Esophagogastric Junction Morphology on Hill's Classification Predicts Gastroesophageal Reflux with Good Accuracy and Consistency

Constructing an artificial intelligence-assisted system for the assessment of gastroesophageal valve function based on the hill classification (with video)

OBJECTIVE

In the functional assessment of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), the endoscopic Hill classification plays a pivotal role in classifying the morphology of the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV). This study aims to develop an artificial intelligence model for Hill classification to assist endoscopists in diagnosis, covering the entire process from model development, testing, interpretability analysis, to multi-terminal deployment.

METHOD

The study collected four datasets, comprising a total of 1143 GEFV images and 17 gastroscopic videos, covering Hill grades I, II, III, and IV. The images were preprocessed and enhanced, followed by transfer learning using a pretrained model based on CNN and Transformer architectures. The model training utilized a cross-entropy loss function, combined with the Adam optimizer, and implemented a learning rate scheduling strategy. When assessing model performance, metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were considered, and the diagnostic accuracy of the AI model was compared with that of endoscopists using McNemar's test, with a p-value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. To enhance model transparency, various interpretability analysis techniques were used, including t-SNE, Grad-CAM, and SHAP. Finally, the model was converted into ONNX format and deployed on multiple device terminals.

RESULTS

Compared through performance metrics, the EfficientNet-Hill model surpassed other CNN and Transformer models, achieving an accuracy of 83.32% on the external test set, slightly lower than senior endoscopists (86.51%) but higher than junior endoscopists (75.82%). McNemar's test showed a significant difference in classification performance between the model and junior endoscopists (p < 0.05), but no significant difference between the model and senior endoscopists (p ≥ 0.05). Additionally, the model reached precision, recall, and F1 scores of 84.81%, 83.32%, and 83.95%, respectively. Despite its overall excellent performance, there were still misclassifications. Through interpretability analysis, key areas of model decision-making and reasons for misclassification were identified. Finally, the model achieved real-time automatic Hill classification at over 50fps on multiple platforms.

CONCLUSION

By employing deep learning to construct the EfficientNet-Hill AI model, automated Hill classification of GEFV morphology was achieved, aiding endoscopists in improving diagnostic efficiency and accuracy in endoscopic grading, and facilitating the integration of Hill classification into routine endoscopic reports and GERD assessments.

Phase concept: Novel dynamic endoscopic assessment of intramural antireflux mechanisms (with video)

OBJECTIVES

The gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) consists of various anatomical components that together form a barrier to prevent reflux of gastric content. This study introduces a novel phase concept to dynamically evaluate the antireflux barrier (ARB) during endoscopy and analyzes its functionality.

METHODS

We reviewed previously the recorded endoscopic videos of subjects who underwent the endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) from February to April 2024 for indications other than gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. This device was used as an auxiliary tool to measure intragastric pressure (IGP) during endoscopy with a retroflex view. The ARB dynamic was divided into three phases: Phase I (gastric phase), Phase II (lower esophageal sphincter phase), and Phase III (esophageal clearance phase). We evaluated the morphological changes in the ARB during insufflation using EPSIS.

RESULTS

The median age of the 30 subjects was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46.5-68.8), including 20 men and 10 women. Endoscopic findings and IGPs were recorded during the three phases. In Phase I, at low IGP (median 6.75 mmHg), the gastroesophageal flap valve and longitudinal folds were observed in 80% of cases. In Phase II, at moderate IGP (median 11.8 mmHg), the scope holding sign was observed in 86.7%. In Phase III, at high IGP (median 19 mmHg) inducing belching, peristalsis was observed in 80% of cases with median recovery time of 5 s.

CONCLUSION

The phase concept provides a valuable framework for understanding the antireflux mechanism. Further research is needed to validate these findings in GEJ disorders and explore correlations with other modalities.

