1
|
Wanis KN, Kuerer HM, Sun SX, Hunt KK, Glencer AC, Teshome M, Lucci A, Weiser R, Johnson H, Smith BD, Gutierrez AM, Shaitelman SF, Arun BK. Clinical Outcomes for BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers With Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast Conservation. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2418486. [PMID: 38916888 PMCID: PMC11200147 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Although most women with BRCA-associated breast cancer choose bilateral mastectomy, current guidelines support breast-conserving therapy as an option. As the indications for genetic testing expand and targeted therapies emerge, understanding the outcomes of breast-conserving therapy in the population of patients choosing breast conservation is important. Objective To describe the clinical outcomes of women with BRCA-associated breast cancer who were treated with breast-conserving therapy, including the risks of ipsilateral and contralateral cancer events and bilateral mastectomy-free survival. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study conducted at a single-institution academic national comprehensive cancer center included 172 women identified from a prospectively maintained database who had pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and were treated with breast-conserving therapy from January 1, 1977, to December 31, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical and pathologic characteristics for patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 were compared, and estimates of overall survival, bilateral mastectomy-free survival, distant disease-free survival, risk of ipsilateral breast cancer, and risk of contralateral cancer were computed. Results The cohort included 172 women (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [11.7] years), with 42 (24.4%) receiving a diagnosis of breast cancer prior to 40 years of age. Compared with BRCA2 variant carriers (80 [46.5%]), women with BRCA1 variants (92 [53.5%]) were younger at breast cancer diagnosis and tended to have more advanced tumors, which were more likely to be hormone receptor negative and higher grade. At a median follow-up of 11.8 years (IQR, 5.7-18.2 years), estimates of 10-year survival and risk were: overall survival, 88.5% (95% CI, 83.1%-94.2%); bilateral mastectomy-free survival, 70.7% (95% CI, 63.3%-78.9%); risk of an ipsilateral breast cancer event, 12.2% (95% CI, 5.8%-18.2%); and risk of contralateral cancer, 21.3% (95% CI, 13.3%-28.6%). Risks continued to increase after 10 years of follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, although women with breast cancer and pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants treated with breast-conserving therapy had above-average risks of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer events, most did not have another cancer event and remained bilateral mastectomy free. These findings may be useful for informing patients with BRCA variants choosing breast conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henry M. Kuerer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susie X. Sun
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K. Hunt
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alexa C. Glencer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mediget Teshome
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Roi Weiser
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Helen Johnson
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D. Smith
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Simona F. Shaitelman
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Banu K. Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brantley KD, Rosenberg SM, Collins LC, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Warner E, Come SE, Zheng Y, Kirkner GJ, Snow C, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Second Primary Breast Cancer in Young Breast Cancer Survivors. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:718-725. [PMID: 38602683 PMCID: PMC11009864 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Importance Among women diagnosed with primary breast cancer (BC) at or younger than age 40 years, prior data suggest that their risk of a second primary BC (SPBC) is higher than that of women who are older when they develop a first primary BC. Objective To estimate cumulative incidence and characterize risk factors of SPBC among young patients with BC. Design, Setting, and Participants Participants were enrolled in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a prospective study of 1297 women aged 40 years or younger who were diagnosed with stage 0 to III BC from August 2006 to June 2015. Demographic, genetic testing, treatment, and outcome data were collected by patient surveys and medical record review. A time-to-event analysis was used to account for competing risks when determining cumulative incidence of SPBC, and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to evaluate associations between clinical factors and SPBC risk. Data were analyzed from January to May 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The 5- and 10- year cumulative incidence of SPBC. Results In all, 685 women with stage 0 to III BC (mean [SD] age at primary BC diagnosis, 36 [4] years) who underwent unilateral mastectomy or lumpectomy as the primary surgery for BC were included in the analysis. Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 10.0 (7.4-12.1) years, 17 patients (2.5%) developed an SPBC; 2 of these patients had cancer in the ipsilateral breast after lumpectomy. The median (IQR) time from primary BC diagnosis to SPBC was 4.2 (3.3-5.6) years. Among 577 women who underwent genetic testing, the 10-year risk of SPBC was 2.2% for women who did not carry a pathogenic variant (12 of 544) and 8.9% for carriers of a pathogenic variant (3 of 33). In multivariate analyses, the risk of SPBC was higher among PV carriers vs noncarriers (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 5.27; 95% CI, 1.43-19.43) and women with primary in situ BC vs invasive BC (sHR, 5.61; 95% CI, 1.52-20.70). Conclusions Findings of this cohort study suggest that young BC survivors without a germline pathogenic variant have a low risk of developing a SPBC in the first 10 years after diagnosis. Findings from germline genetic testing may inform treatment decision-making and follow-up care considerations in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen D. Brantley
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shoshana M. Rosenberg
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Laura C. Collins
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathryn J. Ruddy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rulla M. Tamimi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Lidia Schapira
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | | | - Ellen Warner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven E. Come
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yue Zheng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Craig Snow
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Ann H. Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Breast Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martelli G, Barretta F, Vernieri C, Folli S, Pruneri G, Segattini S, Trapani A, Carolla C, Spatti G, Miceli R, Ferraris C. Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Survival After BRCA1/2 Breast Cancer Resection. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:1275-1284. [PMID: 37792368 PMCID: PMC10551816 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Importance Few studies have investigated whether prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy (PSO) for patients with previously resected breast cancer who carry pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants is associated with a reduced risk of cancer-specific death. Objective To assess the association of PSO and prophylactic mastectomy (PM) with prognosis after quadrantectomy or mastectomy as primary treatment for patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was performed in a single-institution, tertiary referral center. Consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer treated surgically between 1972 and 2019 were recruited and followed up prospectively after they were found to carry the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene variant. The data analysis was performed between April 2022 and July 2023. Exposure Following breast surgery, some patients underwent PSO, PM, or both, whereas others did not. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary study end point was overall survival as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary end points were crude cumulative incidence of breast cancer-specific mortality, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), contralateral breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and ovarian cancer-specific mortality. Results Of 480 patients included in the cohort (median age at initial surgery, 40.0 years; IQR, 34.0-46.0 years), PSO was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.25-0.64; P < .001). This reduction was most evident for patients carrying the BRCA1 variant (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.20-0.63; P = .001), those with triple-negative disease (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.46; P = .002), and those with invasive ductal carcinoma (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.84; P = .008). Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy was not associated with risk of contralateral breast cancer or IBTR. Initial or delayed PM was associated with a reduced risk of IBTR but not with overall survival or breast cancer-specific mortality. Conclusions The study findings suggest that PSO should be offered to all patients with BRCA1/2 breast cancer who undergo surgery with curative intent to reduce risk of death. In particular, PSO should be offered to patients with the BRCA1 variant at the time of breast surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Martelli
