Treatment outcome of PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor in Asian metastatic melanoma patients: correlative analysis with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry

IBI310 (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) monotherapy or in combination with sintilimab in advanced melanoma or urothelial carcinoma

IBI310 is a recombinant fully human IgG1 antibody against cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4. This study was conducted to evaluate IBI310 monotherapy or combination therapy with sintilimab in the patients with advanced melanoma or urothelial carcinoma (UC). Patients in phase 1a received IBI310 at 0.3/1/2/3 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W) following the accelerated titration and 3 + 3 escalation design. Patients in phase 1b received IBI310 (1/2/3 mg/kg IV, Q3W) plus sintilimab (200 mg IV, Q3W) for four cycles, followed by sintilimab maintenance therapy. The phase 1b expansion of IBI310 plus sintilimab was performed in patients with advanced melanoma or UC. Overall, 53 patients were enrolled, including 10 patients with melanoma in phase 1a, 34 with melanoma, and 9 with UC in phase 1b. Overall, 94.3% of patients (50/53) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with most being grade 1-2; 26.4% of patients (14/53) experienced grade 3 or higher TRAEs. In phase 1a, the disease control rate (DCR) was 50.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.7%-81.3%). In phase 1b, the objective response rate (ORR) and DCR were 17.6% (95% CI, 6.8%-34.5%) and 44.1% (95% CI, 27.2%-62.1%), respectively, for melanoma, and were 22.2% (95% CI, 2.8%-60.0%) and 66.7% (95% CI, 29.9%-92.5%), respectively, for UC. IBI310 monotherapy or combination therapy with sintilimab was well tolerated with favorable antitumor activity across patients with advanced melanoma and UC.

Blood Group Antigen A Carriers Exhibit an Extended Progression-Free Survival with no more Immune-Related Adverse Events

Extensive investigations have been conducted regarding the potential correlation between blood type and the immune system, as well as cancer risk in the Southern Chinese population. However, the prognostic value of the blood group and its genetic determinants in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment remains unclear. Therefore, the associations between the ABO blood group and its single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were examined in relation to ICI treatment outcomes in 370 eligible patients with cancer. This approach allowed us to derive the blood group from the SNPs responsible for blood group determination. In the discovery cohort (N = 168), antigen A carriers (blood types A and AB) exhibited an extended progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.34-0.98). The association results from the SNP-derived blood were consistent with those from the measured blood group. In the validation cohort (N = 202), Cox regression analysis revealed that the antigen A carriers (rs507666 AA+GA genotype carriers) experienced significantly extended PFS compared with the non-antigen A carriers (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.40-0.93). Therefore, a longer PFS was observed in antigen A carriers (P value = 0.003, HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.44-0.84). Furthermore, haplotype 2 carriers (rs507666 GA and rs659104 GG) demonstrated both extended PFS and improved overall survival. Notably, the presence of antigen A was not associated with the occurrence of overall immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or organ-specific toxicity. In summary, our findings revealed that antigen A carriers did not experience a higher incidence of irAEs while exhibiting better immunotherapy efficacy.

PD-L1, CD4+, and CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) Expression Profiles in Melanoma Tumor Microenvironment Cells

(1) Background: Because melanoma is an aggressive tumor with an unfavorable prognosis, we aimed to characterize the PD-L1 expression in melanomas in association with T cell infiltrates because PD-1/PD-L1 blockade represents the target in treating melanoma strategy. (2) Methods: The immunohistochemical manual quantitative methods of PD-L1, CD4, and CD8 TILs were performed in melanoma tumor microenvironment cells. (3) Results: Most of the PD-L1 positive, expressing tumors, have a moderate score of CD4+ TILs and CD8+TILs (5-50% of tumor area) in tumoral melanoma environment cells. The PD-L1 expression in TILs was correlated with different degrees of lymphocytic infiltration described by the Clark system (X² = 8.383, p = 0.020). PD-L1 expression was observed often in melanoma cases, with more than 2-4 mm of Breslow tumor thickness being the associated parameters (X² = 9.933, p = 0.014). (4) Conclusions: PD-L1 expression represents a predictive biomarker with very good accuracy for discriminating the presence or absence of malign tumoral melanoma cells. PD-L1 expression was an independent predictor of good prognosis in patients with melanomas.

