Analysis of Risk Factors in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Related Immediate and Delayed Hemorrhage

Post-endoscopic sphincterotomy delayed bleeding occurs in patients with just 1-day interruption of direct oral anticoagulants or hemodialysis

Objective

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), especially when anticoagulants are used, carries a significant risk of delayed bleeding. However, the relationship between the use of antithrombotic agents, including direct oral anticoagulants, and post-EST bleeding remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for post-EST delayed bleeding when antithrombotic agents were administered according to the guidelines.

Methods

We analyzed cases of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and EST between January 2018 and August 2022, focusing on those with normal anatomy and naïve papillae. We examined the incidence of post-EST bleeding, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure details, severity and timing of post-EST delayed bleeding, hemostatic interventions, and factors related to post-EST delayed bleeding.

Results

Among the 502 patients included, 76 (15%) were taking antithrombotic agents. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography delayed bleeding was noted in seven patients (1.4%). Mild, moderate, and severe delayed bleeding occurred in four, one, and two cases, respectively. Hemostatic injection completely controlled cases of delayed bleeding. Multivariate analysis identified a 1-day direct oral anticoagulants interruption (odds ratio: 20.5, 95% confidence interval: 3.33-125, p = 0.0011) and dialysis (odds ratio: 38.7, 95% confidence interval: 2.4-624, p = 0.0099) as significant risk factors for delayed bleeding. No thromboembolic events related to the discontinuation of antithrombotic drugs were observed.

Conclusion

A 1-day direct oral anticoagulants interruption and dialysis are independent risk factors for post-EST delayed bleeding, necessitating careful consideration.

Assessment of safety and adverse events in endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction

Background

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used for the treatment of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). The postoperative adverse events associated with RFA treatment have gained importance.

Objective

To investigate the early adverse events and their risk factors associated with RFA for the treatment of MBO.

Design

Observational retrospective study.

Methods

We collected data from patients diagnosed with MBO and treated with endoscopic RFA at our hospital between January 2010 and June 2022. Based on the collected data, the patients were divided into two groups: the adverse event group and the nonadverse event group. Early postoperative adverse events were recorded, and risk factors were assessed.

Results

One hundred and twenty patients with MBO underwent endoscopic RFA, with 20 developing adverse events (16.6%; 20/120). Among these, 13 patients (10.8%) developed biliary infection after RFA treatment, while 7 (5.8%) developed acute pancreatitis, and no bleeding or perforation occurred. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, bile duct stricture length >2.5 cm, segmental RFA, and the proportion of patients receiving single stent drainage were all significantly greater in the adverse event group compared to the nonadverse event group (p < 0.05). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that type 2 diabetes, segmental RFA, and single stent drainage were the three independent risk factors for getting a biliary infection after RFA therapy.

Conclusion

Unresectable MBO combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus, segmental RFA, and postoperative single stent drainage can be the risk factors for adverse events after RFA. More attention should be paid to patients with multiple risk factors and preventive measures should be taken.

Factors and techniques associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes in patients with periampullary diverticulum: Results from a large tertiary center

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients with periampullary diverticulum (PAD) remains a challenge. This study aims to investigate the factors and techniques related to successful and safe ERCP in patients with PAD.

METHODS

We enrolled patients who underwent ERCP in a large tertiary center. The difficult cannulation rate, technical success rate, clinical success rate, and adverse events (AEs) rate were compared between patients with or without PAD. Three independent logistic regression models were established to identify factors and techniques associated with difficult cannulation, clinical success, and AEs.

RESULTS

Five thousand five hundred and ninety patients were included, of which 705 (12.6%) were diagnosed with PAD. Patients with PAD had a significantly higher difficult cannulation rate compared with patients without PAD (10.6% vs 8.0%, P < 0.0001), but the rates of technical success (clinical success (95.2% vs 95.2%, P = 0.951), and AEs (16.5% vs 14.4%, P = 0.156) were similar. Type I PAD (odds ratio [OR] = 2.114, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.05-5.25) and ERCP indication for pancreatic diseases (OR = 1.196, 95%CI: 1.053-1.261) were independently associated with difficult cannulation. Small endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) with balloon dilatation (OR = 1.581, 95%CI: 1.044-2.393) was independently associated with clinical success. Somatostatin injection showed no preventive effect on post-ERCP pancreatitis (OR = 1.144, 95%CI: 1.044-1.254). Moreover, the auxiliary cannulation techniques were safe for PAD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PAD did not affect ERCP outcomes. However, the choice of techniques and AE prophylactic measures should be more specific, especially for patients with type I PAD.