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barretta
- Department of Biostatistics for Clinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Vernieri
- Breast Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- IFOM ETS, the AIRC Foundation of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Secondo Folli
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Breast Unit, Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Anna Trapani
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Humanitas Institute, Catania, Italy
| | - Claudia Carolla
- Department of Surgical and Oncological Sciences, Policlinico P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Gianbattista Spatti
- Unit of Gynecological Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosalba Miceli
- Department of Biostatistics for Clinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Ferraris
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaba F, Blyuss O, Tan A, Munblit D, Oxley S, Khan K, Legood R, Manchanda R. Breast Cancer Risk and Breast-Cancer-Specific Mortality following Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in BRCA Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051625. [PMID: 36900415 PMCID: PMC10001253 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the gold standard method of ovarian cancer risk reduction, but the data are conflicting regarding the impact on breast cancer (BC) outcomes. This study aimed to quantify BC risk/mortality in BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers after RRSO. METHODS We conducted a systematic review (CRD42018077613) of BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers undergoing RRSO, with the outcomes including primary BC (PBC), contralateral BC (CBC) and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) using a fixed-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses stratified by mutation and menopause status. RESULTS RRSO was not associated with a significant reduction in the PBC risk (RR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.59-1.21) or CBC risk (RR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.65-1.39) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined but was associated with reduced BC-specific mortality in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined (RR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.18-0.39). Subgroup analyses showed that RRSO was not associated with a reduction in the PBC risk (RR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.68-1.17) or CBC risk (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.59-1.24) in BRCA1 carriers nor a reduction in the CBC risk in BRCA2 carriers (RR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.07-1.74) but was associated with a reduction in the PBC risk in BRCA2 carriers (RR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.41-0.97) and BCSM in BC-affected BRCA1 carriers (RR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.30-0.70). The mean NNT = 20.6 RRSOs to prevent one PBC death in BRCA2 carriers, while 5.6 and 14.2 RRSOs may prevent one BC death in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined and BRCA1 carriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS RRSO was not associated with PBC or CBC risk reduction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined but was associated with improved BC survival in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined and BRCA1 carriers and a reduced PBC risk in BRCA2 carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiza Gaba
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| | - Oleg Blyuss
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child’s Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 29 Shmitovskiy Proezd, 123337 Moscow, Russia
| | - Alex Tan
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Daniel Munblit
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child’s Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 29 Shmitovskiy Proezd, 123337 Moscow, Russia
- Care for Long Term Conditions Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London SE1 8WA, UK
- Solov’ev Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, 43 Ulitsa Donskaya, 115419 Moscow, Russia
| | - Samuel Oxley
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Khalid Khan
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
- Department of Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun J, Chu F, Pan J, Zhang Y, Yao L, Chen J, Hu L, Zhang J, Xu Y, Wang X, Cao W, Xie Y. BRCA-CRisk: A Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for BRCA Carriers. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:991-999. [PMID: 36480783 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The absolute cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) for patients with BRCA1/2 variants is unknown. The purpose of this study was to develop a CBC risk prediction model for assessing CBC risk for BRCA1/2 carriers. METHODS The primary cohort of 491 patients with BRCA1/2 variants was derived from a large series of unselected patients with breast cancer. A nomogram was established on the basis of the results of a multivariate Cox regression analysis from this cohort. This model, named BRCA-CRisk, was further validated by an independent cohort of 205 patients with BRCA1/2 variants. Discrimination and calibration of the model were assessed. RESULTS In the primary cohort of 491 patients, 66 developed contralateral breast cancer after a median follow-up of 7.0 years. Four variables were significantly associated with risk of CBC and were incorporated in the establishment of the BRCA-CRisk prediction model: younger age at first breast cancer (with continuous variable, P = .002), positive first-degree family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.08; P = .011), variant located near the 3' region of BRCA (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23 to 3.30; P = .006), and endocrine therapy (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.88; P = .013). The area under the time-dependent curves for the 5- and 10-year cumulative risks of CBC were 0.775 and 0.702, respectively. The model was well validated in the independent cohort of 205 BRCA1/2 carriers, with area under the curves of 0.750 and 0.691 for 5 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION BRCA-CRisk model provides a useful tool for assessing the absolute cumulative risk of CBC for BRCA1/2 carriers and may help carriers and clinicians optimally select risk-reducing strategies on the basis of individual CBC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Sun
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Futao Chu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jiani Pan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, P. R. China.,Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yaxin Zhang
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Lu Yao
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jiuan Chen
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Li Hu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Juan Zhang
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Ye Xu
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Xiaojia Wang
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Wenming Cao
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yuntao Xie
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Choi JJ, Fikre T, Fischman A, Buck AK, Ko NY. The Role of Race and Insurance Status in Access to Genetic Counseling and Testing Among High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients. Oncologist 2022; 27:832-838. [PMID: 36124631 PMCID: PMC9526492 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The role of germline genetic testing in breast cancer patients is crucial, especially in the setting of the recent trials showing the benefit of PARP inhibitors. The goal of this study was to identify racial disparities in genetic counseling and testing in patients with high-risk breast cancer. Methods Patients with 2 unique breast cancer diagnoses were examined to understand demographics, insurance coverage, characteristics of breast cancer, and whether they were recommended for and received genetic counseling and testing. Results A total of 69 patients with a dual diagnosis of breast cancer between the years 2000 and 2017 were identified (42% identified as White compared to 58% that identified as non-White). White patients were more likely to be recommended for genetic counseling (OR = 2.85; 95% CI, 1.07-7.93, P < .05), be referred for genetic counseling (OR = 3.17; 95% CI, 1.19-8.86, P < .05), receive counseling (OR = 3.82; 95% CI, 1.42-10.83, P < .01), and undergo genetic testing (OR = 2.88; 95% CI, 0.97-9.09, P = .056) compared to non-White patients. Patients with private insurance were significantly more likely to be recommended for genetic counseling (OR 5.63, P < .005), referred (OR 6.11, P < .005), receive counseling (OR 4.21, P < .05), and undergo testing (OR 4.10, P < .05). When controlled for insurance, there was no significant racial differences in the rates of GC recommendation, referral, counseling, or testing. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that disparities in genetic counseling and testing are largely driven by differences in health insurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alexandra Fischman
- Graduate Medical Sciences, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anne K Buck
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Graduate Medical Sciences, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Naomi Y Ko
