Preprocedural rabeprazole treatment before endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms

Standard and double-dose intravenous proton pump inhibitor injections for prevention of bleeding after endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic resection is commonly used to remove gastric neoplasms. However, effective dosing or scheduling of proton pump inhibitors for the prevention of delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection remains unclear.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-six patients with gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer were enrolled. After an endoscopic procedure, each subject was randomly assigned to 40 mg every 24 h (standard dose group) or 40 mg every 12 h (double-dose group) of intravenous pantoprazole for 48 h. Second-look endoscopy was performed on day 2 after endoscopic resection to compare signs of rebleeding and ulcer status between the two groups.

RESULT

Eighty-one patients of the standard dose group and 81 of the double-dose group were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the incidence of delayed bleeding events (1.3% vs 6.2%, P = 0.21) and bleeding ulcer at the second-look endoscopy (6.2% vs 3.9%, P = 0.69) between standard and double-dose groups. There were no other significant variables associated with delayed bleeding or bleeding ulcer on second-look endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg every 24 h or 12 h for 2 days after endoscopic resection was equally effective for the prevention of delayed bleeding.

Risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Postprocedural bleeding (PPB) is the most common adverse event associated with endoscopic resection. Several studies have tried to identify risk factors for PPB after gastric EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), with controversial results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify significant risk factors for PPB after gastric EMR and ESD.

METHODS

Three online databases were searched. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was computed for each risk factor using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q test and I(2).

RESULTS

Seventy-four articles were included. Pooled PPB rate was 5.1% (95% confidence interval, 4.5%-5.7%), which did not vary according to different study designs. Male sex (OR, 1.25), cardiopathy (OR, 1.54), antithrombotic drugs (OR, 1.63), cirrhosis (OR, 1.76), chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.38), tumor size > 20 mm (OR, 2.70), resected specimen size > 30 mm (OR, 2.85), localization in the lesser curvature (OR, 1.74), flat/depressed morphology (OR, 1.43), carcinoma histology (OR, 1.46), and ulceration (OR, 1.64) were identified as significant risk factors for PPB, whereas age, hypertension, submucosal invasion, fibrosis, and localization (upper, middle, or lower third) were not. Procedure duration > 60 minutes (OR, 2.05) and the use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists instead of proton pump inhibitors (OR, 2.13) were the procedural factors associated with PPB, whereas endoscopist experience and preprocedural proton pump inhibitors were not. Second-look endoscopy was not associated with decreased PPB (OR, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, .85-2.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for PPB were identified that can help to guide management after gastric ESD, namely adjusting further management. Second-look endoscopy is not associated with decreased PPB.

Effects of preoperative proton pump inhibitor administration on bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The efficacy of using proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) prior to gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to reduce gastric bleeding remains controversial. This study aimed to systematically review the literature to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative PPI use to reduce post-ESD bleeding.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane library, and the Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi database were searched to identify randomized trials eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Data from four studies (406 patients) were combined to calculate a pooled risk difference (RD) for developing post-ESD bleeding.

RESULTS

Compared with patients who received no premedication, the pooled RD for post-ESD bleeding in patients who received preoperavive PPI was -0.027 (95% confidence interval: -0.070-0.017, p = 0.228), without significant heterogeneity. Preoperavive PPI use significantly increased gastric pH (weighted mean difference: 1.289, 95% CI: 0.227-2.352, p = 0.0174).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that premedication with PPI had no advantage for the prevention of post-ESD bleeding, despite increasing gastric pH.