Established and Novel Methods to Assess GERD: An Update

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common. Management of reflux symptoms includes medical and nonmedical interventions. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) continue to be considered first-line agents. Standard investigations to diagnose GERD include upper endoscopy, impedance-pH measurement or capsule-based pH measurements and high-resolution manometry. However, diagnosis can sometimes be difficult in individual cases when measurements yield borderline results. Combination of the three mentioned techniques is considered the diagnostic gold standard now.

Summary

Aside from the current measures considered gold standard, new measurement parameters, mostly focusing on impedance of the esophageal mucosa will help better diagnose GERD. Another promising new modality is the combination of wireless pH measurements and evaluation of esophageal motility and structural abnormalities using the endoscopic functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP). Artificial intelligence may play an increasingly supportive role.

Key Messages

GERD needs to be better diagnosed to avoid unnecessary or potentially harmful long-term acid suppression therapy or reflux surgery. A number of tools is under investigation. However, as of now they only have supportive value.

Value of endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve in gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the significance of endoscopic grading (Hill's classification) of gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) in the examination of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing gastroscopy in the Department of Gastroenterology, Xingyi People's Hospital between Apr. 2022 and Sept. 2022 were selected by convenient sampling, and data such as GEFV grade, and findings of esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and esophageal 24-h pH/impedance reflux monitoring, and Los Angeles (LA) classification of reflux esophagitis (RE) were collected and compared.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences in age (F = 9.711, P < 0.001) and hiatal hernia (χ = 35.729, P < 0.001) were observed in patients with different GEFV grades. The resting LES pressures were 12.12 ± 2.79, 10.73 ± 2.68, 9.70 ± 2.29, and 8.20 ± 2.77 mmHg (F = 4.571, P < 0.001) and LES lengths were 3.30 ± 0.70, 3.16 ± 0.68, 2.35 ± 0.83, and 2.45 ± 0.62 (F = 3.789, P = 0.011), respectively, in patients with GEFV grades I-IV. DeMeester score (Z = 5.452, P < 0.001), AET4 (Z = 5.614, P < 0.001), acid reflux score (upright) (Z = 7.452, P < 0.001), weak acid reflux score (upright) (Z = 3.121, P = 0.038), liquid reflux score (upright) (Z = 3.321, P = 0.031), acid reflux score (supine) (Z = 6.462, P < 0.001), mixed reflux score (supine) (Z = 3.324, P = 0.031), gas reflux score (supine) (Z = 3.521, P = 0.024) were different in patients with different GEFV grades, with statistically significant differences. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between RE grade and LA classification of GERD (r = 0.662, P < 0.001), and the severity of RE increased gradually with the increase of the Hill grades of GEFV.

CONCLUSION

The Hill grade of GEFV is related to age, hiatal hernia, LES pressure, and the consequent development and severity of acid reflux and RE. Evaluation of esophageal motility and reflux based on the Hill grade of GEFV is of significance for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.

Endoscopic Management Options for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition that affects a significant portion of the Western population. Despite its benign pathophysiology, it has the potential to cause serious complications over time, ranging from conditions that are benign, premalignant, and/or malignant. Traditional treatment options include lifestyle measures, anti-secretory medications (e.g., proton pump inhibitor (PPI)), and surgical options (e.g., Nissen and Toupet fundoplication). However, recent studies have revealed long-term side effects of anti-secretory medications. Moreover, surgical options, though effective, are considered invasive and associated with potential complications. In the current age of ongoing research in minimally invasive options, endoscopic treatment of GERD has become popular. As a result, procedures such as radiofrequency treatment and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) have gained FDA approval and are currently being covered by most insurance. In this review article, we will discuss pre-procedural workup, appropriate patient selection, advantages, disadvantages, procedure techniques, and follow-up of patients who undergo various endoscopic treatments for GERD. In addition, we will review the short and long-term success of these techniques in improving quality of life, use of PPI, and improvement in symptoms considering published data in high-quality peer-reviewed journals.