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Snyder M, Iraola-Guzmán S, Saus E, Gabaldón T. Discovery and Validation of Clinically Relevant Long Non-Coding RNAs in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163866. [PMID: 36010859 PMCID: PMC9405614 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Recent efforts in biomedical research have focused on the identification of molecular biomarkers to improve the diagnosis, prognosis and eventually treatment of the most common human diseases worldwide, including cancer. In this context, a large number of studies point to a pivotal role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the pathophysiology of carcinogenesis, suggesting diagnostic or therapeutic potential. However, for most of them, supporting evidence is scarce and often based on a single large-scale analysis. Here, focusing on colorectal cancer (CRC), we present an overview of the main approaches for discovering and validating lncRNA candidate molecules, and provide a curated list of the most promising lncRNAs associated with this malignancy. Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer worldwide, with nearly two million newly diagnosed cases each year. The survival of patients with CRC greatly depends on the cancer stage at the time of diagnosis, with worse prognosis for more advanced cases. Consequently, considerable effort has been directed towards improving population screening programs for early diagnosis and identifying prognostic markers that can better inform treatment strategies. In recent years, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been recognized as promising molecules, with diagnostic and prognostic potential in many cancers, including CRC. Although large-scale genome and transcriptome sequencing surveys have identified many lncRNAs that are altered in CRC, most of their roles in disease onset and progression remain poorly understood. Here, we critically review the variety of detection methods and types of supporting evidence for the involvement of lncRNAs in CRC. In addition, we provide a reference catalog that features the most clinically relevant lncRNAs in CRC. These lncRNAs were selected based on recent studies sorted by stringent criteria for both supporting experimental evidence and reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison Snyder
- Barcelona Supercomputing Centre (BSC-CNS), Plaça Eusebi Güell, 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Baldiri Reixac, 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susana Iraola-Guzmán
- Barcelona Supercomputing Centre (BSC-CNS), Plaça Eusebi Güell, 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Baldiri Reixac, 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ester Saus
- Barcelona Supercomputing Centre (BSC-CNS), Plaça Eusebi Güell, 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Baldiri Reixac, 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Toni Gabaldón
- Barcelona Supercomputing Centre (BSC-CNS), Plaça Eusebi Güell, 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Baldiri Reixac, 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kowalchuk RO, Corbin KS, Jimenez RB. Particle Therapy for Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041066. [PMID: 35205814 PMCID: PMC8870138 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy has received increasing attention in the treatment of breast cancer due to its unique physical properties that may enhance patient quality of life and reduce the late effects of therapy. In this review, we will examine the rationale for the use of proton and carbon therapy in the treatment of breast cancer and highlight their potential for sparing normal tissue injury. We will discuss the early dosimetric and clinical studies that have been pursued to date in this domain before focusing on the remaining open questions limiting the widespread adoption of particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Kimberly S. Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Rachel B. Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Emmert-Streib F, Manjang K, Dehmer M, Yli-Harja O, Auvinen A. Are There Limits in Explainability of Prognostic Biomarkers? Scrutinizing Biological Utility of Established Signatures. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13205087. [PMID: 34680236 PMCID: PMC8533990 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Prognostic biomarkers can have an important role in the clinical practice because they allow stratification of patients in terms of predicting the outcome of a disorder. Obstacles for developing such markers include lack of robustness when using different data sets and limited concordance among similar signatures. In this paper, we highlight a new problem that relates to the biological meaning of already established prognostic gene expression signatures. Specifically, it is commonly assumed that prognostic markers provide sensible biological information and molecular explanations about the underlying disorder. However, recent studies on prognostic biomarkers investigating 80 established signatures of breast and prostate cancer demonstrated that this is not the case. We will show that this surprising result is related to the distinction between causal models and predictive models and the obfuscating usage of these models in the biomedical literature. Furthermore, we suggest a falsification procedure for studies aiming to establish a prognostic signature to safeguard against false expectations with respect to biological utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Emmert-Streib
- Predictive Society and Data Analytics Lab, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland;
- Correspondence:
| | - Kalifa Manjang
- Predictive Society and Data Analytics Lab, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland;
| | - Matthias Dehmer
- Department of Computer Science, Swiss Distance University of Applied Sciences, 3900 Brig, Switzerland;
- Department of Mechatronics and Biomedical Computer Science, UMIT, 6060 Hall in Tyrol, Austria
- College of Artificial Intelligence, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
| | - Olli Yli-Harja
- Computational Systems Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland;
- Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Institute of Biosciences and Medical Technology, 33720 Tampere, Finland
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Unit of Health Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Giannakeas V, Lim DW, Narod SA. The risk of contralateral breast cancer: a SEER-based analysis. Br J Cancer 2021; 125:601-610. [PMID: 34040177 PMCID: PMC8368197 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01417-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to estimate the annual risk and 25-year cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer among women with stage 0-III unilateral breast cancer. METHODS We identified 812,851 women with unilateral breast cancer diagnosed between 1990 and 2015 in the SEER database and followed them for contralateral breast cancer for up to 25 years. Women with a known bilateral mastectomy were excluded. We calculated the annual risk of contralateral breast cancer by age at diagnosis, by time since diagnosis and by current age. We compared risks by ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) versus invasive disease, by race and by oestrogen receptor (ER) status of the first cancer. RESULTS There were 25,958 cases of contralateral invasive breast cancer diagnosed (3.2% of all patients). The annual risk of contralateral breast cancer over the 25-year follow-up period was 0.37% and the 25-year actuarial risk of contralateral invasive breast cancer was 9.9%. The annual risk varied to a small degree by age of diagnosis, by time elapsed since diagnosis and by current age. The 25-year actuarial risk was similar for DCIS and invasive breast cancer patients (10.1 versus 9.9%). The 25-year actuarial risk was higher for black women (12.7%) than for white women (9.7%) and was lower for women with ER-positive breast cancer (9.5%) than for women with ER-negative breast cancer (11.2%). CONCLUSIONS Women with unilateral breast cancer experience an annual risk of contralateral breast cancer ~0.4% per year, which persists over the 25-year follow-up period.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Age Factors
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Female
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Staging
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/metabolism
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Risk Factors
- SEER Program
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasily Giannakeas
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David W Lim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Metal Nanoparticle and Quantum Dot Tags for Signal Amplification in Electrochemical Immunosensors for Biomarker Detection. CHEMOSENSORS 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors9040085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
With the increasing importance of healthcare and clinical diagnosis, as well as the growing demand for highly sensitive analytical instruments, immunosensors have received considerable attention. In this review, electrochemical immunosensor signal amplification strategies using metal nanoparticles (MNPs) and quantum dots (Qdots) as tags are overviewed, focusing on recent developments in the ultrasensitive detection of biomarkers. MNPs and Qdots can be used separately or in combination with other nanostructures, while performing the function of nanocarriers, electroactive labels, or catalysts. Thus, different functions of MNPs and Qdots as well as recent advances in electrochemical signal amplification are discussed. Additionally, the methods most often used for antibody immobilization on nanoparticles, immunoassay formats, and electrochemical methods for indirect biomarker detection are overviewed.