Characterization of the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte landscape in sinonasal mucosal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are important prognostic biomarkers in several types of cancers. The interplay between TIL subgroups and immune checkpoint molecules like programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a promising target for immunotherapy. However, the TIL landscape in sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) has not been sufficiently characterized yet and the prognostic value of TIL subgroups and PD-L1 expression remains uncertain. Here, we investigated subsets of TILs (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD20+) and PD-L1 expression patterns in SNMM and assessed their prognostic value for recurrence-free and overall survival.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20 and PD-L1 was performed on tumor tissue from 27 patients with primary SNMM. Patient history was obtained and associations between TIL subgroups or PD-L1 expression and AJCC tumor stage, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with high CD3+ and CD8+ TILs in the primary tumor survived significantly longer than patients with SNMMs with a low number of CD3+ and CD8+ TILs. High CD3+ and high CD8+ TILs were associated with the lower T3 stage and increased 5-year survival. PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells was associated with advanced tumor stage.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that high densities of CD3+ and CD8+ TILs are strong positive prognostic biomarkers for survival in SNMM. Prospective studies with larger case numbers are warranted to confirm our findings.

Thyroid Hormone Induces Oral Cancer Growth via the PD-L1-Dependent Signaling Pathway

Oral cancer is a fatal disease, and its incidence in Taiwan is increasing. Thyroid hormone as L-thyroxine (T₄) stimulates cancer cell proliferation via a receptor on integrin αvβ3 of plasma membranes. It also induces the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cell proliferation in cancer cells. Thyroid hormone also activates β-catenin-dependent cell proliferation in cancer cells. However, the relationship between PD-L1 and cancer proliferation is not fully understood. In the current study, we investigated the role of inducible thyroid hormone-induced PD-L1-regulated gene expression and proliferation in oral cancer cells. Thyroxine bound to integrin αvβ3 to induce PD-L1 expressions via activation of ERK1/2 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). Inactivated STAT3 inhibited PD-L1 expression and nuclear PD-L1 accumulation. Inhibition of PD-L1 expression reduced β-catenin accumulation. Furthermore, nuclear PD-L1 formed a complex with nuclear proteins such as p300. Suppression PD-L1 expression by shRNA blocked not only expression of PD-L1 and β-catenin but also signal transduction, proliferative gene expressions, and cancer cell growth. In summary, thyroxine via integrin αvβ3 activated ERK1/2 and STAT3 to stimulate the PD-L1-dependent and β-catenin-related growth in oral cancer cells.

Immunotherapy as a treatment modality for mucosal melanoma of the head and neck: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare disease, accounting for approximately 1.4% of all melanomas and only 0.03% of all new cancer diagnoses. Traditionally, it has been associated with a poor prognosis, with an overall 5-year survival rate of <25%. Progress in treatment has been hindered by its rarity and lack of evidence. However, studies on the treatment of subcutaneous melanoma with immunotherapy have demonstrated significant improvement in survival rates and have become a core part of oncological strategies. This paper discusses the revision of the evidence for the use of immunotherapy in the head and neck.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted on January 19, 2019. The Medline and Embase databases were searched. In total, 509 articles were collated and screened. Inclusion criteria for the study included treatment-naive cohorts, cohorts with recurrent disease, primary outcomes with overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years and at the longest follow-up, and studies of adults with MM in whom immunotherapy was reported as a treatment strategy. The exclusion criteria included duplicate papers, anatomical sites other than the head and neck, case reports, and those not published in English.

RESULTS

Fifty-two papers out of the 509 collated papers met the inclusion criteria. The results are shown as a comparison of yearly survival rates following different treatment modalities (immunotherapy vs nonimmunotherapy) at 2, 3, and 5 years. It was found that, with immunotherapy, survival rates at all intervals were higher than those without immunotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Immunotherapy outcomes in small studies have shown good data for increasing survival rates at yearly intervals in MM of the head and neck. Larger clinical trials are needed to accurately distinguish the efficacy and survival outcomes of immunotherapy when compared with treatment modalities, excluding immunotherapy. However, the ability to perform larger trials is limited by the rarity of MM of the head and neck.

The pharmacotherapeutic management of nail unit and acral melanomas

INTRODUCTION

Acral and nail unit melanomas are rare subtypes of melanoma, which have poor prognoses. Current guidelines for optimal treatment are lacking. Recent clinical trials have evaluated new pharmacotherapeutic agents for melanoma treatment, with dramatically improved survival rates; however, studies on acral and nail unit melanomas are limited in comparison to trials on cutaneous melanoma.

AREAS COVERED

This is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the available treatment options for acral and nail unit melanomas, with consideration of safety and tolerability.

EXPERT OPINION

Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors are more efficacious than cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 blockers in acral and nail unit melanomas, although both are well-tolerated. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have good clinical activity, however, data on safety is relatively limited. There is minimal data on high dose interferon α-2b and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors, and efficacy and safety must be evaluated in future trials before they can be recommended for use in this patient population. Prospective clinical trials on acral and nail unit melanomas are lacking, and must be performed in large patient populations, with international collaboration likely necessary in order to enroll adequate participants.

