An extended 15 Hz ERG protocol (1): the contributions of primary and secondary rod pathways and the cone pathway

Using optogenetics to dissect rod inputs to OFF ganglion cells in the mouse retina

Introduction

Light responses of rod photoreceptor cells traverse the retina through three pathways. The primary pathway involves synapses from rods to ON-type rod bipolar cells with OFF signals reaching retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) via sign-inverting glycinergic synapses. Secondly, rod signals can enter cones through gap junctions. Finally, rods can synapse directly onto cone OFF bipolar cells.

Methods

To analyze these pathways, we obtained whole cell recordings from OFF-type α RGCs in mouse retinas while expressing channelrhodopsin-2 in rods and/or cones.

Results

Optogenetic stimulation of rods or cones evoked large fast currents in OFF RGCs. Blocking the primary rod pathway with L-AP4 and/or strychnine reduced rod-driven optogenetic currents in OFF RGCs by ~1/3. Blocking kainate receptors of OFF cone bipolar cells suppressed both rod- and cone-driven optogenetic currents in OFF RGCs. Inhibiting gap junctions between rods and cones with mecloflenamic acid or quinpirole reduced rod-driven responses in OFF RGCs. Eliminating the exocytotic Ca²⁺ sensor, synaptotagmin 1 (Syt1), from cones abolished cone-driven optogenetic responses in RGCs. Rod-driven currents were not significantly reduced after isolating the secondary pathway by eliminating Syt1 and synaptotagmin 7 (Syt7) to block synaptic release from rods. Eliminating Syt1 from both rods and cones abolished responses to optogenetic stimulation. In Cx36 KO retinas lacking rod-cone gap junctions, optogenetic activation of rods evoked small and slow responses in most OFF RGCs suggesting rod signals reached them through an indirect pathway. Two OFF cells showed faster responses consistent with more direct input from cone OFF bipolar cells.

Discussion

These data show that the secondary rod pathway supports robust inputs into OFF α RGCs and suggests the tertiary pathway recruits both direct and indirect inputs.

Rod and Cone Coupling Modulates Photopic ERG Responses in the Mouse Retina

Light adaptation changes both the sensitivity and maximum amplitude (R_max) of the mouse photopic electroretinogram (ERG) b-wave. Using the ERG, we examined how modulation of gap junctional coupling between rod and cones alters the light-adapted ERG. To measure changes, a b-wave light adaptation enhancement factor (LAEF), was defined as the ratio of R_max after 15 min light adaptation to R_max recorded at the onset of an adapting light. For wild-type mice (WT), the LAEF averaged 2.64 ± 0.29, however, it was significantly reduced (1.06 ± 0.04) for connexin 36 knock out (Cx36KO) mice, which lack electrical coupling between photoreceptors. Wild type mice intraocularly injected with meclofenamic acid (MFA), a gap junction blocker, also showed a significantly reduced LAEF. Degeneration of rod photoreceptors significantly alters the effects of light adaptation on the photopic ERG response. Rd10 mice at P21, with large portions of their rod photoreceptors present in the retina, exhibited a similar b-wave enhancement as wildtype controls, with a LAEF of 2.55 ± 0.19. However, by P31 with most of their rod photoreceptors degenerated, rd10 mice had a much reduced b-wave enhancement during light-adaptation (LAEF of 1.54 ± 0.12). Flicker ERG responses showed a higher temporal amplitude in mesopic conditions for WT than those of Cx36KO mice, suggesting rod-cone coupling help high-frequency signals to pass from rods to cone pathways in the retina. In conclusion, our study provides a novel method to noninvasively measure the dynamics and modulation by the light adaptation for rod-cone gap junctional coupling in intact eyes.

The morphology of human rod ERGs obtained by silent substitution stimulation

Purpose

To record transient ERGs from the light-adapted human retina using silent substitution stimuli which selectively reflect the activity of rod photoreceptors. We aim to describe the morphology of these waveforms and examine how they are affected by the use of less selective stimuli and by retinal pathology.

Methods

Rod-isolating stimuli with square-wave temporal profiles (250/250 ms onset/offset) were presented using a 4 primary LED ganzfeld stimulator. Experiment 1: ERGs were recorded using a rod-isolating stimulus (63 ph Td, rod contrast, C_rod = 0.25) from a group (n = 20) of normal trichromatic observers. Experiment 2: Rod ERGs were recorded from a group (n = 5) using a rod-isolating stimulus (C_rod = 0.25) which varied in retinal illuminance from 40 to 10,000 ph Td. Experiment 3: ERGs were elicited using 2 kinds of non-isolating stimuli; (1) broadband and (2) rod-isolating stimuli which contained varying degrees of L- and M-cone excitation. Experiment 4: Rod ERGs were recorded from two patient groups with rod monochromacy (n = 3) and CSNB (type 1; n = 2).