Collapse
|
12
|
Gaba F, Goyal S, Marks D, Chandrasekaran D, Evans O, Robbani S, Tyson C, Legood R, Saridogan E, McCluggage WG, Hanson H, Singh N, Evans DG, Menon U, Manchanda R. Surgical decision making in premenopausal BRCA carriers considering risk-reducing early salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study. J Med Genet 2021; 59:122-132. [PMID: 33568437 PMCID: PMC8788252 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acceptance of the role of the fallopian tube in 'ovarian' carcinogenesis and the detrimental sequelae of surgical menopause in premenopausal women following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) has resulted in risk-reducing early-salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) being proposed as an attractive alternative risk-reducing strategy in women who decline/delay oophorectomy. We present the results of a qualitative study evaluating the decision-making process among BRCA carriers considering prophylactic surgeries (RRSO/RRESDO) as part of the multicentre PROTECTOR trial (ISRCTN:25173360). METHODS In-depth semistructured 1:1 interviews conducted using a predeveloped topic-guide (development informed by literature review and expert consultation) until informational saturation reached. Wording and sequencing of questions were left open with probes used to elicit additional information. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, transcripts analysed using an inductive theoretical framework and data managed using NVIVO-v12. RESULTS Informational saturation was reached following 24 interviews. Seven interconnected themes integral to surgical decision making were identified: fertility/menopause/cancer risk reduction/surgical choices/surgical complications/sequence of ovarian-and-breast prophylactic surgeries/support/satisfaction. Women for whom maximising ovarian cancer risk reduction was relatively more important than early menopause/quality-of-life preferred RRSO, whereas those more concerned about detrimental impact of menopause chose RRESDO. Women managed in specialist familial cancer clinic settings compared with non-specialist settings felt they received better quality care, improved hormone replacement therapy access and were more satisfied. CONCLUSION Multiple contextual factors (medical, physical, psychological, social) influence timing of risk-reducing surgeries. RRESDO offers women delaying/declining premenopausal oophorectomy, particularly those concerned about menopausal effects, a degree of ovarian cancer risk reduction while avoiding early menopause. Care of high-risk women should be centralised to centres with specialist familial gynaecological cancer risk management services to provide a better-quality, streamlined, holistic multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiza Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Centre, Queen Mary University of London-Charterhouse Square Campus, London, UK.,Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Shivam Goyal
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Dalya Marks
- Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Dhivya Chandrasekaran
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Centre, Queen Mary University of London-Charterhouse Square Campus, London, UK.,Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Olivia Evans
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Centre, Queen Mary University of London-Charterhouse Square Campus, London, UK.,Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sadiyah Robbani
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Tyson
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rosa Legood
- Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ertan Saridogan
- Department of Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, South West Thames Regional Genetic Services, London, UK
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Centre for Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK .,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Basu NN, Hodson J, Chatterjee S, Gandhi A, Wisely J, Harvey J, Highton L, Murphy J, Barnes N, Johnson R, Barr L, Kirwan CC, Howell S, Baildam AD, Howell A, Evans DG. The Angelina Jolie effect: Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy trends in patients at increased risk of breast cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:2847. [PMID: 33531640 PMCID: PMC7854742 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82654-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) rates have tripled over the last 2 decades. Reasons for this are multi-factorial, with those harbouring a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1/2 gene having the greatest survival benefit. On May 14th, 2013, Angelina Jolie shared the news of her bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM), on the basis of her BRCA1 pathogenic variant status. We evaluated the impact of this news on rates of CRRM in women with increased risk for developing breast cancer after being diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer. The prospective cohort study included all women with at least a moderate lifetime risk of developing breast cancer who attended our family history clinic (1987–2019) and were subsequently diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer. Rates of CRRM were then compared between patients diagnosed with breast cancer before and after Angelina Jolie’s announcement (pre- vs. post-AJ). Of 386 breast cancer patients, with a mean age at diagnosis of 48 ± 8 years, 268 (69.4%) were diagnosed in the pre-AJ period, and 118 (30.6%) in the post-AJ period. Of these, 123 (31.9%) underwent CRRM, a median 42 (interquartile range: 11–54) days after the index cancer surgery. Rates of CRRM doubled following AJ’s news, from 23.9% pre-AJ to 50.0% post AJ (p < 0.001). Rates of CRRM were found to decrease with increasing age at breast cancer (p < 0.001) and tumour TNM stage (p = 0.040), and to increase with the estimated lifetime risk of breast cancer (p < 0.001) and tumour grade (p = 0.015) on univariable analysis. After adjusting for these factors, the step-change increase in CRRM rates post-AJ remained significant (odds ratio: 9.61, p < 0.001). The AJ effect appears to have been associated with higher rates of CRRM amongst breast cancer patients with increased cancer risk. CRRM rates were highest amongst younger women and those with the highest lifetime risk profile. Clinicians need to be aware of how media news can impact on the delivery of cancer related services. Communicating objective assessment of risk is important when counselling women on the merits of risk-reducing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra Nath Basu
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. .,University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| | - James Hodson
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Shaunak Chatterjee
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Ashu Gandhi
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Julie Wisely
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - James Harvey
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Lyndsey Highton
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - John Murphy
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Nicola Barnes
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Richard Johnson
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Lester Barr
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Cliona C Kirwan
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Sacha Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, M20, UK
| | - Andrew D Baildam
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, M20, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, M20, UK.,NW Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Guerrero-Miranda CY, Hall SA. Rethinking the future with evolving technology: It's time to empower change in heart transplantation. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:453-455. [PMID: 32717109 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Cesar Y Guerrero-Miranda
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Shelley A Hall
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baughan S, Tainsky MA. K3326X and Other C-Terminal BRCA2 Variants Implicated in Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:447. [PMID: 33503928 PMCID: PMC7865497 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Whole genome analysis and the search for mutations in germline and tumor DNAs is becoming a major tool in the evaluation of risk as well as the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Because of the identification of cancer predisposition gene panels, thousands of such variants have been catalogued yet many remain unclassified, presenting a clinical challenge for the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Although algorithms exist to estimate the likelihood of a variant being deleterious, these tools are rarely used for clinical decision-making. Here, we review the progress in classifying K3326X, a rare truncating variant on the C-terminus of BRCA2 and review recent literature on other novel single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs, on the C-terminus of the protein, defined in this review as the portion after the final BRC repeat (amino acids 2058-3418).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Baughan