Prognostic Value of Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression in Solid Tumors Irrespective of Immunotherapy Exposure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway, which plays a crucial role in cancer immune surveillance, is the target of several approved immunotherapeutic agents and is used as a predictive biomarker in some solid tumors. However, its use as a prognostic marker (i.e., regardless of therapy used) is not established clearly with available data demonstrating inconsistent prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression in solid tumors.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search of electronic databases and identified publications exploring the effect of PD-L1 expression on overall survival and/or disease-free survival. Hazard ratios were pooled in a meta-analysis using generic inverse-variance and random-effects modeling. We used the Deeks method to explore subgroup differences based on disease site, stage of disease, and method of PD-L1 quantification.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Programmed cell death ligand-1 expression was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.26-1.39; p < 0.001). There was significant heterogeneity between disease sites (subgroup p = 0.002) with pancreatic, hepatocellular, and genitourinary cancers associated with the highest magnitude of adverse outcomes. Programmed cell death ligand-1 was also associated with worse overall disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.30; p < 0.001). Stage of disease did not significantly affect the results (subgroup p = 0.52), nor did the method of quantification via immunohistochemistry or messenger RNA (subgroup p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

High expression of PD-L1 is associated with worse survival in solid tumors albeit with significant heterogeneity among tumor types. The effect is consistent in early-stage and metastatic disease and is not sensitive to method of PD-L1 quantification. These data can provide additional information for the counseling of patients with cancer about prognosis.

VISTA, PDL-L1, and BRAF-A Review of New and Old Markers in the Prognosis of Melanoma

Melanoma is currently known as one of the most aggressive malignant tumors. The prognostic factors and particularities of this neoplasm are a persistent hot topic in the medical field. This review has multiple purposes. First, we aim to summarize the known data regarding the histological and immunohistochemical appearance of this versatile tumor and to look further into the analysis of several widely used prognostic markers, such as B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase BRAF. The second purpose is to analyze the data on the new prognostic markers, V-domain Immunoglobulin Suppressor of T cell Activation (VISTA) and Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). VISTA is a novel target that is considered to be highly important in determining the invasive potential and treatment response of a melanoma, and there are currently only a limited number of studies describing its role. PD-L1 is a marker with whose importance has been revealed in multiple types of malignancies, but its exact role regarding melanoma remains under investigation. In conclusion, the gathered data highlights the importance of correlations between these markers toward providing patients with a better outcome.

Melanoma therapeutics: a literature review

Melanoma is a relentless type of skin cancer which involves myriad signaling pathways which regulate many cellular processes. This makes melanoma difficult to treat, especially when identified late. At present, therapeutics include chemotherapy, surgical resection, biochemotherapy, immunotherapy, photodynamic and targeted approaches. These interventions are usually administered as either a single-drug or in combination, based on tumor location, stage, and patients' overall health condition. However, treatment efficacy generally decreases as patients develop treatment resistance. Genetic profiling of melanocytes and the discovery of novel molecular factors involved in the pathogenesis of melanoma have helped to identify new therapeutic targets. In this literature review, we examine several newly approved therapies, and briefly describe several therapies being assessed for melanoma. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of recent developments and to consider future directions in the field of melanoma.

Interferon-α1b for the treatment of metastatic melanoma: results of a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Recombinant human interferon-α1b (IFN-α1b) is the first genetic engineered drug of China and is approved for cancer treatment by Chinese Food and Drug Administration. Although recombinant IFN-α1b is biologically and therapeutically active, its long-term efficacy against advanced melanoma is unknown.

METHODS

Ninety patients who were diagnosed with stage IV melanoma and received recombinant IFN-α1b therapy in our department were included in this study. The safety and efficacy of IFN-α1b were analyzed.

RESULTS

IFN-α1b was overall well tolerated, with only 7.8% of the patients showing grade 3 toxicity and none with grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related death. The most common adverse effect was fever (78.9%). Furthermore, increasing the drug dosage showed no increase in the incidence of adverse events. The median overall survival (mOS) of the cohort was 14.1 months (95% confidence interval, 11.3-16.9 months). There was no significant difference of the mOS between samples of various primary sites. In the 42 patients who had not received prior adjuvant interferon therapy, the objective response rate, disease control rate and clinical benefit rate were 7.1, 28.5 and 21.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that systemic IFN-α1b treatment is a relatively safe therapy and could prolong the survival of patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma.

