1
|
Quality indicators for capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:693-711. [PMID: 36175176 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Capsule endoscopy (CE) and deep enteroscopy (DE) can be useful for diagnosing and treating suspected small-bowel disease. Guidelines and detailed recommendations exist for the use of CE/DE, but comprehensive quality indicators are lacking. The goal of this task force was to develop quality indicators for appropriate use of CE/DE by using a modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. METHODS An expert panel of 7 gastroenterologists with diverse practice experience was assembled to identify quality indicators. A literature review was conducted to develop a list of proposed quality indicators applicable to preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure periods. The panelists reviewed the literature; identified and modified proposed quality indicators; rated them on the basis of scientific evidence, validity, and necessity; and determined proposed performance targets. Agreement and consensus with the proposed indicators were verified using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS The voting procedure to prioritize metrics emphasized selecting measures to improve quality and overall patient care. Panelists rated indicators on the perceived appropriateness and necessity for clinical practice. After voting and discussion, 2 quality indicators ranked as inappropriate or uncertain were excluded. Each quality indicator was categorized by measure type, performance target, and summary of evidence. The task force identified 13 quality indicators for CE and DE. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive quality indicators have not existed for CE or DE. The task force identified quality indicators that can be incorporated into clinical practice. The panel also addressed existing knowledge gaps and posed research questions to better inform future research and quality guidelines for these procedures.
Collapse
|
2
|
Quality Indicators for Capsule Endoscopy and Deep Enteroscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1780-1796. [PMID: 36155365 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Capsule endoscopy (CE) and deep enteroscopy (DE) can be useful for diagnosing and treating suspected small-bowel disease. Guidelines and detailed recommendations exist for the use of CE/DE, but comprehensive quality indicators are lacking. The goal of this task force was to develop quality indicators for appropriate use of CE/DE by using a modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. METHODS An expert panel of 7 gastroenterologists with diverse practice experience was assembled to identify quality indicators. A literature review was conducted to develop a list of proposed quality indicators applicable to preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure periods. The panelists reviewed the literature; identified and modified proposed quality indicators; rated them on the basis of scientific evidence, validity, and necessity; and determined proposed performance targets. Agreement and consensus with the proposed indicators were verified using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS The voting procedure to prioritize metrics emphasized selecting measures to improve quality and overall patient care. Panelists rated indicators on the perceived appropriateness and necessity for clinical practice. After voting and discussion, 2 quality indicators ranked as inappropriate or uncertain were excluded. Each quality indicator was categorized by measure type, performance target, and summary of evidence. The task force identified 13 quality indicators for CE and DE. DISCUSSION Comprehensive quality indicators have not existed for CE or DE. The task force identified quality indicators that can be incorporated into clinical practice. The panel also addressed existing knowledge gaps and posed research questions to better inform future research and quality guidelines for these procedures.
Collapse
|
3
|
Piccirelli S, Mussetto A, Bellumat A, Cannizzaro R, Pennazio M, Pezzoli A, Bizzotto A, Fusetti N, Valiante F, Hassan C, Pecere S, Koulaouzidis A, Spada C. New Generation Express View: An Artificial Intelligence Software Effectively Reduces Capsule Endoscopy Reading Times. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12081783. [PMID: 35892494 PMCID: PMC9332221 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reading capsule endoscopy (CE) is time-consuming. The Express View (EV) (IntroMedic, Seoul, Korea) software was designed to shorten CE video reading. Our primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EV in detecting significant small-bowel (SB) lesions. We also compared the reading times with EV mode and standard reading (SR). METHODS: 126 patients with suspected SB bleeding and/or suspected neoplasia were prospectively enrolled and underwent SB CE (MiroCam®1200, IntroMedic, Seoul, Korea). CE evaluation was performed in standard and EV mode. In case of discrepancies between SR and EV readings, a consensus was reached after reviewing the video segments and the findings were re-classified. RESULTS: The completion rate of SB CE in our cohort was 86.5% and no retention occurred. The per-patient analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EV compared to SR were 86%, 86%, 90%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, before consensus. After consensus, they increased to 97%, 100%, 100%, 96%, and 98%, respectively. The median reading time with SR and EV was 71 min (range 26−340) and 13 min (range 3−85), respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The new-generation EV shows high diagnostic accuracy and significantly reduces CE reading times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Piccirelli
- Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (S.P.); (A.B.); (C.S.)