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA;
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Michael A. Tainsky
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA;
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gromova M, Vaggelas A, Dallmann G, Seimetz D. Biomarkers: Opportunities and Challenges for Drug Development in the Current Regulatory Landscape. Biomark Insights 2020; 15:1177271920974652. [PMID: 33343195 PMCID: PMC7727038 DOI: 10.1177/1177271920974652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Biomarkers are widely used at every stage of drug discovery and development. Utilisation of biomarkers has a potential to make drug discovery, development and approval processes more efficient. An overview of the current global regulatory landscape is presented in this article with particular emphasis on the validation and qualification of biomarkers, as well as legal framework for companion diagnostics. Furthermore, this article shows how the number of approved drugs with at least 1 biomarker used during development (biomarker acceptance) is affected by the recent advances in the biomarker regulations. More than half of analysed approvals were supported by biomarker data and there has been a slight increase in acceptance of biomarkers in recent years, even though the growth is not continuous. For certain pharmacotherapeutic groups, approvals with biomarkers are more common than without. Examples include immunosuppressants, immunostimulants, drugs used in diabetes, antithrombotic drugs, antineoplastic agents and antivirals. As a conclusion, potential benefits, challenges and opportunities of using biomarkers in drug discovery and development in the current regulatory landscape are summarised and discussed.
Collapse
|
17
|
Huang X, Li H, Gu Y, Chan ISF. Predictive Biomarker Identification for Biopharmaceutical Development. Stat Biopharm Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1819404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Huang
- Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL
| | - Hesen Li
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Yihua Gu
- Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL
| | - Ivan S. F. Chan
- Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gaba F, Manchanda R. Systematic review of acceptability, cardiovascular, neurological, bone health and HRT outcomes following risk reducing surgery in BRCA carriers. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 65:46-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2019] [Revised: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
19
|
Su L, Xu Y, Ouyang T, Li J, Wang T, Fan Z, Fan T, Lin B, Xie Y. Contralateral breast cancer risk in
BRCA1
and
BRCA2
mutation carriers in a large cohort of unselected Chinese breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2020; 146:3335-3342. [PMID: 32037537 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Liming Su
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Xu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
| | - Tao Ouyang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
| | - Jinfeng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
| | - Tianfeng Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoqing Fan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
| | - Tie Fan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
| | - Benyao Lin
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
| | - Yuntao Xie
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Breast Center Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sobsey CA, Ibrahim S, Richard VR, Gaspar V, Mitsa G, Lacasse V, Zahedi RP, Batist G, Borchers CH. Targeted and Untargeted Proteomics Approaches in Biomarker Development. Proteomics 2020; 20:e1900029. [DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201900029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Constance A. Sobsey
- Segal Cancer Proteomics CentreLady Davis InstituteJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H3T 1E2 Canada
| | - Sahar Ibrahim
- Segal Cancer Proteomics CentreLady Davis InstituteJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H3T 1E2 Canada
| | - Vincent R. Richard
- Segal Cancer Proteomics CentreLady Davis InstituteJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H3T 1E2 Canada
| | - Vanessa Gaspar
- Segal Cancer Proteomics CentreLady Davis InstituteJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H3T 1E2 Canada
| | - Georgia Mitsa
- Segal Cancer Proteomics CentreLady Davis InstituteJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H3T 1E2 Canada
| | - Vincent Lacasse
- Segal Cancer Proteomics CentreLady Davis InstituteJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H3T 1E2 Canada
| | - René P. Zahedi
- Segal Cancer Proteomics CentreLady Davis InstituteJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H3T 1E2 Canada
| | - Gerald Batist
- Gerald Bronfman Department of OncologyJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H4A 3T2 Canada
| | - Christoph H. Borchers
- Segal Cancer Proteomics CentreLady Davis InstituteJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H3T 1E2 Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of OncologyJewish General HospitalMcGill University Montreal Quebec H4A 3T2 Canada
- Department of Data Intensive Science and EngineeringSkolkovo Institute of Science and TechnologySkolkovo Innovation Center Moscow 143026 Russia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ye F, Huang L, Lang G, Hu X, Di G, Shao Z, Cao A. Outcomes and risk of subsequent breast events in breast-conserving surgery patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation. Cancer Med 2020; 9:1903-1910. [PMID: 31912664 PMCID: PMC7050073 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Previous studies provide inconsistent interpretations of the effect of inherited genetic factors on the survival and prognosis of patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation on survival and subsequent breast events in Chinese women who underwent breast‐conserving surgery. Methods A retrospective review of the clinical and pathological records was performed in patients diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer between 2005 and 2018 in the cancer registry database. Clinicopathological data and data regarding treatment and outcomes, including date and site of disease progression, were collected. The survival outcomes and independent risk factors were conducted using SPSS. Results Overall, a total of 501 patients who underwent breast‐conserving surgery were identified and subjected to analyses, of which 63 cases with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. The median age at diagnosis was 41 (range, 24‐74) for carriers and 37 (range, 17‐84) for noncarriers. After a median follow‐up time of 61 months (range, 8‐161) and 70 months (range, 0‐153), respectively, in carriers and noncarriers, the overall survival (P = .173) and disease‐free survival (P = .424) were not significantly different. Analogously, there was no significant difference between the two groups about the outcomes of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (P = .348), yet the contralateral breast cancer (CBC) was overt worse than noncarriers (P < .001). When adjusted to confounding factors, BRCA mutation was the only independent risk factors to CBC (HR = 7.89, P = .01). Conclusion In this study, BRCA mutation carriers have higher risk of CBC. And, BRCA mutation is the only independent risk factor to CBC. Therefore, intensive surveillance and follow‐up as well as more effective individual prevention are urgent. Decisions on alternatively effective prevention, especially the prevention of CBC, are urgent and should take into account patient prognosis and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fugui Ye
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Liang Huang
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Guantian Lang
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Hu
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Genhong Di
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ayong Cao
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Breast cancer in neurofibromatosis 1: survival and risk of contralateral breast cancer in a five country cohort study. Genet Med 2019; 22:398-406. [PMID: 31495828 PMCID: PMC7000349 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0651-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant condition caused
by pathogenic variants of the NF1 gene. A
markedly increased risk of breast cancer is associated with NF1. We have
determined the breast cancer survival and risk of contralateral breast cancer in
NF1. Methods We included 142 women with NF1 and breast cancer from five cohorts
in Europe and 335 women without NF1 screened for other familial breast cancers.