Systematic review and meta-analysis efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma patients with anti-PD-1 progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

More than half of melanoma patients taking first-line anti-PD-1 therapy either express transient or no response at all. The efficacy and safety of secondary treatments for these patients are still not well established. Here, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of different melanoma FDA-approved ICI modalities used in post-anti-PD-1 refractory settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the PubMed database and the ASCO meetings library for studies on advanced melanoma patients with cancer progression on anti-PD-1 therapy and were then treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab/ipilimumab combination, or retreated with anti-PD-1. Primary and secondary endpoints were efficacy and toxicity, respectively. Pooled estimates for each treatment group were obtained using a random or fixed effects model according to detected heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies, of which 10 on ipilimumab, 2 on anti-PD-1 treatment, and 6 on combination therapies, were included, involving a total of 1460 patients. Twelve studies reported objective response rates (ORRs) and nine of them reported immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As for ORR, patients experienced a response that was inferior compared to the same therapy in treatment -naïve patients, with combination therapy having the best ORR of a pooled 23.08% (95% CI: 16.75% to 30.03%), followed by ipilimumab with a pooled ORR of 8.19% (95% CI: 5.78% to 10.92%). Survival data were also inferior in the ipilimumab cohort (mOS: 5.1 to 7.4 months) compared to ipilimumab in anti-PD-1 naive patients. As for grade 3/4 irAE occurrence, the ipilimumab cohort showed an estimate of 43.77% (95% CI 22.55% to 66.19%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide the best current evidence that patients who progress on anti-PD-1 can still respond to different ICI modalities (ipilimumab with or without nivolumab, and retreatment or continuation beyond progression with anti-PD-1) with tolerable grade 3/4 irAEs. However, more prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

Find the Flame: Predictive Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Melanoma

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of melanoma. In particular, checkpoint inhibition has shown to increase long-term outcome, and, in some cases, it can be virtually curative. However, the absence of clinically validated predictive biomarkers is one of the major causes of unpredictable efficacy of immunotherapy. Indeed, the availability of predictive biomarkers could allow a better stratification of patients, suggesting which type of drugs should be used in a certain clinical context and guiding clinicians in escalating or de-escalating therapy. However, the difficulty in obtaining clinically useful predictive biomarkers reflects the deep complexity of tumor biology. Biomarkers can be classified as tumor-intrinsic biomarkers, microenvironment biomarkers, and systemic biomarkers. Herein we review the available literature to classify and describe predictive biomarkers for checkpoint inhibition in melanoma with the aim of helping clinicians in the decision-making process. We also performed a meta-analysis on the predictive value of PDL-1.

Outcome of combination therapy using BRAF and MEK inhibitors among Asian patients with advanced melanoma: An analysis of 112 cases

BACKGROUND

As most clinical trials evaluating BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapy (B + Minh) have been conducted in Western countries, little is known about the effect of B + Minh among East Asian populations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from patients with advanced melanoma treated using B + Minh (either dabrafenib + trametinib or encorafenib + binimetinib) were retrospectively collected from 16 institutes in Japan. Response rates, adverse events, patterns of failure and survival were analysed.

RESULTS

We analysed 112 of 144 collected patient records and, of these, 14 had acral/mucosal melanoma. The response rate for the entire cohort was 75.0%. There were no statistical differences in response rates between acral/mucosal and cutaneous melanomas (64.3% versus 76.5%), whereas previous treatment using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) did not affect response (72.7% versus 73.9%) to B + Minh, response to ICI after B + Minh was only 20%. Patients who achieved complete response had the best overall survival rates at 24 months (94.7%). Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and 3 or more metastatic sites were independently associated with survival. The most common relapse site was the brain (17.9%). More than half of the patients (58.8%) experienced grade III/IV pyrexia.

CONCLUSION

B + Minh was effective among Japanese patients with melanoma, including those with acral/mucosal melanoma. Factors associated with survival were similar to previous Western studies. B + Minh response was not affected by the previous use of ICI; however, vigilance against brain metastasis during B + Minh therapy is required as the brain was our most commonly encountered relapse site.

A pooled analysis of the prognostic value of PD-L1 in melanoma: evidence from 1062 patients

Background

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was the first identified ligand of programmed death-1 (PD-1). PD-1/PD-L1 interactions inhibit T cell-mediated immune responses, limit cytokine production, and promote tumor immune escape. Recently, many studies have investigated the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in patients with melanoma. However, the results of these analyses remain a subject of debate. We have therefore carried out a meta-analysis to identify the prognostic role of PD-L1 in melanoma.

Methods

A thorough medical literature search was performed in the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase until October 2019. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to evaluate the correlation between PD-L1 overexpression and prognosis. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s test and Egger’s test.

