Extensive Disease Subtypes in Adult Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Non-pancolitis Versus Pancolitis

Characteristics and Outcomes of Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis With a Cecal/Periappendiceal Patch of Inflammation

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by continuous mucosal inflammation of the rectum, extending uninterrupted to a variable portion of the colon proximally. However, in some patients with distal colitis, a distinct pattern of skip inflammation (so-called patch) involves the cecum and/or appendiceal orifice, but data on this entity are contradictory, and its significance and prognosis are still debated. We identified 102 adult cases of left-sided UC with a cecal/periappendiceal patch and compared them to 102 controls (left-sided UC only) along clinicopathologic characteristics and disease outcomes. In multivariate analysis, patients with a patch were younger (median age: 31 vs. 41 y; P =0.004) and more likely to have rectosigmoid involvement only (58.8% vs. 28.4%; P <0.001), compared with patients without a patch. During follow-up, patients with a patch were more likely to be eventually diagnosed with Crohn disease (CD) (9.8% vs. 1.0%; P =0.022) and to show proximal extension of inflammation (35.6% vs. 10.0%; P =0.021), but showed no differences in rates of neoplasia, colectomy, or pharmacotherapy escalation. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed that patients with a biopsy diagnosis of cecal/periappendiceal patch were more likely to show proximal disease extension ( P <0.001) and to be diagnosed with CD ( P =0.008). In conclusion, cecal/periappendiceal skip inflammation in left-sided UC occurs more often in younger patients and in those with rectosigmoid involvement and is associated with proximal disease extension and, in a small fraction of cases, change of diagnosis to CD. However, it does not portend increased risk of neoplasia, pharmacotherapy escalation, or subsequent colectomy, compared with patients with left-sided UC only.

Utilizing Deep Learning to Analyze Whole Slide Images of Colonic Biopsies for Associations Between Eosinophil Density and Clinicopathologic Features in Active Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophils have been implicated in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis and have been associated with disease course and therapeutic response. However, associations between eosinophil density, histologic activity, and clinical features have not been rigorously studied.

METHODS

A deep learning algorithm was trained to identify eosinophils in colonic biopsies and validated against pathologists' interpretations. The algorithm was applied to sigmoid colon biopsies from a cross-sectional cohort of 88 ulcerative colitis patients with histologically active disease as measured by the Geboes score and Robarts histopathology index (RHI). Associations between eosinophil density, histologic activity, and clinical features were determined.

RESULTS

The eosinophil deep learning algorithm demonstrated almost perfect agreement with manual eosinophil counts determined by 4 pathologists (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.805-0.917). Eosinophil density varied widely across patients (median 113.5 cells per mm2, interquartile range 108.9). There was no association between eosinophil density and RHI (P = 0.5). Significant differences in eosinophil density were seen between patients with Montreal E3 vs E2 disease (146.2 cells per mm2 vs 88.2 cells per mm2, P = 0.005). Patients on corticosteroids had significantly lower eosinophil density (62.9 cells per mm2 vs 124.1 cells per mm2, P = 0.006). No association between eosinophil density and biologic use was observed (P = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a deep learning algorithm to quantify eosinophils in colonic biopsies. Eosinophil density did not correlate with histologic activity but did correlate with disease extent and corticosteroid use. Future studies applying this algorithm in larger cohorts with longitudinal follow-up are needed to further elucidate the role of eosinophils in ulcerative colitis.

Comparative effectiveness of second-line biological therapies for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in patients with prior failure of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased since the introduction of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors a few decades ago. However, direct comparisons of the effectiveness of second-line biological agents in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are lacking.

METHODS

Patients with UC or CD who experienced anti-TNF treatment failure and subsequently used vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib as a second-line drug were retrospectively recruited. The primary outcomes were the clinical remission rate at week 16 and the cumulative relapse rate 48 weeks after receiving induction therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients with UC or CD experienced anti-TNF treatment failure and received vedolizumab (UC: 37; CD: 28), ustekinumab (CD: 16), or tofacitinib (UC: 13). The clinical remission rates were not significantly different between the vedolizumab and tofacitinib groups in UC patients (56.8% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.509). In CD patients, the clinical remission rates were not significantly different between the vedolizumab and ustekinumab groups (53.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.820). Moreover, the cumulative rates of clinical relapse were not significantly different between the vedolizumab and tofacitinib groups in UC patients and between the vedolizumab and ustekinumab groups in CD patients (p = 0.396 and p = 0.692, respectively). Safety profiles were also similar among the treatment groups in both UC and CD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

After prior anti-TNF therapy failure, vedolizumab and tofacitinib in UC patients and vedolizumab and ustekinumab in CD patients were not significantly different in terms of the efficacy in inducing and maintaining a clinical response.

Is fasting beneficial for hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel diseases?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are usually hospitalized because of aggravated gastrointestinal symptoms. Many clinicians empirically advise these patients to fast once they are admitted. However, there has been no evidence that maintaining a complete bowel rest improves the disease course. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of fasting on disease course in admitted patients with IBD or intestinal Behçet's disease.

METHODS

A total of 222 patients with IBD or intestinal Behçet's disease, who were admitted for disease-related symptoms, were retrospectively analyzed. We divided them into 2 groups: fasting group (allowed to take sips of water but no food at the time of admission) and dietary group (received liquid, soft, or general diet).

RESULTS

On admission, 124 patients (55.9%) started fasting and 98 patients (44.1%) started diet immediately. Among patients hospitalized through the emergency room, a significantly higher proportion underwent fasting (63.7% vs. 21.4%, P<0.001); however, 96.0% of the patients experienced dietary changes. Corticosteroid use (P<0.001; hazard ratio, 2.445; 95% confidence interval, 1.506-3.969) was significantly associated with a reduction in the disease activity score, although there was no significant difference between the fasting group and the dietary group in disease activity reduction (P=0.111) on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of disease activity reduction, there was no significant difference between the fasting and dietary groups in admitted patients with IBD, suggesting that imprudent fasting is not helpful in improving the disease course. Therefore, peroral diet should not be avoided unless not tolerated by the patient.

Risk factors and long-term outcome of disease extent progression in Asian patients with ulcerative colitis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The incidence of Ulcerative colitis (UC) in Asia is increasing but reports on its long-term course are few. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors predictive of extent progression in Asian patients with UC and to evaluate the clinical outcome by longitudinal follow-up.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 518 UC patients without ascending colon involvement at diagnosis who were regularly followed and underwent colonoscopy between 2003 and 2016 in an Asian tertiary referral center. Proximal disease extension and associated risk factors were analyzed.

Results

A total of 91 (17.6%) patients experienced proximal disease extension followed for a median period of 7.5 years. The median time for extent extension was 16.1 months (interquartile range (IQR) 8.3–42.2). The cumulative rate of disease extension was 9.9, 14.9, 19.6, 24.6 and 30.5% at 1,2,3,4 and 5 years after diagnosis. 43 (12.0%) patients with E1/E2 progressed to E3, and 40 (21.9%) with E1 progressed to E2. Of patients diagnosed with E3 involvement limited to the hepatic flexure distally, 8 (13.3%) progressed to pancolitis. Cox regression analysis found that disease extent at diagnosis was the sole predictor of disease extension (odds ratio (OR),1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18–2.57, p = 0.01). Proximal disease extension was associated with disease relapse (p = 0.03) and increased use of steroids and immunosuppressive agents (p <  0.01).

Conclusion

UC is a dynamic disease and that the disease extension in Asians was comparable to that in Caucasians. Proximal disease extension increased the risk of disease flare and treatment intensification.