Risk of contralateral breast cancer and death were assessed by Kaplan–Meier
analysis with delayed entry. Results One hundred forty-two women with NF1 were diagnosed for breast
cancer at a median age of 46.9 years (range 27.0–84.3 years) and then followed
up for 1235 person-years (mean = 8.70 years). Twelve women had contralateral
breast cancer with a rate of 10.5 per 1000 years. Cumulative risk for
contralateral breast cancer was 26.5% in 20 years. Five and 10-year all-cause
survival was 64.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 54.8–76.8) and 49.8%
(95%CI = 39.3–63.0). Breast cancer–specific 10-year survival was 64.2% (95%
CI = 53.5–77.0%) compared with 91.2% (95% CI = 87.3–95.2%) in the non-NF1
age-matched population at increased risk of breast cancer. Conclusion Women with NF1 have a substantial contralateral breast cancer
incidence and poor survival. Early start of breast cancer screening may be a way
to improve the survival.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kotsopoulos J, Lubinski J, Lynch HT, Tung N, Armel S, Senter L, Singer CF, Fruscio R, Couch F, Weitzel JN, Karlan B, Foulkes WD, Moller P, Eisen A, Ainsworth P, Neuhausen SL, Olopade O, Sun P, Gronwald J, Narod SA. Oophorectomy and risk of contralateral breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175:443-449. [PMID: 30756284 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05162-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Following a diagnosis of breast cancer, BRCA mutation carriers face an increased risk of developing a second (contralateral) cancer in the unaffected breast. It is important to identify predictors of contralateral cancer in order to make informed decisions about bilateral mastectomy. The impact of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (i.e., oophorectomy) on the risk of developing contralateral breast cancer is unclear. Thus, we conducted a prospective study of the relationship between oophorectomy and the risk of contralateral breast cancer in 1781 BRCA1 and 503 BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer. METHODS Women were followed from the date of diagnosis of their first breast cancer until the date of diagnosis of a contralateral breast cancer, bilateral mastectomy, date of death, or date of last follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of contralateral breast cancer associated with oophorectomy. Oophorectomy was included as a time-dependent covariate. We performed a left-censored analysis for those women who reported a primary breast cancer prior to study entry (i.e., from completion of baseline questionnaire). RESULTS After an average of 9.8 years of follow-up, there were 179 (7.8%) contralateral breast cancers diagnosed. Oophorectomy was not associated with the risk of developing a second breast cancer (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.68-1.25). The relationship did not vary by BRCA mutation type or by age at diagnosis of the first breast cancer. There was some evidence for a decreased risk of contralateral breast cancer among women with an ER-positive primary breast cancer, but this was based on a small number of events (n = 240). CONCLUSION Overall, our findings suggest that oophorectomy has little impact on the risk of contralateral breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Henry T Lynch
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Armel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Fergus Couch
- Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Weitzel
- Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Beth Karlan
- Gynecology Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pal Moller
- Inherited Cancer Research Group, Department for Medical Genetics, Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Ainsworth
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Division of Biomarkers of Early Detection and Prevention, Department of Population Science, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Olufunmilayo Olopade
- Department of Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in primary invasive breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation in China. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175:749-754. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05199-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
25
|
Akdeniz D, Schmidt MK, Seynaeve CM, McCool D, Giardiello D, van den Broek AJ, Hauptmann M, Steyerberg EW, Hooning MJ. Risk factors for metachronous contralateral breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2018; 44:1-14. [PMID: 30580169 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of developing metachronous contralateral breast cancer (CBC) is a recurrent topic at the outpatient clinic. We aimed to provide CBC risk estimates of published patient, pathological, and primary breast cancer (PBC) treatment-related factors. METHODS PubMed was searched for publications on factors associated with CBC risk. Meta-analyses were performed with grouping of studies by mutation status (i.e., BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 c.1100delC), familial cohorts, and general population-based cohorts. RESULTS Sixty-eight papers satisfied our inclusion criteria. Strong associations with CBC were found for carrying a BRCA1 (RR = 3.7; 95%CI:2.8-4.9), BRCA2 (RR = 2.8; 95%CI:1.8-4.3) or CHEK2 c.1100delC (RR = 2.7; 95%CI:2.0-3.7) mutation. In population-based cohorts, PBC family history (RR = 1.8; 95%CI:1.2-2.6), body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (RR = 1.5; 95%CI:1.3-1.9), lobular PBC (RR = 1.4; 95%CI:1.1-1.8), estrogen receptor-negative PBC (RR = 1.5; 95%CI:1.0-2.3) and treatment with radiotherapy <40 years (RR = 1.4; 95%CI:1.1-1.7) was associated with increased CBC risk. Older age at PBC diagnosis (RR per decade = 0.93; 95%CI:0.88-0.98), and treatment with chemotherapy (RR = 0.7; 95%CI:0.6-0.8) or endocrine therapy (RR = 0.6; 95%CI:0.5-0.7) were associated with decreased CBC risk. CONCLUSIONS Mutation status, family history, and PBC treatment are key factors for CBC risk. Age at PBC diagnosis, BMI, lobular histology and hormone receptor status have weaker associations and should be considered in combination with key factors to accurately predict CBC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delal Akdeniz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Caroline M Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Danielle McCool
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniele Giardiello
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Alexandra J van den Broek
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mathelin C, Bruant-Rodier C. [Indications for breast reconstruction after mastectomy according to the oncological situation]. ANN CHIR PLAST ESTH 2018; 63:580-584. [PMID: 30245084 DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2018.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Breast reconstruction is an integral part of breast cancer treatment. It must be systematically mentioned when the disease is announced and proposed at an optimal time during cancer management. In case of ductal carcinoma in situ, reconstruction should be proposed at the same time as mastectomy, which generally preserves the skin. The conservation of the nipple-areolar complex should be further evaluated. In the case of invasive breast carcinoma, breast reconstruction is generally proposed at a distance from the oncological time, except for patients requiring neither chemotherapy nor postoperative radiotherapy for whom reconstruction can be immediate. Finally, in the case of prophylactic synchronous contralateral mastectomy, reconstruction should never delay the overall management of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Mathelin
- Unité de sénologie, hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, CHRU, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex 09, France; Institut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire, biologie du cancer (IGBMC), 1, rue Laurent-Fries, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France.