Results

Thirteen articles with 1062 enrolled patients were included in this meta-analysis. High PD-L1 expression did not correlate with overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.57–1.52, P = 0.781) or progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.43–1.54, P = 0.535). However, PD-L1 overexpression correlated with the absence of lymph node (LN) metastasis (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.22–0.95, P = 0.036). Further, there was no significant relationship between PD-L1 expression and sex (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.90–1.84, P = 0.159), age (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.51–1.57, P = 0.708), or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.06–4.83, P = 0.592).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggested that PD-L1 expression did not predict an inferior prognosis in patients with melanoma. However, high PD-L1 expression was associated with absence of LN metastasis in such patients.

Genetic Aberrations in the CDK4 Pathway Are Associated with Innate Resistance to PD-1 Blockade in Chinese Patients with Non-Cutaneous Melanoma

PURPOSE

PD-1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy induces long and durable response in patients with advanced melanoma. However, only a subset of patients with melanoma benefit from this approach. The mechanism triggering the innate resistance of anti-PD-1 therapy remains unclear.Experimental Design: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analyses were performed in a training cohort (n = 31) using baseline tumor biopsies of patients with advanced melanoma treated with the anti-PD-1 antibody. Copy-number variations (CNVs) for the genes CDK4, CCND1, and CDKN2A were assayed using a TaqMan copy-number assay in a validation cohort (n = 85). The effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy was evaluated in PD-1-humanized mouse (C57BL/6-hPD-1) and humanized immune system (HIS) patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models.

RESULTS

WES revealed several significant gene copy-number gains in the patients of no clinical benefit cohort, such as 12q14.1 loci, which harbor CDK4. The association between CDK4 gain and innate resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy was validated in 85 patients with melanoma (P < 0.05). RNA-Seq analysis of CDK4-normal cell lines and CDK4-normal tumors showed altered transcriptional output in TNFα signaling via NF-κB, inflammatory response, and IFNγ response gene set. In addition, CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib) treatment increased PD-L1 protein levels and enhanced efficacy (P < 0.05) in the C57BL/6-hPD-1 melanoma cell and the HIS PDX model.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we discovered that genetic aberrations in the CDK4 pathway are associated with innate resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. Moreover, our study provides a strong rationale for combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with anti-PD-1 antibody for the treatment of advanced melanomas.

Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Tumor Response and Adverse Events

In the last decade, inhibitors targeting immune checkpoint molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) brought about a major paradigm shift in cancer treatment. These immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improved the overall survival of a variety of cancer such as malignant melanoma and non-small lung cancer. In addition, numerous clinical trials for additional indication of ICIs including adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapies are also currently ongoing. Therefore, more and more patients will receive ICIs in the future. However, despite the improved outcome of the cancer treatment by ICIs, the efficacy remains still limited and tumor regression have not been obtained in many cancer patients. In addition, treatment with ICIs is also associated with substantial toxicities, described as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Therefore, biomarkers to predict tumor response and occurrence of irAEs by the treatment with ICIs are required to avoid overtreatment of ICIs and minimize irAEs development. Whereas, numerous factors have been reported as potential biomarkers for tumor response to ICIs, factors for predicting irAE have been less reported. In this review, we show recent advances in the understanding of biomarkers for tumor response and occurrence of irAEs in cancer patients treated with ICIs.

A Phase Ib Study of Pembrolizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Chinese Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma (KEYNOTE-151)

Background

Pembrolizumab shows robust antitumor activity and favorable safety in metastatic melanoma. KEYNOTE-151 evaluated pembrolizumab in Chinese patients, who have more aggressive melanoma subtypes than other populations.

Methods

Chinese patients aged ≥18 years with advanced melanoma previously treated with one line of therapy received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 35 cycles or until confirmed disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or study withdrawal. Primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and safety. Key secondary end points included duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 and overall survival (OS).

Results

Median age was 52 years (N = 103); 37.9% had acral and 14.6% had mucosal melanoma. Median follow-up was 7.9 months at data cutoff (December 27, 2017). ORR was 16.7% (95% CI, 10.0–25.3%) (1 complete, 16 partial responses). Disease control rate was 38.2%. ORR was 15.8% for acral, 13.3% for mucosal melanoma. Median DOR was 8.4 months; 65.6% of patients had response duration ≥6 months. Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.7–3.5 months); 6-month rate was 20.4%. Median OS was 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.6 months–not reached); 6-month rate, 75.7%; 12-month rate, 50.6%. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 87 (84.5%) patients; 9 (8.7%) experienced grade 3/4 TRAE and 2 (1.9%) discontinued because of TRAE; none died. Two deaths occurred that were unrelated to treatment.