Correlation of the Endoscopic Gastroesophageal Flap Valve with Pathologic Reflux

BACKGROUND

The Hill classification characterizes the geometry of gastroesophageal junction and Hill grades (HGs) III and IV have a high association with pathologic reflux. This study aimed to understand the use of the Hill classification and correlate the prevalence of pathologic reflux across different HGs.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of 477 patients who underwent upper endoscopy and BRAVO pH monitoring between August 2018 and October 2021 was performed. These charts were reviewed for endoscopic findings for hiatal hernia and association of HGs with pathologic reflux, defined as an abnormal esophageal acid exposure time (AET) of ≥4.9%.

RESULTS

Of 477 patients, 252 (52.8%) had an HG documented on the endoscopy report. Of the 252 patients, 61 had HG I (24.2%), 100 had HG II (39.7%), 61 had HG III (24.2%), and 30 had HG IV (11.9%). The proportion of patients with abnormal AET increases with increasing HGs (p < 0.001) as follows: I (39.3%), II (52.5%), III (67.2%), and IV (79.3%). The mean overall AET is as follows: HG I (5.5 ± 6%), HG II (7.0 ± 5.9%), HG III (10.2 ± 10.3%), and HG IV (9.5 ± 5.5%). The proportion of patients with hiatal hernia was 18% for HG I, 28% for HG II, 39.3% for HG III, and 80% for HG IV.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the Hill classification in clinical practice is low. There is an association of increasing HGs with increasing proportion of patients with abnormal AET. There is a high proportion of patients within HGs I and II with documented pathologic reflux and the presence of a hiatal hernia as observed on endoscopic examination. Our study suggests that endoscopic grading of the gastroesophageal junction may not adequately differentiate between normal vs abnormal reflux status, particularly for HGs I and II.

Functional lumen imaging probe topography identifies patients with normal acid exposure and esophageal hypervigilance amongst proton-pump inhibitor non-responders

BACKGROUND

Multiple factors contribute to symptom generation and treatment response in proton-pump inhibitor non-responders (PPI-NRs). We aimed to test whether PPI-NRs with normal acid exposure have a higher degree of esophageal hypersensitivity and hypervigilance and can be identified using functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography at the time of endoscopy.

METHODS

Data from PPI-NRs whom underwent endoscopy, FLIP and wireless 96-h pH-metry were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped according to acid exposure time (AET) as (a) 0 days abnormal (AET > 6%), (b) 1-2 days abnormal, or (c) 3-4 days abnormal. The esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS) score and other symptom scores were compared between groups. The discriminatory ability of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility index (DI) and max EGJ diameter in identifying patients with 0 days abnormal AET was tested via receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

EHAS score was 38.6 in the 0 days abnormal AET group, 30.4 in the 1-2 days abnormal AET group (p = 0.073 when compared to 0 days abnormal) and 28.2 in the 3-4 days abnormal AET group (p = 0.031 when compared to 0 days abnormal). Area-under-the-curve (AUC) for the DI in association with 0 days AET > 6% was 0.629. A DI of < 2.8 mm2/mmHg had a sensitivity of 83.3%, and negative predictive value of 88% in classifying patients with 0 days abnormal acid exposure (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

FLIP complements prolonged wireless pH-metry in distinguishing the subset of PPI-NRs with completely normal acid exposure and a higher burden of esophageal hypervigilance. Proper identification of patients along the functional heartburn spectrum can improve overall surgical outcomes.