Results

The rod-isolated ERGs elicited from normal subjects had a waveform with a positive onset component followed by a negative offset. Response amplitude was maximal at retinal illuminances <100 ph Td and was virtually abolished at 400 ph Td. The use of non-selective stimuli altered the ERG waveform eliciting more photopic-like ERG responses. Rod ERGs recorded from rod monochromats had similar features to those recorded from normal trichromats, in contrast to those recorded from participants with CSNB which had an electronegative appearance.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that ERGs elicited by silent substitution stimuli can selectively reflect the operation of rod photoreceptors in the normal, light-adapted human retina.

Rod Electroretinograms Elicited by Silent Substitution Stimuli from the Light-Adapted Human Eye

PURPOSE

To demonstrate that silent substitution stimuli can be used to generate electroretinograms (ERGs) that effectively isolate rod photoreceptor function in humans without the need for dark adaptation, and that this approach constitutes a viable alternative to current clinical standard testing protocols.

METHODS

Rod-isolating and non-isolating sinusoidal flicker stimuli were generated on a 4 primary light-emitting diode (LED) Ganzfeld stimulator to elicit ERGs from participants with normal and compromised rod function who had not undergone dark-adaptation. Responses were subjected to Fourier analysis, and the amplitude and phase of the fundamental were used to examine temporal frequency and retinal illuminance response characteristics.

RESULTS

Electroretinograms elicited by rod-isolating silent substitution stimuli exhibit low-pass temporal frequency response characteristics with an upper response limit of 30 Hz. Responses are optimal between 5 and 8 Hz and between 10 and 100 photopic trolands (Td). There is a significant correlation between the response amplitudes obtained with the silent substitution method and current standard clinical protocols. Analysis of signal-to-noise ratios reveals significant differences between subjects with normal and compromised rod function.

CONCLUSIONS

Silent substitution provides an effective method for the isolation of human rod photoreceptor function in subjects with normal as well as compromised rod function when stimuli are used within appropriate parameter ranges.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

This method of generating rod-mediated ERGs can be achieved without time-consuming periods of dark adaptation, provides improved isolation of rod- from cone-based activity, and will lead to the development of faster clinical electrophysiologic testing protocols with improved selectivity.

Rod- and cone-isolated flicker electroretinograms and their response summation characteristics

This study defined the amplitude and phase characteristics of rod- and cone-isolated flicker electroretinograms (ERGs) and determined how these responses summate to generate the nonreceptor-specific ERG. Full-field ERGs were obtained from six normally sighted subjects (age 26 to 44 years) using a four-primary LED-based photostimulator and standard recording techniques. The four primaries were either modulated sinusoidally in phase to achieve simultaneous rod and cone activation (ERGR+C; nonreceptor-specific) or in different phases to achieve rod-isolated (ERGR) and cone-isolated (ERGC) responses by means of triple silent substitution. ERGs were measured at two mean luminance levels (2.4 and 24 cd/m2), two contrasts (20 and 40%), and four temporal frequencies (2-15 Hz). Fundamental amplitude and phase for each condition were derived by Fourier analysis. Response amplitude and phase depended on the stimulus conditions (frequency, mean luminance, and contrast), however, for all conditions: 1) response phase decreased monotonically as stimulus frequency increased; 2) response amplitude tended to decrease monotonically as stimulus frequency increased, with the exception of the 24 cd/m2, 40% contrast ERGR+C that was sharply V-shaped; 3) ERGR phase was delayed (32 to 210 deg) relative to the ERGC phase; 4) ERGR amplitude was typically equal to or lower than the ERGC amplitude, with the exception of the 2.4 cd/m2, 40% contrast condition; and 5) the pattern of ERGR+C responses could be accounted for by a vector summation model of the rod and cone pathway signals. The results show that the ERGR+C amplitude and phase can be predicted from ERGR and ERGC amplitude and phase. For conditions that elicit ERGR and ERGC responses that have approximately equal amplitude and opposite phase, there is strong destructive interference between the rod and cone responses that attenuates the ERGR+C. Conditions that elicit equal amplitude and opposite phase rod and cone responses may be particularly useful for evaluating rod-cone interactions.

Rod and cone contributions to the dark-adapted 15-Hz flicker electroretinogram

PURPOSE

To evaluate rod and cone contributions to the dark-adapted 15-Hz flicker electroretinogram (ERG) across a broad range of stimulus luminances by comparing rod-isolating (ERGR), cone-isolating (ERGC), and non-receptor-specific (ERGR+C) responses.

METHODS

Dark-adapted, full-field 15-Hz ERGs were obtained from four normally sighted subjects (ages 29-36 years) using a four-primary LED-based stimulating system. The primaries were either modulated sinusoidally in phase (ERGR+C) or were modulated in counter-phase to achieve rod isolation (ERGR) or cone isolation (ERGC) by means of triple silent substitution. Measurements were made for a broad range of luminances (-2.5 to 1.8 log scot. cd/m(2) in 0.2 log unit steps). Fourier analysis was used to obtain the amplitude and phase of the fundamental response component at each stimulus luminance.