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab was well tolerated and provided clinically meaningful antitumor activity as second-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced melanoma.

Clinical and histopathological characteristics and survival analysis of 4594 Japanese patients with melanoma

Background

The incidence of melanoma among those of an Asian ethnicity is lower than in Caucasians; few large‐scale Asian studies that include follow‐up data have been reported.

Objectives

To investigate the clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with melanoma and to evaluate the prognostic factors.

Methods

Detailed patient information was collected from the database of Japanese Melanoma Study Group of the Japanese Skin Cancer Society. The American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh Edition system was used for TNM classification. The Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the impact of clinical and histological parameters on disease‐specific survival in patients with invasive melanoma.

Results

In total, 4594 patients were included in this analysis. The most common clinical type was acral lentiginous melanoma (40.4%) followed by superficial spreading melanoma (20.5%), nodular melanoma (10.0%), mucosal melanoma (9.5%), and lentigo maligna melanoma (8.1%). The 5‐year disease‐specific survival for each stage was as follows: IA = 98.0%, IB = 93.9%, IIA = 94.8%, IIB = 82.4%, IIC = 71.8%, IIIA = 75.0%, IIIB = 61.3%, IIIC = 41.7%, and IV = 17.7%. Although multivariate analysis showed that clinical classifications were not associated with survival across all stages, acral type was an independent poor prognostic factor in stage IIIA.

Conclusions

Our study revealed the characteristics of melanoma in the Japanese population. The 5‐year disease‐specific survival of each stage showed a similar trend to that of Caucasians. While clinical classification was not associated with survival in any stages, acral type was associated with poor survival in stage IIIA. Our result might indicate the aggressiveness of acral type in certain populations.

Safety and clinical activity with an anti-PD-1 antibody JS001 in advanced melanoma or urologic cancer patients

Background

JS001, a humanized IgG₄ monoclonal antibody against the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor, blocks the interaction of PD-1 with its ligands and promotes T cell activation in preclinical studies. This phase I study is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of JS001 in advanced melanoma or urologic cancer patients who are refractory to standard systemic therapy.

Patients and methods

In the dose escalation cohorts, subjects initially received a single-dose, intravenous infusion of JS001, and were followed for 28 days followed by multi-dose infusions every 2 weeks. In the dose expansion cohorts, subjects received multi-dose infusions every 2 weeks. Clinical response was evaluated after each 8-week treatment cycle according to RECIST v1.1 criteria.

Results

Thirty-six subjects diagnosed with advanced melanoma (n = 22), urothelial cancer (UC) (n = 8), or renal cell cancer (RCC) (n = 6) were enrolled. Melanoma subjects included 14 acral and 4 mucosal subtypes. JS001 was well tolerated, and no dose-limiting toxicity was observed. By the safety data cutoff date, 100% of subjects had treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) with most adverse events being grade 1 or 2, and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 36%. Among all 36 subjects, 1 confirmed complete response (acral melanoma), 7 confirmed partial responses (2 acral melanoma, 1 mucosal melanoma, 2 UC, and 2 RCC), and 10 stable disease were observed, for an objective response rate of 22.2% (95% CI, 10.1 to 39.2), and a disease control rate of 50.0% (95% CI, 32.9 to 67.1). Clinical responses were correlated with PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), baseline tumor volume, ECOG performance status, serum LDH levels, high percentage of activated CD8+ T cells and CD3− CD16+ CD54+ NK cells in the peripheral blood as well as tumor mutational burden (TMB).

Conclusion

JS001 was well tolerated and demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in UC and RCC as well as in previously underexplored acral and mucosal melanoma subtypes. Subjects with an immune-active profile in the tumor microenvironment or in peripheral blood responded favorably to JS001 treatment. The completion of the current phase I study has led to the initiation of the first prospective anti-PD-1 registration trial in Asia focusing on acral and mucosal melanoma subtypes, representative of the regional disease epidemiology.

Trial registration

Clinical Trial ID: NCT02836795, registered July 19, 2016, retrospectively registered.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13045-018-0693-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Nano-diamino-tetrac (NDAT) inhibits PD-L1 expression which is essential for proliferation in oral cancer cells

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a critical regulator to defend tumor cells against immune surveillance. Thyroid hormone has been shown to induce PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Its nano-particulated analogue, nano-diamino-tetrac (NDAT; Nanotetrac) is an anticancer/anti-angiogenic agent. In the current study, the inhibitory mechanism by which NDAT inhibited PD-L1 mRNA abundance and PD-L1 protein content in oral cancer cells was investigated. NDAT inhibited inducible PD-L1 expression and protein accumulation by the inhibition of activated ERK1/2 and PI3K. Knockdown PD-L1 also inhibited the proliferation of oral cancer cells which suggests that the inhibitory effect of NDAT on PD-L1 expression maybe is one of the critical mechanisms for NDAT-induced anti-proliferative effect in oral cancer cells.