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Marco Pennazio
- Division of Gastroenterology, University City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10121 Turin, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Pezzoli
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Sant’Anna University Hospital, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (A.P.); (N.F.)
| | - Alessandra Bizzotto
- Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (S.P.); (A.B.); (C.S.)
| | - Nadia Fusetti
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Sant’Anna University Hospital, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; (A.P.); (N.F.)
| | | | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy;
| | - Silvia Pecere
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Department of Medicine, Odense University Hospital Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Surgical Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy; (S.P.); (A.B.); (C.S.)
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beg S, Card T, Sidhu R, Wronska E, Ragunath K. The impact of reader fatigue on the accuracy of capsule endoscopy interpretation. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:1028-1033. [PMID: 34016545 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Capsule endoscopy (CE) interpretation requires the review of many thousands of images, with lesions often limited to just a few frames. In this study we aim to determine whether lesion detection declines according to the number of capsule videos read. METHODS 32 participants, 16 of which were novices (NR) and 16 experienced (ER) capsule readers took part in this prospective evaluation study. Participants read six capsule cases with a variety of lesions, in a randomly assigned order during a single sitting. Psychomotor Vigilance Tests and Fatigue Scores were recorded prior to commencing and then after every two capsules read. Changes in lesion detection and measures of fatigue were assessed across the duration of the study. RESULTS Mean agreement with the predefined lesions was 48.3% (SD:16.1), and 21.3% (SD:15.1) for the experienced and novice readers respectively. Lesion detection declined amongst experienced reader after the first study (p = 0.01), but remained stable after subsequent capsules read, while NR accuracy was unaffected by capsule numbers read. Objective measures of fatigue did not correlate with reading accuracy. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that reader accuracy declines after reading just one capsule study. Subjective and objective measures of fatigue were not sufficient to predict the onset of the effects of fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Beg
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Card
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Ewa Wronska
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute‒Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krish Ragunath
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Phillips F, Beg S. Video capsule endoscopy: pushing the boundaries with software technology. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:17. [PMID: 33409411 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2020.02.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) has transformed imaging of the small bowel as it is a non-invasive and well tolerated modality with excellent diagnostic capabilities. The way we read VCE has not changed much since its introduction nearly two decades ago. Reading is still very time intensive and prone to reader error. This review outlines the evidence regarding software enhancements which aim to address these challenges. These include the suspected blood indicator (SBI), automated fast viewing modes including QuickView, lesion characterization tools such Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement, and three-dimensional (3D) representation tools. We also outline the exciting new evidence of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL), which promises to revolutionize capsule reading. DL algorithms have been developed for identifying organs of origin, intestinal motility events, active bleeding, coeliac disease, polyp detection, hookworms and angioectasias, all with impressively high sensitivity and accuracy. More recently, an algorithm has been created to detect multiple abnormalities with a sensitivity of 99.9% and reading time of only 5.9 minutes. These algorithms will need to be validated robustly. However, it will not be long before we see this in clinical practice, aiding the clinician in rapid and accurate diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Phillips
- Department of Gastroenterology, NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, Queens Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sabina Beg