RESULTS

Stimulus luminance had different effects on response amplitudes and phases under the three paradigms. Specifically, ERGC amplitude and phase increased monotonically as luminance increased. The effects on ERGR+C and ERGR were complex: ERGR+C and ERGR amplitude was small and the phase decreased for low luminances, whereas amplitude and phase increased sharply at moderate luminances. For high luminances, ERGR+C amplitude and phase increased, whereas ERGR amplitude decreased and phase was approximately constant.

CONCLUSIONS

At low luminances, the ERGR+C and ERGR functions can be attributed to interactions between two rod pathways. At high luminances, the functions can be accounted for by interactions between rod and cone pathways (ERGR+C) or rod insensitivity (ERGR). The ERGR paradigm minimizes cone intrusion, permitting assessment of rod function over a large range of luminance levels.

Human flicker electroretinography using different temporal modulations at mesopic and photopic luminance levels

BACKGROUND

Electroretinographic measurement instruments allow the variation of several stimulation parameters enabling to study a wide range of retinal processes. The purpose of the present study was to measure human flicker electroretinograms (ERGs) varying temporal modulation, temporal frequency and mean luminance in the photopic and higher mesopic ranges where the change from cone to rod dominance occurs.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy subjects (mean age = 31 ± 6) participated in this study. ERG recordings were performed with the RetiPort system (Roland Consult, Germany). The stimuli were ON and OFF sawtooth waves, square wave and sine wave. The temporal frequencies were 4 and 8 Hz. The mean luminance varied from 1 to 60 cd/m(2).

RESULTS

The results confirmed the possibility to distinguish between rod- and cone-dominated retinal responses when using the flicker ERG at different temporal frequencies and luminances. We have also evaluated the responses at luminance levels at which the transition between rod- and cone-dominated responses occurs. This transition between rod- and cone-dominated flicker ERG responses is indicated by a significant change in the response characteristics between 4 and 8 cd/m(2) (between 200 and 400 phot Td).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings on the transition between rod- and cone-dominated ERGs along with the demonstration of ERG responses to different temporal flicker modulations might be informative for the electrophysiologists when setting up the stimulus at mesopic and photopic luminance levels.

Ultrastructural localization of GPR179 and the impact of mutant forms on retinal function in CSNB1 patients and a mouse model

PURPOSE

Complete congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB1) is characterized by loss of night vision due to a defect in the retinal ON-bipolar cells (BCs). Mutations in GPR179, encoding the G-protein-coupled receptor 179, have been found in CSNB1 patients. In the mouse, GPR179 is localized to the tips of ON-BC dendrites. In this study we determined the ultrastructural localization of GPR179 in human retina and determined the functional consequences of mutations in GPR179 in patients and mice.

METHODS

The localization of GRP179 was analyzed in postmortem human retinas with immunohistochemistry. The functional consequences of the loss of GPR179 were analyzed with standard and 15-Hz flicker ERG protocols.

RESULTS

In the human retina, GPR179 is localized on the tips of ON-BC dendrites, which invaginate photoreceptors and terminate juxtaposed to the synaptic ribbon. The 15-Hz flicker ERG abnormalities found in patients with mutations in GPR179 more closely resemble those from patients with mutations in either TRPM1 or NYX than in GRM6. 15-Hz flicker ERG abnormalities of Gpr179(nob5) and Grm6(nob3) mice were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

GRP179 is expressed on dendrites of ON-BCs, indicating that GRP179 is involved in the ON-BCs' signaling cascade. The similarities of 15-Hz flicker ERGs noted in GPR179 patients and NYX or TRPM1 patients suggest that the loss of GPR179 leads to the loss or closure of TRPM1 channels. The difference between the 15-Hz flicker ERGs of mice and humans indicates the presence of important species differences in the retinal activity that this signal represents.

An extended 15 Hz ERG protocol (2): data of normal subjects and patients with achromatopsia, CSNB1, and CSNB2

The amplitude versus flash strength curve of 15 Hz electroretinograms (ERGs) shows two minima. The minima are caused by interactions between the primary and the secondary rod pathways (first minimum), and the secondary rod pathway and the cone-driven pathway (second minimum). Furthermore, cone pathway contributions cause higher-order harmonics to occur in the responses. We measured 15 Hz ERGs in 20 healthy subjects to determine normal ranges and in patients to verify our hypotheses on the contributions of the different pathways and to investigate the clinical application. We analyzed the amplitudes and phases of the 15, 30, and 45 Hz components in the ERGs. The overall shape of the 15 Hz amplitude curves was similar in all normal subjects and showed two minima. The 30 and 45 Hz amplitude curves increased for stimuli of high flash strengths indicating cone pathway contributions. The 15 Hz amplitude curve of the responses of an achromat was similar to that of the normal subjects for low flash strengths and showed a minimum, indicating normal primary and secondary rod pathway function. There was no second minimum, and there were no higher-order harmonics, consistent with absent cone pathway function. The 15 Hz ERGs in CSNB1 and CSNB2 patients were similar and of low amplitude for flash strengths just above where the first minimum normally occurs. We could determine that in the CSNB1 patients, the responses originate from the cone pathway, while in the CSNB2 patients, the responses originate from the secondary rod pathway.