Melanoma treatment in review

Melanoma represents the most aggressive and the deadliest form of skin cancer. Current therapeutic approaches include surgical resection, chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy, immunotherapy, biochemotherapy, and targeted therapy. The therapeutic strategy can include single agents or combined therapies, depending on the patient’s health, stage, and location of the tumor. The efficiency of these treatments can be decreased due to the development of diverse resistance mechanisms. New therapeutic targets have emerged from studies of the genetic profile of melanocytes and from the identification of molecular factors involved in the pathogenesis of the malignant transformation. In this review, we aim to survey therapies approved and under evaluation for melanoma treatment and relevant research on the molecular mechanisms underlying melanomagenesis.

Retrospective study of advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab after nivolumab: Analysis of 60 Japanese patients

BACKGROUND

Due to resistance and immune-related adverse events (irAE) some melanoma patients require ipilimumab after nivolumab therapy. However, little is known about the result of this switching.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the outcome of ipilimumab switching in Japanese patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 60 patients who were treated with ipilimumab after nivolumab from 9 institutes in Japan. Information of the primary tumor, treatment, response, irAE), and survival was collected.

RESULTS

In our cohort, acral lentiginous and mucosal melanoma accounted for 53% of the cases. The most common reason for initiating ipilimumab was disease progression (93%). Median interval from the last nivolumab administration to first ipilimumab administration was 29days. Only 38% of patients completed 4 injections of ipilimumab. The best overall response was 3.6%. IrAE occurred in 78% of patients and 70% of those were of grade 3/4 (G3/4) and 31% of patients experienced 2 or more irAEs. An within interval of 28days or less between the last nivolumab administration and ipilimumab administration was correlated with the development of G3/4 pyrexia and 3 or more irAEs, but irAE occurrence did not affect survival. Multivariate analysis showed that endocrine irAE (relative risk=0.22, P=0.015) and skin irAE (relative risk=2.78, P=0.048) were significant factors associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the response ratio to ipilimumab after nivolumab was unsatisfactory and associated with a high frequency of severe irAEs. As there are few second-line treatment options for patients with BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma after nivolumab failure, patients should be closely monitored if ipilimumab is initiated.

Biomarkers for Response of Melanoma Patients to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeting CTLA-4 or PD-1 molecules, have shown impressive therapeutic results. However, only 20–40% of advanced melanoma patients have durable responses to ICI, and these positive effects must be balanced against severe off-target immune toxicity and high costs. This urges the development of predictive biomarkers for ICI response to select patients with likely clinical benefit from treatment. Although many candidate biomarkers exist, a systematic overview of biomarkers and their usefulness is lacking.

Objectives

Here, we systematically review the current literature of clinical data of ICI treatment to provide an overview of candidate predictive biomarkers for ICI in melanoma patients.

Methods

To identify studies on biomarkers for clinical response or survival to ICI therapy in melanoma patients, we performed a systematic search in OVID MEDLINE and retrieved 429 publications, of which 67 met the eligibility criteria.

Results

Blood and genomic biomarkers were mainly studied for CTLA-4 ICI, while tumor tissue markers were analyzed for both CTLA-4 and PD-1 ICI. Blood cytology and soluble factors correlated more frequently to overall survival (OS) than to response, indicating their prognostic rather than predictive nature. Systemic T-cell response and regulation markers correlated to response, but progression-free survival or OS were not analyzed. Tumor tissue analyses revealed response correlations with mutational load, neoantigen load, immune-related gene expression, and CD8+ T-cell infiltration at the invasive margin. The predictive value of PD-L1 varied, possibly due to the influence of T-cell infiltration on tumor PD-L1 expression. Genomic biomarker studies addressed CTLA-4 and other immune-related genes.

Conclusion

This review outlines all published biomarkers for ICI therapy and highlights potential candidate markers for future research. To date, PD-L1 is the best studied biomarker for PD-1 ICI response. The most promising candidate predictive biomarkers for ICI response have not yet been identified. Variations in outcome parameters, statistical power, and analyses hampered summary of the results. Further investigation of biomarkers in larger patient cohorts using standardized objectives and outcome measures is recommended.