- Department of Gastroenterology, NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, Queens Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beg S, Wronska E, Araujo I, González Suárez B, Ivanova E, Fedorov E, Aabakken L, Seitz U, Rey JF, Saurin JC, Tari R, Card T, Ragunath K. Use of rapid reading software to reduce capsule endoscopy reading times while maintaining accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:1322-1327. [PMID: 31981645 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS A typical capsule endoscopy (CE) case generates tens of thousands of images, with abnormalities often confined to a just few frames. Omni Mode is a novel EndoCapsule software algorithm (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) that proposes to intelligently remove duplicate images while maintaining accuracy in lesion detection. METHODS This prospective multicenter study took place across 9 European centers. Consecutive, unselected CE cases were read conventionally in normal mode, with every captured frame reviewed. Cases were subsequently anonymized and randomly allocated to another center where they were read using Omni Mode. Detected lesions and reading times were recorded, with findings compared between both viewing modes. The clinical significance of lesions was described according to the P classification (P0, P1, and P2). Where a discrepancy in lesion detection in either mode was found, expert blinded review at a consensus meeting was undertaken. RESULTS The patient population undergoing CE had a mean age of 49.5 years (range, 18-91), with the investigation of anemia or GI bleeding accounting for 71.8% of cases. The average small-bowel transit time was 4 hours, 26 minutes. The mean reading time in normal mode was 42.5 minutes. The use of Omni Mode was significantly faster (P < .0001), with an average time saving of 24.6 minutes (95% confidence interval, 22.8-26.9). The 2127 lesions were identified and classified according to the P classification as P0 (1234), P1 (656), and P2 (237). Lesions were identified using both reading modes in 40% (n = 936), and 1186 lesions were identified by either normal or Omni Mode alone. Normal mode interpretation was associated with 647 lesions being missed, giving an accuracy of .70. Omni Mode interpretation led to 539 lesions being missed, with an accuracy of .75. There was no significant difference in clinical conclusions made between either reading mode. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that CE reading times can be reduced by an average of 40%, without any reduction in clinical accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Beg
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ewa Wronska
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Isis Araujo
- Gastroenterology Department, ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Begona González Suárez
- Gastroenterology Department, ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ekaterina Ivanova
- Department of Gastroenterology, Moscow University Hospital N31, Pirogov Russia National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Evgeny Fedorov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Moscow University Hospital N31, Pirogov Russia National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Lars Aabakken
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Uwe Seitz
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heppenheim, Germany
| | - Jean-Francois Rey
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, Institut Arnault Tzanck, St. Laurent du Var, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Roberto Tari
- Gastroenterology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy
| | - Tim Card
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Krish Ragunath
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Le Berre C, Trang-Poisson C, Bourreille A. Small bowel capsule endoscopy and treat-to-target in Crohn's disease: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:4534-4554. [PMID: 31496630 PMCID: PMC6710184 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crohn’s disease (CD) can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract. Proximal small bowel (SB) lesions are associated with a significant risk of stricturing disease and multiple abdominal surgeries. The assessment of SB in patients with CD is therefore necessary because it may have a significant impact on prognosis with potential therapeutic implications. Because of the weak correlation that exists between symptoms and endoscopic disease activity, the “treat-to-target” paradigm has been developed, and the associated treatment goal is to achieve and maintain deep remission, encompassing both clinical and endoscopic remission. Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) allows to visualize the mucosal surface of the entire SB. At that time, there is no recommendation regarding the use of SBCE during follow-up.
AIM To investigate the impact of SBCE in a treat-to-target strategy in patients with CD.
METHODS An electronic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane library using the following search terms: “capsule endoscopy”, in combination with “Crohn’s disease” and “treat-to-target” or synonyms. Two authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts identified by the search strategy after duplicates were removed. Following the initial screening of abstracts, all articles containing information about SBCE in the context of treat-to-target strategy in patients with CD were included. Full-text articles were retrieved, reference lists were screened manually to identify additional studies.
RESULTS Forty-seven articles were included in this review. Two indexes are currently used to quantify disease activity using SBCE, and there is good correlation between them. SBCE was shown to be useful for disease reclassification in patients who are suspected of having or who are diagnosed with CD, with a significant incremental diagnostic yield compared to other diagnostic modalities. Nine studies also demonstrated that the mucosal healing can be evaluated by SBCE to monitor the effect of medical treatment in patients with CD. This review also demonstrated that SBCE can detect post-operative recurrence to a similar extent as ileocolonoscopy, and proximal SB lesions that are beyond the reach of the colonoscope in over half of the patients.
