes of modern gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. The willingness of patients to undergo sedation during endoscopy has increased steadily in recent years and standard sedation practices are needed for both patient safety and successful procedural outcomes. Therefore, regular training and education of healthcare providers is warranted. However, training curricula and guidelines for endoscopic sedation may have conflicts according to varying legal frameworks and/or social security systems of each country, and well-recognized endoscopic sedation training systems are not currently available in all endoscopy units. Although European and American curricula for endoscopic sedation have been extensively developed, general curricula and guidelines for each country and institution are also needed. In this review, an overview of recent curricula and guidelines for training and basic performance of endoscopic sedation is presented based on the current literature.