Medium-term clinical efficacy of endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy on laryngopharyngeal reflux: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Studies on the effect of antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) on laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) are lacking. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to explore the clinical efficacy of ARMS on LPRD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients diagnosed with LPRD by oropharyngeal 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring who underwent ARMS. The effects of ARMS on LPRD were evaluated by comparing the 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36), reflux symptom index (RSI), and 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring scores before and 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided into groups according to gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) grade to explore the effect of GEFV on prognosis.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three patients were included in the study. The oropharyngeal pH monitoring results showed that the effective rate of ARMS was 72.1% (132/183). After surgery, the SF-36 score was higher (P = .000), RSI score was lower (P = .000), and the symptoms of constant throat clearing; difficulty swallowing food, liquids, and pills; coughing after eating or after lying down; troublesome or annoying cough; and breathing difficulties or choking episodes were significantly improved (P < .05). Upright reflux was dominant in GEFV grade I to III patients, and the SF-36, RSI, and upright Ryan index scores were significantly improved after surgery (P < .05). In GEFV grade IV patients, regurgitation was dominant in the supine position, and the above evaluation indexes were worse after surgery (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

ARMS is effective for LPRD. The GEFV grade can predict the prognosis of surgery. ARMS is effective in GEFV grade I to III patients, but the effect is not exact in GEFV grade IV patients and may even be aggravated.

Using deep learning to assess the function of gastroesophageal flap valve according to the Hill classification system

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic Hill classification of the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) is of great importance for understanding the functional status of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Deep learning (DL) methods have been extensively employed in the area of digestive endoscopy. To improve the efficiency and accuracy of the endoscopist's Hill classification and assist in incorporating it into routine endoscopy reports and GERD assessment examinations, this study first employed DL to establish a four-category model based on the Hill classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dataset consisting of 3256 GEFV endoscopic images has been constructed for training and evaluation. Furthermore, a new attention mechanism module has been provided to improve the performance of the DL model. Combined with the attention mechanism module, numerous experiments were conducted on the GEFV endoscopic image dataset, and 12 mainstream DL models were tested and evaluated. The classification accuracy of the DL model and endoscopists with different experience levels was compared.

RESULTS

12 mainstream backbone networks were trained and tested, and four outstanding feature extraction backbone networks (ResNet-50, VGG-16, VGG-19, and Xception) were selected for further DL model development. The ResNet-50 showed the best Hill classification performance; its area under the curve (AUC) reached 0.989, and the classification accuracy (93.39%) was significantly higher than that of junior (74.83%) and senior (78.00%) endoscopists.

CONCLUSIONS

The DL model combined with the attention mechanism module in this paper demonstrated outstanding classification performance based on the Hill grading and has great potential for improving the accuracy of the Hill classification by endoscopists.

Predicting reflux symptom recurrence: The impact of gastroesophageal junction indicators and body mass index among outpatients

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the prediction model in predicting reflux symptom recurrence among outpatients with reflux esophagitis (RE). A total of 261 outpatients diagnosed with RE complicated by anatomical alterations at the gastroesophageal junction and reflux symptoms were included in the study. Through follow-up, patients were divided into a General group (149 cases) and a Recurrent group (112 cases). Receiver operating characteristic curves of the related factors and prediction model were analyzed to compare the efficacy of each element in predicting reflux recurrence. A prediction model was constructed for predicting reflux recurrence using the axial length of the hiatal hernia (HH), the diameter of the esophageal hiatus, Hill classification, and body mass index (BMI) as risk factors. The cutoff values of the aforementioned factors for predicting reflux recurrence were: an axial length of HH >2 cm, esophageal hiatus diameter ≥3 cm, Hill grade >III, and BMI >25.1 kg/m². The multivariate prediction model constructed using the aforementioned four indicators together with chronic atrophic gastritis and Helicobacter pylori infection had the area under the curve of 0.801 (95% confidence interval: 0.748-0.854), and the cutoff value of 46.8 had a sensitivity and specificity of 71.4% and 75.8%, respectively. The predictive model in the present study can be used for the primary assessment of reflux recurrence in patients with RE.