CONCLUSION SBCE could be incorporated in the treat-to-target algorithm for patients with CD. Randomized controlled trials are required to confirm its usefulness and reliability in this indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Le Berre
- Institut des Maladies de l’Appareil Digestif, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes 44093, France
| | - Caroline Trang-Poisson
- Institut des Maladies de l’Appareil Digestif, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes 44093, France
| | - Arnaud Bourreille
- Institut des Maladies de l’Appareil Digestif, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes 44093, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beg S, Parra-Blanco A, Ragunath K. Optimising the performance and interpretation of small bowel capsule endoscopy. Frontline Gastroenterol 2018; 9:300-308. [PMID: 30245793 PMCID: PMC6145435 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 09/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Small bowel capsule endoscopy has become a commonly used tool in the investigation of gastrointestinal symptoms and is now widely available in clinical practice. In contrast to conventional endoscopy, there is a lack of clear consensus on when competency is achieved or the way in which capsule endoscopy should be performed in order to maintain quality and clinical accuracy. Here we explore the evidence on the key factors that influence the quality of small bowel capsule endoscopy services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Beg
- Department of Gastroenterology, NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, Queens Medical Centre campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adolfo Parra-Blanco
- Department of Gastroenterology, NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, Queens Medical Centre campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Krish Ragunath
- Department of Gastroenterology, NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, Queens Medical Centre campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mitselos IV, Christodoulou DK. What defines quality in small bowel capsule endoscopy. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:260. [PMID: 30094246 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Small bowel capsule endoscopy is considered a first-line diagnostic tool for the investigation of small bowel diseases. Gastroenterological and endoscopic societies have proposed and established measures known as quality indicators, quality measures or performance measures for the majority of endoscopic procedures, in order to ensure competence, healthcare quality and define areas requiring improvement. However, there is a paucity of publications describing small bowel capsule endoscopy quality indicators. Hereby, we attempt to identify and describe a number of pre-procedure, intra-procedure and post-procedure quality indicators, regarding process measures in small bowel capsule endoscopy, after a comprehensive review of the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis V Mitselos
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Ioannina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitrios K Christodoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Ioannina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dreanic J, Barret M, Dhooge M, Gaudric M, Leblanc S, Abitbol V, Prat F, Chaussade S, Coriat R. Small bowel capsule endoscopy: May we delegate it to nurses? Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2018; 42:168-173. [PMID: 29239850 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM Small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) is a non-invasive and validated technique allowing the visualization of the small intestine mucosa. It generated more than 40,000 images per examination and induced a long median time of medical reading that may exceed 1 hour. In a transfer of skills' program, the CE reading might be transferred to nurses. We herein evaluate and present a feasibility study of the CE to nurses. METHODS Nurses experienced in endoscopy were trained for small bowel CE reading, selection and interpretation of pathological images. Two strategies were experienced: a partial delegation to nurses, restricted to the selection of picture and an interpretation of the selected pictures by experts in CE (strategy A) or a total delegation including the selection of pictures, their interpretation, and the realization of a report (strategy B). Nurses were volunteers to participate to the study. Strategies were compared to the reference procedure (control) and a blinded analysis of the CE by experts was performed. Selection of pictures and their interpretation were timely evaluated in all strategies. The stomach and small intestine transit times and the reading time were recorded. The accuracy of the whole CE interpretation was compared. Experts reviewed all discordant interpretations. RESULTS The extent of transit time in the stomach and the small intestine, and the identification of a normal endoscopic examination were not statistically different between strategy A and control (P=0.71). The accuracy of reports from strategy A and control was 95% (P=0.9). In one case, a nurse has not selected the pathological image, corresponding to a duodenal ulcer. The median medical time for reading was significantly shorter in strategy A than in control (9.2min [range: 4-20] vs 34.0min [range: 10-60]; P<0.01). The accuracy of reports performed by nurses in strategy B was 80% (P=0.11). In 4 cases, the medical interpretation in strategy B was discordant. The discrepancy was due to a lack of pathological images' selection of the selected pictures for the final report (n=1) and a lack of interpretation (n=3). The median time for analysis was not significantly different between strategy B and control (34.7 [range: 10-75] versus 34.0min [range: 15-60]; P=0.53). CONCLUSION In small bowel CE, a pre-selection of pathological images by a trained nurse could be integrated in a transfer of skills' program and appeared feasible. The gain of time for the gastroenterologists is significant and reduced the medical time for reading from 34 to 9minutes per examination. Meantime, an overall delegation of small bowel CE to nurses suffered for a lack of efficacy. Our study paved the way for a nurse' training program in the pre-selection and identification of CE images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johann Dreanic
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Marion Dhooge
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Marianne Gaudric
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Sarah Leblanc
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Vered Abitbol
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Frederic Prat
