Allelic asymmetry of the Lethal hybrid rescue (Lhr) gene expression in the hybrid between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: confirmation by using genetic variations of D. melanogaster

Gene Regulation and Speciation

Understanding the genetic architecture of speciation is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Hybrid dysfunction is thought to arise most commonly through negative interactions between alleles at two or more loci. Divergence between interacting regulatory elements that affect gene expression (i.e., regulatory divergence) may be a common route for these negative interactions to arise. We review here how regulatory divergence between species can result in hybrid dysfunction, including recent theoretical support for this model. We then discuss the empirical evidence for regulatory divergence between species and evaluate evidence for misregulation as a source of hybrid dysfunction. Finally, we review unresolved questions in gene regulation as it pertains to speciation and point to areas that could benefit from future research.

A test of double interspecific introgression of nucleoporin genes in Drosophila

In interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, the D. simulans nucleoporin-encoding Nup96^sim and Nup160^sim can cause recessive lethality if the hybrid does not also inherit the D. simulans X chromosome. In addition, Nup160^sim leads to recessive female sterility in the D. melanogaster genetic background. Here, we conducted carefully controlled crosses to better understand

the relationship between Nup96^sim and Nup160^sim. Nup96^sim did not lead to female sterility in the D. melanogaster genetic background, and double introgression of Nup96^sim and Nup160^sim did not generally lead to lethality when one was heterozygous and the other homozygous (hemizygous). It appears that introgression of additional autosomal D. simulans genes is necessary to cause lethality and that the effect of the introgression is dominant to D. melanogaster alleles. Interestingly, the genetic background affected dominance of Nup96^sim, and double introgression carrying homozygous Nup96^sim and hemizygous Nup160^sim resulted in lethality. Thus, Nup96^sim and Nup160^sim seem to be two components of the same incompatibility.