The American Foregut Society White Paper on the Endoscopic Classification of Esophagogastric Junction Integrity

Background:

The American Foregut Society (AFS) is dedicated to advancing patient care and digestive health within the realm of foregut disease. One of the most common and debilitating esophageal conditions is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The Hill grade is an endoscopic classification of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) based on the appearance of the gastroesophageal flap valve from a retroflexed view of the hiatus. This endoscopic classification provides insight into the anatomic disruption of the EGJ which has been shown to correlate with GERD. However, clinical utilization of this classification by endoscopists has been limited due to the perceived relevance and subjectivity of the classification. With the advent of endoscopic treatment options for GERD, there is renewed enthusiasm to develop a grading system of the EGJ that can objectively define anatomical impairment and reduce interobserver grading variability.

Methods:

The AFS convened a 13-member working group tasked with reviewing the Hill grade classification and formulating a proposal for its revision utilizing a modified Delphi method. This white paper summarizes the output from this working group.

Results:

The working group concluded that all components of the antireflux barrier—the lower esophageal sphincter and its sling fibers, the crural diaphragm, and the gastroesophageal flap valve—contribute to EGJ integrity. Using defined objective parameters of extent of hiatal axial herniation and crural disruption and presence or absence of a flap valve, the new AFS classification stratifies EGJ integrity from normal (grade 1) to increasing degrees of EGJ disruption (grade 2-4) beginning with loss of the flap valve and progressing to increasing degrees of crural disruption and hiatus hernia. This AFS classification also stipulates appropriate endoscopic methodology to utilize in making the assessment and provides a basic nomenclature for communication among endoscopists.

Conclusions:

The AFS endoscopic classification of the EGJ expands on the Hill classification by including assessment of axial hiatal hernia length (L), hiatal aperture diameter (D), and presence or absence of the flap valve (F) making it more comprehensive - LDF components. Future directions include validation studies correlating the ability of the AFS classification in predicting the presence and severity of GERD.

Clinical Endoscopic and Histologic Findings of a Long-Term Follow-Up (10.7 Years) After Roux-en-Y Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: a Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery, with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LYGB), is one of the most effective treatments for long-term weight loss. However, there are few publications concerning endoscopic evaluations at late control. The purpose was to evaluate the macroscopic and histological findings at the distal esophagus, gastric pouch, jejunal limb and the evolution of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in the long term.

METHODS

Cohort of 110 patients with obesity underwent LYGB in a university hospital. Several clinical, endoscopic and histological evaluations were performed after surgery. Exclusion criteria were previous bariatric procedure, hiatal hernia > 4 cm, BE with histological dysplasia and body mass index (BMI) > 50 kg/m².

RESULTS

Average age was 38.7 ± 9 years with 70% females. BMI averaged 39.6 ± 6 kg/m². Follow-up was 10.7 ± 2 years, and 18 patients (16.4%) were lost. The total weight loss was 23.4 ± 7 kg. Erosive esophagitis, present in 33% of patients, decreased to 5%. After surgery, intestinal metaplasia regressed to cardial mucosa in 5 of 8 patients. One patient developed a short-segment BE. The level of control to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom control was 87% to responders (Visick I-II) and 13% to non-responders (Visick III-IV). An increase in dilated cardia type III was observed (p < 0.001). The length of the gastric pouch increased significantly after surgery (p < 0.001). Anastomotic ulcers healed at 6 months with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, without recurrence.

CONCLUSION

LYGB is a very effective surgical procedure to control symptoms of GERD and/or endoscopic erosive esophagitis. Besides, regression of Barrett's mucosa to carditis occurred in 62%.