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Stanislas Chaussade
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Gastroenterology and endoscopy unit, hôpital Cochin, faculté de médecine, université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shim KN, Jeon SR, Jang HJ, Kim J, Lim YJ, Kim KO, Song HJ, Lee HS, Park JJ, Kim JH, Chun J, Park SJ, Yang DH, Min YW, Keum B, Lee BI. Quality Indicators for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy. Clin Endosc 2017; 50:148-160. [PMID: 28391667 PMCID: PMC5398361 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2017.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Capsule endoscopy (CE) enables evaluation of the entire mucosal surface of the small bowel (SB), which is one of the most important steps for evaluating obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Although the diagnostic yield of SB CE depends on many clinical factors, there are no reports on quality indicators. Thus, the Korean Gut Image Study Group (KGISG) publishes an article titled, “Quality Indicators for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy” under approval from the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE). Herein, we initially identified process quality indicators, while the structural and outcome indicators are reserved until sufficient clinical data are accumulated. We believe that outcomes of SB CE can be improved by trying to meet our proposed quality indicators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki-Nam Shim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ran Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine,Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Joo Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Jinsu Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yun Jeong Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyeong Ok Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyun Joo Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
| | - Hyun Seok Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jae Jun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jaeyoung Chun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Jung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yang Won Min
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bora Keum
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bo-In Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jensen MD, Brodersen JB, Kjeldsen J. Capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis and follow up of Crohn's disease: a comprehensive review of current status. Ann Gastroenterol 2016; 30:168-178. [PMID: 28243037 PMCID: PMC5320029 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2016.0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Capsule endoscopy (CE) has revolutionized the diagnosis and monitoring of small bowel Crohn’s disease (CD). The procedure is patient friendly and noninvasive, and compared to cross-sectional imaging, CE allows a direct and detailed evaluation of the entire small bowel mucosa with a high sensitivity for the earliest lesions of CD. Today, CE is the leading modality for visualizing the small bowel in suspected CD, and validated activity indices are available for the follow up of patients with established CD. CE of the entire gastrointestinal tract (panenteric CE) was recently introduced as a new diagnostic approach in patients examined for CD, and preliminary results are promising. There are important limitations, involving mainly capsule retention. Furthermore, a diagnostic criterion for CD has never been validated, and lesions detected by CE are not specific for CD. Hence, concern has been raised about a low specificity compared to other diagnostic modalities. Important questions about the optimal bowel preparation, selection of patients for CE and the optimal reading protocol remain to be clarified. The aim of this review is to evaluate the performance of CE for diagnosing CD and assess disease activity in known CD; to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CE to that of cross-sectional imaging; to discuss limitations; and to define the place of CE in the diagnostic algorithm in suspected or known CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Dam Jensen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Lillebaelt Hospital Vejle (Michael Dam Jensen)
| | - Jacob Broder Brodersen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Hospital of Southwest Jutland, Esbjerg (Jacob Broder Brodersen)
| | - Jens Kjeldsen
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense (Jens Kjeldsen), Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McAlindon ME, Ching HL, Yung D, Sidhu R, Koulaouzidis A. Capsule endoscopy of the small bowel. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2016; 4:369. [PMID: 27826572 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.09.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a first line small bowel investigative modality which provides more sensitive mucosal imaging than comparators. It is a non-invasive, non-irradiating tool well tolerated by patients. The risk of retention of the capsule can be minimised by ensuring luminal patency using the Agile patency device. Research continues into how to minimise missed pathology and variability in the identification of pathology or interpretation of images. The consensus is that bowel preparation using laxatives improves visibility and diagnostic yield. Research includes the development of image recognition software, both to eliminate sequentially identical images to improve viewing speed and to select or enhance images likely to represent pathology. However, careful reading by experienced capsule endoscopists remains the benchmark. This should be performed at a speed comfortable to the viewer, probably at a maximum of 15 frames per second. Some prior experience of endoscopy appears to be helpful for novice capsule endoscopists and formal training on a hands-on training course seems to improve pathology recognition, for novices and for those with CE experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E McAlindon
- Gastroenterology & Liver Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hey-Long Ching
- Gastroenterology & Liver Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Diana Yung
- Endoscopy Unit, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Gastroenterology & Liver Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Optimizing the interpretation of capsule endoscopic images: shortsighted or taking the long view? Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:1519-21. [PMID: 25724167 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3601-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|