Melanoma subtypes demonstrate distinct PD-L1 expression profiles

PD-L1 expression in the tumor immune microenvironment is recognized as both a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with cutaneous melanoma, a finding closely related to its adaptive (IFN-γ-mediated) mechanism of expression. Approximately 35% of cutaneous melanomas express PD-L1, however, the expression patterns, levels, and prevalence in rarer melanoma subtypes are not well described. We performed immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 and CD8 on 200 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from patients with acral (n=16), mucosal (n=36), uveal (n=103), and chronic sun-damaged (CSD) (n=45) melanomas (24 lentigo maligna, 13 'mixed' desmoplastic, and 8 'pure' desmoplastic melanomas). CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) densities were characterized as mild, moderate, or severe, and their geographic association with PD-L1 expression was evaluated. Discrete lymphoid aggregates, the presence of a spindle cell morphology, and the relationship of these features with PD-L1 expression were assessed. PD-L1 expression was observed in 31% of acral melanomas, 44% of mucosal melanomas, 10% of uveal melanomas, and 62% of CSD melanomas (P<0.0001). Compared to our previously characterized cohort of cutaneous melanomas, the proportion of PD-L1(+) tumors was lower in uveal (P=0.0002) and higher in CSD (P=0.0073) melanomas, while PD-L1 expression in the acral and mucosal subtypes was on par. PD-L1 expression in all subtypes correlated with a moderate-severe grade of CD8+ TIL (all, P<0.003), supporting an adaptive mechanism of expression induced during the host antitumor response. The tumor microenvironments observed in CSD melanomas segregated by whether they were the pure desmoplastic subtype, which showed lower levels of PD-L1 expression when compared to other CSD melanomas (P=0.047). The presence of lymphoid aggregates was not associated with the level of PD-L1 expression, while PD-L1(+) cases with spindle cell morphology demonstrated higher levels of PD-L1 than those with a nested phenotype (P<0.0001). Our findings may underpin the reported clinical response rates for anti-PD-1 monotherapy, which vary by subtype.

Frequent Genetic Aberrations in the CDK4 Pathway in Acral Melanoma Indicate the Potential for CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Targeted Therapy

Purpose: Effective therapies for the majority of metastatic acral melanoma patients have not been established. Thus, we investigated genetic aberrations of CDK4 pathway in acral melanoma and evaluated the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in targeted therapy of acral melanoma.Experimental Design: A total of 514 primary acral melanoma samples were examined for the copy number variations (CNV) of CDK4 pathway-related genes, including Cdk4, Ccnd1, and P16^INK4a , by QuantiGenePlex DNA Assay. The sensitivity of established acral melanoma cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) containing typical CDK4 aberrations to CDK4/6 inhibitors was evaluated.Results: Among the 514 samples, 203 cases, 137 cases, and 310 cases, respectively, showed Cdk4 gain (39.5%), Ccnd1 gain (26.7%), and P16^INK4a loss (60.3%). The overall frequency of acral melanomas that contain at least one aberration in Cdk4, Ccnd1, and P16^INK4a was 82.7%. The median overall survival time for acral melanoma patients with concurrent Cdk4 gain with P16^INK4a loss was significantly shorter than that for patients without such aberrations (P = 0.005). The pan-CDK inhibitor AT7519 and selective CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991 could inhibit the cell viability of acral melanoma cells and the tumor growth of PDX with Cdk4 gain plus Ccnd1 gain, Cdk4 gain plus P16^INK4a loss, and Ccnd1 gain plus P16^INK4a loss.Conclusions: Genetic aberration of CDK4 pathway is a frequent event in acral melanoma. Acral melanoma cell lines and PDX containing CDK4 pathway aberrations are sensitive to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Our study provides evidence for the testing of CDK4/6 inhibitors in acral melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 6946-57. ©2017 AACR.

Pembrolizumab use for the treatment of advanced melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, overall long term survival in patients with stage IV melanoma was lower than 10%. However, the treatment of melanoma has evolved rapidly over the last few years, with the advent of inhibitors of BRAF and MEK and of immunotherapeutic agents including ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. Areas covered: This is a comprehensive review of the literature on the role of pembrolizumab in melanoma. Pembrolizumab is a Programmed Death Receptor 1 (PD-1) directed monoclonal antibody which is approved by FDA and EMA for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Expert opinion: Phase II and III trials demonstrated that pembrolizumab is superior to ipilimumab in previously untreated patients and to chemotherapy in ipilimumab pre-treated patients. Unfortunately, prospectively validated predictive markers are lacking. Immune-related adverse events are particularly interesting and should be managed per the published guidelines. There are still many issues that remain unresolved including: when to stop treatment, biomarkers for choosing a single agent or combination therapy, the optimal schedule of ipilimumab in combination with anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies, optimal management of adverse events, the role of immunotherapy in specific populations, the optimal sequence of immunotherapy and the BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination in patients.