| | - C Bruant-Rodier
- Service de chirurgie esthétique et réparatrice, hôpital civil, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, CHRU, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wadasadawala T, Lewis S, Parmar V, Budrukkar A, Gupta S, Nair N, Shet T, Badwe R, Sarin R. Bilateral Breast Cancer After Multimodality Treatment: A Report of Clinical Outcomes in an Asian Population. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18:e727-e737. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
28
|
Szigyarto CAK, Spitali P. Biomarkers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: current findings. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis 2018; 8:1-13. [PMID: 30050384 PMCID: PMC6053903 DOI: 10.2147/dnnd.s121099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous biomarkers have been unveiled in the rapidly evolving biomarker discovery field, with an aim to improve the clinical management of disorders. In rare diseases, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, this endeavor has created a wealth of knowledge that, if effectively exploited, will benefit affected individuals, with respect to health care, therapy, improved quality of life and increased life expectancy. The most promising findings and molecular biomarkers are inspected in this review, with an aim to provide an overview of currently known biomarkers and the technological developments used. Biomarkers as cells, genetic variations, miRNAs, proteins, lipids and/or metabolites indicative of disease severity, progression and treatment response have the potential to improve development and approval of therapies, clinical management of DMD and patients’ life quality. We highlight the complexity of translating research results to clinical use, emphasizing the need for biomarkers, fit for purpose and describe the challenges associated with qualifying biomarkers for clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Al-Khalili Szigyarto
- Division of Proteomics, School of Biotechnology, AlbaNova University Center, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, .,Science for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden,
| | - Pietro Spitali
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands,
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lobo M, López-Tarruella S, Luque S, Lizarraga S, Flores-Sánchez C, Bueno O, Solera J, Jerez Y, Del Val RG, Palomero MI, Cebollero M, Echavarría I, Torres G, Martín M, Márquez-Rodas I. Evaluation of Breast Cancer Patients with Genetic Risk in a University Hospital: Before and After the Implementation of a Heredofamilial Cancer Unit. J Genet Couns 2017; 27:854-862. [PMID: 29247312 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0187-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The identification of patients at risk for breast cancer by genetic testing has proven to reduce breast cancer mortality. In 2010, due to a lack of systematization in hereditary cancer assistance in our center, we implemented a multidisciplinary Heredofamilial Cancer Unit (HFCU). We analyze if the HFCU improved the rates of referrals and preventive management of breast cancer patients with genetic risk. We retrospectively compared family history records, referrals of high-risk patients to genetic counseling, and detection and management of patients with BRCA1/2 mutations in two cohorts of breast cancer patients diagnosed before (first period: 2007-2010) and after the creation of the HFCU (second period: 2010-2013). In the first period, 893 patients were included, and 902 were included in the second. Due to the inability to establish their genetic risk, 142 patients (15.9%) vs. 70 (7.8%) were excluded from analysis (p < 0.001). Among the evaluable patients, 194 (25.8%) vs. 223 (26.8%) fulfilled one or more risk criteria (p = 0.65). Family history documentation in patient's medical records (92.4 vs. 97.8%, p < 0.001) and referral rate (26.3 vs. 52%, p < 0.0001) significantly increased in the second period. Eight BRCA1/2 mutations were detected among patients referred in the first period and 17 among those referred to the HFCU. The rate of preventive surgeries in patients with BRCA mutations significantly increased in the second period (25 vs. 76.5%, p = 0.03). In conclusion, there was a clear improvement in family history records, referrals, and preventive surgeries in breast cancer patients with genetic risk after the implementation of the HFCU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Lobo
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara López-Tarruella
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Soledad Luque
- Servicio de Ginecología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Santiago Lizarraga
- Servicio de Ginecología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Flores-Sánchez
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Oscar Bueno
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Solera
- Instituto de Genética Molecular, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yolanda Jerez
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo González Del Val
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Isabel Palomero
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Cebollero
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Echavarría
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gabriela Torres
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Martín
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Iván Márquez-Rodas
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Habash M, Bohorquez LC, Kyriakou E, Kron T, Martin OA, Blyth BJ. Clinical and Functional Assays of Radiosensitivity and Radiation-Induced Second Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2017; 9:cancers9110147. [PMID: 29077012 PMCID: PMC5704165 DOI: 10.3390/cancers9110147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Whilst the near instantaneous physical interaction of radiation energy with living cells leaves little opportunity for inter-individual variation in the initial yield of DNA damage, all the downstream processes in how damage is recognized, repaired or resolved and therefore the ultimate fate of cells can vary across the population. In the clinic, this variability is observed most readily as rare extreme sensitivity to radiotherapy with acute and late tissue toxic reactions. Though some radiosensitivity can be anticipated in individuals with known genetic predispositions manifest through recognizable phenotypes and clinical presentations, others exhibit unexpected radiosensitivity which nevertheless has an underlying genetic cause. Currently, functional assays for cellular radiosensitivity represent a strategy to identify patients with potential radiosensitivity before radiotherapy begins, without needing to discover or evaluate the impact of the precise genetic determinants. Yet, some of the genes responsible for extreme radiosensitivity would also be expected to confer susceptibility to radiation-induced cancer, which can be considered another late adverse event associated with radiotherapy. Here, the utility of functional assays of radiosensitivity for identifying individuals susceptible to radiotherapy-induced second cancer is discussed, considering both the common mechanisms and important differences between stochastic radiation carcinogenesis and the range of deterministic acute and late toxic effects of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Habash
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
| | - Luis C Bohorquez
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia.
| | - Elizabeth Kyriakou
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia.
| | - Tomas Kron
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia.
| | - Olga A Martin
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia.
- Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia.
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
| | - Benjamin J Blyth
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia.
- Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yadav S, Reeves A, Campian S, Sufka A, Zakalik D. Preoperative genetic testing impacts surgical decision making in BRCA mutation carriers with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2017; 15:11. [PMID: 28770017 PMCID: PMC5530488 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-017-0071-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of timing of genetic testing on surgical decision making in women with breast cancer and BRCA mutation is not well known. Methods Women who were found to carry a deleterious BRCA mutation and had been diagnosed with breast cancer were identified from a database at Beaumont Health. Women who had received BRCA positive results at least a day prior to their index surgery were considered to be aware of their mutation status prior to surgery. Baseline characteristics and surgical choices were compared between women who were aware of their mutation status prior to surgery and those who were not. Fischer’s exact test was used for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U-Test was used for continuous variables. Results A total of 220 patients were included in the final analysis, 208 (94.5%) with unilateral breast cancer and 12 (5.5%) with bilateral breast cancer. Out of the 208 patients with unilateral breast cancer, 106 (51.0%) patients were aware of their mutation status prior to index surgery while 102 (49%) were not. A significantly (p < 0.05) higher proportion of women underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the group that was aware of their mutation status prior to index surgery compared to the group that was not (76.4% vs 14.7%). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that knowledge of BRCA mutation status impacts surgical decision making in favor of bilateral mastectomy in patients who are aware of their results prior to index surgery. This finding supports the practice of preoperative genetic testing in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhartha Yadav
- Department of Internal Medicine, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA.,Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, Beaumont Cancer Institute, Beaumont Health, 3577 W 13 Mile Rd, Ste. 140, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
| | - Ashley Reeves
- Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, Beaumont Cancer Institute, Beaumont Health, 3577 W 13 Mile Rd, Ste. 140, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
| | - Sarah Campian
- Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, Beaumont Cancer Institute, Beaumont Health, 3577 W 13 Mile Rd, Ste. 140, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
| | - Amy Sufka
- Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, Beaumont Cancer Institute, Beaumont Health, 3577 W 13 Mile Rd, Ste. 140, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
| | - Dana Zakalik
- Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, Beaumont Cancer Institute, Beaumont Health, 3577 W 13 Mile Rd, Ste. 140, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA.,Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 2200 N Squirrel Rd, Rochester, MI 48309 USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jacobs C, Pichert G, Harris J, Tucker K, Michie S. Key messages for communicating information about BRCA1 and BRCA2 to women with breast or ovarian cancer: Consensus across health professionals and service users. Psychooncology 2017; 26:1818-1824. [PMID: 28101941 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2016] [Revised: 12/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic testing of cancer predisposing genes will increasingly be needed in oncology clinics to target cancer treatment. This Delphi study aimed to identify areas of agreement and disagreement between genetics and oncology health professionals and service users about the key messages required by women with breast/ovarian cancer who undergo BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing and the optimal timing of communicating key messages. METHODS Participants were 16 expert health professionals specialising in oncology/genetics and 16 service users with breast/ovarian cancer and a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variant. Online questionnaires containing 53 inductively developed information messages were circulated to the groups separately. Participants rated each message as key/not key on a Likert scale and suggested additional messages. Questionnaires were modified according to the feedback and up to 3 rounds were circulated. Consensus was reached when there was ≥75% agreement. RESULTS Thirty key messages were agreed by both groups with 7 of the key messages agreed by ≥95% of participants: dominant inheritance, the availability of predictive testing, the importance of pretest discussion, increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer, and the option of risk-reducing mastectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both groups agreed that key messages should be communicated before genetic testing and once a pathogenic variant has been identified. CONCLUSIONS There was a high level of agreement within and between the groups about the information requirements of women with breast/ovarian cancer about BRCA1/BRCA2. These key messages will be helpful in developing new approaches to the delivery of information as genetic testing becomes further integrated into mainstream oncology services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Jacobs
- Research Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Romanowicz H, Strapagiel D, Słomka M, Sobalska-Kwapis M, Kępka E, Siewierska-Górska A, Zadrożny M, Bieńkiewicz J, Smolarz B. New single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in homologous recombination repair genes detected by microarray analysis in Polish breast cancer patients. Clin Exp Med 2016; 17:541-546. [DOI: 10.1007/s10238-016-0441-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
34
|
Tran G, Helm M, Litton J. Current Approach to Breast Cancer Risk Reduction for Women with Hereditary Predispositions to Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-016-0220-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
35
|
Basu NN, Littlechild S, Barr L, Ross GL, Evans DG. Attitudes to contralateral risk reducing mastectomy among breast and plastic surgeons in England. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98:121-7. [PMID: 26741657 PMCID: PMC5210481 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rates of contralateral risk reducing mastectomy (CRRM) are rising despite a paucity of data to support this practice. Surgeons work as part of the multidisciplinary team (MDT). They may counsel women on these requests without the benefit of established guidelines or agreed protocol. This study assessed the practices and perceptions of breast and plastic surgeons in England on CRRM. METHODS A postal questionnaire was sent to 455 breast and 364 plastic surgeons practising in England. Basic demographics, trends in CRRM, risk assessment, role of the MDT and knowledge base were assessed. RESULTS The response rate among breast surgeons was 48.3% (220/455) and 12.6% (46/364) among plastic surgeons. Nearly half (44%) of the respondents felt there had been an increase in rates of CRRM over the last three years. Seventy-one per cent of those surveyed performed 1-5 CRRMs annually while sixteen per cent did not perform this procedure at all. A third (32%) of respondents correctly quoted their patients an annual risk of 0.5-0.7%. Funding was refused in 4% of cases and 43% of the surgeons felt that in the future they would have to apply to relevant clinical commissioning groups. Over half (58%) of all respondents reported that decisions for CRRM are always discussed in the MDT meeting but 6% stated that these cases are never discussed by the MDT. BRCA mutation was perceived as the main risk factor for contralateral breast cancer by 81% of respondents. Surgeons felt that women requested CRRM mainly to alleviate anxiety. The next most common reasons were carriage of BRCA mutation and a desire to have reconstructions match. CONCLUSIONS A wide variation of surgical practices and perceptions exist in assessing women for CRRM. Guidelines to standardise practices are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N N Basu
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre , Manchester , UK
- University of Manchester , UK
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| | - S Littlechild
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre , Manchester , UK
| | - L Barr
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre , Manchester , UK
| | | | - D G Evans
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre , Manchester , UK
- University of Manchester , UK
| |
Collapse
|