Association Between Gastroesophageal Flap Valve and Endoscopically Diagnosed Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease According to Lyon Consensus: A Meta-analysis of Asian Studies

BACKGROUND

Lyon Consensus altered the previous understanding of endoscopic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and pointed out that only high-grade reflux esophagitis (RE) [Los Angeles (LA) grades C or D], Barrett's esophagus or peptic stricturing were considered confirmatory evidence for GERD but low-grade RE (LA grades A or B) was regarded as suspected GERD. We aimed to summarize the possible relationship between gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) and endoscopic GERD according to Lyon Consensus using meta-analysis of studies done in Asia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comprehensive searches of PubMed, WOS, Embase, SinoMed, and CNKI databases were completed to identify eligible studies published before September 22, 2019. A total of 237 articles have been reviewed and 2 reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility for inclusion, extracted, and analyzed the statistical data. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were measured for the association. Random-effects models were used when observing significant heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included and we found that abnormal GEFV (III and IV) could be associated with RE and the correlation become stronger as the grade increases (RE-A vs. controls-RR: 2.186, 95% CI: 1.560-3.064, P<0.001; RE-B vs. RE-A-RR: 1.268, 95% CI: 1.128-1.425, P<0.001; RE-C vs. RE-B-RR: 1.181, 95% CI: 1.000-1.395, P=0.049; RE-D vs. RE-C-RR: 1.471, 95% CI: 1.151-1.879, P=0.002). Both suspected GERD (RR: 2.400, 95% CI: 1.761-3.271, P<0.001) and endoscopic GERD (RR: 1.388, 95% CI: 1.127-1.711, P=0.002) were related to abnormal GEFV.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal GEFV could provide useful information for reflux conditions, but it could not distinguish confirmatory GERD from low-grade RE under the upper endoscopy.

Therapeutic Endoscopy and the Esophagus: State of the Art and Future Directions

Therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy is rapidly evolving, and this evolution is quite apparent for esophageal diseases. Minimally invasive endoluminal therapy now allows outpatient treatment of many esophageal diseases that were traditionally managed surgically. In this review article, we explore the most exciting new developments. We discuss the use of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia and other related diseases, as well as the modifications that have allowed its use in treatment of Zenker diverticulum. We cover endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus. Further, we explore advanced endoscopic resection techniques.

Endoscopic approaches to gastroesophageal reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common chronic conditions affecting adults. A substantial proportion of patients continue to have symptoms despite medical therapy, and there has been increased demand for minimally invasive GERD therapy. We will examine currently available techniques and outcomes data on endoscopic approaches to the treatment of GERD.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last 2 years, research has given rise to more robust understanding of not only the pathophysiology of GERD but also how to better manage the various phenotypes. We are learning the ideal patient to benefit from endoscopic GERD therapy. In this review, we describe the four major endoluminal techniques for treating GERD and summarize current data.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic therapies are well positioned to fill the 'therapy gap' between medical therapy and more invasive surgical procedures.

Correlation between gastroesophageal flap valve abnormality and novel parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms by the lyon consensus

Gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) grading is a simple and reproducible parameter. There is limited information about the association between GEFV abnormality and novel parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) symptoms by the Lyon Consensus. To investigate the value of GEFV grading in GERD, the clinical data of 320 patients with GERD symptoms who underwent endoscopy, 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring, and high-resolution manometry (HRM) were retrospectively analyzed. The percentage of acid exposure time (AET%)(4.2 [1.5–7.4] vs. 1.3 [0.3–4.2], P < 0.001) and the proportion of abnormal esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology (71 [87.7%] vs. 172 [72.0%], P = 0.011) were significantly higher, while the mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) (2068.3 [1658.4–2432.4] vs. 2228.5 [1794.8–2705.3]Ω, P = 0.012) and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) (19.7 [13.9–29.0] vs. 33.3 [25.0–44.0]%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the abnormal GEFV group compared with the normal GEFV group. AET% and EGJ morphology showed positive correlations with GEFV grade, while PSPWI and MNBI showed negative correlations. Patients with an abnormal GEFV had a significantly greater risk of conclusive evidence of GERD compared to those with a normal GEFV (OR 3.035, 95% CI 1.758–5.240, P < 0.001). Further, when identifying patients with conclusive evidence of GERD, abnormal GEFV had a specificity of 80.4% (95% CI 75.3–85.5%). GEFV grading might be regarded as supportive evidence for GERD diagnosis.