Multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing is clinically useful in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms

The utility of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing in tailoring the management of paediatric gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

AIM

To determine whether combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) testing led to a change in management of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was done in all patients who underwent MII-pH testing for GORD symptoms at Sydney Children's Hospital between 2008 and 2016. Changes to anti-reflux medications and referral for anti-reflux surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 365 patients, 260 (71.2%) of whom were on acid-suppressing therapy. The median age was 4.1 ± 4.8 years, 205 patients (56%) were males, 83 (22.7%) were infants (<1 year of age) and 145 (39.7%%) had comorbid conditions. We found 72.1% had abnormal MII-pH results, of which 17.5% had abnormal acid reflux, 8.2% had abnormal number of retrograde bolus movements and 46.3% had hypersensitive oesophagus (positive symptom association only). Infants were significantly more likely to have abnormal MII-pH results compared to older children (P = .04). Results of MII-pH testing led to medication changes in 44.7% and referral for anti-reflux surgery in 6.8% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH testing is clinically useful in the management of children with symptoms of GORD and over half the patients had changes to their medical treatment or referral for anti-reflux surgery based on the results of MII-pH testing. It resulted in a treatment change in an additional 32% of patients over traditional pH-metry.

Does Combined Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH (MII-pH) Testing Improve Clinical Outcomes in Children With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate the role of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) testing in clinical management of children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by exploring the impact of treatment changes made based on MII-pH testing results on symptoms and quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

All patients (<18 years) referred to the Sydney Children's Hospital for MII-pH testing were recruited. Patients were classified by acid suppression therapy (AST) status (on AST and off AST) and changes in medical and surgical management were evaluated. Validated questionnaires (Pediatric Gastroesophageal Symptom and Quality of Life Questionnaire and Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised) were administered at baseline at the time of MII-pH testing, and 4 weeks after treatment changes were made and questionnaire scores were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 45 patients recruited, 24 patients (53.3%) were off AST and 21 patients (46.7%) were on AST. MII-pH testing led to medication changes in 30 patients (66.7%). This included 15 of 24 (62.5%) in those off AST and 15 of 21 (71.4%) in those on AST. More than 98% of patients who had treatment changes showed a significant improvement in both symptoms and quality of life scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is one of the first pediatric studies to evaluate the clinical validity of MII-pH testing in the pediatric population referred for suspected GERD, and its ability in guiding clinical management. Our study has shown that treatment decisions guided by and based on results of MII-pH testing led to a significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life in infants and children with GERD.

Diagnostic yield of ambulatory oesophageal studies on versus off proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms despite proton pump inhibitors are increasingly encountered. It remains controversial if proton pump inhibitors should be stopped before functional oesophageal tests.

AIM

This meta-analysis compares the positive yield of oesophageal studies performed off versus on proton pump inhibitors.

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Outcomes assessed were the number of subjects with: elevated oesophageal acid exposure time when studied off versus on proton pump inhibitors; positive symptom index (≥50%) and/or positive symptom association probability (≥95%) for acid reflux; and/or non-acid reflux events off versus on proton pump inhibitors. The random effects model was applied.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (n = 5033 individuals; 33% on proton pump inhibitors; 32% men; mean age 52.1 years) were analysed. Pooled risk ratio for the comparison of high oesophageal acid exposure time off versus on proton pump inhibitors was 2.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-3.28). The risk ratio of a positive symptom index (acid reflux) was 2.64 (95% CI 1.52-4.57) and the risk ratio of a positive symptom association probability (acid reflux) was 2.94 (95% CI 2.31-3.74). Conversely, the risk ratio of a positive symptom index (non-acid reflux) was 0.96 (95% CI 0.49-1.88) and risk ratio of a positive symptom association probability (non-acid reflux) was 0.54 (95% CI 0.30-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal studies after proton pump inhibitor cessation improve the positive yield for acid reflux-related events but reduce the detection of symptomatic non-acid reflux events.

Esophageal Impedance Monitoring: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls

The development of intraluminal esophageal impedance monitoring has improved our ability to detect and measure gastroesophageal reflux without dependence on acid content. This ability to detect previously unrecognized weak or nonacid reflux episodes has had important clinical implications in the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In addition, with the ability to assess bolus transit within the esophageal lumen, impedance monitoring has enhanced the recognition and characterization of esophageal motility disorders in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia. The assessment of the intraluminal movement of gas and liquid has also been proven to be of diagnostic value in conditions such as rumination syndrome and excessive belching. Further, alternative applications of impedance monitoring, such as the measurement of mucosal impedance, have provided novel insights into assessing esophageal mucosal integrity changes as a consequence of inflammatory change. Future applications for esophageal impedance monitoring also hold promise in esophageal conditions other than GERD. However, despite all of the clinical benefits afforded by esophageal impedance monitoring, important clinical and technical shortcomings limit its diagnostic value and must be considered when interpreting study results. Overinterpretation of studies or application of impedance monitoring in patients can have deleterious clinical implications. This review will highlight the clinical benefits and limitations of esophageal impedance monitoring and provide clinical pearls and pitfalls associated with this technology.